Eden Hazard signs for Chelsea........ Or does he? *shifty eyes*

Kristopherus

SS News have it running on their ticker that he is joining Chelski.

Oat23

Good luck to him in London.

Can he f**k off out of my twitter timeline now?

Paully D

Good news from a neutral point of view. Means the league looks even more wide open now.

handsomecake

ive no time for him already .

CSF

Chelsea

Tbh, he seems like as a person he will be well suited to Chelsea. Him and Terry will have great fun rooming together.

batistuta9

Soby wrote: »

yeah be quite sad if his english was bad and he meant A champions league winner

ceegee wrote: »

nah, he tweeted in french too "le champion d'europe"

So its yourselves or leinster

image he's from the dutch speaking part of belgium & his french isn't that good either

or he breaks both his legs against england

Underground

Sgt Pepper 64 wrote: »

Thats it, with him supplying the bullets, CHELSEA will EAT UP THE LEAGUE NEXT SEASON!

YOUS CAME 6TH
LOTS OF CATCHING UP TO DO

Warper

Good to see him join Chelsea, let Utd keep playing Scholes and Giggs

DB21

Man City

Warper wrote: »

Good to see him join Chelsea, let Utd keep playing Scholes and Giggs

Meanwhile, Liverpool will continue to use the sprightly Gerrard and Carragher

Turtyturd

Sgt Pepper 64 wrote: »

Thats it, with Lampard in the team, CHELSEA will EAT UP THE LEAGUE NEXT SEASON!

Agree.

Can't wait to see how this plays out, hopefully the media are as eager to capture every comment he makes when he realises that the CL win was not indicative of Chelsea's ability to constantly challenge for titles.

Corholio

Sky are reporting that he was allowed to announced it on Twitter by Chelsea as long as he gave no interviews.

Even his future employers think he's an annoying troll.

KingdomYid

A shame he has joined them IMO.

Turtyturd

DB21 wrote: »

Meanwhile, Liverpool will continue to use the sprightly Gerrard and Carragher

If you're gonna take a comment to heart and retaliate at least do it about the right team.:rolleyes:

MUSEIST

Turtyturd wrote: »

Agree.

Can't wait to see how this plays out, hopefully the media are as eager to capture every comment he makes when he realises that the CL win was not indicative of Chelsea's ability to constantly challenge for titles.

maybe the fact that chelsea have been consitantly challenging for multiple titles every season for almost a decade now. Anyway now chelsea just need one more quality winger and maybe a right back and we can challenge for the PL again. Good stuff.

BERBA

Man City

Sgt Pepper 64 wrote: »

Thats it, with him supplying the bullets, CHELSEA will EAT UP THE LEAGUE NEXT SEASON!

Remember where ye finished season just gone?. I think City and United have had a lucky escape tbh. I think the bloke will turn in to another Torres.. Gut feeling.

pistolpetes11

BERBA wrote: »

Remember where ye finished season just gone?. I think City and United have had a lucky escape tbh. I think the bloke will turn in to another Torres.. Gut feeling.

Yeah sixth with the FA Cup in our pocket and THE CHAMPIONS OF EUROPE , not a bad season for one of our worst league performances in years .

Copper_pipe

Man City

This looks nice

GK - Cech
RB - Ivanovic
CB - Terry
CB - Luiz
LB - Cole
CDM - Lampard
CDM - Mikel
LAM - HAZARD
CF - Mata
RAM - RAMIRES
ST - Torres

(From a man utd fan)

djPSB

Copper_pipe wrote: »

This looks nice

GK - Cech
RB - Ivanovic
CB - Terry
CB - Luiz
LB - Cole
CDM - Lampard
CDM - Mikel
LAM - HAZARD
CF - Mata
RAM - RAMIRES
ST - Torres

(From a man utd fan)

What about Marin?

double GG

Oat23

djPSB wrote: »

What about Marin?

He's sh*te.

