Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Connor Murray - Kidney's new TOL?

24

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 537 ✭✭✭ozymandias10


    i think non functioning is a bit harsh i think there playing pretty well

    I think ferris is playing well....others are below what we expect from them...I accept that Non Functioning is a bit ott


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,497 ✭✭✭BoardsMember


    I'd love to see SOB at 8, and someone, maybe POM at 7 at some stage.

    I'd also like to see Heaslip return to form, with Ferris in second row, that would give us some serious weapons, but I dont think it will ever happen.

    The really noticeable thing, for me, regarding Reddan, is that our ball carriers commit to taking flat passes at pace on the gainline, whereas with Murray the runs just dont happen because either he doesnt pass it, or they have no idea when he's going to get around to passing it. This business of standing at the back of the ruck looking around for ages is a nonsense and needs to be eliminited.


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Kannon Curved Bellboy


    Heaslip and O brien aren't performing one needs to go..O Brien should be given a chance in his preferred position...when you say all season is this the two games we have played in the six nations...cause I am basing on current form..and specifically for this tournamnet ..the six nations....not baffling at all

    But hey if you would rather continue with a non functioning back row that is your perogative

    Your idea is equivalent to using a blowtorch to close a cut instead of a plaster.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,787 ✭✭✭d-gal


    Being honest anyone would have sped up the game after the 50th minute. It was a good call by Kidney, play a physical scrum half against the most physical 6nations team and then speed it up in the 2nd half and blow them away, which Ireland did. Stringer would have been god like if he came on after 50minutes, the speed of play increased 100% and Italy couldn't handle that.
    Reddan is a better scrumhalf but he shouldn't start against France, too physical a game. Schimdt wouldn't pick him for this game so kidney def won't. I'd do the same as the Italy match, 50 for Murray and 30 for reddan. Horses for courses.
    Murray is the future and being honest we should be blooding players now so Murray, sexton, POM, Ryan, mcfadden should all be getting gametime


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,806 ✭✭✭corny


    I'd love to see SOB at 8

    Genuine question. Why?

    IMO our entire back row are under utilised. They all basically do the same thing for Kidney. Stand close to the ruck and take it up against the strong fringe defence. The numbers they wear makes very little difference in attacking situations as far as i can see. The obvious off the back of scrum for the No.8 makes sense but our scrum rarely dominates to the extent where this is possible and if your scrum is going backwards Heaslip is one of the best there is at 8.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,915 ✭✭✭MungBean


    d-gal wrote: »
    Being honest anyone would have sped up the game after the 50th minute. It was a good call by Kidney, play a physical scrum half against the most physical 6nations team and then speed it up in the 2nd half and blow them away, which Ireland did. Stringer would have been god like if he came on after 50minutes, the speed of play increased 100% and Italy couldn't handle that.

    Murray didnt speed it up after 40-45 so I dont see any reason to assume Reddan played no part.
    Reddan is a better scrumhalf but he shouldn't start against France, too physical a game. Schimdt wouldn't pick him for this game so kidney def won't

    I'd wager that if Schmidt had to choose between Murray and Reddan he'd go with Reddan. If he was choosing between Reddan/Murray and Boss then Murray wouldnt make the bench.
    . I'd do the same as the Italy match, 50 for Murray and 30 for reddan. Horses for courses.
    Murray is the future and being honest we should be blooding players now so Murray, sexton, POM, Ryan, mcfadden should all be getting gametime.

    They are getting time, they got their 20 minutes against Italy and will do again against Scotland I'd say. Thats the way it should be done (bar Ryan who's clearly passed DOC a long time ago) not giving them a start and hoping for the best. If Murray starts in Paris we know we are resigned to defending for 50/60 minutes. Murray's a good defender but this is France in Paris, no team on the planet could defend for 50-60 minutes and hope to come away with a win.

    Our only chance is to catch them on the hop and put them on the back foot and try create space out wide for Bowe, Trimble and Kearney to attack at pace.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,079 ✭✭✭Mr.Applepie


    so you'd move Ferris out of the position he's played all season,
    followed by moving SOB out of the position he's played all season,
    and also move POM out of the position he's played all season?

