We should form a boards group

TeddyTedson

There's power in numbers, am I right?
I have been thinking (shut up :P), with the likes of this referendum coming up. If we all voted together we could have a real impact.
We could elect a few of the good ones to the board, they would read over the finer details of these bills. Then lets say they decided we were to vote yes on this, we would all vote yes. We could have 100s of thousands of people possibly and would have the control again.
Over time we could use our vote to get things we wanted brought in to our law, legalise cannabis, prostitution, no more suspended sentences for scumbags with lots of previous convictions, bring back chain gangs and public punishments, medicinal use of mdma and removal of that USC.

What do we think!?

Pushtrak

Yes, because everyone on boards will randomly agree on something on the basis of being on boards.

rednik

An army too.

TeddyTedson

Pushtrak wrote: »

Yes, because everyone on boards will randomly agree on something on the basis of being on boards.

If we want the power people will just have to get over themselves and do it. It won't work if we don't all trust each other.
Even if you fell that you oppose the leaders stance on something if you just follow it will work out for the best. After making an impact we can get everything we want.

RichieC

Pushtrak wrote: »

Yes, because everyone on boards will randomly agree on something on the basis of being on boards.

You're wrong! of course we all agree. we are from the internet.

Immaculate Pasta

You could organise it all on your iPhone 4S TeddyTedson :cool:

Pushtrak

What sort of power does the person voting against how they'd want have? I don't see such a person as having any power.

grindle

HAHAHA!
Might as well stick with the devil we know.

dr.bollocko

I'm only backing it if we invade the falklands too.

TeddyTedson

Immaculate Pasta wrote: »

You could organise it all on your iPhone 4S TeddyTedson :cool:

unfortunately that's now MIA :mad:

RichieC

TeddyTedson wrote: »

unfortunately that's now MIA :mad:

That's what happens when your phone is also sweet lewt.

PseudoFamous

dr.bollocko wrote: »

I'm only backing it if we invade the falklands too.

If we took over all the smaller island nations, we could eventually use increasing scale to take over the world. I say we do that.

Coriolanus

Falklands is too far and we have no boats. I vote for the isle of man. We can get the ferry home if it doesn't work out.

Scioch

Sounds good. The mods of the forums running polls on particular issues to gauge users opinions and then chosen representatives on any particular topic acting as spokesperson to take it to the masses.

TeddyTedson

RichieC wrote: »

That's what happens when your phone is also sweet lewt.

What do you mean?

mikemac1

Who is leader?

Pushtrak

mikemac1 wrote: »

Who is leader?

Batman
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7fnmhj58o0k

Pandora2

I'm in Teddy!

Can you get on with it? There's a thread on here advocating that we have our kids micro-chipped, we could start there!!

I have very limited success with technology and even less with the kids, could you imagine if someone brought the two together:eek::eek::eek:

Jester252

dr.bollocko wrote: »

I'm only backing it if we invade the falklands too.

Infect is what we do. We have the US and its only a matter of time before Australia will fall to our might.

mikemac1

Can we sink some Spanish trawlers?

Over here stealing our fish and seducing our wimmins :mad:

TeddyTedson

mikemac1 wrote: »

Who is leader?

Highly respected boardies, like DeVore, AMP, Makikomai (might have spelled that wrong) Biggins, Degsy, Dudess, Sarky, Cyberwolf, Abi, myself:p (joke) and many more. They will take turns of being king boardsie.

Agent Smith

I call president

ClosedAccount

I nominate that guy ClosedAccount to be leader, heard hes sound

mikemac1

TeddyTedson wrote: »

Highly respected boardies, like DeVore, AMP, Makikomai (might have spelled that wrong) Biggins, Degsy, Dudess, Sarky, Cyberwolf, Abi, myself:p (joke) and many more. They will take turns of being king boardsie.

You've nominated Dubs, Corkonians, nordies and everyone else

You've started a civil war!

Scioch

TeddyTedson wrote: »

Highly respected boardies, like DeVore, AMP, Makikomai (might have spelled that wrong) Biggins, Degsy, Dudess, Sarky, Cyberwolf, Abi, myself:p (joke) and many more. They will take turns of being king boardsie.

