CADETSHIPS 2012

superbaby88

Done stage 2 of the army cadetship competition yesterday. 60 fellas and girls made the morning after and the standard was very high. It's going to be tough but I wish you all the best. Hoping to get the magic e-mail saying I have the interview.

Thors Hammer

superbaby88 wrote: »

Done stage 2 of the army cadetship competition yesterday. 60 fellas and girls made the morning after and the standard was very high. It's going to be tough but I wish you all the best. Hoping to get the magic e-mail saying I have the interview.

How was the group exercise buddy? did many fail the fitness?

superbaby88

There was 75 in the group but about 8 didn't turn up I think. Then around 7 failed the fitness part inside the gym. Nobody failed the run which was strange compared to last year. The group assessment was good now. My group had a very good dynamic and we shared responsibility for different tasks, time-keeping, note keeping etc. It's very hard to gauge how you did in the group assessment task but I would err on the side that I did well enough perhaps to get the interview. Here's hoping!!! Was anybody else on this thread up there this week?

quirkster

I'm on tomorrow. Nerves are starting to kick in

superbaby88

Best of luck quirkster, give it socks and make sure you give your best, take fish oils in the morning time so as to keep your concentration through the day as you may not have group assessment until about 9 O' Clock by which time you may be mentally fatigued. Ultimately, give it your best and give good valid points during group assessment and point out information others don't.

Thors Hammer

superbaby88, was it the Liberia challenge group test you did or a different scenario?

goldie fish

blackjack21 wrote: »

hi all, about stage 2 of the navy cadetship, put in for operational and engineering, but recently received notice that i am eligible for the operational cadetship but not for the engineering, does anyone know how the requirements are different?

Eyesight?
Have you completed the Leaving cert? If yes, then your subject choice coud be a factor.
Don't worry about it though, you did well to get this far.

superbaby88

Thors Hammer wrote: »

superbaby88, was it the Liberia challenge group test you did or a different scenario?

Man, this group assessment was set up in some fictional town called Buwaili and ****., You be the mother****a in charge of a UN base camp wher there be rebellious ass bitches coming from the north, I ain't going to relay too much after that because people got to decide for their ownselves how to counter it. Still few folk got to face that here **** y'all. Ya feel me?
(After watching 5 episodes of the Wire back to back, so excuse the street talk)
Peace out homes!!!
Avon.

blackjack21

goldie fish wrote: »

Eyesight?
Have you completed the Leaving cert? If yes, then your subject choice coud be a factor.
Don't worry about it though, you did well to get this far.

Nah eyesights grand, have the leaving cert+ engineering degree, still have to attend stage 2 at the end of the month, but was told i now only qualify for the operational cadetship and not the engineering cadetship, i'l give them a ring an ask sur, cheers

BigDuffman

Finished stage 2 this morning. Not about people not showing. Only 2 failed fitness (P/Ups) that I saw. Everyone made the run AFAIK. Seemed to be a relatively fit group this year compared to some of the fatties that went last year. There were 69 that completed stage 2 this morning. Apparently over 2500 initially applied. 105 will be called for interview. Call backs for start of next weeks.

Connie Bah

superbaby88 wrote: »

There was 75 in the group but about 8 didn't turn up I think. Then around 7 failed the fitness part inside the gym. Nobody failed the run which was strange compared to last year. The group assessment was good now. My group had a very good dynamic and we shared responsibility for different tasks, time-keeping, note keeping etc. It's very hard to gauge how you did in the group assessment task but I would err on the side that I did well enough perhaps to get the interview. Here's hoping!!! Was anybody else on this thread up there this week?

Was up there yesterday, just got home now. The fitness test was fine, the push ups/sit ups are very easy if you've done any bit of preparation for them at all, although in saying that, two did fail immediately from the first group.

Our group assessment went well. Everyone seemed to be on the same note, and nobody was too headstrong or too timid in their contributions. Interviews start next Monday so we were told we'd hear how we got on by tomorrow lunchtime.

BigDuffman

Anyone heard anything yet?

Connie Bah

BigDuffman wrote: »

Anyone heard anything yet?

Nope. Been sitting here twiddling my thumbs all morning!

BigDuffman

Havn't heard of anyone getting info yet. So hopefully its monday!

