Liveline Thread (15/02/2012 to 01/05/2012)

eviltwin

AngryBollix wrote: »

Absolutely. It shouldnt be tolerated full stop. WW2 or not.

Different times though...not easy to leave when there was no support. Where would she go? How would she finance it? Besides the laws then allowed men to beat wives and kids, she would probably have been dragged back to him. Deffo would have been zero garda protection.

surferdudz

Cardinal Richelieu wrote: »

These guys isolate women and its WW2 Britain, domestic violence is way down the list.

domestic violence rife

Suzie4

my open lettter to liveline listeners..

dear live line listeners, i know how terrible your addiction to live line is.
you wore shorts when you were younger.
and ate ice cream when you went to the zoo,
your mums and dads listened to liveline too,
you hadnt really got a chance.

if you are listening now,like i know you are,
try to change channel,
even just for a second,
you ate easter eggs at easter

I feel your pain ,
if i could ring the police about it i would,
but its not illegal to listen,

you are not alone,



thanks love suzie 4

signostic

eviltwin wrote: »

Different times though...not easy to leave when there was no support. Where would she go? How would she finance it? Besides the laws then allowed men to beat wives and kids, she would probably have been dragged back to him. Deffo would have been zero garda protection.

Garda action in those times would be to deliver the children to an industrial school where even more and worse abuse was perpetrated on them

AngryBollix

eviltwin wrote: »

Different times though...not easy to leave when there was no support. Where would she go? How would she finance it? Besides the laws then allowed men to beat wives and kids, she would probably have been dragged back to him. Deffo would have been zero garda protection.

Its almost inevitable that going home to that man was the worst place she could have gone.

What choice could she make that would have been worse?

eviltwin

AngryBollix wrote: »

Its almost inevitable that going home to that man was the worst place she could have gone.

What choice could she make that would have been worse?

But your missing the point, where would she go? There were no refuges back then, you went back to your family you got a lecture about "you made your bed". She would have been totally helpless.

Suzie4

This is really getting into mcsavage territory..

Cardinal Richelieu

eviltwin wrote: »

Different times though...not easy to leave when there was no support. Where would she go? How would she finance it? Besides the laws then allowed men to beat wives and kids, she would probably have been dragged back to him. Deffo would have been zero garda protection.

Was there Garda in 1940s Liverpool?

surferdudz

she sounds terrified and broken .............

JonathanAnon

Sounds far to active to be a civil servant..

AngryBollix

eviltwin wrote: »

But your missing the point, where would she go? There were no refuges back then, you went back to your family you got a lecture about "you made your bed". She would have been totally helpless.

This may be true.

Do you go back or leave? Thats the choice she had

Suzie4

surferdudz wrote: »

she sounds terrified and broken .............

Sure isnt that what joe wants,watch him drag this out now.

For all who were saying how sensitive a man duffy is..:D:D

JM Skipton

Suzie4 wrote: »

This is really getting into mcsavage territory..

"de hurt do be hurting de hurted"

AngryBollix

Joe says we'll leave her second name out 2 seconds after she said it

Cardinal Richelieu

AngryBollix wrote: »

Its almost inevitable that going home to that man was the worst place she could have gone.

What choice could she make that would have been worse?

This is a very white and black way of thinking. Its 1940s Britain, there are no social workers, women refuges, NGOs like today. Giving the wife a few slaps was seen as the social norm by many.

Suzie4

that woman shouldnt have been let on air,obviously needs counciling.

europa11

Cardinal Richelieu wrote: »

Was there Garda in 1940s Liverpool?

Wouldn't they be Kops?



.........I'll get me coat ...:rolleyes:

signostic

Suzie4 wrote: »

Sure isnt that what joe wants,watch him drag this out now.

For all who were saying how sensitive a man duffy is..:D:D

I fear we will have all of this next week

europa11

Minute to go....time for break-een Joe?

Suzie4

signostic wrote: »

I fear we will have all of this next week

And who will help you with that fear?

Who ..?

signostic

Suzie4 wrote: »

And who will help you with that fear?

Who ..?

Joe?

SEPT 23 1989

No mention of the Friday that dare not speaks its name

steelcityblues

Suzie4 wrote: »

And who will help you with that fear?

Who ..?

'Can fear be a positive thing sometimes?'

Suzie4

Dont think theres a fuccy friday 2moro,by the sounds of him there.

Remember there was one this month already.

ButtersSuki

Suzie4 wrote: »

And who will help you with that fear?

Who ..?

Maria, and her open letter.

signostic

Mooney on now, abusing the privacy of robins

Suzie4

signostic wrote: »

Joe?

yes joe,call joe..and read out an open letter to yourself about your fears for the upcoming topics on the show..

we all have your fear .

you are not alone.

europa11

signostic wrote: »

Mooney on now, abusing the privacy of robins

Robin won't like that.....you'd hope

steelcityblues

Suzie4 wrote: »

yes joe,call joe..and read out an open letter to yourself about your fears for the upcoming topics on the show..

we all have your fear .

you are not alone.

He should play the Michael Jackson song at the start of the next broadcast.

ButtersSuki

Suzie4 wrote: »

Dont think theres a fuccy friday 2moro,by the sounds of him there.

Remember there was one this month already.

Technically, we had 2!

We had the Feb Funny Friday in March as Joe didn't understand the calendar; and then we had Sil Fox's Day of National Lampoonery and Commemoration of the 79th year of exiting his Monther's Vagina Lahv Lahn Extravaganza Tribute Extraordinaire!