Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

New Plans for Childrens Hospital on Coombe site

13

Comments

  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 14,097 Mod ✭✭✭✭monument


    Will reply to your other points, but there's one major element, which is more important than access that you seem to be forgetting about...

    You don't seem to care about co- or tri- location... Why is this???

    That's at the core for optimising the facility for children and babies.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,397 ✭✭✭✭FreudianSlippers


    Wild Bill wrote: »
    I think this is the key issue with you. It trumps all rational concerns or notions of optimizing the facility for patient and visitor utility.

    Sad really.
    Nope, I have nothing wrong with developers promoting sites that are worthwhile. The sad thing is that you cannot see that there is nothing beneficial to patient and visitor utility to having this hospital in the middle of nowhere with no co-location.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 14,097 Mod ✭✭✭✭monument


    Still waiting to hear why you don't care about the health issues around co- or tri- location. But in the meanwhile, let's put this access by car non-issue to rest... Let's look at the measurements Google Maps gives, even for areas outside the M50...

    N = Newslands Cross
    M = Mater

    Blanch (the other side of the SC)
    N = 14mins (includes toll!)
    M = 8mins

    Castleknock (junction of Castleknock Road and Oak Lodge)
    N = 12mins (includes toll!)
    M = 11mins

    Charlestown, Finglas (right beside the M50!)
    N = 14mins (includes toll!)
    M = 10mins

    South Finglas (at Dunnes)
    N = 16mins (includes toll!)
    M = 9mins

    Coolock (at the Northside SC)
    N = 18mins (includes toll!)
    M = 10mins

    West Cabra (includes toll!)
    N = 15min
    M = 7mins

    Inchicore
    N = 8mins
    M = 10mins

    Ballyfermot
    N = 7mins
    M = 13mins

    South Docklands
    N = 25mins
    M = 10mins

    Ringsend (at the library)
    N = 22mins
    M = 8mins

    Dundrum (SC)
    N = 16mins
    M = 20mins

    Milltown
    N = 18mins
    M = 16mins

    Rathfarnham
    N = 12mins
    M = 15mins

    Terenure
    N = 11mins
    M = 12mins

    Dun Laoghaire
    N = 26mins
    M = 24mins

    Booterstown
    N = 20mins
    M = 16mins

    Bray
    N = 18mins
    M = 30mins

    Swords
    N = 21mins (includes toll!)
    M = 17mins

    One of the main differences is everywhere north of the Westlink gets tolled each trip and that does not happen with the Mater.

    Driving travel time is fairly irrelevance overall -- makes little difference, one is closer to many places and the other is closer to others. I was thinking that you'd be right and anywhere close to the M50 would be closer to Newlands -- but that's not true in many cases (Swords, Blanch, North Finglas, Castleknock etc), and there's also places very south like Dun Laoghaire where the Mater is closer.

    So more drivers would be affect and unconvinced by a Newlands Cross site! And more public transport users also would be!

    Wild Bill wrote: »
    I didn't realize there was a separate census for inside the M50 - call me St Thomas but I'll have to check that. Not sure what your point is even if this is true.

    He's actually wrong. It's less that the figure he provided. But the GDA accounts for nearly 40% of the population and inside the M50 accounts for 47% of that -- so it's more like around 860,000 people within the M50.

    (Inside the M50 is around about 240km², the state is 70,273km² so...)

    That's just under 20% of the population living inside the M50 -- an area which accounts for just 0.34% of the area of the state.

    Wild Bill wrote: »
    You do realize that more folk inside the M50 live closer to the M50 than they do to the Mater?

    That would only be important if the hospital side was all the way round the M50, not at just one point.

    Wild Bill wrote: »
    Eh...so?

    He errored there too.

    But your reaction shows you don't care.


    Wild Bill wrote: »
    Bull. You build them is the most accessible area to the entire customer base.

    In the 1790s that would have been the city centre.

    And the city centre is by far still the overall most accessible area today in 2012.

    Wild Bill wrote: »
    The "crazy site" is within 30 seconds drive of the M50! Short of literally building the hospital on the motorway you can't get closer.

    Yes, it'd be crazy building the hospital in the middle of nowhere, away from co- or tri- location, with few services close by, away from population centres, away from prime public transport sites, away from any intercity rail option, and so close to a motorway as to be affected by noise and air pollution.

    Wild Bill wrote: »
    Compared to the inner city? No. (Nevermind that I'm not suggesting building the facility in either Clondalkin or Tallaght)

    You don't seem to know much about gandland crime and west Dublin.

    Where do you suggest parent's go for a break from the hospital or to get a few things not available on site etc?

    Wild Bill wrote: »
    Again, compared to the inner city I suspect pollution levels at Newlands would be considerably lower.

    Beside two of the most busy roads in the county? Grand, whatever...


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭Wild Bill


    monument wrote: »
    let's put this access by car non-issue to rest... Let's look at the measurements Google Maps gives, even for areas outside the M50...

    N = Newslands Cross
    M = Mater

    Dundrum (SC)
    N = 16mins
    M = 20mins

    Milltown
    N = 18mins
    M = 16mins

    Rathfarnham
    N = 12mins
    M = 15mins

    Terenure
    N = 11mins
    M = 12mins

    Bray
    N = 18mins
    M = 30mins

    Just looking at a few of the 'local' Google times and they are...how can I put it politely.....utterly daft :rolleyes:

    The M50 times apply near enough 24/7...for the Mater they'd only apply before 7.24 (am)! ;)

    He's actually wrong. It's less that the figure he provided. But the GDA accounts for nearly 40% of the population and inside the M50 accounts for 47% of that -- so it's more like around 860,000 people within the M50.
    I know he's wrong; my point was that this issue is irrelevant - whether he was right or wrong.

    "That would only be important if the hospital side was all the way round the M50, not at just one point. "

    He erred there too.