    :baffling:

    It's only baffling if you are unaware of the creamy, blind manlove some supporters have for blindside flankers in this country

    Problem:
    The backrow is unbalanced


    MORE BLINDSIDE FLANKERS

    Problem:
    Our centres are too small


    MORE BLINDSIDE FLANKERS

    Problem:
    The 2nd row isn't giving enough ball carrying options


    MORE BLINDSIDE FLANKERS

    Personally I can't wait for the discussion about moving SOB to 9 for his sniping ability!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,497 ✭✭✭BoardsMember


    corny wrote: »
    Genuine question. Why?

    A few reasons - I think SOB is wasted at 7, it's just not his position at all. Ferris cant play any other backrow position afaik, and I have seen SOB play really well there for Leinster. It also means Heaslip being off the team which might give him the kick up the arse, and it would make space for someone who can actually play the 7 position, or at least try out some other options, POM being one such option.

    I completely agree with your point about us having effectively 3 very similar players, particularly SOB & Ferris, and all three doing very similar things.


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Kiera Savory Monochrome


    MungBean wrote: »
    Murray didnt speed it up after 40-45 so I dont see any reason to assume Reddan played no part.



    I'd wager that if Schmidt had to choose between Murray and Reddan he'd go with Reddan. If he was choosing between Reddan/Murray and Boss then Murray wouldnt make the bench.



    They are getting time, they got their 20 minutes against Italy and will do again against Scotland I'd say. Thats the way it should be done (bar Ryan who's clearly passed DOC a long time ago) not giving them a start and hoping for the best. If Murray starts in Paris we know we are resigned to defending for 50/60 minutes. Murray's a good defender but this is France in Paris, no team on the planet could defend for 50-60 minutes and hope to come away with a win.

    Our only chance is to catch them on the hop and put them on the back foot and try create space out wide for Bowe, Trimble and Kearney to attack at pace.

    1. every team that italy played have pulled away aound 60 mins fresh legs at 60 and a player thats played 40-50 mins are very different thats why benches are so important

    2. murray adds another player france have to keep an eye on reddan docent make close to as many breaks this is why peter stringer is not longer relevant

    3. i dont think we can go all out attack against france like that in loose play were good but there second only to nz they will destroy us


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,445 ✭✭✭WeleaseWoderick


    I'd love to know where this thing of Heaslip needing a kick up the ass to play better comes from?

    In my opinion, he was out best player against Wales and was alongside POC & Ferris as our standout forward this week.

    It reminds me of when people were saying Kearney had a bad game after every match a couple of years back, no matter how well he played.

    As regards Conor Murray, I've no doubt he'll be a good player for Ireland in the future but at present he is not doing the fundamentals of a scrum half's job well enough to be first choice.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,969 ✭✭✭buck65


    I wonder if Reddan had started last week would he have made the same impression?
    Italy are ****e, always are, they make good players seem ordinary and that's as much as they do. Yes we wore them down and pulled away after 50 mins but we usually always do in Dublin.
    Murray has alot to learn and needs to speed up his game and look for the killer pass rather than seek contact all the time. Reddan is a fine SH but blows hot and cold too.
    But dropping him (Murray)from the panel would be nuts at this stage. Alternating both is probably the way to go.
    And the title of this thread is a joke, O Leary was a fine player for us until his injury and has struggled to stay fit and find form since, the slagging he gets here is too severe, it's not his fault that he kept getting picked whilst out of form.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,308 ✭✭✭✭.ak


    A few reasons - I think SOB is wasted at 7, it's just not his position at all. Ferris cant play any other backrow position afaik, and I have seen SOB play really well there for Leinster. It also means Heaslip being off the team which might give him the kick up the arse, and it would make space for someone who can actually play the 7 position, or at least try out some other options, POM being one such option.

    I completely agree with your point about us having effectively 3 very similar players, particularly SOB & Ferris, and all three doing very similar things.

