Circumscision revision.

cloptrop

Why when a man has a circumcision it is cool because hes jewish , but when a woman has a circumscision its disgraceful and a reason for asylum .
When a man gets it done its a normal religeous experience
When a woman gets it done its mutilation.

I dont feel for or against this I just think sometimes the people blasting this are usually the least informed. Im sure Ill get a load of Jim Corrs telling me tht we need to save the world of female circumscision , unless george bush wants to do that .

If george wants to do it its wrong as far as I know .

ONE TWO THREE DEBATE

InkSlinger67

ONE TWO THREE SHUTUP!

later12

My understanding is that a female circumision usually involves an excision of the entire clitoris, in a way that would totally deprive a woman of practically any sexual feeling whatever.

Whereas, a male circumcision deprives a man of only one aspect of a sexual experience: that which pertains to the foreskin alone. This is a significant deprivation, in my view, but not realistically one which is comparable to female circumcision. Men who have been circumcised can still experience a similar level of sexual climax as un-circumcised men.

k.p.h

The equivalent circumcision for a fella would be to chop his whole knob off ...

Yeah that's grand too is it ...

Jesus ...

cloptrop

later10 wrote: »

My understanding is that a female circumision usually involves an excision of the entire clitoris, in a way that would totally deprive a woman of practically any sexual feeling whatever.

Whereas, a male circumcision deprives a man of only one aspect of a sexual experience: that which pertains to the foreskin alone. This is a significant deprivation, in my view, but not realistically one which is comparable to female circumcision.

So the g spot does not exist . I am not argueing for or against Im just summarising. If a jewish girl claims to have a g spot should she be circumsized too?

jimthemental

Ink Slinger, it's not fair to just cut him off like that.

Jesus Shaves

cloptrop wrote: »

So the g spot does not exist . I am not argueing for or against Im just summarising. If a jewish girl claims to have a g spot should she be circumsized too?

Intelligent much?

cloptrop

Should the jewish ritual of circumscision be outlawed . Im just asking.
####i dont care . It makes it look bigger aparantly

k.p.h

cloptrop wrote: »

So the g spot does not exist .

Whats this thread about ..?

later12

cloptrop wrote: »

So the g spot does not exist

The g spot is most probably related to the clitoris, which is typically excised during FGM.

i am not argueing for or against Im just summarising. If a jewish girl claims to have a g spot should she be circumsized too?

I don't think anyone ought to be circumcised, really. But I don't think all circumcisions are equal in their brutality.

Depriving an individual of any sexual enjoyment is far crueller than depriving a man of his foreskin (itself a cruel, but less reprehensible practice, in my opinion).

cloptrop

cloptrop wrote: »

So the g spot does not exist .

Call for "An G Team"

circum222

Had it done a couple weeks back because of the reason of no sexial sensation and yes it does make it look bigger, the opposite of what I originally expected.

later12

I wouldn't have thought it would make your dick look any bigger.

You know the logic that women follow, which advises you not to wear a belt because it cuts your body in half, and makes you look shorter?

That's the logic I imagine ought to apply to circumcision.

Jesus Wept

It is never cool
If you have any other questions, pm me.

whatsamsn

InkSlinger67 wrote: »

ONE TWO THREE SHUTUP!

Hello, my name is thank whore.

Chuck Stone

Circumcision outlawed? Probably not.

Ridiculed as being a barbaric practice? Absolutely.

chickenbutt

later10 wrote: »

My understanding is that a female circumision usually involves an excision of the entire clitoris, in a way that would totally deprive a woman of practically any sexual feeling whatever.

Whereas, a male circumcision deprives a man of only one aspect of a sexual experience: that which pertains to the foreskin alone. This is a significant deprivation, in my view, but not realistically one which is comparable to female circumcision. Men who have been circumcised can still experience a similar level of sexual climax as un-circumcised men.

I'm fairly certain female circumcision does not reduce sexual arousal and orgasm.

finality

chickenbutt wrote: »

I'm fairly certain female circumcision does not reduce sexual arousal and orgasm.

What's that certainty based on?

The Sweeper

chickenbutt wrote: »

I'm fairly certain female circumcision does not reduce sexual arousal and orgasm.

Yes, of course, you're entirely correct.

The entire excision of the bundle of nerves called the clitoris shouldn't have any effect on reaction to stimulation. Similarly the entire excision of your fingertips wouldn't have any effect on your ability to touch.

Additionally in the context of how female circumcision is usually practiced, having your personal bits forcibly excised with no anaesthetic wouldn't have any effect on your future ability to become sexually aroused if someone else tried to touch your personal bits.

Also: petrol is good for you when drunk in a ratio of 5:2 with banana juice every morning.

chickenbutt

Gosh guys, sorry I don't have a dozen references right off the bat there for ya!

Chuck Stone

chickenbutt wrote: »

Gosh guys, sorry I don't have a dozen references right off the bat there for ya!

Well in fairness it's a bold claim you made and when people make such claims it is standard that they are asked to either back them up or rescind them.

Sindri

whatsamsn wrote: »

Hello, my name is thank whore.

Yeah? I bet you're dirty.
Reeaaalll dirty.
You got the soggy porridge, eh? Awww, that's why you're cranky?

Now I'll pay you a dollar and then your going to squat down over a jar and attempt to open the lid using only your sphincter. I don't know what it is but seeing a whore trying to remove a lid from a jar using only her sphincter makes me feel superior to that jar.

Chuck Stone wrote: »

Well in fairness it's a bold claim you made and when people make such claims it is standard that they are asked to either back them up or rescind them.

Rescind THIS!!!

Chuck Stone

Sindri wrote: »

RescindTHIS!!!:)

Get back in your cage you

Sindri

Chuck Stone wrote: »

Get back in your cage you

NO. I'm a big boy now. And I can do big boy things.

up for anything

cloptrop wrote: »

Why when a man has a circumcision it is cool because hes jewish , but when a woman has a circumscision its disgraceful and a reason for asylum .
When a man gets it done its a normal religeous experience
When a woman gets it done its mutilation.

I dont feel for or against this I just think sometimes the people blasting this are usually the least informed. Im sure Ill get a load of Jim Corrs telling me tht we need to save the world of female circumscision , unless george bush wants to do that .

If george wants to do it its wrong as far as I know .

ONE TWO THREE DEBATE

cloptrop wrote: »

So the g spot does not exist . I am not argueing for or against Im just summarising. If a jewish girl claims to have a g spot should she be circumsized too?

cloptrop wrote: »

Should the jewish ritual of circumscision be outlawed . Im just asking.
####i dont care . It makes it look bigger aparantly

chickenbutt wrote: »

I'm fairly certain female circumcision does not reduce sexual arousal and orgasm.

chickenbutt wrote: »

Gosh guys, sorry I don't have a dozen references right off the bat there for ya!

Did you ever want to smack someone? I'm not advocating violence, just daydreaming about it. Anyhow it's not half-term till next week!

Sindri

NSFW, but the Rabbi on dicks.

kincsem

When <insert name here> had a circumcision they threw away the best bit.

biko

I'm gonna save us some trouble and stop this now.