Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Pharmacy dispensing charge... did you know?

245

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,175 ✭✭✭angeldelight


    Why do people think pharmacists should put a breakdown of the price on the receipt when it's not expected of anyone else?

    A doctor doesn't have to explain how much of their fee is for the paper, how much for their time, how much for their expertise

    Dunnes don't have to put the mark up on their products on the receipt

    Different pharmacies charge different dispensing fees. They're not obliged to tell you what that is, but if you bring your prescription into a number of different pharmacies they'll price it for you and you can go with the cheapest, if money is your only concern when choosing a pharmacy.

    Also there is no drug I'm aware of that has a 300-400% mark up as mentioned above, that's just mindless speculation. Those kinds of mark ups exist in supermarkets and clothes shops where people don't seem to mind paying them


  • Registered Users Posts: 28 rose14


    Motorist wrote: »
    Do you complain that a doctor charges you more than the price of a sheet of paper and the ink on it (around 5 cent) when he sees you and prints a prescription also? Do you complain also if a physiotherapist charges you more than the cost of the electricity to light the bulb in their consultation room?

    People like you, imho, are the first to try and sue though if you received wrong medication from your GP. The newsagent has no professional responsibility, specialist expertise or liability. You probably wouldn't understand that though, it's not your fault.


    Yes I do actually, €50 to visit the GP is ridiculous, there is a system in this Country that if private companies were doing it there would be an investigation into collusion. GPs are all the same price, that's price fixing. You're not allowed to do that supposedly. And there is a racket going on between GPs and Consultants that needs to be investigated too. You tell me how in a Country that has such trained and brilliant minds how we have such a S**t healthcare system. All they money they are taking in between all the charges you'd think we'd be better off, not dying on trollies in the hallway. I don't know why you are getting so offended at my comment over a €5 charge in the first place.

    No comment on the 'people like you' remark - I'll just see you in court.


  • Registered Users Posts: 28 rose14


    People really do underestimate the work that pharmacists do.:( I'd be more worried about the link-selling that is slowly creeping into irish pharmacies.


    I don't under estimate their job, I go to them before my GP to see if I need to go to GP and I ask and value their advice. My point is, they have their mark up, a €5 dispensing per item on the prescription is over the top. I'm not interested in their mark-up percentage, like I'm not in shops either. A contact lens costs less than 1 cent to make but sells for €15, I don't like it but I want my contacts so I pay them. But I'm not paying €10 for the lens and €5 for the optician to give it to me. I pay the optician €15, they pay the lens company and keep their profit. Of course they need to make a profit, but they don't need just rake it in.

    But you know what, I've learned a lot over the years and I'm still learning that under it all I'm the ejit cos' I believe in a 'fair price' but then I'm not rich so obviously I need to change my attitude. I'm glad I'm learning this young.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,070 ✭✭✭ScouseMouse


    I walked into an Asda in Liverpool a few weeks ago for an emergency prescription due to me forgeting to bring my medication from home.

    The girl said fine. Tablets were 1.50 and charge was 3.50. Paid a fiver in total. I did not complain as they provide a good service.


  • Registered Users Posts: 192 ✭✭superblu


    rose14 wrote: »
    I also asked a particular Pharmacist chain about this and was told they have no say over how the dispensing fee is calculated. I was told the Pharmacy Union of Ireland controls this.
    When I am not getting my inhalers (asthma) I get them all in one go so they only charge me one dispensing fee.

    Welcome to the real world OP, I just hope you never end up having a few children who need medicines regularly (and aren't on the cosy medical card scheme that is) ;)



    I didn't know this charge existed either - and whether we have children or not (which I do) is irrelevant. So if we don't have kids we can be glad we won't be going to chemist as much? Typical Irish attitude, we should be campaigning for cheaper pharmacy costs in this Country. Also, a pharmacy won't dispense numerous months of the pill at once or most medications actually and now I understand why, they'll miss out on their fiver. It's not the same in every Country, you can get inhalers over the counter in Spain and at a fraction of the cost.