Davehopper

Safety wrote: »

---

Hi everyone, had the preliminary interview today for the Air Corps and thought it had gone well. The technical qs were tricky but when I answered them and particularly when I answered one and expanded on it the interviewer admitted that they had no further knowledge of the question they had ask. But one hour after the interview finished I recieved an email stating I was unsuccessful. I got the impression the jobs vacant have been selected already. As in it was who you know to get in there. I have just graduated with a level 8 degree and had thought I would have gone further in the competition. Has anyone else experienced this??

i aggree, its a ****in jke! ive aplide 5 yeers in row nd hvnt got in yet. ive aced d intervew every time. ive produce a record ov my flight hrs frm flight sim, which i mst say are impressive. ive told thm what i thnk the aer corp dose wrong nd was able 2 mke sugestions on how to improve the organisation.

lookin bak id say nt very many ppl came close 2 my standaard. i even have online awards for difficult flights completed in bad weather and all from both fsx and flight sim 2004. even still i woz unsuccseful every time. msut b a fukn FIX! :mad::mad::mad::mad:

goldie fish

Davehopper wrote: »

i aggree, its a ****in jke! ive aplide 5 yeers in row nd hvnt got in yet. ive aced d intervew every time. ive produce a record ov my flight hrs frm flight sim, which i mst say are impressive. ive told thm what i thnk the aer corp dose wrong nd was able 2 mke sugestions on how to improve the organisation.

lookin bak id say nt very many ppl came close 2 my standaard. i even have online awards for difficult flights completed in bad weather and all from both fsx and flight sim 2004. even still i woz unsuccseful every time. msut b a fukn FIX! :mad::mad::mad::mad:

Did you get dropped on your head recently? "coz" your spelling has gotten much worse since your first post.

TROLL

Davehopper

goldie fish wrote: »

Did you get dropped on your head recently? "coz" your spelling has gotten much worse since your first post.

TROLL

sorry i was in a hurry. i have since been advised to not use text speak again, so i wont.

superbaby88

Anybody get info on interviews yet, this **** is killing me. Put me out my misery already!!!

Davehopper

Well I got my rejection email from the aer corps ,

travelledpengy

CIGANO wrote: »

Your cv isn't great and its not your fault (I am the same age as you so I know that its very hard to have as much things on it that someone in their late 20's would have). But you should know that you are competing with Rdf nco's, uni grads (engineering especially would be looked for so if you are doing that in uni now,great job) and even inter county players which the army love getting a hold off. My advice to you is try and get into the rdf this will help you a lot also even if you dont get through you will atleast know what will be expected of you in future competitions (some officers have tried 4+ time before they got accepted). Also if you are willing to take a step down so to speak and go in through general enlistment then your age would in some cases be seen as an advantage as opposed to cadets where your lack of life experience would be seen as a disadvantage.

RETARD

SciencesPo

Davehopper wrote: »

i aggree, its a ****in jke! ive aplide 5 yeers in row nd hvnt got in yet. ive aced d intervew every time. ive produce a record ov my flight hrs frm flight sim, which i mst say are impressive. ive told thm what i thnk the aer corp dose wrong nd was able 2 mke sugestions on how to improve the organisation.

lookin bak id say nt very many ppl came close 2 my standaard. i even have online awards for difficult flights completed in bad weather and all from both fsx and flight sim 2004. even still i woz unsuccseful every time. msut b a fukn FIX! :mad::mad::mad::mad:

Well, obviously you didn't. You've applied 5 times, and failed 5 times. By this point, it's time to start getting the message - a career in the Aer Corps isn't for you, and never will be.

Anything over three attempts is seriously pushing it. Move on to another career - this just ain't made for you.

Local-womanizer

SciencesPo wrote: »

Davehopper wrote: »

i aggree, its a ****in jke! ive aplide 5 yeers in row nd hvnt got in yet. ive aced d intervew every time. ive produce a record ov my flight hrs frm flight sim, which i mst say are impressive. ive told thm what i thnk the aer corp dose wrong nd was able 2 mke sugestions on how to improve the organisation.

lookin bak id say nt very many ppl came close 2 my standaard. i even have online awards for difficult flights completed in bad weather and all from both fsx and flight sim 2004. even still i woz unsuccseful every time. msut b a fukn FIX! :mad::mad::mad::mad:

Well, obviously you didn't. You've applied 5 times, and failed 5 times. By this point, it's time to start getting the message - a career in the Aer Corps isn't for you, and never will be.

