Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

NVIDIA Kepler Information

Options
  • 14-03-2012 5:08pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 7,180 ✭✭✭


    Figured we might as well start this.

    NB - When I mention anything, it's all rumour, and could completely change on launch day. Just bear that in mind.

    Right, just some general info for anyone who hasn't been following Kepler as of late. The part that's going to be release soon (all indications are for the 22nd of this month) is going to be based on the GK104 architecture. This was originally slated to be a mid-range kepler part (similar to the 560 Ti) but because NVIDIA was expecting a hell of a lot more from AMD, they've just said "f*ck it", and have moved to compete directly with the 7970. Indications are that it'll beat it by about 20% or so on average, and cost around $550-600.

    NVIDIA_GeForce_GTX680_Specs.jpg

    From the looks of things, it's going under the GTX 680 moniker, with the 780 arriving a couple of months from now based on GK110 - the true flagship part. This is indented to compete with the 7990 at this point. NVIDIA has also said that their Kepler GPUs (it's unclear if they were talking about the 104 or 110 varient) can run the Samaritan demo. That's one card, running it in real time. This is with FXAA, not MSAA though.

    NVIDIA also has a 690 planned that is likely going to be a slightly underclocked GK104 part coming soon-ish (not too sure on timeframe for this).

    As with the Ivy thread, I'll keep this updated with info as I find stuff.


    Personally, at this point I'm probably going to wait for the GK110 part, simply because I don't really want to only get three months out of a 680 waterblock, and not have it be compatible with a 780. (Having said that, if anyone is looking for a 580 and block, feel free to PM me.) Going to be an interesting launch day I think!


«134567

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 4,983 ✭✭✭Tea_Bag


    theyre releasing a 600 and 700 series GPU in the same generation?

    thats going to be annoying when Maxwell comes around. what idiots do the naming conventions for nvidia and AMD?


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,180 ✭✭✭Serephucus


    It's technically the same generation, but it's going to be a while off. It's similar to the 480/580 thing. Odds are Maxwell will be the 800 series or something. (unless they decide to call the GK110 part a 685)


  • Registered Users Posts: 22,929 ✭✭✭✭ShadowHearth


    Well bad news for me so. I was expecting 670i instead. I can't afford 680. I really doubt 7970 will drop in price if this 680 is so drastically prised over 7970 price.

    What are you saying aswell that it is based on current gen architecture? The real deal will be 7xx series?

    Good time to buy 570 or 580 though.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,180 ✭✭✭Serephucus


    God no, the 680 is Kepler, it's just that it was originally going to be the 670 because AMD was supposed to pull something a lot bigger out of the bag. Wait and see though, this could all change before launch / people could have got rumours wrong, etc.

    Also, the 7970 is $550-600 as well, so I'm not sure what you mean by the pricing bit.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,983 ✭✭✭Tea_Bag


    Thing about nvidia, is they're usually pretty bang on with their roadmaps.

    nvidia_kepler_maxwell_roadmap.jpg

    i'll eat a raw potato if the 7970 competitor is less than €100 more expensive though.
    the €500 GPU market is a very touchy subject already, i dont see how anyone will want to spend €600+ on a GPU.

    i cant wait to see the X90 prices though. my bets on $1000.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 22,929 ✭✭✭✭ShadowHearth


    Serephucus wrote: »
    God no, the 680 is Kepler, it's just that it was originally going to be the 670 because AMD was supposed to pull something a lot bigger out of the bag. Wait and see though, this could all change before launch / people could have got rumours wrong, etc.

    Also, the 7970 is $550-600 as well, so I'm not sure what you mean by the pricing bit.

    well 1 week to go so.

    still 550-600 price tag? so in EU it will be around 650eu at retailers? damn, you can build a nice budget pc for that money... pricing is really out of control.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,180 ✭✭✭Serephucus


    I should mention that the prices I gave were 550-600 Dollars.

    The 7970 is 550-600 Dollars as well on Newegg right now, so based on that, they'll be priced pretty similarly.

    And yup, it is supposed to go for around $1,000, so probably about €850-900 or something.

    @Shadow: How do you figure that? If it's $600, the most it's going to be here is €600, and even then, that's very unlikely.


  • Registered Users Posts: 22,929 ✭✭✭✭ShadowHearth


    Tea_Bag wrote: »
    Thing about nvidia, is they're usually pretty bang on with their roadmaps.

    nvidia_kepler_maxwell_roadmap.jpg

    i'll eat a raw potato if the 7970 competitor is less than €100 more expensive though.
    the €500 GPU market is a very touchy subject already, i dont see how anyone will want to spend €600+ on a GPU.

    i cant wait to see the X90 prices though. my bets on $1000.

    all this bull**** pricing, when pc became more affordable... :rolleyes: damn, i hope this wont put us in to stone age again.

    for the matter of intrest, how much 6970 and gtx580 were at launch?