    And to the last comment of "it's not a newsagents" - it's not much harder and if it takes €5 compensation per item for the pharmacist to dispense a packet of tablets then maybe they are working beyond their intelligence and skill sets and should start serving OK magazine instead, less taxing for the poor devils.

    A newsagent cannot kill you a pharmacist potentially could hence the reason they are so highly paid. If it was so easy wouldn't everybody be doing it. Of course 90 per cent of the time they are just pulling boxes off shelves and giving them out but they are also responsible for spotting mistakes in doctors scripts. Talk to any pharmacy owners and most will readily admit they're creaming it however and I know I sound like a dick "don't hate the player hate the game." The same argument could be made about extortionate fees charged by all healthcare professionals and legal professionals .

    Many pharmacists will give medical advice now and most pharmacies have consultation rooms where you can talk to your pharmacist in private. Use this service as it may save you a few bob in doctors fees and in a lot of cases may be able to give you something where a prescription is not needed. In cases where a pharmacist cannot diagnose you they will send you to the doctor anyway. There is no charge for this advice even if you do not end up buying anything and all you need to do is ask to speak to the pharmacist in private.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 28 rose14


    Tablets were 1.50 and charge was 3.50. Paid a fiver in total. I did not complain as they provide a good service.

    The point is you knew up front there was a €3.50 charge for this, that's the point of the OP, they and a few others didn't know this was a charge. So when we get our prescription here of €10 we think that is the medication, but the medication is €5 and the fee for getting it is €5.


  • Registered Users Posts: 28 rose14


    superblu wrote: »
    Many pharmacists will give medical advice now and most pharmacies have consultation rooms where you can talk to your pharmacist in private. Use this service as it may save you a few bob in doctors fees


    Yes I use this service and find it very useful.


  • Registered Users Posts: 307 ✭✭kellso81


    rose14 wrote: »
    GPs are all the same price, that's price fixing. You're not allowed to do that supposedly.

    No they're not, they can range form €35 to €70. A lot of what your saying are broad generalisations with no depth to them. For a start, a private dispensing fee is closer to €3 in most pharmacies than €5. Whenever your in a pharmacy do you ever notice the staff that are there? They don't work for free. The building the pharmacy is in? Generally has to be rented. Do the lights normally be on? Did you ever phone the pharmacy? Do you know businesses have to pay rates? Is there CCTV? Is there music being played? Is there stock on the shelves? Someone has already mentioned on this thread that if pharmacists give out the wrong medication there can be serious adverse effects, how do you think insurance companies view this? Do you think they'd raise they're premiums appropriately? Pharmacies and pharmacists have to pay exorbitant fees to professional bodies just to open the doors and dispense prescriptions. Most pharmacies have been bought through mortgages from the banks, generally the banks look for this money back. How do you expect a pharmacy to pay for this stuff? Do you want a local pharmacy? A large number of pharmacies in the country are running on a loss, a lot are in administration, most are in negative equity. the vast majority of the money paid to pharmacies through state fees and private dispensing fees ends up with the drug companies, most of the rest goes to paying to paying some of the points I've raised above.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,070 ✭✭✭ScouseMouse


    rose14 wrote: »
    The point is you knew up front there was a €3.50 charge for this, that's the point of the OP, they and a few others didn't know this was a charge. So when we get our prescription here of €10 we think that is the medication, but the medication is €5 and the fee for getting it is €5.

    I believe she told me due to me only needing four tablets. I doubt very much she would have told me if I was looking for a full prescription.

    Dopey arse here left his tablets for two days sitting on the kitchen table in Dublin!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,992 ✭✭✭✭partyatmygaff


    rose14 wrote: »
    The point is you knew up front there was a €3.50 charge for this, that's the point of the OP, they and a few others didn't know this was a charge. So when we get our prescription here of €10 we think that is the medication, but the medication is €5 and the fee for getting it is €5.
    I always thought it was fairly common knowledge that there's a dispensing fee on every medicine dispensed. You're not just paying for the drug itself, you're paying for the pharmacist's expertise and advice.

    On medical card prescriptions, there's even a similar non-dispensing fee for every item not dispensed due to the occasional unsuitable/dangerous prescription.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 173 ✭✭Fatscally


    You're not just paying for the drug itself, you're paying for the pharmacist's expertise and advice.