Anything over three attempts is seriously pushing it. Move on to another career - this just ain't made for you.

I'm pretty sure he is a troll, and a bad one at that. Look through some of his previous comments!

Davehopper

SciencesPo wrote: »

Well, obviously you didn't. You've applied 5 times, and failed 5 times. By this point, it's time to start getting the message - a career in the Aer Corps isn't for you, and never will be.

Anything over three attempts is seriously pushing it. Move on to another career - this just ain't made for you.

tryin to wipe out competition for next year already? dont wory il be their.

superbaby88

Anybody get word yet?

neilled

Davehopper wrote: »

i aggree, its a ****in jke! ive aplide 5 yeers in row nd hvnt got in yet. ive aced d intervew every time. ive produce a record ov my flight hrs frm flight sim, which i mst say are impressive. ive told thm what i thnk the aer corp dose wrong nd was able 2 mke sugestions on how to improve the organisation.

lookin bak id say nt very many ppl came close 2 my standaard. i even have online awards for difficult flights completed in bad weather and all from both fsx and flight sim 2004. even still i woz unsuccseful every time. msut b a fukn FIX! :mad::mad::mad::mad:

The ability to communicate clearly and concisely is one of the competencies they are looking for. Text speak, punctuation and basic grammar or lack thereof will not cut it I'm afraid.

Remember its not just flight school your going to, you will be doing a grunt cadetship for the first 9 months or so until your spirited away to "the promised land" that is baldonnell to do the wings course. That means lugging rifles, grenade launchers and machineguns around the place, battle runs and all that other Infantry stuff.

Failure to pass the wings course results in being booted back to the curragh to do the remainder of an army cadetship.

The board aren't just looking for pilots, they are looking for someone who has the level of commitment that is required for a military officer who might not fly at the end of the day. They are going to ask themselves if this candidate wants to be a pilot and fails the wings course, will they simply quit, or will they have the fortitude to go back and do the army cadetship. That means being a cadet for up to three years. Three years of not getting home at weekends, not going out on the beer with your mates, being restricted to where you go, when you get to drive your car, uniform, room and weapon inspections every week, late nights, freezing your arse off in kilworth, the glen of imall and other horribly wet and cold locations around the country cradling your rifle in your sleeping bag. If your not up for all of that then I'd suggest you bin your application, it'd be a waste of a cadetship.

Many people apply multiple times, indeed some of the best officers have had to.

Edit : having looked at the post again and the references to MS Flight Sim I am convinced that this is a troll. It'd be like saying you've unlocked every achievement in battlefield or call of duty - can I have an army cadetship please.

Safety

BEASTERLY wrote: »

First of all I am sure the vacancies are not already filled, as that would be highly illegal! I'm sure they are conducting hundreds of interviews, would they really waste their time? From my (unsuccessful) experience of the process, the interview is purely competency based. Meaning your level 8 degree means zero if you cant show in the interview how it has helped you obtain those qualities. It sounds like you did well in the technical side of things. Maybe you didn't perform as well in the other 3 competencies? And as said before, the competition for the Air Corps competition of fierce.

My advice would be to accept failure, I know it's hard. Stop blaming others for your lack of success and look critically upon your own performance, see what you can improve on and apply again next year. All the best.

Hi Beasterly, From my overall evaluation I had thought the interview went well in all competencies. Hypothetically you are right, it would be illegal to have the positions filled already. Thats why there is public competition for these jobs and the interviewing of hundreds of people have to take place as that is the procedure. This still does not mean that their candidates are not already picked/selected. The only way of finding out for certain if this is the case is by seeing who actually gets offered the cadetship and observing if there is a link between that person and a somewhat connection with someone in the Air Corps/Dept of Defence. I am not saying I am right but thats the impression I got as mentioned. I totally accept If I am wrong if proven. Take care.

Manic Moran

travelledpengy wrote: »

RETARD

[Mod]Your name hasn't come across my radar before. Consider this your warning that if you have a disagreement with a post, a little more civility and a little more explanation is required.[/mod]

ZeitgeistGlee

Was just wondering if anyone has got any response back after the group assessment yet?