    But your reaction shows you don't care.
    Nope; my reaction showed that I regard the issue as irrelevant.

    And the city centre is by far still the overall most accessible area today in 2012.
    By car? Absolutely not. You really should try starting near the M50 anywhere from Lucan to Bray and commuting to the Mater site daily; compared to driving to the Red Cow/Newlands.

    It is, frankly, bizarre to think there is any comparison. I make Newlands from here (Sandyford) in 15 mins most days, at the morning peak. It takes at least 50 minutes to O'Connell St on an average morning - and then the parking :rolleyes:

    Yes, it'd be crazy building the hospital in the middle of nowhere, away from population centres, away from prime public transport sites, away from any intercity rail option, and so close to a motorway as to be affected by noise and air pollution.
    Jaysus! Red Cow/Newlands is not in the 'middle of nowhere' by any definition. Given the dominance and practicality of car as the main mode of transport a location on the national road transport node is as obvious as a location in a crowded city centre (which has no direct rail connection or parking possibilities) is daft.

    Frankly building it somewhere along the Naas Road or any of the main national routes outside the M50 would be a vastly better bet than the top of O'Connel St!

    The notion that noise/pollution at the site would be worse than the city centre is pure 24 carat bull.
    You don't seem to know much about gandland crime and west Dublin.
    In goes the kitchen sink....:rolleyes:
    Ever take a stroll around Parnell Square at night? Don't. I'm confident there are Garda stats showing the city centre to be more crime ridden than the area around Newlands - so confident that I'm nor arsed to look it up as it's, literally, a stupid point.

    Also - gangland killers are notorious for shooting hospital visitors? And they'd never peddle drugs in the inner city?


    Where do you suggest parent's go for a break from the hospital or to get a few things not available on site etc?
    Another huge plus for a greenfield site! Facilities can be provided adjacent to, or in, the complex. Those looking for a bit of R'n'R can visit Tallaght down the road - it has every facility you'll get in the north inner city - without the pollution and street crime; with fresh air and with a fine view of the mountains. :D


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭Wild Bill


    Wild Bill wrote: »
    Just looking at a few of the 'local' Google times and they are...how can I put it politely.....utterly daft :rolleyes:

    The M50 times apply near enough 24/7...for the Mater they'd only apply before 7.24 (am)!


    Slight correction; on Mon - Friday mornings 7.24am would be much too late to make the stated times to the Mater. ;)

    Might even do a real-life test tomorrow morning and report back! (I'm free this week ;)


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 14,097 Mod ✭✭✭✭monument


    Do you care just about driving around? What about sick children and babies, do you care about them? If so, why can't you address co- / tri-location??? It's clear why you can't: It does not suit your agenda.

    You also don't seem to care about the toll for everywhere north of the Westlink bridge, but why would you? Then, they are just northsiders, both county and city! You also don't care about the large numbers of people who don't have access to car, but you only seem to care about driving, not people.

    The proof you don't care about people? You want to put the hospital at edge of 860,000 rather to the core of that population. You think that population mass in such a small area is "irrelevant".

    Then you go on about morning morning peak travel times and morning commuting as if many hospital appointments or visites happen at that time. You're stuck in a bubble.

    And one min you say you're not suggesting Tallaght, then the next you seemed to be including Tallaght -- as you're sending parents there for R&R. And in the same breath you try to make it out to be some low crime area! The reality here is Tallaght is around the same as the Mater on crime and is a "traffic nightmare" (something you get most urban areas)! To try to cover your back, you're also proving things on site -- but at what extra cost?

    LOL on trying to attack the Mater over Newlands on rail access! A 10min taxi to the two main national train stations, with Dart and/or commuter services, and 10min walk to a local station, vs miles away from anything at Newlands!

    As for ",,,vastly better bet than the top of O'Connel St!" and parking issues you claim are problems.... [a] nobody is suggesting "at the top of O'Connell St" and [b.] the Rotunda seems to mannage "at the top of O'Connell St" and Mater and Temple Street manage, but let's not let facts get in the way of you wanting to drive on the M50. :)

    To top it off and show you don't know what you're talking about, you think there is no view of mountains from the current Mater, never mind a talker building!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,397 ✭✭✭✭FreudianSlippers


    I was looking at the wrong numbers, but the difference is negligible. In any event, the population inside the M50 is not irrelevant to the discussion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,397 ✭✭✭✭FreudianSlippers


    Wild Bill wrote: »
    In goes the kitchen sink....:rolleyes:
    Ever take a stroll around Parnell Square at night? Don't. I'm confident there are Garda stats showing the city centre to be more crime ridden than the area around Newlands - so confident that I'm nor arsed to look it up as it's, literally, a stupid point.

    This proves to me that you haven't a clue what you're talking about. Have you ever been to Parnell Square? I'm there every day and many many nights. It's mainly people waiting for the bus or late at night the odd Roma or homeless person. Your confidence is misplaced.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,817 ✭✭✭antoinolachtnai


    The sites south of Heuston (RHK, Steeven's Hospital) seem to have great potential. They are on Luas and beside the national rail links. Those sites also have frontage on the N4, linking it to the M50. They are beside St James's, and there is plenty of space to build a maternity hospital or other facilities there later.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭Wild Bill


    monument wrote: »
    Do you care just about driving around? What about sick children and babies, do you care about them? If so, why can't you address co- / tri-location??? It's clear why you can't: It does not suit your agenda.

