Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Should/could I have used less links in new chain?

  • 04-07-2012 9:57pm
    #1
    rat_race
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 989 ✭✭✭


    Hi...

    My OEM chain had 106 links, and my new DID x-ring had 110 (including the rivet link), so I hacked 4 off, and put it on, along with new sprockets.

    BUT, at the right tension, the wear/wheel alignment indicator/notch (whatever it's called) is already past halfway to the back. This means, as my chain wears, I am likely to run out of tighening space and be unable to tighten it anymore even though the chain is fine. I could have pushed the wheel much farther forward, but the chain would obviously be too loose.

    Should/could I have taken more links out? I really think I could have done with 102...but it just seems wrong to do.

    Just curious for next time really...Not a hope I am taking it off and putting it back on again :) ... No idea if my rivets are rivetted "correctly" either. Scary stuff for a novice ;) ...

    Thanks!


Advertisement