Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Chronicles of a fish: the days of surf and turf

Options
1179180182184185193

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,157 ✭✭✭Kurt_Godel


    Nothing scientific or reasonable about this question- just for the fun of it:

    If you could change numbers in your training log to different numbers, what would you change and why?


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,888 ✭✭✭Dory Dory


    Kurt_Godel wrote: »
    Nothing scientific or reasonable about this question- just for the fun of it:

    If you could change numbers in your training log to different numbers, what would you change and why?

    What kind of numbers are you referring to?? Time spent training in each discipline? Or...my race times? Power? Speed? Pace? Sleep? :)

    (Heading out to a play - The National Theatre of Scotland - so will respond after I return.)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,157 ✭✭✭Kurt_Godel


    Dory Dory wrote: »
    What kind of numbers are you referring to?? Time spent training in each discipline? Or...my race times? Power? Speed? Pace? Sleep? :)

    (Heading out to a play - The National Theatre of Scotland - so will respond after I return.)

    Whatever numbers you would like to be different, and why! But it doesn't matter at the moment- Art trumps Numbers so enjoy the play!


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,038 ✭✭✭Neady83


    Oh, I've a question too. You've been doing your TRX and core work now for a few weeks, are you seeing/feeling any benefits in your bike, run or swim work?


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,888 ✭✭✭Dory Dory


    RJM85 wrote: »
    Add your reply here.

    Of the logs on this forum the most likely people to get a KQ are Dory, Zico and Peter. It's no coincidence that they are all some of the most dedicated athletes you'll find and have managed to set their lives up in an abnormally focussed way for years to allow them to get the training done.

    The real dedication is in the setting your life up to allow you to do the necessary training

    "abnormally focused" :D Love it! How eloquently and accurately put. ;):)
    Kurt_Godel wrote: »
    Whatever numbers you would like to be different, and why! But it doesn't matter at the moment- Art trumps Numbers so enjoy the play!

    Will address this with pleasure tomorrow. And the play was totally fab! :)
    Neady83 wrote: »
    Oh, I've a question too. You've been doing your TRX and core work now for a few weeks, are you seeing/feeling any benefits in your bike, run or swim work?

    It seems so strange from my perspective, but I have noticed an improved core while I am swimming. I honestly have not noticed any benefits in my bike, and I'd say the jury is out with the run. No doubt my abs are stronger/firmer for the work, and I believe my triceps and biceps in particular have reaped some rewards as well.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,888 ✭✭✭Dory Dory


    Kurt_Godel wrote: »
    Nothing scientific or reasonable about this question- just for the fun of it:

    If you could change numbers in your training log to different numbers, what would you change and why?

    Numbers...and keep in mind I am answering this as it specifically relates to triathlon, and nothing else. Four numbers come to mind:

    The first number I'd like to change is my age - I'd prefer to be in my 20s. Why? Because I think if I had been introduced to triathlon in my early 20s I might have been competitive at the pointy end of things - and what fun (I think) that would have been! As it stands, I only started running for fun 5 years ago, and only started cycling 3 years ago. I'm a bit late to the dance and I think I've missed out on some really good years I could have had, plus I think it hurts me now in multiple ways when competing against the gals who have so much more experience than me.

    The next number I'd like to change is the number of KQ slots allocated, and the way they are allocated. Why? Because in my gender and age group, I will essentially have to win it to get a slot. From my perspective, zico and Peter potentially have a greater chance of snagging a spot (Peter did last year but let it go) since the allocation is based on pure numbers of participation in each age group and not on the talent within.

    I'd also love to change the hours I work...meaning, I'd love to work less. Why? Because I'd spend more time training in a more relaxed fashion instead of always having to keep such a tight schedule when I need to do this and that. I'm always rushing to and from....and always squeezing things in to get it all done. I'd also get more sleep if I worked less. Or at least I think I would.

    And the last number I'd like to change is my bike power. Why? Because it's horribly weak and not really competitive with the ones I want to be competitive with. I think I train really hard, but I am also aware of my fear of failure - fear of not hitting/exceeding training targets. If I look at my bike training numbers, I tend to see a trend that appears I may hold back early on in sessions - I tend to "throw the kitchen sink" at the last interval. A disaster for me would be not ending on the highest (or near highest) power number. Is my fear of failure, then, influencing my effort? If so, perhaps I need to risk failure more often to reap power rewards. ???