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,180 ✭✭✭Serephucus


    GTX 580 was about €500-550 I believe.


  • Registered Users Posts: 22,929 ✭✭✭✭ShadowHearth


    Serephucus wrote: »
    I should mention that the prices I gave were 550-600 Dollars.

    The 7970 is 550-600 Dollars as well on Newegg right now, so based on that, they'll be priced pretty similarly.

    And yup, it is supposed to go for around $1,000, so probably about €850-900 or something.

    @Shadow: How do you figure that? If it's $600, the most it's going to be here is €600, and even then, that's very unlikely.

    well, when they say 550dollars, it usually means 550eu++ for EU. they were rumoring the price of 7970 500dollars, but its really rare to see one for 500eu. almost all of them are 530ish and up. the only one that is an exception the pixmania one, which is priced at 460eu.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,180 ✭✭✭Serephucus


    well, when they say 550dollars, it usually means 550eu++ for EU. they were rumoring the price of 7970 500dollars, but its really rare to see one for 500eu. almost all of them are 530ish and up. the only one that is an exception the pixmania one, which is priced at 460eu.

    Well that's all well and good, but you can't go comparing rumoured launch prices to actual prices in a different continent.

    They go for about $550-600 in the US, and about €500-550 here, which seems perfectly normal to me.


  • Registered Users Posts: 22,929 ✭✭✭✭ShadowHearth


    Serephucus wrote: »
    Well that's all well and good, but you can't go comparing rumoured launch prices to actual prices in a different continent.

    They for about $550-600 in the US, and about €500-550 here, which seems perfectly normal to me.
    True. Rumors are rumors. If it will be 550eu them why not?


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,696 ✭✭✭Jonny7


    Nvidia could be overindulging in a spot of propaganda - they want their potential customers to wait for their new cards in the belief they will stomp AMD's current offerings - so will be interesting to see how much translates into performance rather than hype. If the cards are good we all benefit as AMD will drop prices correspondingly.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,720 ✭✭✭dan_ep82


    Really wish they drove the 580 prices down a bit more.
    If you could get one for 250 I'd be tempted to get two to replace my 6870's.

    I'm looking forward to seeing what they have to offer in the price range of the 7870/7850. Its where the sweet spot is for price v performance for me


  • Registered Users Posts: 22,929 ✭✭✭✭ShadowHearth


    I for once would love to buy the most high end card :). I know it's stupid, but atleast once in my life!!! I can't afford New Skyline GTR to satisfy a petrolhead in me, but maybe I can get best thing for my nerd side :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,180 ✭✭✭Serephucus


    Depending on the performance, I might get one. As it is though my 580 trades blows with the 7970, so it'll have to beat it by a fair margin (and overclock well).


  • Registered Users Posts: 618 ✭✭✭pandaboy


    Serephucus wrote: »
    NVIDIA_GeForce_GTX680_Specs.jpg

    Looking at the CUDA cores it seems like this is going to be a beast card, especially for video editors. The GTX 580 holds just 512 so this does look like it has its value for money. Will you need the new Ivybridge processor to run this though? Is there a sandybridge board that supports PCIE 3.0?


  • Registered Users Posts: 618 ✭✭✭pandaboy


    http://www.ubergizmo.com/2012/03/geforce-gtx-680-specs/

    Some more details released yesterday on the GTX 680.


  • Registered Users Posts: 22,929 ✭✭✭✭ShadowHearth


    pandaboy wrote: »
    Looking at the CUDA cores it seems like this is going to be a beast card, especially for video editors. The GTX 580 holds just 512 so this does look like it has its value for money. Will you need the new Ivybridge processor to run this though? Is there a sandybridge board that supports PCIE 3.0?

    There are tons of gen 3 boards for sandy, but I really doubt there will be any benefit from pcie 3.0. Well if everything will go fine I will get 680 and put it in to my 2500k with pcie 2.0. We will be able to see how 2.0 works with that beast.


  • Registered Users Posts: 618 ✭✭✭pandaboy


    There are tons of gen 3 boards for sandy, but I really doubt there will be any benefit from pcie 3.0. Well if everything will go fine I will get 680 and put it in to my 2500k with pcie 2.0. We will be able to see how 2.0 works with that beast.

    Yeah I saw but they seem fairly redundant. I'm looking to build my first so was checking out the info on PCIE, going to wait for Ivybridge and see if the 2011 socket boards decrease in any way.

    Looking at the power required by the 680, it seems like it should have no hassle on a PCIE 2 board. It uses less power than a 580 but again benchmarks need to be set. Looking forward to release though. I'm half tempted to do either a dual 560ti or 580 set-up depending on final budget and prices so hopefully the prices should drop.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 22,929 ✭✭✭✭ShadowHearth


    Well prices already droped a lot for 570 and 580. It's a real bargain now!
    On the other hand 680 does look really Impresive, but it won't give much advantage over current games unless you will go something like triple monitor or very high resolution.

