Survival of the weakest - Society's poorest doing the most breeding

Rabidlamb

There's a sperm deposit facility up the road from me that has 5 kids from 4 different fathers, she's only in her early 30's so plenty of time to work on the half forwards.
Every so often the kids start missing school & looking disheveled, the social services appear but she squeaks them up for the visits so none have been put into care, yet.

This activity is is the sole preserve of humans.
Were she an over productive mother in the wild without means to provide for her litter they would die or be picked off.
The survival of the fittest has led to the growth & perfection of our species to where it is today.
Will this retrograde step in evolution lead to packs of wandering savages in centuries to come ?, probably not but I believe it will stunt our progression as a species.

When someone who is a burden to the state can afford a large family while those who work can barely cover the costs of one child the system is flawed.
How could/should the government incentivise better family planning in those who can least afford it while also allowing more responsible parents the means to have more children ?.

El Weirdo

We had a single-mother bashing thread a short time ago.

Do we really need another clusterfuck?