andreac wrote: » Why on earth would you want a wolf anyway? They are wild animals, not domesticated so are far from suitable to be owned as a pet, its ridiculous to even consider such thing
P4DDY2K11 wrote: » Why question him when he's looking for answers?
andreac wrote: » P4DDY2K11 wrote: » Why question him when he's looking for answers? If you really have to ask that then im not even going to explain myself. Do you know anything about wolves then you should know they arent suitable for pets.
Karlitto wrote: » Get the closest domesticated dog, Huski, Akita, Malmut
Orim wrote: » Beyond the obvious issues of it being a completely wild animal, people's images of wolves has been massively skewed by hollywood and other pop culture. A malmut would appear to the lay person a lot more wolf-like then an actual wolf at this stage.
cruizer101 wrote: A Tamaskan is the most wolflike dog I've come across without being or having any wolf in it.
derekeire wrote: » Get a white German shepherd
dodderangler wrote: How do u figure that? Are you saying no animal canbe tamed there are people out there with leopards and bobcats and wolves and even wolverines as pets and are tamed and kept as loyal companions
Wibbs wrote: » OK then short answer no, outside of Dublin Zoo and the like there are no "breeders" of pure wolves in Ireland. Even with our lax legislation it would be illegal. There are a couple of people who have brought in Saarloos and Czech wolfdogs from the UK, but that has issues too. One, the lines seem very inbred and pedigrees are hard if not impossible to come by. There are a lot of mixes. two, a Saarloos if purebred tends to be a very nervous dog, while Czechs would be a dog only for an experienced dog owner. Think of a strong working line German Shepherd on speed. Neither would be insurable. dodderangler wrote: How do u figure that? Are you saying no animal canbe tamed there are people out there with leopards and bobcats and wolves and even wolverines as pets and are tamed and kept as loyal companions With respect and no offence meant DA, if you don't know the difference between tame and domesticated you would not be a good candidate for any dog with wolf blood. IMHO of course. Also IMHO I have found those out there who want an animal like this are the very ones that shouldn't have one. They usually have no idea of what it may involve, what the animals social and physical needs are and have little idea about the species in question. Usually their idea of a wolf is very very different to the reality of one. Too many macho types or worse ditsy hippie at one with nature types. Don't get me wrong DA I can understand why someone would want an animal like that. They're a magnificent creature up close. They can also be quite affectionate, but not a "pet". Ditto for leopards etc. Wolverines? ehhh let's just say if you had one of those as a pet you'd very quickly end up being only count up to one or two on your fingers.
andreac wrote: » Sorry to be pedantic, but Akitas dont weigh 11 stone. The weigh around 45-60kg which is around 7 1/2 to 8 stone, far from 11 stone. I hear people saying the same about their rotties when there is no way a rottie is 11 stone. Mine is a big enough dog and hes 50kg so nowhere near 11 stone.
Wibbs wrote: » Yea ferrets aren't a bad example. DA They're tame alright and have been around long enough to be selectively bred, plus their life in the wild is not too dissimilar to a life in captivity especially if the owner hunts and the like. Even then they can be nippy little bastards A mate had them when I was a kid. He has the scars to prove it. Something like a wolf would be very different though as far as the comparison between it's life as a pet and in the wild. If you think an Akita is hard at times... Strength wise even an Akita wouldn't have much hope against a wolf. Wolf hunters in the past used to use packs of wolfhounds for this reason and even then it wsn't a sure thing. They would usually lose a few hounds in the process. The Irish wolfhound is unusual as they were originally bred for one on one hunting and look at the size of those feckers. :eek::)
dodderangler wrote: » Wolfhounds I reckon are big enuff for wolves but wolves have different fighting strategies a dog will go for throat where as a wolf will go for any unprotected area
Accounts as to how wolves react to being attacked by dogs vary, though John James Audubon wrote that young wolves generally show submissive behaviour, while older wolves fight savagely.[13] As wolves are not as fast as smaller canids such as coyotes, they typically run to a low place and wait for the dogs to come over from the top and fight them.[7] Theodore Roosevelt stressed the danger cornered wolves can pose to a pack of dogs in his Hunting the Grisly and Other Sketches:“ A wolf is a terrible fighter. He will decimate a pack of hounds by rabid snaps with his giant jaws while suffering little damage himself; nor are the ordinary big dogs, supposed to be fighting dogs, able to tackle him without special training. I have known one wolf to kill a bulldog which had rushed at it with a single snap, while another which had entered the yard of a Montana ranch house slew in quick succession both of the large mastiffs by which it was assailed. The immense agility and ferocity of the wild beast, the terrible snap of his long-toothed jaws, and the admirable training in which he always is, give him a great advantage over fat, small-toothed, smooth-skinned dogs, even though they are nominally supposed to belong to the fighting classes. In the way that bench competitions are arranged nowadays this is but natural, as there is no temptation to produce a worthy class of fighting dog when the rewards are given upon technical points wholly unconnected with the dog's usefulness. A prize-winning mastiff or bulldog may be almost useless for the only purposes for which his kind is ever useful at all. A mastiff, if properly trained and of sufficient size, might possibly be able to meet a young or undersized Texas wolf; but I have never seen a dog of this variety which I would esteem a match single-handed for one of the huge timber wolves of western Montana. Even if the dog was the heavier of the two, his teeth and claws would be very much smaller and weaker and his hide less tough. ” The fighting styles of wolves and dogs differ significantly; while dogs typically limit themselves to attacking the head, neck and shoulder, wolves will make greater use of body blocks, and attack the extremities of their opponents.[14]
gud4u wrote: » This guy was supposed to be a bit Wolf, he was completely out of control and vicious to anyone bar my husband and I. He was in a state when we got him and we never found out why half his tail was gone. Seeing him in that pic makes me miss him:-(
Jackasaurus rex wrote: » recommended viewing is the secret life of dogs. there is a study shown where they tape wolf pups from the mother at a couple days old and try raise them in the same manner as a litter of pups. completely different results. its on youtube. take a look. really interesting if you like dogs