Europol arrests 112 in child porn crackdown

ahal

Paparazzo wrote: »

Are you seriously suggesting he should be out of a job because he called a group of paedos scumbags? In that case every policeman in the world should be sacked

Missing my point completely, so I'll put it simply. Which do you prefer?

1/ Paedo is aquitted because of pre-trial loose talk,

- or -

2/ Paedo is imprisoned.

The law is not emotional, sorry an' all, but I didn't invent it. Where do we draw the line? The problem otherwise with high emotion is that you can end up with the wrong people being attacked / houses burnt, and it actually contributes nothing to the main goal, which is imprisoning these sick individuals.

The image of the stranger in trenchcoat in a park is b.s. ... most abused children know their abusers, and quite often it's within the family.

I very much doubt also that any police force would in any way suggest that an outside organization should discuss anything, for fear of the obvious ... that being that regardless of how careful one is, there's always the risk of some info. slipping out and prejudicing a trial.

Dudess

crazygeryy wrote: »

Even animals don't do it.**** the do gooders and human rights people. these scum bags should be all put to death if found guilty.

Pointless comment - the do-gooders and human rights people (damn them!) don't set sentencing.

Paparazzo

ahal wrote: »

Missing my point completely, so I'll put it simply. Which do you prefer?

1/ Paedo is aquitted because of pre-trial loose talk,

- or -

2/ Paedo is imprisoned.

The law is not emotional, sorry an' all, but I didn't invent it. Where do we draw the line? The problem otherwise with high emotion is that you can end up with the wrong people being attacked / houses burnt, and it actually contributes nothing to the main goal, which is imprisoning these sick individuals.

The image of the stranger in trenchcoat in a park is b.s. ... most abused children know their abusers, and quite often it's within the family.

I very much doubt also that any police force would in any way suggest that an outside organization should discuss anything, for fear of the obvious ... that being that regardless of how careful one is, there's always the risk of some info. slipping out and prejudicing a trial.

Read through your post that I quoted. Your first 2 points were giving out about El Horseboxo calling the poor paedos scumbags. You also seem to think that no one involved in law enforcement refer to criminals this way! Very naive. Also, as El Horseboxo said already, he knows exactly what he can say, and the idea that he won't work on a case again because of his internet post is just as laughable.

ahal

Paparazzo wrote: »

giving out about El Horseboxo calling the poor paedos scumbags..

Your abstract "view" :rolleyes: Do I take it that your use of the term "poor paedos" means you empathise with them, or are you being otherwise pathetic?

Paparazzo wrote: »

You also seem to think that no one involved in law enforcement refer to criminals this way!

See above :rolleyes:

Paparazzo wrote: »

and the idea that he won't work on a case again because of his internet post is just as laughable.

ahal

Paparazzo wrote: »

Are you seriously suggesting he should be out of a job because he called a group of paedos scumbags? In that case every policeman in the world should be sacked

Unlike your good self I don't know every policeman in the World.

PS: There are police women these days too

Terry

TeddyTedson wrote: »

Well why do so many priests abuse kid then. I'm not having a go against the church for the sake of it, but out of the general public, I imagine there's a higher percentage of paedo priests than say teachers or something.

There is a school of thought that says victims of paedophilia become paedophiles themselves.
We have no idea how many children were victims of priests in this country, and how many of them went on to become paedophile priests themselves.

I remember reading something Freud said about paedos developing into paedos if they don't mature properly or something as children.
Do we have more than most counties here?

Freud thought everything was about yore ma.*

St.Spodo wrote: »

I've always thought the main reason why there were/are so many paedophile priests in Ireland because they realised the trust their position would ensure, and the access they would have to children who trusted them.

That would be a reason, but you could apply the same reasoning to teachers, Gardaí and so forth.
It would also apply to priests in other predominantly Catholic countries such as Italy, Spain etc.


Someone suggested that we have more paedophiles here than in any other country. I very much doubt that is the case.
Yeah, we used to be a very sociable country, but we're not unique in that way.
The same argument comes up all the time in Ireland. We have more scumbags, rapists, terrorists, kiddie fiddlers and gingers than everywhere else.
Let's ignore the fact that only one of the 112 people arrested was Irish and say that we are a nation of paedos.

Sorry. I've spent too much time in AH and read the ramblings of too many self-loathing Irish people.

Anyway, I was just checking my spam folder and saw this: https://us.v-cdn.net/6034073/uploads/attachments/30961/185700.PNG

I'd love if the link (I'm assuming there's a link. Didn't open it) was a trap.

---

*How to use yore ma in context.

TheSean

Haha El Graymer, nice wind up.