    I don't have "an agenda". I have opinions based on facts rather than slogans and myths.
    The proof you don't care about people? You want to put the hospital at edge of 860,000 rather to the core of that population.
    No - I want it at the "core" of accessibility for the National population; not for a small minority in the inner city.
    Then you go on about morning morning peak travel times and morning commuting as if many hospital appointments or visits happen at that time.
    The point I made was those times are daft outside about midnight to 6am.
    And one min you say you're not suggesting Tallaght, then the next you seemed to be including Tallaght -- as you're sending parents there for R&R.
    It's a gift -I can walk and chew gum at the same time! Newlands/Tallaght..close by.
    And in the same breath you try to make it out to be some low crime area! The reality here is Tallaght is around the same as the Mater on crime and is a "traffic nightmare" (something you get most urban areas)!
    Wow! That's a bit of a crawl-down from someone who was banging on about the gangland crime at Newlands compared to the safety of the north inner city. Your surrender on this point is accepted ;) (One down, several more to go :))
    LOL on trying to attack the Mater over Newlands on rail access! A 10min taxi to the two main national train stations
    A taxi! And you were complaining about tolls on the M50! I've got some breaking news: they have taxis in Tallaght, Newlands, Red Cow - loads of them. And they travel on much less cluttered and congested roads. :rolleyes:
    vs miles away from anything at Newlands!
    Eh...wrong again! Red Cow is right beside the proposed campus. Unlike the "waiting for Metro North" fantasy of the Mater site!
    To top it off and show you don't know what you're talking about, you think there is no view of mountains from the current Mater, never mind a talker building!
    You can't even get the trivia right :rolleyes:

    It was the folk taking a break in sunny downtown Tallaght that I said would have fresh air and mountain views; unlike the folk slinking around the north inner city looking for some supplies.

    If you don't/can't read what I write why do you bother replying? :confused:

    btw; I'll address the "trilocation" issue when we've finished eliminating the daft notions about the Mater's relative accessibility. I've seen you're not up to dealing with multiple issues simultaneously. Best we take this one step at a time. ;)


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭Wild Bill


    The sites south of Heuston (RHK, Steeven's Hospital) seem to have great potential. They are on Luas and beside the national rail links. Those sites also have frontage on the N4, linking it to the M50. They are beside St James's, and there is plenty of space to build a maternity hospital or other facilities there later.

    There are some very strong arguments in favour of a site west and south of Heuston Station. Agreed.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭Wild Bill


    This proves to me that you haven't a clue what you're talking about.

    Ah yes! From the man who posted all those fantasy stats in his earlier post :rolleyes:
    Have you ever been to Parnell Square?
    Indeed I have - ugly place.
    Your confidence is misplaced.
    If you are referring to the relative crime stats for Newlands v North Inner City - I doubt it! (And we've established that yerself and reliable stats don't mix well :))


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 14,097 Mod ✭✭✭✭monument


    Wild Bill wrote: »
    I've seen you're not up to dealing with multiple issues simultaneously. Best we take this one step at a time. ;)

    If that is really your problem then put everything else aside and deal with co- or tri-location -- which is the most important issue.

    Wild Bill wrote: »
    I don't have "an agenda". I have opinions based on facts rather than slogans and myths.

    You clearly do have an agenda, that's why you won't talk about the co- or tri-location.

    Wild Bill wrote: »
    No - I want it at the "core" of accessibility for the National population; not for a small minority in the inner city.

    Sure, that would make sense if such a high percentage of the population (20% of the population) were not living in just 0.34% of the area of the state.

    But when you got so many people so close together you put the hospital close to them. Access isn't the issue you and others are making it out to be -- the Rotunda, the current Mater and Temple Street prove this!

    Wild Bill wrote: »
    The point I made was those times are daft outside about midnight to 6am.

    No, you talked nonsense about commuting and morning peak travel times.

    The Google Map times may not apply at rush hour, but they do take into account of average traffic patterns and the roads. That's why the time from the South Docklands is slowing than from Ringsend (which is further from the Mater)!

    Wild Bill wrote: »
    Wow! That's a bit of a crawl-down from someone who was banging on about the gangland crime at Newlands compared to the safety of the north inner city. Your surrender on this point is accepted ;) (One down, several more to go :))

    You seem to have problem with the crime levels in around the Mater, but not those near Newlands. :rolleyes:

    Wild Bill wrote: »
    A taxi! And you were complaining about tolls on the M50! I've got some breaking news: they have taxis in Tallaght, Newlands, Red Cow - loads of them. And they travel on much less cluttered and congested roads. :rolleyes:

    Right, but the point was about a taxi from the two intercity railway stations near the Mater.

    And if we're talking about taxi access from the other parts of Dublin -- the city also wins.
    Wild Bill wrote: »
    Eh...wrong again! Red Cow is right beside the proposed campus. Unlike the "waiting for Metro North" fantasy of the Mater site!

    Sorry, when I say rail I mean heavy rail. Which serves more than the red line (ie intercity rail). Drumcondra Station is about 10mins walk away from the Mater (it most likely will be upgraded to Dart in the lifetime of the hospital) and the nearest Luas BXD stop will be be about an 11mins walk away

    At the Newlands site the Red Cow Luas stop is at least 10-12mins away.

    Wild Bill wrote: »
    There are some very strong arguments in favour of a site west and south of Heuston Station. Agreed.

    I agree there is favourable arguments for such a site, but...

    That site or the Mater would make little difference overall to access by car. That would mean extra travel time and/or a toll for those coming from north of the Westlink. You seem very focused on having the best possible access for the southside of Dublin.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭Wild Bill


    As most of your other stuff in your post is mere tedious repetition of already repudiated points I'll not bother with them.

    I agree there is favourable arguments for such a site [Heuston area], but..

    That site or the Mater would make little difference overall to access by car. That would mean extra travel time and/or a toll for those coming from north of the Westlink. You seem very focused on having the best possible access for the southside of Dublin.
    Yet again, clearly you are clueless when it comes to the traffic access issues.

    Heuston is beside light and heavy rail and is far more accessible to the national road network than the top of O'Connell St.

    Claims about "agendas" and "Southside" are mere blather.