    As a side note - some who follow this log might be muttering under their breath that I am not spending enough time on my bike. And to that I say, you are correct, but it is by design. This month is all about the run. I have to trust in the plan - every plan is just an experiment, really - and fingers crossed this one is a successful experiment for me. There will be plenty of bike time coming up - many century rides on the schedule, including an overnight extravaganza in May that includes 2 full days of riding with over 200 miles covered and 20,000 feet climbed. :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 827 ✭✭✭RJM85


    https://owenmartinblog.wordpress.com/2016/02/09/dont-be-afraid-of-failure/

    Read this recently - some nice thoughts about fear of failure.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,157 ✭✭✭Kurt_Godel


    Very interesting answer Dory- we measure and define ourselves by numbers all the time, when the real value is what is attached to those numbers.

    Age, Kona slots, work hours: not a lot you can do to change these numbers so just roll with them.

    Wattage: I guess this is why I asked, and its a great response you gave. Your bike numbers do seem low (not that PM numbers need to correspond to what others are posting), but your reasoning for this is very interesting- fear of failure. There have been a few instances on this blog where you've discussed holding back on the bike, for fear of blowing up. Personally I find the valuable turbo/bike sessions are the ones where I start off too hard, and struggle to maintain (a slowly dying!) wattage from halfway to the end. I guess consistency is key though in Tri, so steady splits/reps would be best- however if you feel you are holding back at the start, in order to end the session on a high number... I'd agree it might be worth risking failure for an overall benefit.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,454 ✭✭✭hf4z6sqo7vjngi


    Dory Dory wrote: »
    Because in my gender and age group, I will essentially have to win it to get a slot.

    You will, i can see this happening.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,888 ✭✭✭Dory Dory


    Sunday, February 14th, 2016 - VaLeNtInE's DaY!

    Run

    Okay, we are totally and completely embedded in the deep freeze here in the land of Dory. Very...very....very....cold. Dangerously cold. So, that meant this 2 hour and 15 minute easy run was going to have to be done in the climate controlled (and extremely comfy) basement on the dreadmill. whoop whoop! And, to commemorate the 1 year anniversary of my fractured femur, I wore the same running shoes that I wore at Donadea when the break occurred. :D They're a fetching little shoe, mainly in black but with hues of pink peeking through the mesh body and in a US size 6.5. But I digress...

    My strategy was to structure this run as I did 2 weeks ago, which was to start off super slow and easy, then to build into something reasonable. I positioned my antique wooden box fan at an angle to maximize the breeze, turned on the fairly useless treadmill fan that is designed to cool someone much taller than me, plunked down two bottles of water and some nutrition, turned up the tunes, and away I went. I did this run as follows:

    For the first 2 hours: I started out at 6.0 and upped it .1 every 10 minutes
    Then for the last 15 minutes I did this:
    5 min @ 7.2
    5 min @ 7.3
    1 min @ 7.4
    1 min @ 7.5
    1 min @ 7.6
    1 min @ 7.7
    1 min @ 7.8

    This run felt great, especially the final 30 to 40 minutes. I feel I fueled this perfectly - took a gel at 60 minutes, 2 shot bloks (3 shot bloks = 1 gel) 30 minutes later, 1 shot blok 20 minutes later, 1 quick disc 10 minutes later. I have zero complaints on this one, and was tickled to death how much stronger I got towards the end. (yay me!!)

    Actual run: 15 miles in 2:15:14 for an average pace of 9 min/mile

    ~~~~~~~

    Swim

    Ugh. I really need to add some water to the tank, but I am too afraid to use the outside spigot in this frigid weather. It should be warmer tomorrow, so fingers crossed!!

    10 minute warmup
    10 x (3 min @ 1:24, 30 sec rest)
    5 minute cool down

    This went totally fine. My day was a bit compressed with work in the morning and a social engagement in the evening, so I only had an hour in between the run and this swim. However, the 1:24 intervals felt fairly easy and the body is in pretty good shape. Well, in good shape other than a kink in my neck from sleeping on it wrong. !!! Not fun, especially when it's on your favored side to breathe.