RasTa

Right so time for us to hurry up and sign Kagawa. Thought Hazard was going to City myself

ctrl-alt-delete

Does nobody think he is taking trolling to another level again,

and will come back at some stage saying the team he has joined will win the Champions League with him, and he isn't actually joining Chelsea?

pistolpetes11

ctrl-alt-delete wrote: »

Does nobody think he is taking trolling to another level again,

and will come back at some stage saying the team he has joined will win the Champions League with him, and he isn't actually joining Chelsea?

You really couldn't write it off could you , although rumors are starting to emerge that he will ware the No 11 shirt

Dempsey

Man City

It would be funny if the new Chelsea manager falls out with him or doesnt rate him

cgpg5

Paully D wrote: »

Good news from a neutral point of view. Means the league looks even more wide open now.

Agree completely! Must say am surprised that he's not joining City, as a neutral I hope he lives up to expectations and can get Chelsea challenging again.

greendom

Chelsea

I suppose Chelsea could do what they did to Torres, to Hazard. More likely that Hazard will help Torres recreate his best form

KingdomYid

cgpg5 wrote: »

Agree completely! Must say am surprised that he's not joining City, as a neutral I hope he lives up to expectations and can get Chelsea challenging again.

Chelsea's biggest fan, sorry meant Newcastle's :rolleyes:

cgpg5

KingdomYid wrote: »

Chelsea's biggest fan, sorry meant Newcastle's :rolleyes:

Don't really like Chelsea but would love 3 teams challenging tbh

KingdomYid

cgpg5 wrote: »

Don't really like Chelsea but would love 3 teams challenging tbh

Would'nt the league be a better place if money did not talk and the likes of your team and mine could actually challenge. The likes of Chelski getting stronger is only bad news for Newcastle and the rest of us.

BERBA

Man City

KingdomYid wrote: »

Would'nt the league be a better place if money did not talk and the likes of your team and mine could actually challenge. The likes of Chelski getting stronger is only bad news for Newcastle and the rest of us.

Barca and Bayern have a lot to anwser for

Blatter

BERBA wrote: »

Barca and Bayern have a lot to anwser for

And Arjen Robben :pac:

daddydick

Man City

To be honest I havn't even seen the guy play and he is annoying the crap out of me.

Saying all season he'll be playing in Manchester, leading everyone on and then going where they pay him the most. Not cool.

I for one hope he turns out to be a complete flop.

homer simpson

KingdomYid wrote: »

Would'nt the league be a better place if money did not talk and the likes of your team and mine could actually challenge. The likes of Chelski getting stronger is only bad news for Newcastle and the rest of us.

KingdomYid

homer_simpson wrote: »

Well done sir. Bravo

cgpg5

KingdomYid wrote: »

Would'nt the league be a better place if money did not talk and the likes of your team and mine could actually challenge. The likes of Chelski getting stronger is only bad news for Newcastle and the rest of us.

Much better but what can ya do. City and Utd running away with it on their own isn't great I'd rather another team challenging in my view, both our teams are miles off title winning sides

KingdomYid

cgpg5 wrote: »

Much better but what can ya do. City and Utd running away with it on their own isn't great I'd rather another team challenging in my view, both our teams are miles off title winning sides

Oh I know we are miles off, but believe me I would much prefer United to be running away with it than the way things are going. It's just the way I feel about it though, I know some people would prefer more teams challenging for the title.

homerjay2005

Genuine question. how many players went to chelsea over the past 8 years since the russian came in and now, are/became genuine better players?

you could count them on one hand id say, Drogba being one of them and even now, he is not the force he was in 09/10. ashley cole another, but he was hardly going to become a worse player by moving a few miles across the city.

going to chelsea is not a good move for hazard, it doesnt make sense for him at all.

cadaliac

daddydick wrote: »

To be honest I havn't even seen the guy play and he is annoying the crap out of me.

Saying all season he'll be playing in Manchester, leading everyone on and then going where they pay him the most. Not cool.

I for one hope he turns out to be a complete flop.

