Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Acamptonectes densus - Cretaceous ichthyosaur

  • 05-01-2012 2:47am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭


    The discovery is particularly exciting because this order of animal, known as Ichthyosauria, was thought to have been largely extinct by the time of the Cretaceous, the scientists said.

    “It’s a spectacular find,” said museum director Ulrich Joger. “With this, an entire extinction theory will be questioned.”

    A portion of the almost perfectly preserved skeleton was found by a private collector scouring a motorway construction site near Cremlingen, Lower Saxony, in 2005.

    http://www.thelocal.de/sci-tech/20120104-39911.html

    39911.jpg


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭Adam Khor


    Galvasean wrote: »

    So friggin cute :D

    It seems that plenty of ichthyosaurs (including some traditionally considered to be Jurassic, like Ophtalmosaurus) did make it into the Cretaceous. So that ichthyosaurs went practically extinct at the begining of the Cretaceous is a myth, comparable to the old one that said the same about sauropods.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    There's even a late Cretaceous pliosaur that lived in the American inland sea (because frankly, there just weren't enough things in there that could eat you!).
    It just shows how palaeontology can be too quick to make assumptions. Sometimes lack of evidence truly does not mean evidence of absence.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,551 ✭✭✭Rubecula


    Galvasean wrote: »
    There's even a late Cretaceous pliosaur that lived in the American inland sea (because frankly, there just weren't enough things in there that could eat you!).
    It just shows how palaeontology can be too quick to make assumptions. Sometimes lack of evidence truly does not mean evidence of absence.

    This says it all.


Advertisement