Terry Court Case * Mod Note #51 *

Leiva

Yakult wrote: »

Did Jesus really have a baby lamb?

No it was Mary .

Mary had a little lamb ...

:pac:

Guy:Incognito

amiable wrote: »

I hope his personal hearing isn't on a day when he's due to collect somebody elses gold medal

Ivanovic can go instead.

amiable

I worry about society

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=79950534&postcount=3780

~Rebel~

Des wrote: »

Holy be the devine baby lamb of jaysis, Liverpool fans are insufferable when it comes to this shít.

Oh come on ffs, PEOPLE are insufferable when it comes to this shit.

Honestly, the way people talk on here sometimes, you'd swear there's actually some sort of hive mind with fans, when in fact the only thing they have in common is shouting for the same team.

People can be good. People can be bad. People can be irrational or stupid or petty. i know plenty of Liverpool fans I hate, and I know plenty of ManU fans I get on great with.

On issues like the above, taking a handful of peoples comments and branding it "liverpool fans" is retarded.
It's one of those things that really just grinds my gears.

willmunny1990

Although Anton clearly brought this on himself (rightly or wrongly), Terry being charged is the right decision. I have no doubt in my mind that he's as guilty as sin and will get a ban.

Leiva

~Rebel~ wrote: »

Oh come on ffs, PEOPLE are insufferable when it comes to this shit.

Honestly, the way people talk on here sometimes, you'd swear there's actually some sort of hive mind with fans, when in fact the only thing they have in common is shouting for the same team.

People can be good. People can be bad. People can be irrational or stupid or petty. i know plenty of Liverpool fans I hate, and I know plenty of ManU fans I get on great with.

On issues like the above, taking a handful of peoples comments and branding it "liverpool fans" is retarded.
It's one of those things that really just grinds my gears.

I wouldn't mind but he pulled that response/reaction right out of his own ass cause I never meant any malice with my post.

Sometimes people need to look at themselves before accusing others.

amiable

willmunny1990 wrote: »

Although Anton clearly brought this on himself (rightly or wrongly), Terry being charged is the right decision. I have no doubt in my mind that he's as guilty as sin and will get a ban.

That's like saying a girl deserved to be raped because she was wearing a skimping outfit and was asking for it.

willmunny1990

amiable wrote: »

That's like saying a girl deserved to be raped because she was wearing a skimping outfit and was asking for it.

I disagree.

There is nothing wrong, morally or otherwise, with a girl wearing a skimpy outfit.

It was wrong of Anton to insult Terry in the way he did, and he did it to provoke a reaction, which he got and then some. I'm not saying Terry was right in what he did, all I'm saying is that Anton clearly brought it on himself. If he wasn't trying to rile Terry in the first place, none of this would have happened.

MUSEIST

amiable wrote: »

That's like saying a girl deserved to be raped because she was wearing a skimping outfit and was asking for it.

No it isn't. Not even a little bit:rolleyes:

amiable

willmunny1990 wrote: »

I disagree.

There is nothing wrong, morally or otherwise, with a girl wearing a skimpy outfit.

It was wrong of Anton to insult Terry in the way he did, and he did it to provoke a reaction, which he got and then some. I'm not saying Terry was right in what he did, all I'm saying is that Anton clearly brought it on himself. If he wasn't trying to rile Terry in the first place, none of this would have happened.

I didn't say there was

amiable

MUSEIST wrote: »

No it isn't. Not even a little bit:rolleyes:

Aren't you the poster who thinks its ok to call someone a mong?

willmunny1990

amiable wrote: »

I didn't say there was

You implied it was by comparing it to Anton verbally abusing JT.

MUSEIST

amiable wrote: »

Aren't you the poster who thinks its ok to call someone a mong?

eh, what makes you think that.

amiable

willmunny1990 wrote: »

You inferred it was by comparing it to Anton verbally abusing JT.

I inferred that the excuse someone deserved something is like that.
2 wrongs don't make a right.
What Ferdinand said was ok because its true.
If he didn't want to be accused of shagging a team mates wife he shouldn't have done it.