    The old Phoenix Park racecourse (Northside, look it up on Google maps :rolleyes:) would be a much more accessible site than the Mater; it has rail connection and is accessible to the M50.
    (And the N4 location has the added bonus from your perspective that folk coming from the Cork, Limerick, Galway, Sligo and South Dublin would have to pay the M50 toll)

    It's parochial gibberish to regard a site 200m south of the Liffey as an issue because it's "southside". That sort of irrationality leads to the confused mish-mash of internally contradictory mush that passes for "debate" by some Mater advocates.

    I bet ye speak fluent Bertie too! :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,604 ✭✭✭grumpymunster


    Firstly, 40% of the population of the country lives in the GDA, approximately 27% of the population of the country lives inside the M50.

    That means approx 67% of those living in the GDA live inside the M50.

    Secondly, I sad that the Luas is not a viable or realistic method of transport for bringing children to the hospital. I'm not sure there is any difference to visitors whether they get on the luas and go to the Red Cow and make a 5 minute walk versus O'Connell Street and make a 7 minute walk.

    Who cares? Access is an issue being bandied about when discussing traffic and congestion problems. There are as many problems, if not more, at the proposed greenfield site than on Dorset Street.



    So, where ON the M50 do you propose we build this hospital and off/on-ramps?

    Curious do you read before posting? I suggested that a site adjacent to the Tallaght hospital may be good from a co-location, cost and access aspect. Whilst some on here seem intent to rely on population density figures that seem to change with the weather and how much quicker it is to get to the Mather from Ballydehob than anywhere else in the known universe cost is most conveniently forgotten. €600M plus come on guys get with the programme here we cant afford it what part of the country is skint do you not understand?

    Also you did not say the LUAS was a viable or realistic method of transport for bringing sick children to the hospital, that may be what you meant but it is not what you said. I on the other hand never mentioned it in conjunction with bringing sick children to hospital but looked at the access and egress point of view for visitors.

    Why would we build more on and off ramps you do not seem to have a clear understanding of any aspect of traffic management. The more on and off ramps on a motorway the slower the traffic flows. If you leave the M50 at the N7 jucntion you can go to Newlands Cross and turn left up the Belgard Road towards the Square. You can continue down to the old DID roundabout turn right and access the hospital from there. Alternatively you can turn right at the Belgard pub and access the hospital from there. Alternatively you can turn right at the LUAS tracks go through Cookstown Industrial Estate and access the hospital through there (all of these routes are available also from the Ballymount off ramp). You can continue on the N7 to the Lucan intersection turn left at the top of the slip road follow road along and you have a choice of turning left and going to the hospital via Springfield or going all the way to the Blessington Road turn left towards the Square and access the hospital from there. Alternatively you can continue on the N7 to the Citywest Business Park intersection turn left at the right at the top of the slip road continue along to the roundabout for the LUAS park and ride continue along that road until you reach the hospital. You can also continue along that road turn left at the Citywest shopping centre or along again until you reach the Blessington Road and turn left.

    Just how much more access do you want from the M50 an intersection just for the hospital? I drive on average 60,000km a year all over the country I only found traffic bad on those routes during the heavy snows and during the floods. But then most of Dublin was at a standstill during those events.

    Now would someone please address the issue of cost, without illogical statements such as knowing the cost of everything and the value of nothing which has previously been shown to be not valid in this instance.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,458 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Well the one very strong advantage of the Mater site, is how easy it is to get to by public transport from almost anywhere in Dublin (which makes up the majority of the Irish population).

    Almost every bus route in Dublin goes straight into the city and the vast majority of them stop on O'Connell St (the great bus station as I like to call it), just a few minutes walk from the mater.

    Many stop right outside the doorstep of the Mater on Parnell Square.

    You literally couldn't get a better location for public transport users of Dublin. Somewhere out by Newlands X is a terrible location for the majority of Dubliners. As it would involve getting a bus/dart into town, followed by the LUAS back out.

    I just checked hittheroad.ie for the majority of big population locations around Dublin (e.g. Swords, Lucan, Blanchardstown, Tallaght, Dun Laoghaire, Finglas, Balbriggan, Rathmines, Ranelagh, etc.) and they amost all have a bus route that puts you within a 5 minute walk of the Mater, with no need to change

    You couldn't ask for a better location in terms of public transport. So in other words, you are asking the majority of people living in Dublin who take public transport to spend an extra hour to get to a hospital out in Newlands X, because Newlands X might be a few minutes faster for some people coming by car (but slower for others). Madness.

    Of course I'm talking about people coming to visit or for non emergency appointments, obviously sick children would be brought by Ambulance and a city center location, near the greatest population density benefits from this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,397 ✭✭✭✭FreudianSlippers


    bk wrote: »

    You couldn't ask for a better location in terms of public transport. So in other words, you are asking the majority of people living in Dublin who take public transport to spend an extra hour to get to a hospital out in Newlands X, because Newlands X might be a few minutes faster for some people coming by car (but slower for others). Madness.

    Exactly my point! An additional 10 minutes makes relatively little difference to the visitor coming in from Sligo or Waterford or wherever else 60% of the population are coming from outside of Dublin; whereas it is a much bigger inconvenience to the other 40% of the people in the GDA to get to the greenfield site in question.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,604 ✭✭✭grumpymunster


    So it is fairly obvious then that cost will not be addressed because it does not fit in with Dublin City centre is also the centre of the Universe argument.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,817 ✭✭✭antoinolachtnai


    The problem is that it is a national hospital, not just a city hospital.

    From the outer parts of Dublin, it is pretty tough to access by public transport, certainly involving a change. There is not going to be a lot of parking. The reality is that it is not currently a great area for walking around with children. I have been robbed twice on visits to the mater for my own part. That has never happened to me on any other hospital campus. If you don't believe me, then compare the crime figures for the area to other hospitals.

    South of Heuston station is a very big site with very good public transport access from both the city and suburbs, and from the rest of the country via the N4 which it has frontage to.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,458 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    South of Heuston station is a very big site with very good public transport access from both the city and suburbs, and from the rest of the country via the N4 which it has frontage to.

