Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Price of cattle may have gone up but so has every associated cost

  • 24-03-2012 12:52am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,274 ✭✭✭


    People chatting about the great price of cattle but feed, fert,diesel, contractors, plastic, seed, sprays, medicines, etc are also up

    Bought tonne of 18-6-12 E445 and a acre mix bag of seed is crazy money @E73.. same sized bag when i was reseeding last harvest were E52???!!

    Anyone have a good online site for seed?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,422 ✭✭✭just do it


    Bodacious wrote: »
    People chatting about the great price of cattle but feed, fert,diesel, contractors, plastic, seed, sprays, medicines, etc are also up

    Bought tonne of 18-6-12 E445 and a acre mix bag of seed is crazy money @E73.. same sized bag when i was reseeding last harvest were E52???!!
    Anyone have a good online site for seed?
    Agree with you there Bod. Notice everything you list is reliant on oil in some shape or form.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,769 ✭✭✭Birdnuts


    Livestock are part of the current commodity bull market which includes most agri inputs unfortunatly:(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Timmaay


    Look on the bright side lads, at least we have loads of cheap, low energy grass in Ireland. As the cost of energy rises around the world, it makes our low energy system more and more competitive.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,274 ✭✭✭Bodacious


    Timmaay wrote: »
    Look on the bright side lads, at least we have loads of cheap, low energy grass in Ireland. As the cost of energy rises around the world, it makes our low energy system more and more competitive.

    True and the weather is great for this time of year!! Never had them off to grass so early! Dont like still getting ripped off and seed at E73 is way too expensive!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,296 ✭✭✭leg wax


    Timmaay wrote: »
    Look on the bright side lads, at least we have loads of cheap, low energy grass in Ireland. As the cost of energy rises around the world, it makes our low energy system more and more competitive.
    grass is not cheap to grow if you are pushing up the stocking rate.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,410 ✭✭✭bbam


    leg wax wrote: »
    grass is not cheap to grow if you are pushing up the stocking rate.

    Also being on poorer land that requires constant work is no picnic either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 354 ✭✭Pharaoh1


    Even the small things like bucket licks have increased hugely in the last say 3 or 4 years. Beef buckets gone from around 12-13 euro up to 18.

    The Germinal Top 5 extend mix I bought last Spring has gone from 47.50 up to 65 euro.

    Cattle prices will have to be at least maintained to cover these costs.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,087 ✭✭✭vanderbadger


    bale wrap will probably be a shocking price this summer as well, it was bad enough last year


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,174 ✭✭✭✭Muckit


    We could be all back to the haybobs and the small squares again!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,025 ✭✭✭Tipp Man


    leg wax wrote: »
    grass is not cheap to grow if you are pushing up the stocking rate.

    Sometimes less is more

    We find it very hard to justify fertiliser for beef so we don't use any

    Less cattle but less costs


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,174 ✭✭✭✭Muckit


    Tipp Man wrote: »
    Sometimes less is more

    We find it very hard to justify fertiliser for beef so we don't use any

    Less cattle but less costs

    When you say no fertiliser, is that bag only... does the land get slurry or FYM?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,552 ✭✭✭pakalasa


    Anybody ever work our a formulae for the optimum fertiliser to use, based on stocking rate and cattle prices? You would think Teagasc would have something. When do you start to get diminishing returns?


  • Registered Users Posts: 178 ✭✭thetangler


    pakalasa wrote: »
    Anybody ever work our a formulae for the optimum fertiliser to use, based on stocking rate and cattle prices? You would think Teagasc would have something. When do you start to get diminishing returns?


    The minute you put on the spreader :D:D:D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,296 ✭✭✭leg wax


    pakalasa wrote: »
    Anybody ever work our a formulae for the optimum fertiliser to use, based on stocking rate and cattle prices? You would think Teagasc would have something. When do you start to get diminishing returns?
    this is what i was trying to find out in a other thread:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Timmaay


    pakalasa wrote: »
    Anybody ever work our a formulae for the optimum fertiliser to use, based on stocking rate and cattle prices? You would think Teagasc would have something. When do you start to get diminishing returns?

    Hmm yeh it is something that I have thought about, but there's no simple answer for it. There's far more variables required then just cattle prices (or milk price for dairy) and the stocking rate, you would have to consider soil type, availability of organic fertiliser, time from last reseeding and then weather variation. If Teagasc did research to try predict the optimum fertiliser, it would only be for a very specific type of farm, and would be meanless to many farmers in Ireland.

    And then of course, at the end of the day we are assuming that the price of cattle (or milk) is going to stay constant, no point working out in March that well its worth spreading X amount of nitrogen per Ha to get an extra profit for animals that we have almost zero idea what the price will be for when we sell them at the end of the year.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,025 ✭✭✭Tipp Man


    Muckit wrote: »
    When you say no fertiliser, is that bag only... does the land get slurry or FYM?

    No bag used if at all possible

    Only slurry or FYM it gets is what comes out their a**e

    Major note though we are a summer grazing system - no silage or hay taken


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,025 ✭✭✭Tipp Man


    pakalasa wrote: »
    Anybody ever work our a formulae for the optimum fertiliser to use, based on stocking rate and cattle prices? You would think Teagasc would have something. When do you start to get diminishing returns?