    Yeah, but SOB has played really well at 7 for Leinster as well. Infact, better at 7 than at 8. His sniping from the base of a scrum was immense, and that earned him a couple of tries last season when covering for Heaslip. But his decision making at 8 is suspect. One of the reasons why Heaslip is such a fine number 8, he's got a rugby brain.

    Aside from the HEC final last season, can you think of one time SOB has played badly at 7 for Leinster? I can't. He was made look particularly good at 6 in the second half of the HEC final because he was given so much space. Most teams wouldn't afford him that luxury.

    He's a fine 7. International standard, and probably in the top 8 in the world.

    Which brings me back on topic... isn't this about Murray?

    You know what really grinds my gears? Murray thinks he's a 7.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,497 ✭✭✭BoardsMember


    Murray tried to make breaks, gets caught early, ends up at the bottom of rucks and is missing for a couple of phases so we end up with no SH.

    Within 3 minutes of Reddan coming on he made a clear line break, Murray did not do this once.

    Maliyah Fast Spike - if you cant see that Murray is playing poorly and needs to be dropped then there's not much hope for you :) I dont think anyone is suggesting that we go all out attack against France, they are suggesting we pick a competent SH. Reddan is playing a lot better than Murray at the moment, and Reddan is not poor defensively.


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Kiera Savory Monochrome


    .ak wrote: »
    You know what really grinds my gears? Murray thinks he's a 7.

    ya your right so did bod neither should ever have gotten an ireland cap:)


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,301 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    Seph503 wrote: »
    I think being subbed at the 50min mark was an indication that Kidney knew he wasn't having a good game, rather than waiting until the usual 60-65min mark of swapping the half backs, as opposed to what he suggested in his interview about the forwards providing cleaner ball (and not Reddan) for improving our game.


    don't know about that. boss is usually subbed around the 50 min mark when he and reddan are playing for Leinster. boss started the two french games in the heineken cup and he was subbed at 50 mins in the first game and 56 mins the second game.

    In Munster's last two games against Northamton and castres, murray was subbed at 60 and 56 mins.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 872 ✭✭✭smurphy29


    Maliyah Fast Spike - aside from the grammatical and spelling shockers there, that is nonsense. Almost the first thing Reddan did on saturday was to make a break. He also took a quick tap penalty and set us off on attack in opposition 22.

    Reddan is far from flawless, but what he does better than anyone, on his good days, is set a quick tempo. To say that France 'won't have to keep an eye on him' is the just dreamed-up rubbish that doesn't make any sense at all.

    The only way we can play France is to get quick ball and attack them. Get into a slugfest and they will just grind us down with their powerful scrums and ferocious tight play. They're a hard nut to crack either way, but you have to hope for a bit of 'volatility' in the game and to somehow get ahead on the scoreboard and get them to start doubting themselves.


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Kiera Savory Monochrome


    Murray tried to make breaks, gets caught early, ends up at the bottom of rucks and is missing for a couple of phases so we end up with no SH.

    Within 3 minutes of Reddan coming on he made a clear line break, Murray did not do this once.

    Maliyah Fast Spike - if you cant see that Murray is playing poorly and needs to be dropped then there's not much hope for you :) I dont think anyone is suggesting that we go all out attack against France, they are suggesting we pick a competent SH. Reddan is playing a lot better than Murray at the moment, and Reddan is not poor defensively.

    i see your point and if reddan started i wouldnt be upset about it at all i just think people are giving him a hard time when he doent really deserve it he made 1 or 2 poor calls it happens but to say reddan changed the game is wrong in my opinion italy have consistantly been run all over at that point of the game this year it is there legs as there not used to playing that expansive a game reddan is by no means worse but i dont think hes better either just different.
    also reddan is an ok defender but not as good if you were a french back row who would you rather run at


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,915 ✭✭✭MungBean


    1. every team that italy played have pulled away aound 60 mins fresh legs at 60 and a player thats played 40-50 mins are very different thats why benches are so important