I withdraw my support. I wont be a party to anything involving that lot being in charge of anything :P

Immaculate Pasta

ClosedAccount wrote: »

I nominate that guy ClosedAccount to be leader, heard hes sound

Pfft you'd have to at least double your post count before you can at least be put into consideration newbie :cool: :pac:

stoneill

I'm in - I'm an individual - tell me what to vote!

FloatingVoter

...and we'll get the lads and ladies in the junior cert thread to cast our votes for us. I'll be signing on on polling day and have work afterwards.

I call God Emperor (or failing that Minister of Finance).

ClosedAccount

TeddyTedson wrote: »

Highly respected boardies, like ClosedAccount, DeVore, AMP, Makikomai (might have spelled that wrong) Biggins, Degsy, Dudess, Sarky, Cyberwolf, Abi, myself:p (joke) and many more. They will take turns of being king boardsie.

I couldn't agree more.....

Teyla Emmagan

Well, I've given this proposal the consideration it deserves and...

Yes, I'm in. *rabble rabble*

Will we have pitchforks and stuff?

The King of Moo

I think meetings might end up being too much like Springfield Town-Hall meetings, and half the attendees would be swayed into taking immediate action by a catchy anti-single mothers song.

hondasam

TeddyTedson wrote: »

We could elect a few of the good ones to the board, they would read over the finer details of these bills. Then lets say they decided we were to vote yes on this, we would all vote yes.

What do we think!?

You are suggesting we just agree with what a few people decide, we lose the right to vote for what we want.

Samich

Did he say 100's of thousands? Probably max 3000 people would go with it.

hondasam

Samich wrote: »

Did he say 100's of thousands? Probably max 3000 people would go with it.

He definitely said we should all agree with what a few people decide whether we agree or not.

Jesus Shaves

Down with airplanes....

Jesus Wept

I will lead you.

Battered Mars Bar

TeddyTedson wrote: »

Then lets say they decided we were to vote yes on this, we would all vote yes.

No, problem? :P

hondasam

Andy Carroll wrote: »

I will lead you.

To Anfield?

Jesus Wept

hondasam wrote: »

To Anfield?

To the promise land.

Shryke

Abortions for some?

Temptamperu

I agree as long as I get me death camp for scummers, we could rival austwitz for the biggest pile of second hand shoes in europe :pac:

Defiler Of The Coffin

I have contacts in New York whom we can source weapons from.

Truly it will take an inspirational leader to hold this motley crew of would-be revolutionaries together. You have my sincere best-wishes Teddy.

wendell borton

It won't end well.

“The slave begins by demanding justice and ends by wanting to wear a crown.”
― Albert Camus

Shryke

That slave did pretty well for himself.

Jesus Shaves

Andy Carroll wrote: »

To the promise land.

yeah like Kenny Dalglish did

Ficheall

Seems fairly straightforward http://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/government_in_ireland/national_government/houses_of_the_oireachtas/registering_a_political_party.html

To be registered, your party has to satisfy the Registrar that:

>It is organised to contest elections
>It does not have less than 300 recorded members aged 18 or over. A party that applies for registration as a party organised to contest elections in part of the State, local elections or elections to Údarás na Gaeltachta only needs 100 recorded members aged 18 or over and at least least half of the party's recorded members are on the Register of Electors.
>In addition, the party must have a constitution, a memorandum or another document or set of rules that have been adopted by the party and that provide for:

>>An annual or other periodic meeting or conference of the party
>>An executive committee or similar body elected by the party, which administers the business of the party.

dan185

Andy Carroll wrote: »

To the promise land.

Same thing.

Johro

The King of Moo wrote: »

I think meetings might end up being too much like Springfield Town-Hall meetings, and half the attendees would be swayed into taking immediate action by a catchy anti-single mothers song.

What we really really need though, is a monorail.

Son Of A Vidic

TeddyTedson wrote: »

We should form a boards group

Teddy, on a site where most can't agree on the colour of shyte, I think you are being way too ambitious.