    It is certainly better then Newlands X, but it isn't as accessible as the Mater via public transport for people living in Dublin. It would involve one change for many onto the Luas from O'Connell St. However I readily admit that isn't such a big deal.

    However what about co-location with an adults hospital. And does the government actually own that land?

    Actually I'm not sure what land you are talking about, can't find it on google maps?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,397 ✭✭✭✭FreudianSlippers


    bk wrote: »
    It is certainly better then Newlands X, but it isn't as accessible as the Mater via public transport for people living in Dublin. It would involve one change for many onto the Luas from O'Connell St. However I readily admit that isn't such a big deal.

    However what about co-location with an adults hospital. And does the government actually own that land?

    Actually I'm not sure what land you are talking about, can't find it on google maps?
    The only plot I can think of is next to the MoMA on the N4 :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,817 ✭✭✭antoinolachtnai


    There are two sites, beside RHK and another by Steevens Hospital beside St Patrick's. Both sites have frontage to the N4. The site is all state/HSE owned. The more easterly site in particular is across the road from St James's Hospital, the busiest adult hospital in the country.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,397 ✭✭✭✭FreudianSlippers


    There are two sites, beside RHK and another by Steevens Hospital beside St Patrick's. Both sites have frontage to the N4. The site is all state/HSE owned. The more easterly site in particular is across the road from St James's Hospital, the busiest adult hospital in the country.
    Perhaps I'm being daft, but could you provide a map link? I don't see any sites across the road from James's or beside St Patrick's.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 14,097 Mod ✭✭✭✭monument


    Wild Bill wrote: »
    As most of your other stuff in your post is mere tedious repetition of already repudiated points I'll not bother with them.

    Tedious? Like why you can't put everything else aside and deal with co- or tri-location -- which is the most important issue. :confused:

    Wild Bill wrote: »
    Claims about "agendas" and "Southside" are mere blather.

    The old Phoenix Park racecourse (Northside, look it up on Google maps :rolleyes:) would be a much more accessible site than the Mater; it has rail connection and is accessible to the M50.
    (And the N4 location has the added bonus from your perspective that folk coming from the Cork, Limerick, Galway, Sligo and South Dublin would have to pay the M50 toll)

    But you're supporting that site, you're supporting another, one at Newlands Cross. Wildcard locations are pure blather! Or is this game, everything but the Mater?

    So it is fairly obvious then that cost will not be addressed because it does not fit in with Dublin City centre is also the centre of the Universe argument.

    Ok, if you truly want to talk about cost:

    What cost do we put on the loss or harm to children or babies because of no co- or tri-location on a greenfield site?

    Wild Bill wrote: »
    It's parochial gibberish to regard a site 200m south of the Liffey as an issue because it's "southside". That sort of irrationality leads to the confused mish-mash of internally contradictory mush that passes for "debate" by some Mater advocates.

    The diffrence between the Matter and a site at Heuston is one is a bit better for those north or south of the Westlink.

    Wild Bill wrote: »
    Claims about "agendas" and "Southside" are mere blather.

    The old Phoenix Park racecourse (Northside, look it up on Google maps :rolleyes:) would be a much more accessible site than the Mater; it has rail connection and is accessible to the M50.
    (And the N4 location has the added bonus from your perspective that folk coming from the Cork, Limerick, Galway, Sligo and South Dublin would have to pay the M50 toll)

    But you're not supporting that site, you're supporting another, one at Newlands Cross. Wildcard locations are what are pure blather!

    So it is fairly obvious then that cost will not be addressed because it does not fit in with Dublin City centre is also the centre of the Universe argument.

    Ok, if you truly want to talk about cost:

    What cost do we put on the loss or harm to children or babies because of no co- or tri-location on a greenfield site?

    Wild Bill wrote: »
    It's parochial gibberish to regard a site 200m south of the Liffey as an issue because it's "southside". That sort of irrationality leads to the confused mish-mash of internally contradictory mush that passes for "debate" by some Mater advocates.

    For those driving, diffrence between the Matter and at Heuston is clear: The Mater site is better for everybody north of the Westlink, while the Heuston site is better for everybody south of the Westlink.

    There's very little difference overall between the two on access. It just shows access by car to the Mater site is really a hyped up non-issue.

    From the outer parts of Dublin, it is pretty tough to access by public transport, certainly involving a change.

    The Mater site? It's one of the prime areas in the city which has the most direct connections.
    • The 46a serves Dun Laoghaire, nearly all of the N11, and most of the NCR
    • The 120 serves Ashtown and Cabra
    • The 41s serve Swords, Rolestown, etc, the airport, Santry
    • The 38s serve Damastown and north of the N3 in D15
    • The 40s serve Finglas, Ballyfermot, Liffey Valley Shopping Centre, everywhere in-between, the odd ones also serve Toberburr and Tyrrelstown
    • The 11 serves from Wadelai to Sandyford Industrial Estate
    • The 222 serves Ashington, the Navan Road and to Drimnagh

    The Maynooth line directly serves Maynooth, Leixip, Clonsilla‎, Blanch, Carpenerstown, Castleknock, and Ashtown. With just one covered rail connection you also have: Balbriggan, Skerries, Rush, Lusk, Donabate‎, Malahide, Portmarnock, Howth, the North Fringe, Kilbarrack,
    Raheny, Blackrock, Dalkey, Killiney, Shankill, Bray, Greystones, and places closer to the city like Fairview, Killester and Sandymount etc.

    If BXD goes ahead it will directly serve the green line and the red line with one very frequent connection: The list of places is getting very long here... I'm guessing you get the point?

    And that's all without the coach services -- public and private.

    There is not going to be a lot of parking. The reality is that it is not currently a great area for walking around with children.

    The Rotunda, the current Mater and Temple Street all manage fine parking wise.