    680 is just to increase your e-penys size to be honest, not a practical solution. Amd I want that bigger e-penis :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,720 ✭✭✭dan_ep82


    Well prices already droped a lot for 570 and 580. It's a real bargain now!
    On the other hand 680 does look really Impresive, but it won't give much advantage over current games unless you will go something like triple monitor or very high resolution.

    680 is just to increase your e-penys size to be honest, not a practical solution. Amd I want that bigger e-penis :)

    You'll need 2 to tale advantage of the dual/triple screen set up aswell,unless nvidia has something similar to eyefinity now?


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,180 ✭✭✭Serephucus


    Well prices already droped a lot for 570 and 580. It's a real bargain now!
    On the other hand 680 does look really Impresive, but it won't give much advantage over current games unless you will go something like triple monitor or very high resolution.

    680 is just to increase your e-penys size to be honest, not a practical solution. Amd I want that bigger e-penis :)

    Everyone says this about every flagship card on every launch, and they're almost always wrong. Yeah it's over-priced for what you get, especially when you compare it to the X70 card, but to say there's no benefit in getting one unless you're running 57x12 or something isn't true. (See Unreal Engine 4 ;))


  • Registered Users Posts: 618 ✭✭✭pandaboy


    Well prices already droped a lot for 570 and 580. It's a real bargain now!
    On the other hand 680 does look really Impresive, but it won't give much advantage over current games unless you will go something like triple monitor or very high resolution.

    680 is just to increase your e-penys size to be honest, not a practical solution. Amd I want that bigger e-penis :)

    For editing though it should be a powerful card. I had to double check when I saw the CUDA cores, now whether the drop in power can fully support the CUDA cores is another thing. Premier Pro should be a doddle with this card now.


  • Registered Users Posts: 22,929 ✭✭✭✭ShadowHearth


    Serephucus wrote: »
    Everyone says this about every flagship card on every launch, and they're almost always wrong. Yeah it's over-priced for what you get, especially when you compare it to the X70 card, but to say there's no benefit in getting one unless you're running 57x12 or something isn't true. (See Unreal Engine 4 ;))

    Ah yeah, I should be more clear. It's still am awesome card and I will get it hopefully at launch, it's just after playing bf3 yesterday on all ultra with only motion blur off and AA down I said myself: right, this game is most demanding in the market and I play it prety much maxed out... What is the point spending so much money now on new gen card?! There is nothing announced for pc that will need very high spec...

    Dead on there bud. 570 does look like a bargain of century and makes the new card look like a product which is not really needed, but there are always people who want more performance, even of they won't use much out of it, yet!

    I just hope misses won't see a bill of 600eu on one item on my account... I shot you not that one of our cars - ford mondeo costed 500eu... She will flip if she will see that I spend so much on damn pc part ! :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,983 ✭✭✭Tea_Bag


    BF3 is actually a beast of a game. on all ultra settings @ 1080p its using 99% of my 6990 to run. I don't see how people say they max it on something like a 560Ti. they can't possibly get away with it on a 64player map without some fps spikes?

    there definitely is a market for the flag ships. 6 months ago if you told me I'd own a €700 GPU I'd have laughed in your face. I'm now moving to a 2560*1440 monitor, so I've destroyed any notion of going down budget cards again.

    thing about these Kepler cards is that, Nvidia has pulled its classic move of: let AMD have the early market, and give us 3 months to refine our cards to ensure theyre 20% faster across the board, and slap on a nice premium.


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 17,134 Mod ✭✭✭✭cherryghost


    My OC'd 570 is on par with the 570 and some 7970 benchmarks, so as Serephucus said it'll need to be competitively priced and be more than 20% better than than the 580 to warrant any purchase for me.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,720 ✭✭✭dan_ep82


    To get a constant 60fps+ I run BF3 on high,no aa but high FXAA and I'm using 6870 CF

    To be honest I think Vram is holding me back from ultra,but I'm going to try OC'ing the them again to see if I can push the settings a bit more.

    I've always been an AMD buyer,purely for price v performance. But with the prices of the 2500k and the drop in the gpu's I'm finding myself swaying to upgrading to S-Bridge and a 580 of their old line or one of their newer mid range cards


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,983 ✭✭✭Tea_Bag


    ill play tonight and monitor my vram usage to see what it uses. I remember reading that BF spikes to 1200mb in some cases.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 22,929 ✭✭✭✭ShadowHearth


    My OC'd 570 is on par with the 570 and some 7970 benchmarks, so as Serephucus said it'll need to be competitively priced and be more than 20% better than than the 580 to warrant any purchase for me.

    Aren't they saying that it will be 20% more then 7970, not 580 m8.


Advertisement