    Well then what's the point of the GP? If the GP writes I should have penicillian then it's certainly not for the pharmacist to over-rule or interfere with that decision.
    Also in my personal experiences, 1 particular pharmacist will always try to sell me something I didn't ask for or tell me what I want isn't obtainable when I know for a fact it is, almost guaranteed.
    And on another occasion with a different pharmacist I was given a laxative for a dose of the trots. Only for the non qualified minimum wage young inexperienced but alert shop floor assitant that coped it and pointed it out I probably would have left and carried on with the faith that I had indeed been given a proper rememdy. My point is I certainly don't ever depend on the words from a pharmacist.

    And a last by-note on the second pharmacist, there was an air of resentment from the pharmacist towards the girl for catching the blunder.

    Oh and one last thing... for a fiver why are they always so effin slow?:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,992 ✭✭✭✭partyatmygaff


    Fatscally wrote: »
    Well then what's the point of the GP? If the GP writes I should have penicillian then it's certainly not for the pharmacist to over-rule or interfere with that decision.
    You do realise that Pharmacists know more about drugs and pharmacotherapy than doctors right? They're the experts on drugs and they know what's safe and what's not. If they don't think a prescription is safe or appropriate, it's safe to assume they have good reason. That's not to say doctor's aren't knowledgeable about drugs as well but it's not their main area of expertise. At a primary care level, the community pharmacist and GP work together to ensure that their shared pool of patients effectively and safely use medicines as a form of therapy.
    Also in my personal experiences, 1 particular pharmacist will always try to sell me something I didn't ask for or tell me what I want isn't obtainable when I know for a fact it is, almost guaranteed.
    I can't imagine a pharmacist trying to sell you another medicine alongside your prescription. As for what is obtainable and what isn't i'm not quite sure how you'd know about a particular medicine's stock levels.
    And on another occasion with a different pharmacist I was given a laxative for a dose of the trots. Only for the non qualified minimum wage young inexperienced but alert shop floor assitant that coped it and pointed it out I probably would have left and carried on with the faith that I had indeed been given a proper rememdy. My point is I certainly don't ever depend on the words from a pharmacist.
    Bulk-forming laxatives such as polycarbophil, methylcellulose or psyllium are actually used to treat that condition. The same way not all "Antibiotics" are the same, not all "laxatives" are the same.
    Oh and one last thing... for a fiver why are they always so effin slow?:rolleyes:
    Probably because there's more to do than pick a box off a shelf and bag it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,235 ✭✭✭ceegee


    Fatscally wrote: »
    You're not just paying for the drug itself, you're paying for the pharmacist's expertise and advice.

    Well then what's the point of the GP? If the GP writes I should have penicillian then it's certainly not for the pharmacist to over-rule or interfere with that decision.
    Also in my personal experiences, 1 particular pharmacist will always try to sell me something I didn't ask for or tell me what I want isn't obtainable when I know for a fact it is, almost guaranteed.
    And on another occasion with a different pharmacist I was given a laxative for a dose of the trots. Only for the non qualified minimum wage young inexperienced but alert shop floor assitant that coped it and pointed it out I probably would have left and carried on with the faith that I had indeed been given a proper rememdy. My point is I certainly don't ever depend on the words from a pharmacist.

    And a last by-note on the second pharmacist, there was an air of resentment from the pharmacist towards the girl for catching the blunder.

    Oh and one last thing... for a fiver why are they always so effin slow?:rolleyes:

    Pharmacists are "always so effin slow" because they spend so much time ringing GPs to sort out their f**k ups, if people were just handed out your meds as prescribed without a pharmacist checking its suitability the number of deaths due to prescription errors would be through the roof.

    Wrong dose, wrong drug, prescription given to wrong patient by GP surgery, drugs that patient is allergic to, drugs that interact, these are mistakes i see almost daily working in community pharmacy. I dont think a few quid fee for checking that

    (a) the dose etc is correct
    (b) no interactions with other meds
    (c) no contraindications due to patient allergies, disease history etc

    is in anyway unfair


    Some of the most timeconsuming meds from the point of view of explaining things to patients re safety and dosage are also very cheap (eg warfarin, methotrexate) - To expect a pharmacist to provide patient counselling and monitoring for interactions etc for under one euro markup is unreasonable, the comparison to a newsagents insulting.