    I'm talking about the speed of the ball off the ruck and the momentum it gave the receivers. Murray managed it once in the first half, he got quick ball and gave it instantly out wide with a clean sharp pass. Momentum beilt and we gained ground. But he only managed it once, too often to was indecisive and slow about moving the ball. I know Italy tiring contributed to that but the difference at SH was clear the instant Reddan came on.
    2. murray adds another player france have to keep an eye on reddan docent make close to as many breaks this is why peter stringer is not longer relevant

    Reddan is well able to snipe, as is Boss. Murray is being picked purely on his defensive capabilities not because of his attacking, ball delivery or game management. We are swapping any chance of getting on the front foot for an extra defender.
    3. i dont think we can go all out attack against france like that in loose play were good but there second only to nz they will destroy us

    You dont have to go all out attack but you cant expect to defend for 60 against France and then hit them when they tire like Italy. They wont tire, if given posession which will happen with Murray killing momentum and forcing Sexton to kick they will hammer our line like Wales did and we'll be banjaxed from the word go. We need to attack and score if we are to stand a chance of winning. We need fast ball to gain momentum so the ball carriers can break the gain line and we push forward.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,308 ✭✭✭✭.ak


    ya your right so did bod neither should ever have gotten an ireland cap:)

    The difference is BOD could turn ball over, or handle himself in the breakdown.

    Murray just gets sucked into it, and then we have POC acting as SH doing his best impression of hot-potato...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,318 ✭✭✭Fishooks12


    I really hate lazy comparisons, surprised this thread has gotten so much attention


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,636 ✭✭✭✭Tox56


    ya your right so did bod neither should ever have gotten an ireland cap:)

    You do know what position Murray plays?


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Kiera Savory Monochrome


    ok ok maby i got a bit carried away i do think reddans an outstanding sh just think murrays gettin more stick than he deserves


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,084 ✭✭✭Hyperbullet


    The guy has one bad game and suddenly everyone is jumping down his throat.

    He's 22, had a decent world cup, has been playing great for Munster this season and has the potential to be a world class scrum half. He needs experience, and he needs experience of having bad days as well as good ones.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,320 ✭✭✭Teferi


    I'd love to know where this thing of Heaslip needing a kick up the ass to play better comes from?

    There are a number of George Hook-esque characters elsewhere on the internet who dislike Heaslip and come up with a loads of spoofs about him. Then people with little working knowledge of rugby read what these eejits write and think it sounds intelligent so they parrot it elsewhere. There really is no basis for it at all.

    Anyway, regarding Murray: Bags of potential but Reddan needs to start ahead of him. He just isn't international level quite yet but I believe he will get there. I'd like to see him work on his decision making ability and also on his management of the game, especially in working the tempo of a match. He is quite a physical player and I'm impressed by his courage to run straight into guys twice his size but 9 times out of 10 that isn't what you need from a scrummie.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,308 ✭✭✭✭.ak


    The guy has one bad game and suddenly everyone is jumping down his throat.

    He's 22, had a decent world cup, has been playing great for Munster this season and has the potential to be a world class scrum half. He needs experience, and he needs experience of having bad days as well as good ones.

    Firstly, judging by the majority of the comments on this thread (aside from the OP), the majority of people admit he has bags of potential.

    But the thing is it isn't just 'one game'. He's consistently slow every time he's played for Ireland. It's not hat he's bad, it's more that he's not getting the basics right and more importantly he's not getting the tempo right.

    You're right tho. He needs experience. But dumping him into international matches on the starting 15 is not the way to do it. He should be on the bench for the rest of the 6N, and learn how to take the reigns of the team when he doesn't have his back against the wall and he's not spending 10 seconds at ruck panicking.


  • Registered Users Posts: 138 ✭✭Catalpa1


    Murray did okay on Saturday, his quick pass led to Bowe's 1st half try. Needs to quicken up the service a bit, but he is doing alright. Why not just chop and change like Leinster do? Murray for the first half/50 minutes and Reddan when the game opens up?