    I walk around the area with my 11 month old all the time, and you often see children in the area.

    I have been robbed twice on visits to the mater for my own part. That has never happened to me on any other hospital campus.

    That's very unfortunate, that it happened twice to you, but not at all a good way to set policy.

    South of Heuston station is a very big site with very good public transport access from both the city and suburbs, and from the rest of the country via the N4 which it has frontage to.

    Agreed. But the difference access wise -- for both public transport and by car -- between the Mater and around Heuston is marginal at best.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,817 ✭✭✭antoinolachtnai


    Here are some maps showing the locations south of Heuston.

    I would disagree that the difference in access is marginal. From Sligo, Galway, Cork, Wexford, or the western suburbs, the access is considerably easier. Access is also easier from the south of Dublin.

    And there is plenty of space for parking.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,236 ✭✭✭lucernarian


    This proves to me that you haven't a clue what you're talking about. Have you ever been to Parnell Square? I'm there every day and many many nights. It's mainly people waiting for the bus or late at night the odd Roma or homeless person. Your confidence is misplaced.
    I think that's a very unjustified view. I also regularly walk along Parnell Square and Parnell St. and while I only have my own experience and that of people I know to offer, the streets off Parnell St including the square have by far the most amounts of crime and violence that I have seen or heard about. It's also the only place I've seen plainclothes and uniformed gardai enter a pub with their handguns drawn. Or seen a pool of blood being cleaned up on another occasion. Not to mention the muggings and an attack that has happened to friends on O'Connell St and Parnell St. Or a guy using an IV syringe in a phone booth on Dorset st last year. (And my experiences of crime in the rest of the city wouldn't be as dramatic) I'm not saying that my experience is proof per se, but it's unreasonable to shoot down someone else's point by offering your own pleasant experiences. After living in Dublin for several years, I should be at least able to offer an opinion on the subject and not have it come under fire for being anything but that.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭Wild Bill


    I thought this was a new thread - seems to be the same one myself and monument have been sparring on! :rolleyes:

    Let me say my initial reaction is that this seems an even worse option than the Mater from an accessibility/height restriction/crank obstructionist/daft preservationists viewpoint - but I'll need a map to check the exact location.

    I'll get back to you with my verdict.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    Seemingly NAMA cjust ame up with a list of 11 separate sites in Dublin including a 11 acre site on the SQR near James' and a 7-8 acre site in Elm Park near Vincents as well as misc.fields out near Tallaght/M50/Newlands Cross.

    The further outside the canal the better, in my opinion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,817 ✭✭✭antoinolachtnai


    Just because NAMA has these sites on a list does not mean NAMA owns them. NAMA has a charge over these properties in many cases and in all cases the State would have to pay full commercial value to secure ownership.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,005 ✭✭✭Cionád


    I'll just budge in here for a couple of observations as a former resident of Drumcondra.

    Firstly, I don't think crime is really an issue. The walking route to the train is certainly safe, as is the route to the bus stops.

    However, the traffic in the area is amongst the worst in the city, and I would not consider the area anywhere near as car-accessible than an M50 location, apart from those in the north, north-east of the city. The estimations shown by google are overly ambitious, a considerable upgrade and dueling of the old N1 qould be badly needed to address the problem. Parallel roads like Gracepark Rd is also wedged at peak times. Match days can be just as bad.

    I wouldn't object to Mater going ahead, but only if road improvements are made a priority. Ideally, an M50-ish location would be best IMO, as long as it retains it's size.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,414 ✭✭✭markpb


    Cionád wrote: »
    Ideally, an M50-ish location would be best IMO, as long as it retains it's size.

    Ideal for who? What about the thousands of staff who will work there - will be ideal for them if they all have to drive? What about people living in Dublin and will be forced to drive because public transport provision is much worse than a city centre location? Will it be ideal for the surrounding rounds (including the M50) when traffic levels increase substantially because everyone has to drive to the hospital?

    Finally, will it be ideal if it's built away from every other hospital even though one of the primary objectives was co-location.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,236 ✭✭✭lucernarian


    It's worth considering that public transport may be more easily provided from scratch in a more greenfield site towards the M50 than it would be to alleviate parking and traffic congestion (which affects bus users and ambulances to some degree too) in a location so close to the city centre. The lack of any suitable co-location facilities near the M50 is a more important consideration for me. I would have hoped that Adelaide & Meath could have met those ideals but it seems the site doesn't really allow for such a large development. Something near St. James or the Coombe may tick more of these boxes.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 14,097 Mod ✭✭✭✭monument


    Here are some maps showing the locations south of Heuston.

    I'm not dismissing the fact there is room on those sites but with the Royal Hospital Kilmainham grounds -- you might as well suggest to build on the Phoenix Park while you're at it.

    How much of the other site directly south of Heuston is usable? For example, it's unlikely you could count the front lawn of Dr Steeven's Hospital open for development, and what's the larger building between the lawn and HSQ? But there's still a large area in the centre of the site which could be developed / redeveloped.

    I would disagree that the difference in access is marginal. From Sligo, Galway, Cork, Wexford, or the western suburbs, the access is considerably easier. Access is also easier from the south of Dublin.

    My point is that the difference to access overall between near Heuston and at the Mater would be marginal.

    Both nationwide and in Co Dublin, the Mater site would be easier for those approaching from the north and the Heustion site would be easier for those approaching from the south. The difference is marginal because you're putting one or the other at a marginal disadvantage (time wise or toll wise or both).

    And there is plenty of space for parking.

    Like the Mater it would be built below or above ground.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭Wild Bill


    I estimate that of the 4.8 million people in the state, if traveling by car or bus, about 800,000 would come from north of the M50 toll.

    Four million would come come from South of the toll.

