When was the last time you had sex?

stupidusername

thanks for those, guys.

smcgiff

I want to know how many of the 110 (so far) tapped their partner on the back last night looking for a bit of nookie just so they could tick the within the last day

YE KNOW WHO YE ARE!!!

issem

Wow, I didn't know only 12.04% of Irish people weren't married. Oh wait, we live in an immoral society where sex is a recreational activity

The King of Moo

issem wrote: »

Wow, I didn't know only 12.04% of Irish people weren't married. Oh wait, we live in an immoral society where sex is a recreational activity

Sex has always been a recreational activity.

How many cavepeople do you think were married?

It's also a f**king great recreational activity, and best of all, if people are having it, whether they're married or not, it doesn't affect you in the slightest.

Gummy Panda

Surprised no one posted this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQlIhraqL7o

Friel

Saturday past. Heading to Liverpool on Thrusday till Sunday though so I plan on leaving her limping.

issem

The King of Moo wrote: »

Sex has always been a recreational activity.

How many cavepeople do you think were married?

I'm well informed of how it's been determined that pre-historically humans had orgies all day long, older males had sex with 12 year old girls etc. But we had evolved past that stage with the culmination of monogamy within the structure of marriage. Why do we want to devolve back to polyamory and live like animals just for the sake of people being able to have sexual variety? Especially when people are being so clearly influenced by outside forces to want to have this sexual variety?

The King of Moo wrote: »

It's also a f**king great recreational activity, and best of all, if people are having it, whether they're married or not, it doesn't affect you in the slightest.

Some people actually care about the future of society, and not just about their next orgasm.

Teyla Emmagan

I just about qualify for the 'within the last year' category.

Pathetic!!!!

Tiocfaidh Armani

What a sad thread. A thinly veiled "look at me, I got my hole" thread:rolleyes::D

jaffacakesyum

Tiocfaidh Armani wrote: »

What a sad thread. A thinly veiled "look at me, I got my hole" thread:rolleyes::D

Why do people keep saying that. It's not thinly veiled at all.

And yes, it is pathetic.

The King of Moo

issem wrote: »

I'm well informed of how it's been determined that pre-historically humans had orgies all day long, older males had sex with 12 year old girls etc. But we had evolved past that stage with the culmination of monogamy within the structure of marriage. Why do we want to devolve back to polyamory and live like animals just for the sake of people being able to have sexual variety? Especially when people are being so clearly influenced by outside forces to want to have this sexual variety?

Why does monogamy have to necessarily be the culmination of our sexual evolution? That might be what you prefer and that's fine, but I'm not sure you can say it's the natural situation for all mankind.
We don't have to choose between polyamorously living like animals and monogamy within marriage: you're setting up a false dichotomy.
People can enjoy sex outside marriage and still be sophisticated, civilized, decent people.

issem wrote: »

Some people actually care about the future of society, and not just about their next orgasm.

Again, this is a false dichotomy: I care about both!

McChubbin

About 3 years and 7 months to date. Pity me.

McChubbin

McChubbin wrote: »

About 3 years and 7 months to date. Pity me.

Aww. *hugs*

I'm almost double that.

AngryBollix

I banged my best friends sister last weekend.

Neither have disowned me yet.

McChubbin

Karsini wrote: »

Aww. *hugs*

I'm almost double that.

Eh, to be perfectly honest, I don't really miss it anymore. As Beverly Hofstader once put it: "I've been responsible for my own orgasms since 1988!"
That said, I've got a good thing going with a male friend though our relationship is taking a very Shammy-esque road...

Latchy

jaffacakesyum wrote: »

Why do people keep saying that. It's not thinly veiled at all.

And yes, it is pathetic.

Of course it is ...anybody asking such a question ,even by AH standards and expecting an honest answer has got to be joking .

tok9

Must be about 5 months now

However things are looking good for some action on Wednesday or Thursday!

The following morning will go something like this -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8tJoIaXZ0rw

jaffacakesyum

Latchy wrote: »

Of course it is ...anybody asking such a question ,even by AH standards and expecting an honest answer has got to be joking .