  • Registered Users Posts: 192 ✭✭superblu


    Fatscally wrote: »
    Well then what's the point of the GP? If the GP writes I should have penicillian then it's certainly not for the pharmacist to over-rule or interfere with that decision.
    You do realise that Pharmacists know more about drugs and pharmacotherapy than doctors right? They're the experts on drugs and they know what's safe and what's not. If they don't think a prescription is safe to dispense, it's safe to assume they have good reason. That's not to say doctor's aren't knowledgeable about drugs as well but it's not their main area of expertise. At a primary care level, the community pharmacist and GP work together to ensure that their shared pool of patients effectively and safely use medicines as a form of therapy.
    Also in my personal experiences, 1 particular pharmacist will always try to sell me something I didn't ask for or tell me what I want isn't obtainable when I know for a fact it is, almost guaranteed.
    I can't imagine a pharmacist trying to sell you another medicine alongside your prescription. As for what is obtainable and what isn't i'm not quite sure how you'd know about a particular medicine's stock levels.
    And on another occasion with a different pharmacist I was given a laxative for a dose of the trots. Only for the non qualified minimum wage young inexperienced but alert shop floor assitant that coped it and pointed it out I probably would have left and carried on with the faith that I had indeed been given a proper rememdy. My point is I certainly don't ever depend on the words from a pharmacist.
    Bulk-forming laxatives such as polycarbophil, methylcellulose or psyllium are actually used to treat that condition. The same way not all "Antibiotics" are the same, not all "laxatives" are the same.
    Oh and one last thing... for a fiver why are they always so effin slow?:rolleyes:
    Probably because there's more to do than pick a box off a shelf and bag it.

    Very well said.

    We can all point to instances where we've had below par service from so called professionals. That doesnt give anybody a licence to cast aspersions on the profession as a whole.


  • Registered Users Posts: 173 ✭✭Fatscally


    You do realise that Pharmacists know more about drugs and pharmacotherapy than doctors right?
    Well that strikes me with the same conceited air that I usually get when I go into a pharmacy. Ahh the whiff of self importance. :) You're not a (defensive) pharmacist yourself by any chance? Although in specialist areas Junkies probably know more than either. :rolleyes:
    They're the experts on drugs and they know what's safe and what's not.
    That maybe but yet I was handed an off the shelf treatment for constipation when I asked for a treatment for diarrhea AND I made the point it was for a pregnant woman. You'd think that'd mean a little double checking of the attention to detail that you claim they're charging (/fleecing) people for.
    I can't imagine a pharmacist trying to sell you another medicine alongside your prescription. As for what is obtainable and what isn't i'm not quite sure how you'd know about a particular medicine's stock levels.
    Well I didn't write "medicine". I very rarely buy pharmacutical medicines.

    Probably because there's more to do than pick a box off a shelf and bag it
    Perhaps occasionally but I expect usually it's not much more. Mostly it's down to jacking up their own self importance like a taxi man pontificating about he's responsible for your physical safety when in the vehicle and then lecturing you on the health effects of drinking and loud noise before allowing you to disembark at the entrance of a night club. That's a bit harsh but it makes the point. It's an overwhelming sense of importance that's undue IMO.
    superblu wrote:
    Very well said.
    You wouldn't be in the game either?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 246 ✭✭palmcut


    whiterebel wrote: »
    No, I asked in McCauley's today. She didn't like it either, and referred to the Pharmacist. They will give you all the stuff in one go if you have a 6 month prescription. She said they advise people of this, but I have never been asked. I'll be getting them all in one go next time.
    The pharmacy regulator will cancel the licence of a pharmacy if they are dispensing six months at a time. It is not safe to dispense six months at a time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,340 ✭✭✭borderlinemeath


    Fatscally wrote: »
    Well that strikes me with the same conceited air that I usually get when I go into a pharmacy. Ahh the whiff of self importance. :) You're not a (defensive) pharmacist yourself by any chance? Although in specialist areas Junkies probably know more than either. :rolleyes:

    That maybe but yet I was handed an off the shelf treatment for constipation when I asked for a treatment for diarrhea AND I made the point it was for a pregnant woman. You'd think that'd mean a little double checking of the attention to detail that you claim they're charging (/fleecing) people for.