  • Site Banned Posts: 1,519 ✭✭✭Higher


    The guy has one bad game and suddenly everyone is jumping down his throat.

    He's 22, had a decent world cup, has been playing great for Munster this season and has the potential to be a world class scrum half. He needs experience, and he needs experience of having bad days as well as good ones.

    ONE bad game?

    What game has been good in for Ireland? In the world cup he was terrible against USA, poor when he came on against Australia and utterly dreadful against Wales


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,497 ✭✭✭BoardsMember


    In fairness, there is a bit more to the Heaslip thing than that. I think it's fair to say that he's not having the obvious impact on games that he was having at all levels a couple of years back, or when he first hit the scene.

    My own belief is that his game has changed somewhat, he does more dirty work on the ground, more stuff that you wouldnt necessarily notice unless you knew a lot about the game or were looking for it.

    I'd much prefer to have a proper openside, and have the old Heaslip back. His form was less than you'd expect of someone with so much natural talent. He had a fine game against Wales, one of his best in a long time for Ireland. I didn't think he was quite as good against Italy. I dont see anyone challenging him for the 8 jersey. That said, I have been impressed with what I've seen of Coughlin for Munster, but I havent seen a whole lot of him really.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,244 ✭✭✭rrpc


    i disagree the tempo raised when pom and d ryan came on but pom shouldn't be starting in front of what we have the italians have tired out in every 6 nations game this year the same happened on sat. murray had a poor match but reddan didn't outplay him to the level people are claiming yes reddans passing is a bit better but murray is a lot bigger than him and when it come do defending that counts for a lot.
    You really need to watch that game again and in particular pay a bit of attention to what Reddan does. I've watched him and timed him at 3 breakdowns in 10 seconds regularly. He trails the ball carrier whilst checking the positions of players and dives in and gets the ball away sometimes when there's only one forward in the ruck. The damage that does to defences is incalculable, as evidenced in the HEC match against Bath in Lansdowne; Luke Fitz getting the ball with only a lock or a prop to beat.

    Murray on the other hand was sometimes walking from ruck to ruck, other times just watching whilst the forwards recycled the ball themselves. It very seldom varied, the ball was slow, more forwards had to pile in to protect it and the defense was set and reading the newspaper by the time he got the ball away.

    He also took the ball on himself at least five times last weekend and was therefore unavailable for the next breakdown. We don't need a part time scrum half/ruck foundation.

    It's no surprise our forwards all looked better when they weren't scrapping to prevent turnovers at every breakdown.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 881 ✭✭✭ray jay


    Using Murray's potential as justification to start him at 9 is stupid. By that logic we should be playing Zebo because he's fast and sure won't the experience help the rest of his game come on.

    Plenty of players have potential but never go on to realise it. The difference is that most of them have to prove themselves at lower levels of competition before earning the starting jersey for the national team.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,301 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    Higher wrote: »
    ONE bad game?

    What game has been good in for Ireland? In the world cup he was terrible against USA, poor when he came on against Australia and utterly dreadful against Wales

    the same could be said about sexton in that he has only a couple of good games in nearly 30 games, but everyone thinks he should be persisted with. murray also has a new backrow and sexton to build up a partnership with. think he has only played 2 or 3 games with sexton.

    I think schmidt is getting it right with the way he rotates boss and reddan and in general, the one that starts usually looks the poorest for leinster as well.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,915 ✭✭✭MungBean


    jm08 wrote: »
    the same could be said about sexton in that he has only a couple of good games in nearly 30 games, but everyone thinks he should be persisted with. murray also has a new backrow and sexton to build up a partnership with. think he has only played 2 or 3 games with sexton.

    I think schmidt is getting it right with the way he rotates boss and reddan and in general, the one that starts usually looks the poorest for leinster as well.

    This isnt club level where rotation is necessary though. This is an international competition, and there are clearly better players who should be starting. Sexton has shown what he has to offer and is picked on that basis, Murray hasnt, its all ifs and buts and maybe in the future while players who outplay him are consigned to the bench and the A team.