    As mentioned above there are just so variables and every farm has a different system they try to farm to - but if Teagasc could produce a template that allowed you to enter the relevant variables then it would be a very useful tool

    Looking at the Derrypatrick project from afar and reading the journal it seems that they want to push the high stocking rate angle. Not saying its wrong but with the cost of fert not sure its 100% correct either


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,174 ✭✭✭✭Muckit


    Tipp Man wrote: »
    No bag used if at all possible


    What kind of weight gain are you getting on them with just summer grazing? What are we talking about ... 7mths?

    One sure thing with your system, is the figures are easy add up. Their weight/price are there in black and white on the mart dockets.

    Alot to be said for it


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,552 ✭✭✭pakalasa


    On fertiliser cost and diminishing returns - This is really one for the acountants. Your fixed costs are going to stay the same, but your variable costs will rise.
    The stocking rate and max fertiliser use are set by the Nitrates Directive, so that simplifies things a bit.

    So you need to know how much extra grass it will grow and how much extra cattle you can keep as a result.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,025 ✭✭✭Tipp Man


    Muckit wrote: »
    What kind of weight gain are you getting on them with just summer grazing? What are we talking about ... 7mths?

    One sure thing with your system, is the figures are easy add up. Their weight/price are there in black and white on the mart dockets.

    Alot to be said for it

    could be anything from 180-250kg. We'd be looking for an average of 220 over a couple of hundred cattle and are in the middle of a major reseeding programme after which we'd hope to bring the average closer to 250

    Buy as early as possible - sell as late as possible - both of these have a major impact on profits we have found - usually March to November. But last year we were buying right up till end of april - which is much later than usual and much later than we wanted. Keeping the cattle as late as possible also has a major impact - much better demand for cattle in November than October - not always possible though

    Transport and Mart/Factory fees are by far the 2 biggest costs, a dose and TB test are the remaining costs

    A very simple system (hardly any work whatsoever) which suits us with the cows but we think it could be coming to an end. Getting too hard to get cattle in the numbers we need, cattle are too dear and TB is always a major risk


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,271 ✭✭✭✭johngalway


    Muckit wrote: »
    We could be all back to the haybobs and the small squares again!

    :confused:

    What do you mean "back to"?

    :D:p

    €2.80 for small square hay now, nice enough hay too, sheep like it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,422 ✭✭✭just do it


    pakalasa wrote: »
    On fertiliser cost and diminishing returns - This is really one for the acountants. Your fixed costs are going to stay the same, but your variable costs will rise.
    The stocking rate and max fertiliser use are set by the Nitrates Directive, so that simplifies things a bit.
    The journal profiled two of the better farmers 2 or 3 weeks ago. One has a high input system involving continental beef, the other has a low input system producing angus. There wasn't much of a difference in the gross margin per ha, probably just enough to justify the extra workload with the high input system.
    So you need to know how much extra grass it will grow and how much extra cattle you can keep as a result.
    Don't forget the extra capital costs for housing extra cattle! Housing is a huge cost and I have to say I like the system Tipp Man is talking about. Just don't tell him, I'd hate for a Tipp man to think he knew better than a banner man;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,552 ✭✭✭pakalasa


    I suppose the key is to know your costs for everything. Put them all down on a spreadsheet. Things should become a lot clearer then.:D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,296 ✭✭✭leg wax


    guys i sent an e-mail to justin mc about our little debate on the fert question and he replied straight away as follows: '' I will do but to be honest most of the BETTER farms that have increased output are actually using less N - it is all about spreading it at the right time and on productive swards and getting full utilisation from productive animals. The BETTER farms have increase output by 30% and yet N usage is down. Overall fert costs have increased but this is due to additional P&K usage.'' Justin

    Justin McCarthy
    Livestock Editor
    Irish Farmers Journal
    Irish Farm Centre
    Bluebell
    Dublin 12


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,552 ✭✭✭pakalasa


    Legs,
    Does he know you're the guy that nicknamed The Journal, ...........Da Comic.....:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,592 ✭✭✭limo_100


    leg wax wrote: »
    guys i sent an e-mail to justin mc about our little debate on the fert question and he replied straight away as follows: '' I will do but to be honest most of the BETTER farms that have increased output are actually using less N - it is all about spreading it at the right time and on productive swards and getting full utilisation from productive animals. The BETTER farms have increase output by 30% and yet N usage is down. Overall fert costs have increased but this is due to additional P&K usage.'' Justin

    Justin McCarthy
    Livestock Editor
    Irish Farmers Journal
    Irish Farm Centre
    Bluebell
    Dublin 12

    thats shocking decent of him and he makes a very good point. Did use see the better farm programme videos on the internet?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,296 ✭✭✭leg wax


    pakalasa wrote: »
    Legs,
    Does he know you're the guy that nicknamed The Journal, ...........Da Comic.....:D
    whoo meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee:eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:


Advertisement