    Well I didn't write "medicine". I very rarely buy pharmacutical medicines.


    Perhaps occasionally but I expect usually it's not much more. Mostly it's down to jacking up their own self importance like a taxi man pontificating about he's responsible for your physical safety when in the vehicle and then lecturing you on the health effects of drinking and loud noise before allowing you to disembark at the entrance of a night club. That's a bit harsh but it makes the point. It's an overwhelming sense of importance that's undue IMO.


    You wouldn't be in the game either?

    Typical response. Anybody that disagrees with you or points out the work that pharmacists do must be in the game right?:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users Posts: 173 ✭✭Fatscally


    Typical response. Anybody that disagrees with you or points out the work that pharmacists do must be in the game right?:rolleyes:
    No. I can see the work they do and the need for it. I do think though that the responsibility they hold or the difficulty of the job is exaggerated though. Which might explain why junior staff are often seen carrying out their work.
    If they were as clever and caring as they say they are they might promote exercise as a treatment for blood pressure or nutrition for depression (generally speaking) but no they fire chemicals over the counter and then argue that they're dead right about it. So where they might know a lot about the chemicals they're supplying they don't seem to know as much about patient care as they think they do.

    Anyway I didn't intend this thread to be a slant on the work that they, taxi drivers or anyone else does. Just simply that the €5 charge got past me and many others for years and now that I know about it and have read the arguments for it here I still can't justify it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,340 ✭✭✭borderlinemeath


    Fatscally wrote: »
    No. I can see the work they do and the need for it. I do think though that the responsibility they hold or the difficulty of the job is exaggerated though. Which might explain why junior staff are often seen carrying out their work.

    After they have finished their college degree, junior pharmacists have to complete a years training under a qualified pharmacist. I've pointed this out already but you prefer to think they delegate because it's above them to serve the mere mortals.
    If they were as clever and caring as they say they are they might promote exercise as a treatment for blood pressure or nutrition for depression (generally speaking) but no they fire chemicals over the counter and then argue that they're dead right about it. So where they might know a lot about the chemicals they're supplying they don't seem to know as much about patient care as they think they do.

    So now they must be dieticians, shrinks and pharmacists for your €5?:rolleyes:

    Anyway I didn't intend this thread to be a slant on the work that they, taxi drivers or anyone else does. Just simply that the €5 charge got past me and many others for years and now that I know about it and have read the arguments for it here I still can't justify it.

    The charge 'got past you'?? No, you just weren't bothered to notice that you paid for a professional service. And now that it's 'cool' to give out about ANY profession or business that has a charge for a service you begin to notice and rant.

    If the consumer gets something for nothing it's viewed as an 'entitlement' yet if there's a charge it's automatically a 'rip off'.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,401 ✭✭✭Nonoperational


    I agree that the €5 can be steep. Especially on cheap medications. You should really offer to give 6 months at a time especially for cheaper medications. On things like the pill it could save you a lot.

    The arguments for both sides are pretty polarised but the truth is somewhere in between. Some prescriptions literally take 30 seconds. Quick check, ask about any allergies, other meds etc and that's it. Input it into the computer, count out the correct quantity and stick on the label. If there's no prescriptions in front of it it'll in and out in a minute. €5 for that seems steep. I don't disagree with that. The problem is that that €5 is subsidising the 40 minutes you spend on the medical card prescription for 10 items that has drug interactions, incorrect doses and numerous things that need to be checked.
    On top of that there are staff to pay, rent and all those overheads that other shops have. Pharmacies probably would have a larger more expensive staff to pay than say a newsagent. Then there's the fact you have to keep a few hundred grand of stock on hand so people can get their stuff when they need it as much as possible...