    Actual swim: ~50 minutes in the tank


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 8,766 Mod ✭✭✭✭mossym


    good lord. i often get surprised at some people aversion to the turbo, and how they cannot understand how anyone could be on it for 2 or 3 hours. i never have a problem with that.

    however.

    2+ hours on the treadmill is my own idea of hell.


    fair play dory


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,888 ✭✭✭Dory Dory


    Tuesday, February 16th, 2016


    Gym

    T!
    R!
    X!

    TRX over lunch. An ab-o-srtavaganza!! And some love to other parts of the body too. Politics humming in the background. Good god are we f-ed up or what?

    Actual gym: ~35 minutes with straps

    ~~~~~~~

    Swim/run combo

    Swim...

    10 min warmup
    5 min buoy-band
    30 x (90 sec @ 1:19, 30 sec rest)
    5 min kick
    5 min cool down

    This is the same session I did last Tuesday, and, like last week, it went fine tonight. The 30 x 100s seemed quite easy at the start, but I knew that that easy feeling wouldn't last forever, and I was right - the real work seemed to begin on the 18th interval. I was able to up the water level in the pool earlier today (it had gotten too low!!), and that higher water level seemed to alter the wave such that my legs were being pushed down a bit more than usual (marginally resembling swimming with a band only), thus forcing me to use a slightly choppy stroke to keep me high in the water. I'm thinking this might be a good thing for open water swimming!!!

    Run...

    Dripping wet, I hopped on the treadie for 60 minutes of easy trotting. I structured this run as follows:

    Started out at 6.0 and upped it .2 every 3 minutes until I got to 6.6.
    Held it at 6.6 for the next 21 minutes.
    Upped it .1 every 3 minutes until I got to 7.2.
    Held it at 7.2 for the next 15 minutes.

    The first 15 minutes felt heavy and sluggish, but the legs started to come to life as the trot progressed....and the last 15 minutes by far were the best of the entire 60 minutes. Whoop whoop!

    Actual swim/run combo: ~90 minutes splashing in the tub, and 60 minutes (6.77 miles) dashing on the treadie


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,888 ✭✭✭Dory Dory


    Wednesday, February 17th, 2016

    Run

    This was a 60 minute easy lunchtime treadmill run, and all went well. I structured the trot as follows:

    Started out at 6.0 and upped it .1 every 5 minutes for the first half hour, then upped it .1 every 3 minutes for the last half hour.

    Not much else to say!

    Actual run: 6.66 miles in 60 minutes on the treadmill done sneaky lunchtime style

    ~~~~~~~

    Bike

    Description:
    15 mins warm up
    Cadence set -
    3 x [easy gear, start cadence at 70 rpms, increase 5 rpms every 30 seconds until your reach 120 rpms (5 mins) + 1 min rest]

    Iso Leg Drills -
    1 min each leg 60 rpm - hard gear. 1 min easy
    1 min each leg 80 rpm - easy gear. 1 min easy
    1 min each leg 60 rpm - hard gear. 1 min easy

    Standing big gear set -
    3 x [5 mins standing biggest gear possible- surging the final 10 secs of each min + 2 mins easy]

    Iso Leg Drills -
    1 min each leg 60 rpm - hard gear. 1 min easy
    1 min each leg 80 rpm - easy gear. 1 min easy
    1 min each leg 60 rpm - hard gear. 1 min easy

    Cadence set -
    2 x [easy gear, start cadence at 70 rpms, increase 5 rpms every 30 seconds until your reach 120 rpms (5 mins) + 1 min rest]
    1 x [easy gear, start cadence at 70 rpms, increase 5 rpms every 30 seconds until you reach 105rpms then hold 5 mins]

    10 min cooldown

    In many ways, the cadence sets are the hardest parts of this session for me. I pretty much have difficulty keeping the legs turning over for very long once I get beyond 105 rpm....but I gave it good effort. The heart of this session was the standing big gear work, and I am fairly happy with how that went. I did this same session 3 times around Christmas, so of course I had a look at my big gear numbers for those 3 sessions....and tonight's numbers are pretty much smack dab in the middle of those previous sessions' numbers. Meh. Not too exciting. But, I felt good during that standing big work, and I felt like my effort was honest, so that's why I indicated above that I am fairly happy with how this went.

