Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Privatize Irish Rail, yay or nay?

13»

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,463 ✭✭✭CIE


    Yep, and it would have made a lot more sense to reopen Inny Junction/Cavan than the WRC but there was no pressure group.
    Government types love those that pit one railway against the other, as though they were in competition for funds or something. AAMOF, I submit that kind of thinking as evidence that we do need privatisation, and the sooner the better.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,439 ✭✭✭Richard


    CIE wrote: »
    There's no need for state-owned railway infrastructure. If the railway carries freight at sufficient volumes as to keep the bottom line well-satisfied (as it is very possible to do), then the operating company can pay for its own infrastructure out of pocket instead of having to depend on the government for any cash to cover it.

    There's bugger all freight on the railways in Ireland, though. It isn't extensive enough to be useful for that. Why send something by lorry, train, then lorry again, when you can send it by lorry the whole way? - it'll be cheaper and as fast if not faster.

    Even in GB, where there is some freight, the tracks and stations are now back in Government hands.

    I think something similar could happen in Ireland with the tracks and stations kept in a jointly owned cross-border state company and the rest of NIR/IE sold off.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,463 ✭✭✭CIE


    Richard wrote: »
    There's bugger all freight on the railways in Ireland, though. It isn't extensive enough to be useful for that. Why send something by lorry, train, then lorry again, when you can send it by lorry the whole way? - it'll be cheaper and as fast if not faster.

    Even in GB, where there is some freight, the tracks and stations are now back in Government hands.

    I think something similar could happen in Ireland with the tracks and stations kept in a jointly owned cross-border state company and the rest of NIR/IE sold off.
    It'll never be cheaper. Roads aren't even faster and they're subject to traffic jams.

    I hope we haven't forgotten that the reason that there is less freight on the rails in Ireland is all down to the government? They made a unilateral decision to downgrade the railfreight business; it had nothing to do with profitability or lack of same, because they weren't losing money when they suddenly decided out of the blue to cut railfreight by 40 percent. That's what you call a conflict of interest.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,373 ✭✭✭✭foggy_lad


    CIE wrote: »
    It'll never be cheaper. Roads aren't even faster and they're subject to traffic jams.

    I hope we haven't forgotten that the reason that there is less freight on the rails in Ireland is all down to the government? They made a unilateral decision to downgrade the railfreight business; it had nothing to do with profitability or lack of same, because they weren't losing money when they suddenly decided out of the blue to cut railfreight by 40 percent. That's what you call a conflict of interest.
    OK, the reason freight is dead in Ireland is the cost involved in double and triple handling goods into and out of railway yards and on and off of trains!

    If you own a large company that wants to move 5 containers a day to a port your fastest and cheapest option is by road, your company will not be linked to any railway line as this would be too complex and involve too much red tape and you would have to get into bed with CIE, you would need to bring those 5 containers to your nearest rail freight yard by road costing you quite a lot for loading and unloading plus extras when drivers are left hanging around freight yards when goods inwards staff cant be found. then it is loaded onto a train wagon and left till the next train is ready to take it onwards to the nearest freight yard to its destination where it is unloaded and left to be collected by lorry and driver again costing you even more!

    Far cheaper to drive it by road all the way in a country the size of Ireland!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,733 ✭✭✭✭corktina


    foggy is spot on and CIE lives in a bit of a dreamworld if he thinks roads arent faster!

    Whilst you are messing around transferring your container to the rail depot, (which might actually be in the opposite direction to where your goods are heading), that container would be winging its way to destination on the road.

    As for traffic jams, well the Port Tunnel will have removed the majority of them single-handedly not to mention other road improvements. Traffic jams are nowhere near what they were pre-motorway.

    Its also cheaper due to the less labour required and the non-union rate wages paid in a competitive world of independant road hauliers.

