Page 3 Boobs

Captain Darling

rossie1977 wrote: »

the sun has had a policy of "natural boobs" only since the late 1990s......

Glad to see they have such high 'standards.'

syklops

foxyboxer wrote: »

Page 3....pfffft.

Now the Daily Sport. :cool:

Phwooooooarrr....corrrrrr.....hubba hubba...etc etc

Whenever I hear about the daily sport, I think of this time when I was working in Tech Support for broadband and it was a Sunday morning and this guy rang up and got the one girl working that day because his broadband wasnt working and he kept telling her how he wanted to get on the Daily Sport website for the porn. And he just kept going on about how he wanted to get on the porn". I think she hung up on him in the end.

Nothingbetter2d

chin_grin wrote: »

Pffft. Newb. Who clicks on image links anymore when you can Hover Zoom? :pac:

(works on gifs too).

thumbnail zoom plus 1.6.0 works for firefox 10.0.1

Dudess

I like the sight of a good pair of tits!

But I think it's weird that someone in the Sun thought "I know! tits with cornflakes!" and yeah, teen topless models just barely legal (think that's changed now though) and then outrage over the paedos etc - dumb.

seanmc1980

wouldn't been seen dead with that rag in my hand, so can't comment on page 3

stovelid

It's tacky and, in a sense, exploitative but nobody forces the girls to do it.

It's always wryly amusing to see papers that fulminate so hysterically about pedos than go and show titty pictures of girls a year or two over the legal age for older men to check out.

kryogen

seanmc1980 wrote: »

wouldn't been seen dead with that rag in my hand, so can't comment on page 3

So what are you doing here then?

AnonoBoy

Little known fact but 67% of Page 3 models actually go on to get Masters qualifications. And of those 47% go on to become doctors.

sbsquarepants

xxxJennyxxx wrote: »

(I have big dreams about being a page 3 girl, but alas, my short stature and limited boob job fund worked against me :cool:)

Jen, can i call you jen? Great!
As luck would have it, I am a professional booboligist/talent scout. Whip them on out there and i'll give you an unbiased professional opinion. I'll even wave my usual fee in this one case, and also in the case of any of your friends or relatives who also want opinions.:D

davet82

sbsquarepants wrote: »

Jen, can i call you jen? Great!
As luck would have it, I am a professional booboligist/talent scout. Whip them on out there and i'll give you an unbiased professional opinion. I'll even wave my usual fee in this one case, and also in the case of any of your friends or relatives who also want opinions.:D

what a nice guy, your typical Sun reader

smash

sbsquarepants wrote: »

Jen, can i call you jen? Great!
As luck would have it, I am a professional booboligist/talent scout. Whip them on out there and i'll give you an unbiased professional opinion. I'll even wave my usual fee in this one case, and also in the case of any of your friends or relatives who also want opinions.:D

If you snoop hard enough you'll see that she'd deffo get the seal of approval!

wonton

AnonoBoy wrote: »

Little known fact but 67% of Page 3 models actually go on to get Masters qualifications. And of those 47% go on to become doctors.

must be embarassing when they realised they didn't even need the masters to become doctors.

davet82

wonton wrote: »

must be embarassing when they realised they didn't even need the masters to become doctors.

get your broadsheet humor out of my thread please! :rolleyes:

kryogen

smash wrote: »

If you snoop hard enough you'll see that she'd deffo get the seal of approval!

.

smash

kryogen wrote: »

.

Hey... do your own stalking!

kryogen

smash wrote: »

Hey... do your own stalking!

I dont have time! Just give me a clue and I'll creep on her later

On second thoughts, na, I have football to be watching!

syklops

xxxJennyxxx wrote: »

(I have big dreams about being a page 3 girl, but alas, my short stature and limited boob job fund worked against me :cool:)

If its a serious dream I would say go for it. Short stature doesnt matter because in a picture there is no point of reference that makes you short looking. And speaking as a great big pervy bloke, we dont just want big ones. little ones and medium ones are just as nice too.

I'd get on the phone to the Sun if I were you.

AnonoBoy

wonton wrote: »

must be embarassing when they realised they didn't even need the masters to become doctors.