You are lowering yourself to his level.
Everyone has a price and when the check is waved in front of a player, time to sh1t or get off the pot.
I don't like the way he behaved either but hoping he is a flop isn't going to benefit anyone.
Its good for Chelsea yes, but also better for the league, if we can challenge the Manchester clubs better this year.

homer simpson

Cech, Rameries, Glen Johnson, Ivan, Alex, Mikel, Diarra, Robben, Duff, Malouda, Kalau, Essien that's just off the top of my head, IMO are better players after they've joined Chelsea, granted some have had a decline since like Essien since his injury.. Thats a lot more than can be counted on one hand, unless your a mutant of some sort :P

GavRedKing

homerjay2005 wrote: »

Genuine question. how many players went to chelsea over the past 8 years since the russian came in and now, are/became genuine better players?

you could count them on one hand id say, Drogba being one of them and even now, he is not the force he was in 09/10. ashley cole another, but he was hardly going to become a worse player by moving a few miles across the city.

going to chelsea is not a good move for hazard, it doesnt make sense for him at all.

Cech, Carvalho, Robben.

Suryavarman

homerjay2005 wrote: »

Genuine question. how many players went to chelsea over the past 8 years since the russian came in and now, are/became genuine better players?

you could count them on one hand id say, Drogba being one of them and even now, he is not the force he was in 09/10. ashley cole another, but he was hardly going to become a worse player by moving a few miles across the city.

going to chelsea is not a good move for hazard, it doesnt make sense for him at all.

On top of those already mentioned, Joe Cole, Claude Makelele and Paulo Ferreira.

cgpg5

gavredking wrote: »

Cech, Carvalho, Robben.

To name a few, surely you could argue Essien, Malouda?

Also don't see how it doesn't make sense for him. Tbf it's not as if he has joined all of a sudden without thought, he gave it ages. Chelsea are the side he probably feels that he can perform best in and he is a guaranteed starter even if he has a dip

DB21

Man City

Turtyturd wrote: »

If you're gonna take a comment to heart and retaliate at least do it about the right team.:rolleyes:

My sincerest apologies. I thought Warper was a Liverpool fan

KingdomYid

cadaliac wrote: »

Its good for Chelsea yes, but also better for the league, if we can challenge the Manchester clubs better this year.

Hmmmm, still trying to work out how Chelsea being stronger is better for the rest of the league? Please tell me how.

Suryavarman

KingdomYid wrote: »

Hmmmm, still trying to work out how Chelsea being stronger is better for the rest of the league? Please tell me how.

Having 3 teams challenge for the title is surely better than 2 no? Also a strong Chelsea team will be better able to take points off the 2 Manchester sides and close the gap between the top and the upper middle of the table.

gosplan

hmm,

so chelsea are going to eat up the league.

wonder who their manager will be for this?

KingdomYid

gosplan wrote: »

hmm,

so chelsea are going to eat up the league.

wonder who their manager will be for this?

Or managers you mean, one for first 3 months then his replacement

BERBA

Man City

gosplan wrote: »

hmm,

so chelsea are going to eat up the league.

wonder who their manager will be for this?

R-O-M-A-N A-B-R-A-M-O-V-I-C-H

Turtyturd

MUSEIST wrote: »

maybe the fact that chelsea have been consitantly challenging for multiple titles every season for almost a decade now. Anyway now chelsea just need one more quality winger and maybe a right back and we can challenge for the PL again. Good stuff.

That 'constant' challenge was on the back of the team Mourinho built, and the Champions league, which took 10 years to reach was the pinnacle for a lot of that team. They have already started to move on, and over the next year or two the spine of the team will be gone with it looking unlikely that there will be players to step in. Him or his agent obviously haven't done their research if they think it will be a regular occurance, but it looks like money and attention is more important to him so maybe he will be happy there.

KingdomYid

Suryavarman wrote: »

Having 3 teams challenge for the title is surely better than 2 no? Also a strong Chelsea team will be better able to take points off the 2 Manchester sides and close the gap between the top and the upper middle of the table.

I could not give a flying f*ck who challenges for the title because realistically my team won't be involved in it. As I have already said I would prefer if United ran away with it than one of the oil rich teams competing and winning it.