    Data for the 3 x 5 min standing big gear work:

    51 rpm...143w
    52 rpm...154w
    53 rpm...163w

    Actual bike: 1 hour and 40 minutes on the Black Cat


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,888 ✭✭✭Dory Dory


    Thursday, February 18th, 2016

    Run

    This was to be a recovery run to loosen the legs, so I did this sneaky lunchtime style in easy breezy fashion. Top setting for this one was 6.0. :D

    Actual run: 3.64 miles jogging on the treadie

    ~~~~~~~

    Run/swim combo

    Run...

    Dreadie treadie time!!!

    10 minutes easing into 7.6
    20 minutes @ 7.6
    15 minutes @ 7.9
    10 minutes @ 8.2
    5 minutes @ 8.5

    I intentionally didn't give this session much advance thought because I knew it was going to push my recent running fitness. (translation: my running sucks) Aaaaannnnd......holy cow were those last 5 minutes a push! But I got this done in pretty good shape. I tried to keep myself as relaxed as possible, and I tried to conserve my energy along the way. Happy I could actually move at an artificial pace of 7 min/mile when 55 minutes into this run. Fingers crossed this is the beginning of me getting some speed back.

    Swim...

    10 min swim
    10 min buoy
    10 min buoy-band

    I hopped in the pool fresh off the treadmill and took this nice and easy. The swim was a mixture of free and breast at 1:33, and both the buoy and the buoy-band were a bit of arm work at 1:30. Water felt great tonight!

    Actual run/swim combo: 7.73 miles in 60 minutes on the treadie, and 30 minutes in the tank


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,888 ✭✭✭Dory Dory


    Friday, February 19th, 2016

    Gym

    TRX....TRX....TRX.

    Actual gym: ~35 minutes of TRX work in the basement while 2 kitties actively observed my form and effort

    ~~~~~~~

    Swim/run combo

    Swim...

    This seems to be my Friday night swim special:

    10 minute warmup
    3 x
    {4 x (30 sec @ 1:14, 30 sec rest)
    6 min @ 1:24
    3 min @ 1:33}
    5 min cool down

    This session went totally fine - no issues at all. One very interesting thing, however, that I noticed - (listen up, Kurt, if you're out there!!!) - with the spiffy and turbulent 1:14 sprints, the "uglier" my stroke was, the faster I seemed to swim. Huh. I have had zero open water instruction...I am a pool swimmer...so this was sort of a revelation for me. Obviously if I'm open water swimming in a flat lake or still body of water this technique would not be effective, but now I know what all the choppy fuss is about when swimming in an agitated mess.

    Run...

    This was 60 minutes of a slippery slog on the treadmill. Nothing new or exciting to report other than I got the lowdown on the Nevada caucus and the South Carolina primary that are going on tomorrow.

    Actual swim/run combo: 60 minutes of really fast ugly swimming, followed by 60 minutes of slippery slogging


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,157 ✭✭✭Kurt_Godel


    Dory Dory wrote: »


    This session went totally fine - no issues at all. One very interesting thing, however, that I noticed - (listen up, Kurt, if you're out there!!!) - with the spiffy and turbulent 1:14 sprints, the "uglier" my stroke was, the faster I seemed to swim. Huh. I have had zero open water instruction...I am a pool swimmer...so this was sort of a revelation for me. Obviously if I'm open water swimming in a flat lake or still body of water this technique would not be effective, but now I know what all the choppy fuss is about when swimming in an agitated mess.

    The biggest message I get from this is that (check it out folks, relevant to everyone on the forum!) swimming is a learning process every time you get in the water, no matter what level/experience you swim at.

    So what was ugly about your stroke Dory? I presume you are talking of powering through the water at the expense of grace (my default style of swimming!)? Which begs the question... why not do both? All ears here, looking forward to learning more later on :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,888 ✭✭✭Dory Dory


    Kurt_Godel wrote: »
    The biggest message I get from this is that (check it out folks, relevant to everyone on the forum!) swimming is a learning process every time you get in the water, no matter what level/experience you swim at.