BigDuffman

Yup, heard back. Interviews this week. They will be contacting anyone due in this week first.

ZeitgeistGlee

Cheers, brother did his not too long ago and I'm just wondering what his chances are if he hasn't heard back yet.

BigDuffman

ZeitgeistGlee wrote: »

Cheers, brother did his not too long ago and I'm just wondering what his chances are if he hasn't heard back yet.

They are ringing everyone who said they can do an interview this week first. So once they are out of the way they will get round to ringing the rest. So no news may still be good news. Apparently everyone should know by end of week one way or another.

Eoin Stapleton

Hi folks,

I'm invited to the assessment centre in Baldonnel on Saturday and have a couple of questions:
1. What tests are being conducted? The email specifies aptitude tests only, presumably numerical, verbal and spatial reasoning? The original email stated that the psychological and psychomotor tests are being done at the same time as the final interview, but I can't fathom the need to be in Baldonnell for most of the day Saturday just to do a few psychometric tests, is there something more?
2. Has anyone set eyes on a document with sample psychometric questions, similar to the army/navy version that was posted earlier in this thread?
3. What is the dress code, if any?

Thanks for any subsequent help, greatly appreciated.

hopefulaplican

I didn't get passed the interview for the Air Corps. This must be some sort of mistake as I felt I performed very well. I really don't understand it, I have a level 8 degree in marketing and when I was there for the interviews it was full of what seemed like 12 year olds. How do I appeal the decision?

ZeitgeistGlee

hopefulaplican wrote: »

I didn't get passed the interview for the Air Corps. This must be some sort of mistake as I felt I performed very well. I really don't understand it, I have a level 8 degree in marketing and when I was there for the interviews it was full of what seemed like 12 year olds. How do I appeal the decision?

As far as I know, all decisions are final. The best you might be able to do is find how where you need to improve and come back better prepared the next time around.

hopefulaplican

ZeitgeistGlee wrote: »

As far as I know, all decisions are final. The best you might be able to do is find how where you need to improve and come back better prepared the next time around.

That's the thing, i don't feel i need to improve, I performed very well. Therefore I would like to appeal the decision.

Topper Harley

hopefulaplican wrote: »

I didn't get passed the interview for the Air Corps. This must be some sort of mistake as I felt I performed very well. I really don't understand it, I have a level 8 degree in marketing and when I was there for the interviews it was full of what seemed like 12 year olds. How do I appeal the decision?

hopefulaplican wrote: »

That's the thing, i don't feel i need to improve, I performed very well. Therefore I would like to appeal the decision.

Are you taking the piss? You realise it's a very competitive competition? And as far as I know it's a set number who make it through the preliminary interview, so you might have scored well but just not quite well enough.

I think you need to accept the result and show some respect to the competition and the other applicants.

And just in case you want to apply next year, I wouldn't be too quick to tell them they got it "wrong".

hopefulaplican

Topper Harley wrote: »

Are you taking the piss? You realise it's a very competitive competition? And as far as I know it's a set number who make it through the preliminary interview, so you might have scored well but just not quite well enough.

I think you need to accept the result and show some respect to the competition and the other applicants.

And just in case you want to apply next year, I wouldn't be too quick to tell them they got it "wrong".

No I'm not taking the piss, I am very intent on pursuing this career. Yes I realise there is a lot of competition, but I believe I am a much better candidate than most. Why should I have to apply next year if I think I did good enough this time? So does anybody have an answer to my original question?

It wasn't me!

hopefulaplican wrote: »

Why should I have to apply next year if I think I did good enough this time?

Because the people whose opinions in this matter actually count (i.e. the interview board) disagree with your opinion.

So does anybody have an answer to my original question?

There is no mechanism of appeal. You're entitled to a detailed performance review, which you request in writing and which will give an analysis of your performance. If you really are as good as you say you are, you'll be anxious to get this information and see what you have to work on, in the eyes of those you're trying to appeal to. If you think you're fine as is, find something else to do.

cabla

hopefulaplican wrote: »

No I'm not taking the piss, I am very intent on pursuing this career. Yes I realise there is a lot of competition, but I believe I am a much better candidate than most. Why should I have to apply next year if I think I did good enough this time? So does anybody have an answer to my original question?