    The posts about pharmacists being self important and condescending to staff are more a reflection on the individual than anything else. You get that in all walks of life. Don't understand it personally but there you go...Pharmacists are usually only slow if there are other prescriptions to do in front of yours. There's not much you can do about that.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,742 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    Fatscally wrote: »
    Isn't it just an exploit? You can't get them anywhere else. Or it's not noted on your receipt so there's no incentive to shop for competition.
    But seriously a fiver for handing over a packet! I can't see how it's so much more work than handing out a pack of sweets or a lottery ticket. I was stunned and sickened to think it was going to cost me €15 per month for the next 6 months.

    Seriously? I picked up a prescription for someone a week ago and the pharmacist came to point out to me that there was a 'Major Warning' or some such phrase, of a conflict between two of the medicines involved, and that the GP should be consulted.

    Other times I have said 'I am on X medication, can you recommend an over the counter treatment that will not conflict', and they have been able to advise me.

    On another occasion a pharmacist was able to do a quick test that I would otherwise have had to find a doctor for on a Saturday, as a result I went to A&E for treatment.

    Whatever about the charges, they are highly skilled people with a huge investment in drugs, staff and premises to maintain.


  • Registered Users Posts: 922 ✭✭✭trishasaffron


    After reading this thread I'm still a bit confused as to how to manage the costs most effectively.

    So I have blood pressure meds - if I get a few months together (no need for debate on how many months or how safe) will I pay just one dispensing fee rather than a dispensing fee per month?


  • Registered Users Posts: 192 ✭✭superblu


    There are some pharmacists that sit in the dispensary like the queen of Sheba checking scripts and then sending shop staff out to the customer with the medicine. This is wrong. But once again it's not fair to tar everybody with the same brush. I

    As for the dispensing fee I can't justify it. Take it up with the Irish pharmaceutical union or the pharmacy regulator.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,992 ✭✭✭✭partyatmygaff


    Fatscally wrote: »
    Well that strikes me with the same conceited air that I usually get when I go into a pharmacy. Ahh the whiff of self importance. :) You're not a (defensive) pharmacist yourself by any chance? Although in specialist areas Junkies probably know more than either. :rolleyes:
    I suppose you get the same "conceited air" with a "whiff of self importance" when you get in to a GP too, right?
    That maybe but yet I was handed an off the shelf treatment for constipation when I asked for a treatment for diarrhea AND I made the point it was for a pregnant woman. You'd think that'd mean a little double checking of the attention to detail that you claim they're charging (/fleecing) people for.
    I love how you seemed to ignore the section of my last post that said that some bulk-forming laxatives (Psyllium, methylcellulose e.t.c.) can be used to treat diarrhea.
    Perhaps occasionally but I expect usually it's not much more. Mostly it's down to jacking up their own self importance like a taxi man pontificating about he's responsible for your physical safety when in the vehicle and then lecturing you on the health effects of drinking and loud noise before allowing you to disembark at the entrance of a night club. That's a bit harsh but it makes the point. It's an overwhelming sense of importance that's undue IMO.
    For most straightforward cases, the GP usually just has to match up your symptoms to a suitable drug and dose as per the indications in the BNF/IMF/Mims. They also "lecture you on the health effects" of X, Y and Z as well yet you still don't begrudge them their fee. For simple cases, there's not a lot for either the GP or Pharmacist to do. For more complex cases, you'll be glad that there's more than one person in charge of your drug therapy.
    Fatscally wrote: »
    No. I can see the work they do and the need for it. I do think though that the responsibility they hold or the difficulty of the job is exaggerated though.
    Which is a load of nonsense as you evidently don't have a clue what a Pharmacist does.
    Which might explain why junior staff are often seen carrying out their work.
    Ancillary staff stock shelves, put things in bags and operate tills. They don't do the pharmacist's job.
    If they were as clever and caring as they say they are they might promote exercise as a treatment for blood pressure or nutrition for depression (generally speaking) but no they fire chemicals over the counter and then argue that they're dead right about it.
    I'm pretty sure they do. Your GP does as well. But "exercise" isn't always as effective as a drug for a particular condition.
    So where they might know a lot about the chemicals they're supplying they don't seem to know as much about patient care as they think they do.
    Which is a load of nonsense.
    Anyway I didn't intend this thread to be a slant on the work that they, taxi drivers or anyone else does. Just simply that the €5 charge got past me and many others for years and now that I know about it and have read the arguments for it here I still can't justify it.
    The pharmacy's mark up (Which it doesn't have on many items dispensed) goes towards the cost of the item, its storage, the building costs e.t.c.