That too It's also pathetic that someone has to boast about getting laid on an internet forum.

That said, this is AH

issem

The King of Moo wrote: »

Why does monogamy have to necessarily be the culmination of our sexual evolution? That might be what you prefer and that's fine, but I'm not sure you can say it's the natural situation for all mankind.

I'm in no way saying that monogamy is the natural situation for all mankind; I'm saying it's the best situation for mankind and the only one in which civilizations have flourished under all throughout history.

We don't have to choose between polyamorously living like animals and monogamy within marriage: you're setting up a false dichotomy.
People can enjoy sex outside marriage and still be sophisticated, civilized, decent people.

So you're suggesting that it's a good scenario we have in Ireland now where people **** around until they're in their mid-thirties when they settle down and get married? What about all the bastard children being born without a proper family who are far more likely to be mentally ill or a criminal? What about the single-mothers who do not make a career for themselves as they rely on handouts from the government? You can't say that's better than having a two-parent household where children have full-siblings.

The King of Moo

issem wrote: »

I'm in no way saying that monogamy is the natural situation for all mankind; I'm saying it's the best situation for mankind and the only one in which civilizations have flourished under all throughout history.



So you're suggesting that it's a good scenario we have in Ireland now where people **** around until they're in their mid-thirties when they settle down and get married? What about all the bastard children being born without a proper family who are far more likely to be mentally ill or a criminal? What about the single-mothers who do not make a career for themselves as they rely on handouts from the government? You can't say that's better than having a two-parent household where children have full-siblings.

It all depends on the parents: one good single parent is better than two bad ones.
It's not like there are so many single mothers around anyway: 24% of children in Ireland are being raised by single parents, 85% are female, 15% male: 24% of those are single parents, 40% are widowed and 32% are separated or divorced.
So there's really not that many single mothers at all, and I don't know where you're getting your facts about mental health and crime from.

I respect your preference for monogamy within marriage, but I don't think you can claim that modern attitudes towards sex are having a serious detrimental effect on society.

Also, why would you use an outdated term like "bastard," if only because you know it has such negative connotations?

Sauve

issem wrote: »

So you're suggesting that it's a good scenario we have in Ireland now where people **** around until they're in their mid-thirties when they settle down and get married? What about all the bastard children being born without a proper family who are far more likely to be mentally ill or a criminal? What about the single-mothers who do not make a career for themselves as they rely on handouts from the government? You can't say that's better than having a two-parent household where children have full-siblings.

Sleeping around until you're in your mid-thirties and then settling down is not necessarily connected to 'bastard' children as you put it.
We have this magic stuff now called contraception.

Logical Fallacy

Sauve wrote: »

Sleeping around until you're in your mid-thirties and then settling down is not necessarily connected to 'bastard' children as you put it.
We have this magic stuff now called contraception.

Yeah, but contraception is evil.

Sauve

Logical Fallacy wrote: »

Yeah, but contraception is evil.

All forms of it?
Rhythm method even?

ihsb

Sauve wrote: »

All forms of it?
Rhythm method even?

The best kind of method! This can not be evil

Sauve

ihsb wrote: »

The best kind of method! This can not be evil

Even outside the confines of a holy and righteous marriage?

ihsb

Sauve wrote: »

Even outside the confines of a holy and righteous marriage?

Well it doesn't provide protection so you know... should be done responsibly. And of course that can only happen in marriage :pac:

Sauve

ihsb wrote: »

Well it doesn't provide protection so you know... should be done responsibly. And of course that can only happen in marriage :pac:

Of course, of course.
And sure if it doesn't work, then isn't that a blessing from God himself.

Princess Peach

McChubbin wrote: »

About 3 years and 7 months to date. Pity me.

Karsini wrote: »

Aww. *hugs*

I'm almost double that.

I see a love match

issem wrote: »

Wow, I didn't know only 12.04% of Irish people weren't married. Oh wait, we live in an immoral society where sex is a recreational activity

Lol I thought this was a genuine joke response!