    The short nature of freight hauls in Ireland and the lack of bulk cargoes are what made it uncompetitive, It's nothing to do with Government.We have a different adminstration now and yet there is no move mooted back to rail and no clamour from Industry for mre freight facilities.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,373 ✭✭✭✭foggy_lad


    corktina wrote: »
    foggy is spot on and CIE lives in a bit of a dreamworld if he thinks roads arent faster!

    Whilst you are messing around transferring your container to the rail depot, (which might actually be in the opposite direction to where your goods are heading), that container would be winging its way to destination on the road.

    As for traffic jams, well the Port Tunnel will have removed the majority of them single-handedly not to mention other road improvements. Traffic jams are nowhere near what they were pre-motorway.

    Its also cheaper due to the less labour required and the non-union rate wages paid in a competitive world of independant road hauliers.

    The short nature of freight hauls in Ireland and the lack of bulk cargoes are what made it uncompetitive, It's nothing to do with Government.We have a different adminstration now and yet there is no move mooted back to rail and no clamour from Industry for mre freight facilities.
    Labour costs and health and safety and Nothing else killed off most railways. Years ago tara mines trains would be unloaded by hand by thousands of big burly dockers most of whom left school at 7-10 and who couldnt read or write, they were the unwashed masses who were used as slaves because they were paid little for 70-80hour weeks, they knew no better and were kept ignorant so they would not revolt. then things were slowly imprioved but along with this came increased costs and mechanisation and suddenly 100 workers could do the same work that 1000 had done, they were also paid better as semi-skilled operatives but still worked long hours for buttons.

    Nowadays the minimum wage and more specifically union rates makes sure that Irish Rail will never again be competitive for freight services in Ireland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,247 ✭✭✭✭Losty Dublin


    foggy_lad wrote: »
    Labour costs and health and safety and Nothing else killed off most railways. Years ago tara mines trains would be unloaded by hand by thousands of big burly dockers most of whom left school at 7-10 and who couldnt read or write, they were the unwashed masses who were used as slaves because they were paid little for 70-80hour weeks, they knew no better and were kept ignorant so they would not revolt. then things were slowly imprioved but along with this came increased costs and mechanisation and suddenly 100 workers could do the same work that 1000 had done, they were also paid better as semi-skilled operatives but still worked long hours for buttons.

    Mineral traffic from Navan has been machine loaded and unloaded at both ends of it's journey from day one.

    As an aside, your patronising language about dock staff just shows your usual level of ignorance.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,592 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Losty, did you think Tara Mines opened in 1930 or what?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,247 ✭✭✭✭Losty Dublin


    MYOB wrote: »
    Losty, did you think Tara Mines opened in 1930 or what?

    I know they didn't. You perhaps should ask our resident ignoramus what he reckons first :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,035 ✭✭✭✭-Chris-


    I know they didn't. You perhaps should ask our resident ignoramus what he reckons first :)

    Relax with the name calling.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,373 ✭✭✭✭foggy_lad


    I know they didn't. You perhaps should ask our resident ignoramus what he reckons first :)
    Well of course Tara mines trains weren't around but every other piece of coal or anything that was moved by rail or sea was handled by tens of thousands of unskilled dock workers, they were uneducated and nothing more than slaves but that was the way things were done at the time.

    On privatising Irish rail well they never really came out of the steam age completely and still continue with many antiquated work practices related to old signaling and the steam era which no private company will tolerate so it should be asked what company would have them?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,592 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    I know they didn't. You perhaps should ask our resident ignoramus what he reckons first :)

    Oops. Foggy, I meant (and I suspect you understood). Five letters ending in a Y....
    foggy_lad wrote: »
    Well of course Tara mines trains weren't around but every other piece of coal or anything...

    Why did you mention Tara than? Tara opened in the late 70s, well in the era of mechanisation


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,167 ✭✭✭gsxr1


    The Unions will never let private companies come in to take over the running.

    Even with contractors work. There has to be a certain amount of railway men there to oversee the work at all times.


Advertisement