The fact you have a level 8 really means nothing if you can't back it up. The "12 year olds" remark you use is completely condescending and they clearly have the same goal as you to get into the air corp. If that's your attitude and your looking to join a career where you will be a leader I suggest you re-asses your attitude and learn from it. No one will EVER perform a perfect interview. Even if you got into the Air Corp you should be looking to where you went wrong and looking to improve. That's how a true leader would act!!

I'm still in the running for it and I have a level 8 with Marketing too. As you can see it doesn't make a difference, it is how you perform and how competent you are for the job. It's not a job to take lightly! Arrogance will get you no where.

BigDuffman

hopefulaplican wrote: »

No I'm not taking the piss, I am very intent on pursuing this career. Yes I realise there is a lot of competition, but I believe I am a much better candidate than most. Why should I have to apply next year if I think I did good enough this time? So does anybody have an answer to my original question?

I'd take a good long hard look for "arrogance" under any FOI material you get back on request.

I hope that you are taking the piss. A cadetship is one of the most highly competitive positions in the country at the minute. How exactly do you figure that you are "better than most"?? Do you intimately know every one of the thousands of applicants??! In answer to your question about "why should I have to apply next year?"..Don't.

Your attitude is terrible. Confidence is one thing arrogance is another. Its not about how awesome you think you are, it's about how awesome the board think you are.

If you feel your degree and age makes you a better candidate than most. Heres a snap shot of 2 lads I met during group assessments for the army.

1 lad a laywer with a Masters in Int. Law AND a BA in Computer Science with 10 years experience in the army reserve, marathon runner. 2nd Time going for cadets.

Another guy I know very well, degree in international relations, with a masters in Military history, 9 years experience in the army reserve, county level hurler. 3rd time going for cadets.

Both of which in my opinion should be top choices for a cadetship. What makes you better?

Having a level 8 gets you a bonus 10 points regardless of discipline. Thats it. The rest is down to your performance at group and interview stages.

ZeitgeistGlee

hopefulaplican wrote: »

No I'm not taking the piss, I am very intent on pursuing this career. Yes I realise there is a lot of competition, but I believe I am a much better candidate than most. Why should I have to apply next year if I think I did good enough this time? So does anybody have an answer to my original question?

I already answered it: there isn't any method to appeal the board's decision. Ultimately your opinion as to your suitability as a candidate is irrelevant compared to the board's opinion.

And frankly, I'd have to agree with how the others have assessed your attitude with regards to this. You've shown not only a shocking level of conceitedness, but also a reprehensible level of disrespect to others who have gone forward for the cadetships. Rather than continuing to demean those who have been successful, you should (as I said originally) be reviewing where you could improve and focus on becoming a better candidate.

neilled

hopefulaplican wrote: »

I didn't get passed the interview for the Air Corps. This must be some sort of mistake as I felt I performed very well. I really don't understand it, I have a level 8 degree in marketing and when I was there for the interviews it was full of what seemed like 12 year olds. How do I appeal the decision?

to repeat

Remember its not just flight school your going to, you will be doing a grunt cadetship for the first 9 months or so until your spirited away to "the promised land" that is baldonnell to do the wings course. That means lugging rifles, grenade launchers and machineguns around the place, battle runs and all that other Infantry stuff.

Failure to pass the wings course results in being booted back to the curragh to do the remainder of an army cadetship.

The board aren't just looking for pilots, they are looking for someone who has the level of commitment that is required for a military officer who might not fly at the end of the day. They are going to ask themselves if this candidate wants to be a pilot and fails the wings course, will they simply quit, or will they have the fortitude to go back and do the army cadetship. That means being a cadet for up to three years. Three years of not getting home at weekends, not going out on the beer with your mates, being restricted to where you go, when you get to drive your car, uniform, room and weapon inspections every week, late nights, freezing your arse off in kilworth, the glen of imall and other horribly wet and cold locations around the country cradling your rifle in your sleeping bag. If your not up for all of that then I'd suggest you bin your application, it'd be a waste of a cadetship.

hopefulaplican

ZeitgeistGlee wrote: »

I already answered it: there isn't any method to appeal the board's decision. Ultimately your opinion as to your suitability as a candidate is irrelevant compared to the board's opinion.