    And Sexton wasnt catapulted to the 10 jersey ahead of clearly better players based on hunch that he might be good. He stepped up in finals of the Heinekup cup and earned his international place.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,770 ✭✭✭danthefan


    jm08 wrote: »
    the same could be said about sexton in that he has only a couple of good games in nearly 30 games, but everyone thinks he should be persisted with. murray also has a new backrow and sexton to build up a partnership with. think he has only played 2 or 3 games with sexton.

    I think schmidt is getting it right with the way he rotates boss and reddan and in general, the one that starts usually looks the poorest for leinster as well.

    Except we don't have a better option than Sexton. It looks very likely we do have a better option than Murray.

    I was actually in favour of letting Murray and Sexton develop as a partnership but you just cannot ignore how much better Reddan was on Saturday. The difference was incredible.

    I would be 95% sure Murray will start again though. In fact I'd be 95% sure it will be the exact same team.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,541 ✭✭✭Luckycharm


    Murray has potential but let him reach that potential at munster until then he has not earned a starting spot - he is killing us at the moment, he is taking so long to get the ball out and it has to be on a platter for him. His box kicks are so telegraphed don't think we regained one.
    Reddan has flaws but is far better then Murray at the moment, also regarding starting for Leinster who starts all the Knockout must win games for Leinster?
    Damage limitation has not worked for Ireland much in the last 40 years in paris so if that is our gameplan god help us!!! Also Reddan defence is fine when has he ever missed a bad tackle for Ireland.

    Regarding Heaslip he was our best backrow on Sat - he wins alot of turnovers and carried well. If anyone needs a rest at the moment then it is prob SOB.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,301 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    MungBean wrote: »
    This isnt club level where rotation is necessary though. This is an international competition, and there are clearly better players who should be starting. Sexton has shown what he has to offer and is picked on that basis, Murray hasnt, its all ifs and buts and maybe in the future while players who outplay him are consigned to the bench and the A team.

    And Sexton wasnt catapulted to the 10 jersey ahead of clearly better players based on hunch that he might be good. He stepped up in finals of the Heinekup cup and earned his international place.

    are you serious:confused: rotation is necessary at club level and not at international level:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users Posts: 686 ✭✭✭Flincher


    I get the feeling Murray is overthinking things at the moment. He was at his best last season and against Castres away, Scarlets at home and Northampton away when he just concentrated on feeding the backs and giving quick ball to the forward carriers. He mentioned in an interview that he's under a bit of pressure to take control of the pack. I wonder is that message getting lost and resulting in ponderous play.

    The encouraging thing for me is that the basics are there. Someone mentioned earlier that his passing is rubbish. Thats not true, he's a very decent passer in my view. For anyone who watches him warm up before, he often does a kicking drill where he kicks to a player who stands on the 10m line. That player rarely has to move.

    The skills are there, the head isn't yet.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,301 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    danthefan wrote: »
    Except we don't have a better option than Sexton. It looks very likely we do have a better option than Murray.

    I was actually in favour of letting Murray and Sexton develop as a partnership but you just cannot ignore how much better Reddan was on Saturday. The difference was incredible.

    I would be 95% sure Murray will start again though. In fact I'd be 95% sure it will be the exact same team.

    How do you know Murray won't be a better option. sexton didn't look like a better option in his first 6Ns, and is only now begining to look confident at internatinoal level. reddan and boss are no spring chickens now and murray looks to be the only player to show international promise at the moment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,084 ✭✭✭Hyperbullet


    Higher wrote: »
    ONE bad game?

    What game has been good in for Ireland? In the world cup he was terrible against USA, poor when he came on against Australia and utterly dreadful against Wales

    You're entitled to your opinion but I don't agree with you. He's got 8 caps and was thrown in at the deep end for the world cup, where he did well. This is his first 6N as a starting scrum half and he should be given time to get up to speed. I agree totally that Reddan made a significant impact when he came on, and if he can make that impact again against France then brilliant, but this sensationalist notion that he's "the new TOL" is just ridiculous and completely unfair to a guy of just 22.