    So what was ugly about your stroke Dory? I presume you are talking of powering through the water at the expense of grace (my default style of swimming!)? Which begs the question... why not do both? All ears here, looking forward to learning more later on :)

    The ugly was the shortened, quick stroke I was using to combat waves and turbulence. Shortened in the sense that there was no real reach so that the underwater pull began much sooner than it does when I am ever so gracefully gliding across calm waters. :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,157 ✭✭✭Kurt_Godel


    Dory Dory wrote: »
    The ugly was the shortened, quick stroke I was using to combat waves and turbulence. Shortened in the sense that there was no real reach so that the underwater pull began much sooner than it does when I am ever so gracefully gliding across calm waters. :)

    Ah, proper swimming! Into a gale of whitecaps smacking your face, against the tide, falling out of high waves and punching straight into the next. Must sign you up for the Leinster OW season, no wetsuit required ;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,888 ✭✭✭Dory Dory


    Saturday, February 21st, 2016

    Bike/run combo:

    Bike...

    Duration: 03:00:00
    Description:
    TRAINER option:
    30 min warm up
    10 min single-leg drills
    5 min easy
    8x
    (3 min big gear + 1 min easy spin + 2 min one gear harder + 1 min easy spin + 1 min add one gear--this should be biggest possible gear, such that it is very difficult to turn over 45-50 cadence + 3 min easy spin)
    5 min easy
    3x
    4 min @ 125 watts + 3 min @ 135 watts + 3 min @ 155 watts + 1 min 165-175 watts
    9 min easy

    Hahahahaha. "4 min @ 125 watts + 3 min @ 135 watts + 3 min @ 155 watts + 1 min 165-175 watts"....starting 2 hours and 18 minutes into this session and immediately after 88 minutes of grinding in the 3 biggest gears on the Cat. Hahahahaha. Oh my...I knew when I saw this that this was a huge reach for me...but what the heck, right? Oh myyyyy.....

    Okay, so I had the option of doing a 3 hour proper ride, or doing 3 hours on the trainer. Ugh. I've been nursing a bit of a sore throat, and it was insanely windy outside, so I took the option that I thought would serve me best today - the trainer. The 8 x 11 minute big gear set went pretty well. I didn't bother tracking my power, but rather I kept an eye on my cadence since the gearing was a given. For the 3rd biggest gear I targeted 60 rpm...for the 2nd biggest gear I targeted 55 rpm...and the for the biggest gear I targeted 50 rpm. All seemed to go well, and I felt my effort was consistent and appropriate.

    And then came the 125w-135w-155w-165/175w set.

    KABOOM!

    :D

    I knew pretty much immediately that this was never going to happen. Nope. So I went to Plan B, which was to try my hardest, never give in, crank it up one gear for each increase in targeted power, ignore my screaming thighs, and hold my head up high when it was over. :) Job done. Oh how some of my numbers weren't even close to the targets, but the effort was there. Personally I think the targeted power numbers were too ambitious for me, but when I suggested that as a possibility, I got the impression from my almighty leader that she didn't really agree with me. ??? Actual numbers as follows:

    #1:
    4 min - 79 rpm...122w
    3 min - 71 rpm...137w
    3 min - 66 rpm...135w
    1 min - 61 rpm...134w

    #2:
    4 min - 77 rpm...121w
    3 min - 70 rpm...130w
    3 min - 65 rpm...134w
    1 min - 56 rpm...140w

    #3:
    4 min - 77 rpm...123w
    3 min - 70 rpm...136w
    3 min - 65 rpm...133w
    1 min - 62 rpm...146w

    I'm a bit surprised at how low my cadence is above - I wasn't really "aware" of it at the time. I do know I tend to prefer a lower cadence as I tire, so I'm not sure if it was a function of fatigue or just a bad choice in gearing....or more likely I thought I'd have a better chance at a higher power number if I could grind it out rather than spinning in an easier gear. But whatever it was, these are some lower than expected cadence numbers.

    One other thing I'll note here, and this is not to excuse my data in any way as we will take these numbers as Gospel and let them tell the story as it appears...but, during my last trainer session (last Wednesday?), my right Garmin Vector pedal came loose and totally off while I was pedaling. And over Christmas holiday my brother noticed my pedal was loose as well when he was giving my bike the once over. ??? I'm not totally sure what is going on, but obviously this isn't right. The other part of this story is I have not done a Garmin Vector calibration in months. !!! So, in the deep recesses of my mind I'm secretly thinking how hilarious it would be if my power data is off. ;) I'll be looking into this pedal thing, and I'll be calibrating the Vectors the next time I hop on the Cat!