And frankly, I'd have to agree with how the others have assessed your attitude with regards to this. You've shown not only a shocking level of conceitedness, but also a reprehensible level of disrespect to others who have gone forward for the cadetships. Rather than continuing to demean those who have been successful, you should (as I said originally) be reviewing where you could improve and focus on becoming a better candidate.

Well then I'll just chalk it up to a mistake on their part and will have to wait for next year to come round, fairly inconvenient to be honest! Attitude? That's your opinion! :rolleyes:

neilled wrote: »

to repeat

Remember its not just flight school your going to, you will be doing a grunt cadetship for the first 9 months or so until your spirited away to "the promised land" that is baldonnell to do the wings course. That means lugging rifles, grenade launchers and machineguns around the place, battle runs and all that other Infantry stuff.

Failure to pass the wings course results in being booted back to the curragh to do the remainder of an army cadetship.

The board aren't just looking for pilots, they are looking for someone who has the level of commitment that is required for a military officer who might not fly at the end of the day. They are going to ask themselves if this candidate wants to be a pilot and fails the wings course, will they simply quit, or will they have the fortitude to go back and do the army cadetship. That means being a cadet for up to three years. Three years of not getting home at weekends, not going out on the beer with your mates, being restricted to where you go, when you get to drive your car, uniform, room and weapon inspections every week, late nights, freezing your arse off in kilworth, the glen of imall and other horribly wet and cold locations around the country cradling your rifle in your sleeping bag. If your not up for all of that then I'd suggest you bin your application, it'd be a waste of a cadetship.

I think you are underestimating me.

Topper Harley

hopefulaplican wrote: »

Well then I'll just chalk it up to a mistake on their part and will have to wait for next year to come round, fairly inconvenient to be honest! Attitude? That's your opinion! :rolleyes:

I think you are underestimating me.

Eh lads, this is quite clearly a troll with a superiority complex. I've just had a look back through this thread and this is the same lad who was asking if they check I.D. and could he get away with sending someone into the interview in his place. (Surely not something someone so conceited would need).

@hopefulaplican - you didn't actually send someone in your place in the end, did you?

ZeitgeistGlee

You're probably right Topper, not going to bother with it any further. I'd just feel sorry for anyone who'd lose out a place to someone with that attitude.

cabla

ZeitgeistGlee wrote: »

You're probably right Topper, not going to bother with it any further. I'd just feel sorry for anyone who'd lose out a place to someone with that attitude.

To be honest I wouldn't say it was hard to spot!

hopefulaplican

Topper Harley wrote: »

Eh lads, this is quite clearly a troll with a superiority complex. I've just had a look back through this thread and this is the same lad who was asking if they check I.D. and could he get away with sending someone into the interview in his place. (Surely not something someone so conceited would need).

@hopefulaplican - you didn't actually send someone in your place in the end, did you?

I never asked that at all! I am appalled by that allegation. I was just making sure that the necessary security procedures were in place, you know how public servants are and all that!

ZeitgeistGlee

hopefulaplican wrote: »

I never asked that at all! I am appalled by that allegation. I was just making sure that the necessary security procedures were in place, you know how public servants are and all that!

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=78356217&postcount=13

hopefulaplican wrote: »

Hey folks, do they check for photo ID on the day of interviews and/or fitness tests for the Air Corps??? If you could let me know quick that would be great!

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=78357360&postcount=18

hopefulaplican wrote: »

Just say in a hypothetical situation, if for some reason a candidate decided they were unable to do the test/interview could a surrogate candidate step in without being caught?

I am moved by the sincerity of your outrage. :rolleyes:

BigDuffman

This thread is being derailed by a Troll / arrogant chap with a superiority complex (I'm not sure which to be honest). Can this be put back on track for those who are actually going forward for final interviews??

Hopefulaplican, best of luck for next application. Hopefully when you recieve your FOI you will review your attitude listen to some of the sage advice that the experienced boardsies have offered and go forward honestly.

Anyone in this week?

hopefulaplican

ZeitgeistGlee wrote: »

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=78356217&postcount=13



http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=78357360&postcount=18



I am moved by the sincerity of your outrage. :rolleyes:

And where did I say that I was going to get somebody else to do it? I didn't, as I have already made clear, I wouldn't need to do that. I have already outlined my motives for making that inquiry.

In my opinion, people here have inferiority complexes and are trying to tar me to better their own chances. I have every right to contact a moderator.