    Patience is a virtue that Irish people simply don't have. But when it's given, like in Sexton's case, it pays dividends.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 556 ✭✭✭leonard7


    this threads a bit harsh on o'leary


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,225 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    I can't wait until Luke Mc Grath comes through. He'll have the Leinster and Ireland No.9 jersey for years to come.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,915 ✭✭✭MungBean


    jm08 wrote: »
    are you serious:confused: rotation is necessary at club level and not at international level:rolleyes:

    You dont rotate your players through an international competition you play your best squad to try and win the game. Any players who get game time for the sake of getting game time get it at the A level or during non competitive matches (including games against lesser opponents, Russia in world cup for example).

    Roll your eyes all you want but look at the Irish starting 15 through the last number of competitive international matches and point of any rotation in the squad. You cant because there is none.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,038 ✭✭✭TomsOnTheRoof


    Firstly let me just say this; Yes, Murray had a bad game on Saturday. He was slow and ponderous and cost us momentum at times. Now people are calling for his head, we have a more experienced option on the bench they say, better at the basics they say. May I remind everyone that it's not so long ago Sextoon was in the exact same position. Yet he was given the benefit of the doubt and persisted with. This bore fruit.

    Secondly; Am I the only one who has noticed that this whole drop Murray thing seems to be a tad to provincial? I thought we had got past this ****e. The same guys advocating Murray being dropped are the very ones blind to the failings of guys like Heaslip and O' Brien. Heaslip has had one or two good games for us in the last two years. The rest of the time he has been dragging his arse like a lame donkey. For all of you guys saying he is doing more of the dirty work, if by this you mean making tackles, hitting rucks and slowing down the ball then I would say one thing to you... WAKE UP! That is his job, he is a backrow forward for Christ's sake. And can we please stop attributing O' Briens lack of form to his position or because "Kidney tells him to play like this" The guy is not playing well and hasn't exactly shone for Leinster in the way that he has last year. He needs to stop making runs off static ball and look for space. POC may be much derided on here for being a poor ball carrier but so far this championship he has out carried O' Brien.

    Thank you for your time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,377 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Higher wrote: »
    Kidney must hate Reddan. Murray goes from not even being on the plane to being starting scrum half. Although it could be possible that the IRFU have to play a certain number of Munster players by the IRFU. It could be very costly if Munster fans began to lose interest in the international game.


    This is absolute rubbish.
    I'm pretty confident that Keatley and Murray haven't played with each other once yet.

    Shocking (if that is the case) IMO.

    Not true but even if it was then why would it be shocking, Keatley has nothing to do with the Irish team at the present moment. Cant even see why it was brought up in this thread.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,592 ✭✭✭GerM


    Murray hasn't been poor for all his caps. He was quite good at first. He was a little green but passed sweetly, defended aggressively and had a bit of spark in his first 3 or 4 caps. Since his placement as first choice though, he has regressed. There's far more pressure on him and it's telling in his performances. He is over thinking his actions, checking his preferred option two or three times before acting as if he's fearful of it being the wrong one. I don't think he's going to be dropped but he's struggling right now. That's three games in a row where he has been noticeably poor. He just looks incredibly uncertain in his play.

    Definitely has raw materials but at this stage, it's better for him to gain confidence and form elsewhere as it was for Fitz a year ago. Dither against Italy and it hinders your attack. Dither against France and they'll murder you. If he is taken out of the team, I've no doubt he'll be back, a better player and a deserved starter.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,257 ✭✭✭Hagz


    MungBean wrote: »
    You dont rotate your players through an international competition you play your best squad to try and win the game. Any players who get game time for the sake of getting game time get it at the A level or during non competitive matches (including games against lesser opponents, Russia in world cup for example).

    Roll your eyes all you want but look at the Irish starting 15 through the last number of competitive international matches and point of any rotation in the squad. You cant because there is none.