    The dispensing fee is the pharmacist's fee for reviewing and dispensing the prescription. It's not always particularly difficult but that doesn't mean it's not justifiable. Your GP probably doesn't find advising you to rest and relax in response to a viral infection to be very difficult either yet you seemingly don't begrudge them their fee.
    After reading this thread I'm still a bit confused as to how to manage the costs most effectively.

    So I have blood pressure meds - if I get a few months together (no need for debate on how many months or how safe) will I pay just one dispensing fee rather than a dispensing fee per month?
    Unless there's a particularly good reason, the maximum you'll get is a single month's supply at a time.

    That said, if you're paying more than €132 a month you can cap it at that with a DPS card. If not that, you can get a tax refund on all your prescriptions by asking for a MED1 form.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,676 ✭✭✭strandroad


    The OP is complaining about pharmacists, not GPs. Why do you feel the need to explain questionable pharmacy practice with "GPs are worse" all the time?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,992 ✭✭✭✭partyatmygaff


    mhge wrote: »
    The OP is complaining about pharmacists, not GPs. Why do you feel the need to explain questionable pharmacy practice with "GPs are worse" all the time?
    When did I say or even imply "GPs are worse"?

    A GP is a primary care healthcare professional. A community pharmacist is a primary care healthcare professional. If she doesn't begrudge the GP's fees for their services, I don't see under what basis she can begrudge the Pharmacist's dispensing fee.


  • Registered Users Posts: 173 ✭✭Fatscally


    Ok this has digressed into a bit of a tit for tat so this is my last post on it.
    First off it wasn't a rant, it was a genuine consumer alert about these charges since I was getting hit €15 x 6 for handing over 3 lousy packets of light meds. ~That's the point.

    I suppose you get the same "conceited air" with a "whiff of self importance" when you get in to a GP too, right?
    No, in one office I get a clear sense of a man that's over worked but doing his best in a working class community and supporting people (that struggle) on welfare. I use this guy because I know what's wrong with me going in and just need a prescription usually.
    In the second that mostly takes bookings only outside of emergencies that we use for my baby, it's a little more pretentious perhaps but the service is better, but no she doesn't act cocky in anyway and definately tries to be as thorough as possible, that's why we use her for my wife and baby.
    I love how you seemed to ignore the section of my last post that said that some bulk-forming laxatives (Psyllium, methylcellulose e.t.c.) can be used to treat diarrhea.
    You were talking without all the facts and I don't want to spend all day at this. The Pharmacist took back the box with "for constipation" written on it and gave me one with "for diarrhea" written on it without bull****ting an excuse other than "it's late on a friday :/". All the tech talk jargon is irrelevant. I'm an end user.
    For most straightforward cases, the GP usually just has to match up your symptoms to a suitable drug and dose as per the indications in the BNF/IMF/Mims. They also "lecture you on the health effects" of X, Y and Z as well yet you still don't begrudge them their fee. For simple cases, there's not a lot for either the GP or Pharmacist to do. For more complex cases, you'll be glad that there's more than one person in charge of your drug therapy.
    Who said that? The second Doc above has gotten a bit of a bashing from me more than once in these times of austerity since her overpriced fee of €50 for 15 minutes service. Especially when I have to visit a few times in a month as has happened and then I get lashed with meds costs.
    The first Doc you'd nearly tip him when you're flush coz he's so generous.
    Which is a load of nonsense as you evidently don't have a clue what a Pharmacist does.
    me no dumm dumm you dumm dumm, give me gum gum?
    Ancillary staff stock shelves, put things in bags and operate tills. They don't do the pharmacist's job.
    And stop the highly trained but tired on a Friday pharmacist from handing over laxatives to people suffering from diahrrea. No you want to talk about not giving credit where credit is due?!
    I'm pretty sure they do. Your GP does as well. But "exercise" isn't always as effective as a drug for a particular condition.
    I did put "generally speaking" because I know every case is individual.
    The pharmacy's mark up (Which it doesn't have on many items dispensed) goes towards the cost of the item, its storage, the building costs e.t.c.
    This is nonsense, apply Tesco to this logic, it's silly. That's a fiver for checking out sir.
    The dispensing fee is the pharmacist's fee for reviewing and dispensing the prescription. It's not always particularly difficult but that doesn't mean it's not justifiable. Your GP probably doesn't find advising you to rest and relax in response to a viral infection to be very difficult either yet you seemingly don't begrudge them their fee.
    Repeating yourself - yes I do, they charge too much in this economy.
    Unless there's a particularly good reason, the maximum you'll get is a single month's supply at a time.
    And they'll charge you multiple fivers each month. That's a particularly good reason not to.
    That said, if you're paying more than €132 a month you can cap it at that with a DPS card. If not that, you can get a tax refund on all your prescriptions by asking for a MED1 form.
    Thanks, I'll look into that. Doesn't seem to be much other than taxes for regular working people.