Damn it! My lack of knowledge about third level qualifications once more proves to be my undoing when trying to propagate erroneous facts about the glamour model industry.

Big Nasty

We got the Irish Times in our house but on a Sunday we used to get the Sunday World. Dragged myself around the room to the page three girly pic in it when I was about ten. I don't think there was even full boobage on display!:o

Paparazzo

kylith wrote: »

I just find it hilarious that the Sun tends to go mad over the slightest issue of morality, but then has boobs on Page 3. Double standard FTW

Naked women on page 3, and they star out the word "shit" to "s***" in their articles.

mysteries1984

rossie1977 wrote: »

the sun has had a policy of "natural boobs" only since the late 1990s......

No way! Has it really? I had no idea!

sbsquarepants wrote: »

Jen, can i call you jen? Great!
As luck would have it, I am a professional booboligist/talent scout. Whip them on out there and i'll give you an unbiased professional opinion. I'll even wave my usual fee in this one case, and also in the case of any of your friends or relatives who also want opinions.:D

Sponge, good call.

Jen, take him up on his offer. Or do indeed call The Sun. Height doesn't matter as much in glamour modelling...and big boobs aren't always a plus. Go forth, good lady.

TwoShedsJackson

Pffffft, ye kids today with your internet porn don't feckin know you're born. When I was twelve a grainy black and white picture of Sam Fox or Linda Lusardi with her tits out was the only way you were going to see tits anywhere.

smash

TwoShedsJackson wrote: »

Pffffft, ye kids today with your internet porn don't feckin know you're born.

???

Here Grandad... Learn how to type a coherent sentence will ya!

MyKeyG

TwoShedsJackson wrote: »

Pffffft, ye kids today with your internet porn don't feckin know you're born. When I was twelve a grainy black and white picture of Sam Fox or Linda Lusardi with her tits out was the only way you were going to see tits anywhere.

Ah they were better times. Because there was no easily available porn you made do with pictures of BB Baskin showing a bit of leg in the RTE guide. The world was a porn mag!!!

ComfyKnickers

mysteries1984 wrote: »

rossie1977 wrote: »

the sun has had a policy of "natural boobs" only since the late 1990s......

No way! Has it really? I had no idea!

sbsquarepants wrote: »

Jen, can i call you jen? Great!
As luck would have it, I am a professional booboligist/talent scout. Whip them on out there and i'll give you an unbiased professional opinion. I'll even wave my usual fee in this one case, and also in the case of any of your friends or relatives who also want opinions.:D

Sponge, good call.

Jen, take him up on his offer. Or do indeed call The Sun. Height doesn't matter as much in glamour modelling...and big boobs aren't always a plus. Go forth, good lady.

And if it works out well for you, I might go fifth!

mysteries1984

ComfyKnickers wrote: »

And if it works out well for you, I might go fifth!

If you do, I will support you and buy the relevant publication Seriously, I think more women should do this.

44leto

BooBs I remember when they meant a bit of titillation, now they are perpetually in your face from every magazine and off course the internet.

I say forget about the boobs and put gees on page three. That off course will depend on if there is a Sun after the leveson enquiry

gbee

mysteries1984 wrote: »

If you do, I will support you and buy the relevant publication Seriously, I think more women should do this.

Any program I've seen on this topic, the papers were fully booked up, the Sun if the only one left with Page 3 ~ I remember them in black n white and I had the special colour pinups in me van. Nostalgia.

Irish Guitarist

davet82 wrote: »

sounds like somethin ya say when tryin the 'sensitive approach' when trying to get into a girls knickers... good work

Not really. I just don't believe in pointless and risky operations.

kryogen wrote: »

Been a long time since I saw it but wasnt page 3's proudest thing that they would only have natural boobs in it?

You might be right. It may be another paper I'm thinking of that had women like I described.

Dudess

44leto wrote: »

BooBs I remember when they meant a bit of titillation, now they are perpetually in your face from every magazine and off course the internet.

I say forget about the boobs and put gees on page three. That off course will depend on if there is a Sun after the leveson enquiry

Gees don't look great though.

Gummy Panda

RichieC wrote: »

I'd be less embarrassed buying a gay porno mag in a shop than I would buying the sun.