    I get what you're saying, but rotation can be used at international level and was used in 2009 when we won the Grand Slam. It serves many purposes such as squad building, boosting moral, it motivates and prevents predictability. I don't think there's much room for rotation for the French match, other than bringing in Ryan and Reddan which isn't so much rotation as starting the best players, but I do think it can be used in a game such as the Scottish one. My opinion of course.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,915 ✭✭✭MungBean


    Hagz wrote: »
    I get what you're saying, but rotation can be used at international level and was used in 2009 when we won the Grand Slam. It serves many purposes such as squad building, boosting moral, it motivates and prevents predictability. I don't think there's much room for rotation for the French match, other than bringing in Ryan and Reddan which isn't so much rotation as starting the best players, but I do think it can be used in a game such as the Scottish one. My opinion of course.

    The Italy game was our only chance for rotating players. But we didnt do it because Kidney doesnt rotate. In a competitive competition you dont rotate your squad, just as Schmidt wont rotate in the Heineken cup finals, he'll pick the best team available to have every opportunity to win. He doesnt pick Boss to start crucial matches to give him game time he picks him because he's the best option for a particular match. Thats not rotation.

    I dont understand how anyone could seriously say going into a competitive match against a team that wont be beaten easily that a player should start just to get game time when they are clearly not the best option.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,770 ✭✭✭danthefan


    jm08 wrote: »
    How do you know Murray won't be a better option. sexton didn't look like a better option in his first 6Ns, and is only now begining to look confident at internatinoal level. reddan and boss are no spring chickens now and murray looks to be the only player to show international promise at the moment.

    I watched the match at the weekend. How the hell else would I judge? Murray was god awful and Reddan was pretty good.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,770 ✭✭✭danthefan


    And whatever about Murray, who there is some justification (however weak) for starting, if DOC starts ahead of Ryan again it will be up there with the worst selections Kidney has ever made.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,301 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    MungBean wrote: »
    You dont rotate your players through an international competition you play your best squad to try and win the game. Any players who get game time for the sake of getting game time get it at the A level or during non competitive matches (including games against lesser opponents, Russia in world cup for example).

    Roll your eyes all you want but look at the Irish starting 15 through the last number of competitive international matches and point of any rotation in the squad. You cant because there is none.

    so, you saying that Murray shouldn't be even in the squad?

    so you'd have reddan & sexton playing 80 mins of rugby over the next 4 weeks then? what happens if either get injured. do you expect their replacements to be able to be internationally match fit not having played for 2 months :confused:

    I'm sure Joe schmidt would be delighted to get the two of them back having played 5 x 80 internationals facing into a Heineken cup quarter final. surely you saw how tired Leinster were after their Heineken cup final last year when they played Munster in the magners league final and that was only one big match.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    GerM wrote: »
    Murray hasn't been poor for all his caps. He was quite good at first. He was a little green but passed sweetly, defended aggressively and had a bit of spark in his first 3 or 4 caps. Since his placement as first choice though, he has regressed. There's far more pressure on him and it's telling in his performances. He is over thinking his actions, checking his preferred option two or three times before acting as if he's fearful of it being the wrong one. I don't think he's going to be dropped but he's struggling right now. That's three games in a row where he has been noticeably poor. He just looks incredibly uncertain in his play.

    Definitely has raw materials but at this stage, it's better for him to gain confidence and form elsewhere as it was for Fitz a year ago. Dither against Italy and it hinders your attack. Dither against France and they'll murder you. If he is taken out of the team, I've no doubt he'll be back, a better player and a deserved starter.
    I disagree. Murray has had the same problems in every one of hos first caps. It was just overlooked because of how green he was.

    He should never have been put in this position, it was terrible judgement. The evidence in favour of the Reddan/Sexton partnership is so incredibly strong that I think only those with alterior motives can overlook it.


    The thing that annoys me is people thinking that the guy is going to sort out his game by playing more at international level. As if any player has ever improved in this situation That is not how to develop the guy, look at what has happened to Ben Youngs. He needs to go away and gain experience at H Cup level (where he has been just as glacial this season).


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement