Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Interesting posters appearing around UL
Options
Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
UL_Antisoc wrote: »no you're not, i'm not getting into a tit for tat on this with you, you're a nobody, much in the same vein ciaranmt is a nobody. when you become a somebody i will take more notice.
>i'm not getting into a tit for tat
>Says after tit-for-tatting for last number of pages and on separate thread
>continues to tit for tat
>mfw:
0 -
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
What a poor and un-thought-out response.
Please try a bit harder to give a real response - or is it that you are not capable of it?
Come on! You've got to be able to put your money where your mouth is
I put it to you that the "anti-soc" is useless, as it offers nothing positive, and no method of improving things. It appears to be only an anti-everything gathering (including open discusison it seems). It can't be called a Soc especially around UL as it isn't under the C&S guidelines, so please try to be a little more accurate with the naming conventions in use.
The "anti-soc" may earn a little bit more respect instead of being laughed at (note not laughed with) if it can do something positive instead of just being negative.
What's your response to that then? Going to attempt to take my comment apart line by line like our favourite UL meme used to do before giving up on here?0 -
-
What a poor and un-thought-out response.
Please try a bit harder to give a real response - or is it that you are not capable of it?
Come on! You've got to be able to put your money where your mouth is
I put it to you that the "anti-soc" is useless, as it offers nothing positive, and no method of improving things. It appears to be only an anti-everything gathering (including open discusison it seems). It can't be called a Soc especially around UL as it isn't under the C&S guidelines, so please try to be a little more accurate with the naming conventions in use.
The "anti-soc" may earn a little bit more respect instead of being laughed at (note not laughed with) if it can do something positive instead of just being negative.
What's your response to that then? Going to attempt to take my comment apart line by line like our favourite UL meme used to do before giving up on here?
Your post was based on ignorance and malice and as such, doesn't really warrant a significant portion of my time in replying. But this once I will make an exception. Your entire premise, by the way, is based on ignorance. Because you actually don't know what antisoc does and doesn't do. All you know is what I choose to leak onto this website, which is just the tip of the iceberg.
Based on my impressions of this university and the SU over the last 2 years nobody, absolutely nobody, has made any attempt to call the university or the SU on its bull****. Maybe i'm being harsh on the lads like reunion or ginge_young who ask their little questions in the council, but from our perspective, nothing has been done to drive transparency or accountability from a student perspective. Nothing.
The only POSITIVE changes to this has been implemented by people associated with antisoc. Since the efforts made my people associated with antisoc, mostly from September of last year, we have seen a concerted effort by MORE people to question the service they receive from their SU and their university.
It would be completely arrogant and presumptuous for antisoc to take the entire credit for this change in attitude and we are not overlooking TST etc. but we feel we have been instrumental in a change of attitude.
We honesty don't care who laughs at us, what is said behind our backs and what nasty, malicious little lies those we low moral character say about us. I certainly don't care.
People have been aware of and critical of the SU in the past but never really made an effort to get that opinion out there. And we think, antisoc have given some people a vehicle to do that and others the spur on they needed to make their voice heard.
Case in point, antisoc is in no way associated with or endorsed by David Hartery. But antisoc started the ball rolling on criticising every ****ty thing the SU has done especially with regard to the health centre and this has given (in our opinion) more impetus to people like David Hartery making his own criticisms in his own way.
You don't know what we do, you don't know what we are about, you don't know what you're talking about popoutman0 -
Advertisement
-
Advertisement