Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Treasury Holdings will open NAMA challenge today

Options
  • 26-01-2012 9:19am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 11,299 ✭✭✭✭


    Lawyers for Treasury Holdings (of Johnny Ronan and Richard Barrett fame) are to challenge NAMA's decision to appoint receivers to its properties today at the High Court in Dublin.

    http://www.rte.ie/news/2012/0126/nama.html
    The company was given permission yesterday evening to bring the application at short notice.
    There is a long list of property assets to which NAMA has decided it will appoint receivers...

    Last night Treasury Holdings, which is owned by developers Johnny Ronan and Richard Barrett, said they were very disappointed with NAMA.
    The company claimed it had assembled investors prepared buy the property loans at a higher price than they were purchased by NAMA.
    However the agency said it was not possible to reach a mutually acceptable agreement.
    It said proposals from Treasury Holdings were not commercially viable and it had engaged rigorously with the company since 2010.

    Probably won't see much happen at the High Court today before the case is adjourned, but it's a potentially interesting case for NAMA as Treasury are also seeking a judicial review to challenge NAMA's right to appoint receivers in this manner.
    Tagged:


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 20,299 ✭✭✭✭MadsL


    proposals from Treasury Holdings were not commercially viable

    No change there then.

    A towering affront to common sense


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,775 ✭✭✭Spacedog


    Treasury Holdings are NAMAs largest debtor, ironically NAMA and many government still pay rent for commercial office space to Treasury Holdings, Ironically, the Treasury Building itself is owned by Treasury Holdings as opposed to The Irish Treasury Department and NAMA residing within it.

    It is no wonder that they are in a position better than when they entered NAMA, the tax payer has been 100% propping up their business, cleared their debts, and they are now they are ready to take the company back.

    This amounts to money laundering, and is yet another example of Irelands people paying for the incompetence of Developers and Anglo golden circle investors.

    Primetime showed a clip of Johnny Ronan telling Bertie to 'keep pulling for us' during an opening event at the National Conference Center in dublins docklands. One of the many juicy government contracts awarded to the TH.

    Before the crisis, Ronan and Frank Daily (then in revenue) both worked in the same building and would have had close contact. Daily widely regarded as a "FF man" in the revenue civil service, remains chairman of NAMA despite FG Lab government election.

    Finance minister Michael Noonan is mysteriously button lipped regarding anything to do with NAMA, bond holder payouts, or any policy that is business as usual from the FF era.

    I also find it ironic that NAMA's biggest debtor Ronan/TH is virtually unheard of in the media, considering he lived the lifestyle of a rockstar during the boom, the lads keeping a real low profile these days.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,460 ✭✭✭Slideshowbob


    Treasury won

    http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/finance/2012/0323/1224313766174.html

    How can an insolvent company play a role in rebuilding the Irish economy?!?


  • Registered Users Posts: 43,311 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    Treasury won

    http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/finance/2012/0323/1224313766174.html

    How can an insolvent company play a role in rebuilding the Irish economy?!?


    They haven't won, just got leave to appeal.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • Registered Users Posts: 20,054 ✭✭✭✭neris


    Treasury won

    http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/finance/2012/0323/1224313766174.html

    How can an insolvent company play a role in rebuilding the Irish economy?!?

    Reports the other day saying their holdings in china were undervalued by nearly 2/3s so maybe not all that insolvent


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 202 ✭✭Dannyboy1987




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,049 ✭✭✭Dob74



    There is no reason for a company like treasury to exsist anymore.
    Time to call it a day. Gov has pumped enough money into this waste of space time to take control of its assets. Which the taxpayer has paid for twice.
    Once with the loans to acquire and build the properties. the second by paying top dollar in rents. Game over


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,293 ✭✭✭Goose81


    Dob74 wrote: »
    There is no reason for a company like treasury to exsist anymore.
    Time to call it a day. Gov has pumped enough money into this waste of space time to take control of its assets. Which the taxpayer has paid for twice.
    Once with the loans to acquire and build the properties. the second by paying top dollar in rents. Game over

    Its really not that simple with treasury. Whatever one thinks about them Barrett and Ronin were shrewder operators than nearly any other developers operating at the time and have a huge amount of performing assets in countries other than Ireland.

    Many would have said they had a legitimate case the last time they went to court to sue NAMA and I doubt they will give up that company without a fight.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,049 ✭✭✭Dob74


    Goose81 wrote: »
    Its really not that simple with treasury. Whatever one thinks about them Barrett and Ronin were shrewder operators than nearly any other developers operating at the time and have a huge amount of performing assets in countries other than Ireland.

    Many would have said they had a legitimate case the last time they went to court to sue NAMA and I doubt they will give up that company without a fight.


    where?
    Is so why cant they pay back there loans?

    The battlsea power station is a white elephant and the china looks like ireland in 07. Only one is down for the real estate market there.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,461 ✭✭✭liammur


    You couldn't make this up. A while back Treasury were taking NAMA to court, now, they are depending on NAMA.

    Close them down. They are out of their depth at every level, and taking the taxpayer down with them.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 20,299 ✭✭✭✭MadsL


    What is the National Convention Centre worth? Aren't the OPW paying Treasury to run it? Boot em out lock the doors? :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,299 ✭✭✭✭later12


    Towards the end of the story, the plot takes another drastic turn:

    http://www.rte.ie/news/2012/0828/treasury-assets-transferred-to-richard-barrett.html
    The assets of a Treasury Holdings subsidiary in Singapore have been transferred by another subsidiary in China to a director of Treasury Holdings, Richard Barrett personally. The High Court was told this was announced overnight...

    The court was told that as a result of this development, NAMA was now supporting the application by KBC Bank to have Treasury Holdings wound up.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,461 ✭✭✭liammur


    NAMA really are a laughing stock, they are so far behind the curve it's frightening.


Advertisement