    So monument, on grounds of not discriminating against Northsiders, wants it North of the toll. :cool:


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 14,097 Mod ✭✭✭✭monument


    Wild Bill wrote: »
    I estimate that of the 4.8 million people in the state, if traveling by car or bus, about 800,000 would come from north of the M50 toll.

    Four million would come come from South of the toll.

    Please do tell how you came to those estimates. :rolleyes:

    And it's not just about the toll but marginal differences in travel times overall.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,604 ✭✭✭grumpymunster


    monument wrote: »


    Ok, if you truly want to talk about cost:

    What cost do we put on the loss or harm to children or babies because of no co- or tri-location on a greenfield site?




    Ok, if you truly want to talk about cost:

    What cost do we put on the loss or harm to children or babies because of no co- or tri-location on a greenfield site?


    This is worse than Rev Lovejoys wife encouraging people to please think of the children. A pointless response to a contrived problem.

    Tallaght has space, Tallaght has an existing hospital, Tallaght has good access, Tallaght is estimated at half the price for the same size hospital. Not just a little less more than €340M less.

    Now you think the city centre is best, as I have said before best is the enemy of good here. Tallaght is at least a good option, perhaps an excellent option maybe not (according to you) the best option but under current fiscal probloms maybe an affordable option.

    Now another question that has not been answered. If a state of the art hospital were to be opened in 2 to 3 years would this not be of great benefit to all?

    If that is what we can afford at the moment why should we not run with it.

    So again what part of "the country is skint we cannot afford a city centre project" do you not understand?


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 14,097 Mod ✭✭✭✭monument


    This is worse than Rev Lovejoys wife encouraging people to please think of the children. A pointless response to a contrived problem.

    Tallaght has space, Tallaght has an existing hospital, Tallaght has good access, Tallaght is estimated at half the price for the same size hospital. Not just a little less more than €340M less.

    Now you think the city centre is best, as I have said before best is the enemy of good here. Tallaght is at least a good option, perhaps an excellent option maybe not (according to you) the best option but under current fiscal probloms maybe an affordable option.

    Now another question that has not been answered. If a state of the art hospital were to be opened in 2 to 3 years would this not be of great benefit to all?

    If that is what we can afford at the moment why should we not run with it.

    So again what part of "the country is skint we cannot afford a city centre project" do you not understand?

    Are you a politician? Because that is a classic case of not answering the question asked! The question was again: What cost do we put on the loss or harm to children or babies because of no co- or tri-location on a greenfield site? Can you actually answer that question or not?

    And how dare I think of children and babies when the subject matter is a children's hospital. :rolleyes:

    This has already been debated -- there is no space around Tallaght hospital, and a greenfield site will not meet co- or tri- location needs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,604 ✭✭✭grumpymunster


    monument wrote: »
    Are you a politician? Because that is a classic case of not answering the question asked! The question was again: What cost do we put on the loss or harm to children or babies because of no co- or tri-location on a greenfield site? Can you actually answer that question or not?

    And how dare I think of children and babies when the subject matter is a children's hospital. :rolleyes:

    This has already been debated -- there is no space around Tallaght hospital, and a greenfield site will not meet co- or tri- location needs.

    I did answer the question you seem to have ignored the point though which seems par for the course, no surprise there if it does not fit your argument it does not exist.

    I think you should look in the mirror with regard to the politician comment, puts me in mind of a politican kissing babies on the hustings. Lets not worry about the real world accuse people of being anti babies / children because they think differently to me. Please show me at any point where I suggested that this hospital should not be built, if you cannot please refrain from insinuating that I am not in favour of such a facility.


    It seems to me that for some nothing matters so long as we build a hospital at a price we cant afford in a location which is not suitable because a few ill informed people wish to shout loudy that this is where it should be. I look forward to the day, which should be soon, when the government makes a decision in the interests of all of the people of the State and announces it will not be a city centre hospital.

    Now how do you suggest we pay for it, off the soap box real economics where is the €680M coming from?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,414 ✭✭✭markpb


    I did answer the question you seem to have ignored the point though

    He might not have phrased it very politely but maybe he's right, perhaps Tallaght does not have the space required?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,604 ✭✭✭grumpymunster


    markpb wrote: »
    He might not have phrased it very politely but maybe he's right, perhaps Tallaght does not have the space required?


    Possibly Markpb much earlier in the thread I did mention I dont live (dont even live in Leinster) there but pass by from time to time on business, in the immeadiate surroundings it looks to my eye there is sufficient space in and around the hospital.

    But it is to be a national hospital so a reasonable debate including cost must be had, and I dont see that at the moment.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 14,097 Mod ✭✭✭✭monument


    The question was not about what site you want or which is best for access, it's not even about how much it would cost. The question was: What cost do we put on the loss or harm to children or babies because of no co- or tri-location on a greenfield site?

    Yes, it's a nasty question. But it's a needed nasty question, because -- even if they have the best intentions in the world -- people ignoring the issue of co- or tri-location has nasty results.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,604 ✭✭✭grumpymunster


    Ok then why does the new childrens hospital alliance Ireland state that the importance of adult hopspital adjacency has been grossly exaggerated. They also state that a submission by Minister Harney to the Senead on 17th November 2010 was peppered with multiple inaccuracies. She referred to 24 of 25 hospitals researched were colocated with adult hospital's. Am no wrong or so it seems.

    We do not live in Utopia we live in Ireland now you can assume we all want the best for the children. Now off the soap box how do we pay for it (talk about ignoring a question).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,349 ✭✭✭dowlingm


    Folks - I'd love to know what proportion of the attendees at the NCH will be emergency admissions as opposed to scheduled admissions or transfers from other hospitals post stabilisation. There seems to be an assumption in posts above that every admission is an emergency one, in which case we will need an NCH on every street corner.