    Right that's it I'm done with this now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,992 ✭✭✭✭partyatmygaff


    Fatscally wrote: »
    No, in one office I get a clear sense of a man that's over worked but doing his best in a working class community and supporting people (that struggle) on welfare. I use this guy because I know what's wrong with me going in and just need a prescription usually.
    In the second that mostly takes bookings only outside of emergencies that we use for my baby, it's a little more pretentious perhaps but the service is better, but no she doesn't act cocky in anyway and definately tries to be as thorough as possible, that's why we use her for my wife and baby.
    And what exactly do you get in your pharmacy? :confused:
    You were talking without all the facts and I don't want to spend all day at this. The Pharmacist took back the box with "for constipation" written on it and gave me one with "for diarrhea" written on it without bull****ting an excuse other than "it's late on a friday :/". All the tech talk jargon is irrelevant. I'm an end user.
    So an honest mistake by one person is enough to judge the entire profession? :confused:
    And stop the highly trained but tired on a Friday pharmacist from handing over laxatives to people suffering from diahrrea. No you want to talk about not giving credit where credit is due?!
    To put it bluntly, it's not really a mistake that should have ever been made. It's not the ancillary staff member's job but they definitely did their bit there.
    This is nonsense, apply Tesco to this logic, it's silly. That's a fiver for checking out sir.
    Tesco's staff sell anything and everything and more than likely don't know more than you do about any of their products. Comparing Tesco to a Pharmacy makes little to no sense.

    In Tesco, you get goods. In a Pharmacy, you get goods and services. When you consider the function of both the comparison becomes even more ridiculous.
    And they'll charge you multiple fivers each month. That's a particularly good reason not to.
    Yes, they will. As will your GP for repeat prescriptions. It's not unreasonable to expect payment for services.
    Thanks, I'll look into that. Doesn't seem to be much other than taxes for regular working people.
    The simple truth is that drugs are expensive. They cost a lot to design and may cost a lot to manufacture. No government (Particularly not ours) can afford the cost of paying for all medicines and all the services that surround them for everyone. For what it's worth, the community health schemes over here are generous compared to the rest of the world.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 622 ✭✭✭greenbicycle


    palmcut wrote: »
    The pharmacy regulator will cancel the licence of a pharmacy if they are dispensing six months at a time. It is not safe to dispense six months at a time.

    I have gotten multiple months filled time in three different chemists, this is for both the pill and other drugs that I get prescribed......

    I am just sticking to one chemist these days but they still will fill whole prescriptions

    Surely so many chemists are not going to break a rule and risk what you are saying if it is true...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,175 ✭✭✭angeldelight


    Pharmacists can dispense 6 months of a prescription in one go. They can also refuse based in safety grounds eg sleeping tablets, or those known to be particularly dangerous in overdose.

    Declaration of interest: I'm a pharmacist


Advertisement