Don't lie and try to be a special snowflake

previous user

Gotta give council dwelling scum something to read.

44leto

Dudess wrote: »

Gees don't look great though.

Ahh they grow on you, its an acquired taste.

SugarCoat

When it comes to tits ya can't bate page 3 of the farmer's journal http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b8/MonbeliardCattleCow_in_CantalMountains.JPG dhurty!

44leto

SugarCoat wrote: »

When it comes to tits ya can't bate page 3 of the farmer's journal http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b8/MonbeliardCattleCow_in_CantalMountains.JPG dhurty!

Oh Yeah

They sometimes do a centrefold of a Massey Ferguson.;

wardy2

worst thing about sun is opening up the paper and find your mam on page 3:eek:

*starts to cry*

McChubbin

How about a nice cheeky ballsac?

Mint Sauce

Have nothing at all against page 3 boobs, its just the s*n newspaper I have a problem with.

Absolute rag of a paper, wouldn't use it to wipe my hole, and would not be disapointed if it disappeared along with the The NOTW.

Jesus Wept

Dudess wrote: »

Gees don't look great though.

Bit harsh.

44leto wrote: »

BooBs I remember when they meant a bit of titillation, now they are perpetually in your face from every magazine and off course the internet.

I say forget about the boobs and put gees on page three. That off course will depend on if there is a Sun after the leveson enquiry

Page gee.

Capt'n Midnight

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Page_Three

The Sun and other British tabloids also provoked controversy by featuring girls as young as 16 as topless models, when it was legal to do so. Samantha Fox, Maria Whittaker, Debee Ashby, and others began their topless modelling careers in The Sun at the age of 16, while the Daily Sport was even known to count down the days until it could feature a teenage girl topless on her 16th birthday, as it did with Linsey Dawn McKenzie in 1994, amongst others. In 2003, the Sexual Offences Act 2003 raised the minimum legal age for topless modelling to 18.

Question is , were those issues sold here ?

And more importantly what are the statutes of limitations for what I assume would have been a breach of Irish law.

16, wouldn't have even finished school yet.

mysteries1984

Capt'n Midnight wrote: »

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Page_Three

Question is , were those issues sold here ?

And more importantly what are the statutes of limitations for what I assume would have been a breach of Irish law.

16, wouldn't have even finished school yet.

I had no idea it was raised to 18, I just assumed most women that did it were around 19-20. I probably didn't think too much about it. And I believe , although I'm open to correction, that those issues were sold here, yes.

stupidusername

Domo230 wrote: »

Thanks lads

Now I have wood

another helper

Mr.Biscuits

orangebud wrote: »

i have nothing against page 3 ..

I do, my cock!

GLaDOS

Page 3 has more substance than most of the rest of the "newspaper" anyway.

stupidusername

ScienceNerd wrote: »

Page 3 has more substance than most of the rest of the "newspaper" anyway.

at least it will when you're finished with it

Millicent

Are they still doing that thing where the girls comment on the story?

i.e. Our lovely lady Jenny says "I think the current government's fiscal policies and cutting of foreign aid payments undermine the progress made in social and humanitarian efforts across the developing world. And not one of you has read this cos you're still staring at my boobs. They put this in because for some reason they thought that meant that nobody was being objectified. Now onto Dear Deidre for pictures of women talking on the phone in their underwear."

44leto

ScienceNerd wrote: »

Page 3 has more substance than most of the rest of the "newspaper" anyway.

It sports section is usually excellent, better then the broadsheets.

gbee

Millicent wrote: »

Are they still doing that thing where the girls comment on the story?

i.e. Our lovely lady Jenny says "I think the current government's fiscal policies and cutting of foreign aid payments undermine the progress made in social and humanitarian efforts across the developing world. And not one of you has read this cos you're still staring at my boobs. They put this in because for some reason they thought that meant that nobody was being objectified. Now onto Dear Deidre for pictures of women talking on the phone in their underwear."

Ahem, that's Miss World. :rolleyes:

stupidusername

Millicent wrote: »

Now onto Dear Deidre for pictures of women talking on the phone in their underwear.

As we women do so frequently

smash

Dudess wrote: »

Gees don't look great though.

Depends who's gee you're looking at. Anything except blue waffle is good with me!