    If it was possible to build a more capable locations with less money in a particular site, perhaps the issue of emergency travel times would be solvable by for instance a better helicopter air ambulance service.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 14,097 Mod ✭✭✭✭monument


    Ok then why does the new childrens hospital alliance Ireland state that the importance of adult hopspital adjacency has been grossly exaggerated. They also state that a submission by Minister Harney to the Senead on 17th November 2010 was peppered with multiple inaccuracies. She referred to 24 of 25 hospitals researched were colocated with adult hospital's. Am no wrong or so it seems.

    You'll have to ask the new childrens hospital alliance what they state and why they state it.

    We do not live in Utopia we live in Ireland now you can assume we all want the best for the children.

    It's for 100 years or more and it's not being Utopian.

    Now off the soap box how do we pay for it (talk about ignoring a question).

    Since you've stepped off for a min, I might as well get on....

    Yes, there is a shortfall, but isn't that's fairly normal for these types of projects before they even get planning? Has any other site got 100% funding right now?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,192 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Ok then why does the new childrens hospital alliance Ireland state that the importance of adult hopspital adjacency has been grossly exaggerated

    Because they are an organisation that exists solely to oppose the Mater site, and hence will talk down anything they possibly can.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,414 ✭✭✭markpb


    MYOB wrote: »
    Because they are an organisation that exists solely to oppose the Mater site, and hence will talk down anything they possibly can.

    Indeed, from the very top of the About Us page on their own site:
    New Children’s Hospital Alliance Goal: As a nation, to provide the highest quality of care for our children as measured by patient outcome and patient experience. The New Children’s Hospital Alliance does not believe it will be possible to achieve and maintain such standards in the tertiary level care of our children by building the proposed National Paediatric Hospital at the Mater site in the centre of Dublin.

    We are campaigning to have this decision reversed.

    Innocent bystanders they are not :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,817 ✭✭✭antoinolachtnai


    monument wrote: »
    I'm not dismissing the fact there is room on those sites but with the Royal Hospital Kilmainham grounds -- you might as well suggest to build on the Phoenix Park while you're at it.

    Well, you would have to do it sensitively to make the best of the site, but it's not a park. It's part of a medical complex and that land was always intended as a medical complex.
    How much of the other site directly south of Heuston is usable? For example, it's unlikely you could count the front lawn of Dr Steeven's Hospital open for development, and what's the larger building between the lawn and HSQ? But there's still a large area in the centre of the site which could be developed / redeveloped.

    The general area already has high buildings and is zoned for more.

    There is plenty space on that site. There is going to be some demolition involved. The illustration in the attachment gives an idea of how it might fit in.

    The buildings on St John's Road/Military Road are none-too-exciting.

    http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?q=steeven's+hospital,+dublin&hl=en&ll=53.345411,-6.296243&spn=0.000943,0.002739&sll=53.800651,-4.064941&sspn=15.320488,44.868164&hq=steeven's+hospital,&hnear=Dublin,+County+Dublin,+Ireland&t=h&z=19&layer=c&cbll=53.345411,-6.296243&panoid=Vr62j47PQPX2MIfX49JHqA&cbp=12,84.1,,0,-2.73

    My point is that the difference to access overall between near Heuston and at the Mater would be marginal.

    Both nationwide and in Co Dublin, the Mater site would be easier for those approaching from the north and the Heustion site would be easier for those approaching from the south. The difference is marginal because you're putting one or the other at a marginal disadvantage (time wise or toll wise or both).

    There is a lot more population approaching from the south than from the North. For the N1 and N2, the Mater has the advantage, but from the N3 and all other roads south of it, Heuston seems more accessible. The train links also give some advantage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,604 ✭✭✭grumpymunster


    MYOB wrote: »
    Because they are an organisation that exists solely to oppose the Mater site, and hence will talk down anything they possibly can.

    Does that mean they are wrong? Or are they experienced professionals with concerns?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,604 ✭✭✭grumpymunster


    monument wrote: »
    You'll have to ask the new childrens hospital alliance what they state and why they state it.




    It's for 100 years or more and it's not being Utopian.




    Since you've stepped off for a min, I might as well get on....

    Yes, there is a shortfall, but isn't that's fairly normal for these types of projects before they even get planning? Has any other site got 100% funding right now?

    Dont have to ask them what they state it is clear on their web site, also why.

    100 years is a sound bite, FF were famous for them and in all fairness FG & Labour are catching up very quickly. 100 years ago Tallaght was but a village south of Dublin now it is fully integrated into the city and then some. Who knows in 100 years Dublin may stretch as far as Naas it is quite likely under this senario a (current) city centre hospital would be a) too small b) most certainly in the wrong location. Lets plan for 20 or 30 years initially the benefit is most cetainly still there, this project does not need such jibberish to justify it.

    Apparently there is some €300M ring fenced for this project, now do I believe that hmmmm where is that very very large pinch of salt. And a shortfall is a very discreet way of terming it when you could nearly get two hospitals for the price of 1 on the Mater site.This is the reality of the situation as I see it at least regarding funding.

    The thing is it is of no real concern to me where this hospital is located but I want to see a proper debate regarding the issue. I do not believe that this ever happened under the FF/PD/Green governments.

    The Minister of State has appointed a chairperson with links to the Mater why? Would it not be possible to get a truely independent chairperson? The hospital will be built somewhere in Dublin there must be many professionals out there with no links to Dublin hospitals. The Minister has also said he believes it important that there should be co-location or tri-location and that experts agree on this. That may or may not be the case but it is influencing the terms of reference before the review even starts. When I conduct reviews my group starts with a blank sheet of paper and then fills it in. We dont have half the sheet filled in already, that is not a review in any sense of the word.

    It should also be short, the construction needs to start soon. What we dont need is another quango making decisions like the Judean Peoples Front (or is it the Peoples Front of Judea?).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,192 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Does that mean they are wrong? Or are they experienced professionals with concerns?

    In this case, it means they're trying to talk down a very important reason that goes against their aims.

    Co-location is too important to NOT be in the terms of reference for any review.


Advertisement