**Ag Science...Before/After**

Bubbleope

YeaaahFaoiSin wrote: »

Nah it was WB X WB. Offspring: WW WB BB

wasn't the second part EE EB EB and BB. :L 1:2:1 ratio.
did anyone get that? :pac:
no Ws in my answer! :P

edit: hmmm i think i did the genetics question wrong after reading back. XD

FaoiSin

Bubbleope wrote: »

wasn't the second part EE EB EB and BB. :L 1:2:1 ratio.
did anyone get that? :pac:
no Ws in my answer! :P

I mixed up W with E :P Yeah 2:1:1 Very straightforward Genetic's question and the rest of the paper wan't too bad

Bubbleope

YeaaahFaoiSin wrote: »

I mixed up W with E :P Yeah 2:1:1 Very straightforward Genetic's question and the rest of the paper wan't too bad

oh so you got the same as me? O: i wonder if we're right. i didn't think it was incomplete dominance when i first read it but now that i think back on it... it could have! :eek:

i liked the paper too. was really lucky actually. didn't have time to look at a lot of chapters and they didn't even show up. :pac: i was so lucky. although average grade probably.. waffled a few answers.. especially Q9. :pac:

FaoiSin

Bubbleope wrote: »

oh so you got the same as me? O: i wonder if we're right. i didn't think it was incomplete dominance when i first read it but now that i think back on it... it could have! :eek:

i liked the paper too. was really lucky actually. didn't have time to look at a lot of chapters and they didn't even show up. :pac: i was so lucky. although average grade probably.. waffled a few answers.. especially Q9. :pac:

Twas incomplete Dominance but I think the way to think of it is W being little e. So EB is actually Ee. Fairly sure your answer is right anyway.

Bubbleope

YeaaahFaoiSin wrote: »

Twas incomplete Dominance but I think the way to think of it is W being little e. So EB is actually Ee. Fairly sure your answer is right anyway.

hopefully i'll get a few marks anyways. even if it's not completely correct. :pac: ah well

FaoiSin

Bubbleope wrote: »

hopefully i'll get a few marks anyways. even if it's not completely correct. :pac: ah well

But it was right :P No point worrying til August

Bubbleope

YeaaahFaoiSin wrote: »

But it was right :P No point worrying til August

ara yeah PARTY! or bog work. :pac:

Siobhnk

Bubbleope wrote: »

wasn't the second part EE EB EB and BB. :L 1:2:1 ratio.
did anyone get that? :pac:
no Ws in my answer! :P

edit: hmmm i think i did the genetics question wrong after reading back. XD

That's exactly what I got!

zuppy10

When i was saying about the "We" thing i mean like you can use any letter for it eg. Ce or Te, its just something to show that neither e nor b are dominant. Which is the point of incomplete dominance!
Anyway, no-one know what the terminal sire was?

123 LC

zuppy10 wrote: »

no-one know what the terminal sire was?

i said it was a sire whose offsring were sold to be killed (ie for meat)

Bubbleope

zuppy10 wrote: »

When i was saying about the "We" thing i mean like you can use any letter for it eg. Ce or Te, its just something to show that neither e nor b are dominant. Which is the point of incomplete dominance!
Anyway, no-one know what the terminal sire was?

123 LC wrote: »

i said it was a sire whose offsring were sold to be killed (ie for meat)

123 LC is right. I think i said something like "It's a ram used in the mating process for meat production". O:
There's probably a better definition in the ag books. S: oh well.
And then my examples were the suffolk and the texel.

Siobhnk wrote: »

That's exactly what I got!

ah good

Siobhnk

Bubbleope wrote: »

123 LC is right. I think i said something like "It's a ram used in the mating process for meat production". O:
There's probably a better definition in the ag books. S: oh well.
And then my examples were the suffolk and the texel.


ah good

I think as long as we said it showed incomplete dominance after that we should be ok!

FaoiSin

Just let this die. I don't want to think about it :P