    Run...

    After a super fast t2, I was treadie trotting and not hating life. Total shocker! My legs didn't really protest as much as I thought they would, maybe they were just happy to be off that damn bike. ;) I started out at 6.0, then eased into my 6.6. 20 minutes done, and I was totally famished.

    Actual bike/run combo: 3 hours on the Black Cat, followed by 20 minutes on the treadmill


    Sunday, February 22nd, 2016

    Run - Track!!!!

    20 minute warmup
    3 x {4 x (200 FAST, 200 super easy), 1 mile at HMP, 90 seconds rest}
    10 minute cool down

    Spitting rain and a slight wind out there today, so not the prettiest of days to be out running. But the good news is, I had the track all to myself!!! Yay!! I prefer to suffer alone, and suffering I was on those awful 200s. Barf. I hate sprinting. I hate the way it makes me feel like I'm going to vomit. I'd much prefer running slower for longer distances than wanting to puke over shorter distances. But, I suppose sprinting is a necessary evil for us all! Suffice it to say, the 200s were nauseating, and the last four 200s in particular were the most miserable. I took the liberty of embracing the super easy 200s at face value.

    The first mile at HMP was fine, but I was clearly over dressed for the occasion. Because it was raining, I had my running rain jacket on over a long sleeved top. I had already noticed I was smothered during the first set of 200s, so during one of the easy 200s I converted my uber cool running rain jacket into the uber cool running rain vest option. (what a great jacket/vest!!!) However, on this first mile at HMP I was roasting in the long sleeved top that was under my newly converted vest, and I wanted it gone. So....let's just say I'm hoping there are no surveillance cameras at the high school track because if there are, they got a little show today by yours truly. Off with the vest, off with the long sleeved top, back on with the vest. Glad I wore one of my better looking sports bras today! :D

    Any way...here are my times for those 3 x 1 mile at HMP:

    7:18, 7:08, 7:09

    Not bad paces....but the only thing is, I'd never be able to hold that sort of pace for 13.1 miles, I'm not fooling anyone. My HM pb is 1:35 from over 2 years ago. That's a 7:15 pace on a hilly course. Not in my wildest dreams am I capable of that right now. I'm still pleased with today's session, but let's not get carried away.

    Actual run: 9 miles in 1:18:30 on the track in the spitting rain

    ~~~~~~~

    Swim

    10 minute warmup
    5 x (10 minute, 30 sec rest) - all with buoy-band
    5 minute cool down

    I did this in the evening....and I did the buoy-band as one long 50 minute swim at a setting of 1:27. I know I was supposed to take a quick rest every 10 minutes, but I didn't feel like it. I just wanted to keep swimming, swimming, swimming. :)

    Actual swim: 65 minutes of swimming, swimming, swimming in the tank


  • Registered Users Posts: 827 ✭✭✭RJM85


    My understanding is that the vector relies on being fitted at the correct torque to give you a good power reading.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,157 ✭✭✭Kurt_Godel


    To be honest your PM numbers have looked very low for a long while. They don't stack up with how your training "reads". Even the results of your 125w-135w-155w-165/175w set... 125W is recovery/easy effort for most*, whereas you look like you were struggling to hold it, and then to increase the effort.

    Might be worth a trip to your bike guys to check its set up correctly?

    *I'm basing this on the perceived effort that comes across in your log.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,888 ✭✭✭Dory Dory


    RJM85 wrote: »
    My understanding is that the vector relies on being fitted at the correct torque to give you a good power reading.

    Yep, I've been scouring the Garmin Vector data and just watched a video on pedal installation and you are absolutely correct! If you do not tighten down the pedals appropriately (preferably with a torque wrench to a specific torque spec), then you will undervalue your power. I merely hand tightened both when my brother noticed how loose the pedal was around Christmas and again last Wednesday....plus I wonder how long before Christmas I was pedaling on a loose pedal!
    Kurt_Godel wrote: »
    To be honest your PM numbers have looked very low for a long while. They don't stack up with how your training "reads". Even the results of your 125w-135w-155w-165/175w set... 125W is recovery/easy effort for most*, whereas you look like you were struggling to hold it, and then to increase the effort.

