Kim Kardashian sums up everything that is wrong with society

Daveysil15

I'd say she's had more pricks than a second hand dart board!

The King of Moo

conorhal wrote: »

Then it's worse then we thought! Not only has society suffered a steep moral and intellectual decline, it would appear that societies eyesight is shot too!

I don't think she's so attractive either. It's partly the fact that she looks like a comic-book artist's drawing of a woman, but mostly that she seems profoundly vapid. I'd actually say her sister Khloe (I can't believe I just typed "Khloe") is more attractive: she's not as conventionally good looking, but she has more personality and is a lot smarter.

Fuinseog

Daveysil15 wrote: »

The model Kim Kardashian's title as the "hottest woman in the world" in a men's magazine sums up "almost everything that is wrong with Western society”, according to a leading private school headmistress.

http://uk.lifestyle.yahoo.com/kim-kardashian-sums-up-everything-that-is-wrong-with-society--headmistress-says.html

What's your opinion on it?

are these the words of a jealous swampdonkey who is not getting any herself?

KINGVictor

Daveysil15 wrote: »

The model Kim Kardashian's title as the "hottest woman in the world" in a men's magazine sums up "almost everything that is wrong with Western society”, according to a leading private school headmistress.

http://uk.lifestyle.yahoo.com/kim-kardashian-sums-up-everything-that-is-wrong-with-society--headmistress-says.html

What's your opinion on it?

Another self obsessed Head teacher who is probably a conservative voter spewing out nonsense to get media attention.

I would suggest that her employers review her position as the head of the school if she thinks Kim Kardashian is the main problem affecting her pupils. Interesting that she did not look closer to home with vile shows like - only way is essex etc and the effect these programmes have on young people. Some posters have mentioned Kim's tape- very wrong but she is not the only one. Recently, another of the crowd's favourite Tulisa was involved in a similar scandal- although admittedly, Kim performed far better at the head job.

The truth is that the problem with society is much more than Kim, it is a far wider problem from readily available porn on the internet, general societal permissiveness towards sex, alcohol etc, bullying via texting and social media networks ala Facebook etc and general lack of parental interest in child development and discipline.

If a child's role model is Kim Kardashian, beyonce or Rihinna- then the parents have done a very poor job in bringing up that child. Kids would be kids and they have that need for exploration and self gratification, it is the responsibility of the parents and indeed that headteacher in curtailing those behavioural tendencies instead of apportioning blame to celebrities that have a sad life themselves and doing anything to make money.

Pantsface

Love them, they are mental. Kim is hot, and ima girl

aligator_am

D1stant wrote: »

I'd say Megan Fox is hotter

IMO Megan Fox is the most over rated woman ever, head like a chip pan victim, nice body mind you, but that's it, and by most accounts a total cnut of a personality.

Cookie_Monster

Fuinseog wrote: »

swampdonkey

heh heh heh

aligator_am wrote: »

IMO Megan Fox is the most over rated woman ever, head like a chip pan victim, nice body mind you, but that's it, and by most accounts a total cnut of a personality.

don't forget those freaky thumbs

conorhal

The King of Moo wrote: »

I don't think she's so attractive either. It's partly the fact that she looks like a comic-book artist's drawing of a woman, but mostly that she seems profoundly vapid. I'd actually say her sister Khloe (I can't believe I just typed "Khloe") is more attractive: she's not as conventionally good looking, but she has more personality and is a lot smarter.

You mean Kong Kardashian? You must like snoo-snoo...

Scanlas The 2nd

The King of Moo wrote: »

conorhal wrote: »

Then it's worse then we thought! Not only has society suffered a steep moral and intellectual decline, it would appear that societies eyesight is shot too!

I don't think she's so attractive either. It's partly the fact that she looks like a comic-book artist's drawing of a woman, but mostly that she seems profoundly vapid. I'd actually say her sister Khloe (I can't believe I just typed "Khloe") is more attractive: she's not as conventionally good looking, but she has more personality and is a lot smarter.

Nonsense, 99.999999% of men prefer Kim.

unplayable

Scanlas The 2nd wrote: »

Nonsense, 99.999999% of men prefer Kim.

i actually would go kourtney/kim////////////////khloe

c_man

I'd insert into all, without discrimination.

Arawn

The King of Moo wrote: »

I don't think she's so attractive either. It's partly the fact that she looks like a comic-book artist's drawing of a woman, but mostly that she seems profoundly vapid. I'd actually say her sister Khloe (I can't believe I just typed "Khloe") is more attractive: she's not as conventionally good looking, but she has more personality and is a lot smarter.

So she's better looking even though you say she's not better looking, well that makes sense

smash

Her mum is a controlling psychotic bitch. She's her manager and get's her all her gigs, even the playboy one where she specifically said she didn't want to be naked and cried over it but her mother told her to cop on and just get on with it. There's rumours that her mother told her to do the sex tape too.

ScumLord

I saw that kardashians thing the other night and thought Kim was carrying a few extra pounds, see certainly wasn't stick thin like most TV celebs. I'm not saying she looked bad or anything, quite the opposite but she's not a waif. I always thought from a physical role model side of things she was a good example because she's simply got good genes, I get the feeling she doesn't work to hard to look the way she does.

The King of Moo

Scanlas The 2nd wrote: »

Nonsense, 99.999999% of men prefer Kim.

Your argument might sound valid if you'd said 100%.

Of course then you'd have been wrong, because I don't prefer Kim.

Arawn wrote: »

So she's better looking even though you say she's not better looking, well that makes sense

It doesn't make sense, but fortunately that's not what I said.

I said that I find Khloe (and Kourtney to a much lesser extent) more attractive, not better looking.

Of course we're talking about degrees here, and I don't actually find any of them particularly attractive.

Daveysil15

You'd shag her but you wouldn't bring her home to meet the parents.

ceegee

BRAIN FEEDs wrote: »

Biggins wrote: »

Sounds like the mother even, MIGHT be a un-class piece of work too!


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/21/kris-humphries-claims-kris-jenner-staged-kim-kardashians-sex-tape_n_1615165.html?utm_hp_ref=celebrity

Kris Humphries is a nobody who came to everyones attention when he dated and married one very desirable Kim Kardashian.

as for the mother,1 savvy business woman.

saw a recent epsiode where she came home and told the girls she was incontinent,so everyone was concerned for her until she told them she had landed a huge sponsorship deal with some company who deal with those womens issues.

fair play i say!:)

Wish I was the kind of nobody that earned 8 million a year playing for a major basketball team