Dudess

issem wrote: »

Wow, I didn't know only 12.04% of Irish people weren't married. Oh wait, we live in an immoral society where sex is a recreational activity

Lol

Someone's jealous of those who are sexually active...

ihsb

Sauve wrote: »

Of course, of course.
And sure if it doesn't work, then isn't that a blessing from God himself.

That is what I tell the OH.

Logical Fallacy

Sauve wrote: »

All forms of it?
Rhythm method even?

Only if you're white, as white folk lack rhythm.

--LOS--

This morning ^_^

Sauve

Logical Fallacy wrote: »

Only if you're white, as white folk lack rhythm.

I'm not though, so am I ok to go ahead and fornicate?

Logical Fallacy

Sauve wrote: »

I'm not though, so am I ok to go ahead and fornicate?

Go crazy!

adam88

McChubbin wrote: »

Karsini wrote: »

Aww. *hugs*

I'm almost double that.

Eh, to be perfectly honest, I don't really miss it anymore. As Beverly Hofstader once put it: "I've been responsible for my own orgasms since 1988!"
That said, I've got a good thing going with a male friend though our relationship is taking a very Shammy-esque road...

You can't leave it at that. Good thing going ??????

Sauve

Logical Fallacy wrote: »

Go crazy!

Woohoo!!

cocoshovel

Only 12.44% have voted never. Something is seriously wrong here.

Paulie Gualtieri

I find the ones who have to talk about it seldom get it.

patwicklow

On friday nite i jumped off the wardrobe on to my waterbed she went flying off the bed i hit the bed so hard that i pulled a muscle in my back so never got down to it and my backs still at me and i think the bed is leaking now to.

--LOS--

patwicklow wrote: »

On friday nite i jumped off the wardrobe on to my waterbed she went flying off the bed i hit the bed so hard that i pulled a muscle in my back so never got down to it and my backs still at me and i think the bed is leaking now to.

The 1970s called..........

efb

right now, you da messaged me on grindr op.

darlett

Dont quite have the inclination to go through the whole thread-so maybe is been er raised before, and I dont want to hint that its been 'awhile' but surely theres a window which allows for people to have not sex in a year, but not to fall into never! Although Im sure for someone who knobbed a blonde last night its more simples than that :rolleyes:

EdenHazard

its weird answering never

xsiborg

EdenHazard wrote: »

its weird answering never

not given your sig it's not!

100 % BELIEBER

:pac:

problemchimp

MickySticks wrote: »

I had it last night. Gave a blonde a right good knobbing. :cool:

I'll add my poll in a minute. :pac:

Are you Allan Partridge? "back of the net"!

Dudess

stupidusername wrote: »

I suppose I don't get the thing about it being more than physical. It just is for me.

Physical only is good, can be great - but for me nowhere near as good as when there's emotion involved, and all the other stuff there is to do besides basic ****ing. I can't relate to people not missing it, but that's just me. Absence makes the heart grow fonder IMO

Natasha_95 wrote: »

Last night (:

We've a winner of the "Gotta tell everyone I'm sexually active" proclamations - you actually set up an account to say it! :pac:

Teyla Emmagan wrote: »

I just about qualify for the 'within the last year' category.

Pathetic!!!!

Well it's not a competition in fairness...

Princess Peach

Paulie Gualtieri wrote: »

I find the ones who have to talk about it seldom get it.

I never talked about it when I was getting some, but I realised I talk too much about my lack of it.

There's a psychological analysis in your theory for some qualified person.

Babybuff

I gave up having random sex aboot three months ago (I have never actually made love, ever.)

AeoNGriM

jaffacakesyum wrote: »

Why do people keep saying that. It's not thinly veiled at all.

And yes, it is pathetic.

People think that using the term 'thinly veiled' makes them look smarter, or more widely read when it's the literary equivalent of stabbing yourself in the eye repeatedly with an 18 inch black rubber cock.

AeoNGriM

Babybuff wrote: »

I gave up having random sex aboot three months ago (I have never actually made love, ever.)

Goddamn Canucks! They're takin ar wimminz, and steelin ar secks!