    Might be worth a trip to your bike guys to check its set up correctly?

    *I'm basing this on the perceived effort that comes across in your log.

    Trust me, the effort has been there. I'll get this pedal thing sorted then we'll see if it's me or Vector putting out the low numbers! ;) Thanks for opening the discussion last week on my low power - I'm not sure I would have given it much thought if you hadn't. !!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,157 ✭✭✭Kurt_Godel


    Dory Dory wrote: »


    Trust me, the effort has been there. I'll get this pedal thing sorted then we'll see if it's me or Vector putting out the low numbers! ;)

    I don't think there is much doubt about the low power numbers, or about the honest training effort. The girl who ran through a broken femur would not struggle to get 1 min at 134W having done 4 mins at 122!


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,888 ✭✭✭Dory Dory


    Garmin here in the states has the best customer service of any product or service I use, hands down. In fact, I dare say there is another business I deal with that comes close. Bottom line, my right pedal is "broken" and they are replacing it for me at no charge (their idea, not mine). I've had the Garmin Vector pedals for nearly 2 years, almost a year beyond their 1 year limited warranty. Obviously they want me safe, and obviously they want me happy....and they are ensuring me of this in very swift fashion. I'm a happy Dory. :) And the bonus is, the rep told me without a doubt my power would have been reading low with this pedal. HAPPY DANCE!!! :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 827 ✭✭✭RJM85


    Free stuff and extra watts? That's like three christmases!


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,888 ✭✭✭Dory Dory


    Tuesday, February 23rd, 2016

    Gym

    Sneaky lunchtime TRX action. My side planks are getting pretty good. I sort of pretend I'm a gymnast when I'm doing them. Don't ask. ;)

    Actual gym: ~35 minutes planking it

    ~~~~~~~

    Swim/run combo

    Swim...

    10 minute warmup
    5 min buoy-band, cruise
    30 x (90 sec @ 1:19, 30 sec rest)
    5 min kick
    5 min cool down

    The worst thing about this swim was all the finger nails I lost to the grate on the wave machine that I kept swimming into. Ugh. I've never had such short nails - not good. But the 100s went fine. Not much else to say!

    Run...

    And...onto the treadie with my google eyes. I kept this at a constant 6.6 for 60 minutes, and it went fine. Nothing too exciting today to report!

    Swim/run combo: 90 minutes in the tank, followed by 60 minutes on the treadie


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,157 ✭✭✭Kurt_Godel


    So... I have a vote, I've been following the schenanigins so far, and blessed if I can't find a valid reason to vote beyond the caricature that is Trump. Wifey want's a household Saunders vote coz she likes his cuddliness- fair enough. However I think that "Yes we can" 2008 turned out to be as pointless a manifesto as the long wall paid by Mexico 2016 ... can you help me out at all?!?!


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,888 ✭✭✭Dory Dory


    Kurt_Godel wrote: »
    So... I have a vote, I've been following the schenanigins so far, and blessed if I can't find a valid reason to vote beyond the caricature that is Trump. Wifey want's a household Saunders vote coz she likes his cuddliness- fair enough. However I think that "Yes we can" 2008 turned out to be as pointless a manifesto as the long wall paid by Mexico 2016 ... can you help me out at all?!?!

    Hahahaha! Trump, now that's some scary sh*t right there. Hey, at least he had the decency to give his "poorly educated" supporters props last night. Classy guy! ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,157 ✭✭✭Kurt_Godel


    Dory Dory wrote: »
    Hahahaha! Trump, now that's some scary sh*t right there. Hey, at least he had the decency to give his "poorly educated" supporters props last night. Classy guy! ;)

    Bloomberg runs as an independent I'm all over it.... otherwise whats the choice (but its all entertainment really...)?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,888 ✭✭✭Dory Dory


    Kurt_Godel wrote: »
    Bloomberg runs as an independent I'm all over it.... otherwise whats the choice (but its all entertainment really...)?

    I'm still desperately waiting for someone to ask him about his hair. :)


Advertisement