Sgt Pepper 64

amiable wrote: »

I inferred that the excuse someone deserved something is like that.
2 wrongs don't make a right.
What Ferdinand said was ok because its true.
If he didn't want to be accused of shagging a team mates wife he shouldn't have done it.

errr, youve just slandered JT. Its never been proved to be true, she has always denied it and so has he.

What is it about you amiable? You post in pretty much every thread, and nearly always post something you know someone will disagree with?

Do you have something genuine to say or do you just like the attention?

I could have put money on you posting about JT being charged by the FA, yep your that predictable

amiable

Sgt Pepper 64 wrote: »

errr, youve just slandered JT. Its never been proved to be true, she has always denied it and so has he.

What is it about you amiable? You post in pretty much every thread, and nearly always post something you know someone will disagree with?

Do you have something genuine to say or do you just like the attention?

I could have put money on you posting about JT being charged by the FA, yep your that predictable

Did Football manager tell you to say that?
Goona throw your toys out of the pram again and tell me I'm on your ignore list?
It's an open forum so I post on the threads I want to.
You are the same bloke who had a dig at Kenny over Hillsborough. Classy.
I post my opinion and so fcukin what if I do

amiable

Sgt Pepper 64 wrote: »

errr, youve just slandered JT. Its never been proved to be true, she has always denied it and so has he.

What is it about you amiable? You post in pretty much every thread, and nearly always post something you know someone will disagree with?

Do you have something genuine to say or do you just like the attention?

I could have put money on you posting about JT being charged by the FA, yep your that predictable

And you the poster who said Anton Ferdinand deserved racist abuse

amiable

Sgt Pepper 64 wrote: »

errr, youve just slandered JT. Its never been proved to be true, she has always denied it and so has he.

What is it about you amiable? You post in pretty much every thread, and nearly always post something you know someone will disagree with?

Do you have something genuine to say or do you just like the attention?

I could have put money on you posting about JT being charged by the FA, yep your that predictable

I didn't slander John Terry by the way. I'll buy you a dictionary

Sgt Pepper 64

amiable wrote: »

Did Football manager tell you to say that?
Goona throw your toys out of the pram again and tell me I'm on your ignore list?
It's an open forum so I post on the threads I want to.
You are the same bloke who had a dig at Kenny over Hillsborough. Classy.
I post my opinion and so fcukin what if I do

what? your slandering me now! - is there no end to your slandering?
I never had a dig at kenny over hillsborough - wtf are you on about?

just for you

a malicious, false, and defamatory statement or report: a slander against his good name.

you must be 12 or something

amiable

Sgt Pepper 64 wrote: »

what? your slandering me now! - is there no end to your slandering?
I never had a dig at kenny over hillsborough - wtf are you on about?

just for you

a malicious, false, and defamatory statement or report: a slander against his good name.

you must be 12 or something

Slander is the spoken word. Libel is the written word.

smileyj1987

Well from what we learned about the FA is they will use probability in their investigation . So it will be hard to say what will happen although he was found not guilty in court because they have to be 100 % certain to convict him but if the FA have 51% belief he abused anton racially then he will be getting a ban . I wonder because he said he didn't abuse him racially can they add more games to his ban .

amiable

smileyj1987 wrote: »

Well from what we learned about the FA is they will use probability in their investigation . So it will be hard to say what will happen although he was found not guilty in court because they have to be 100 % certain to convict him but if the FA have 51% belief he abused anton racially then he will be getting a ban . I wonder because he said he didn't abuse him racially can they add more games to his ban .

when you are charged by the FA you are already deemed guilty

Sgt Pepper 64

amiable wrote: »

Slander is the spoken word. Libel is the written word.

Its essentially the same thing, but hey if you want to be picky

thast you back on ignore anyway and the season hasnt even started yet!

amiable

Sgt Pepper 64 wrote: »

Its essentially the same thing, but hey if you want to be picky

thast you back on ignore anyway and the season hasnt even started yet!

I love you too x

Beefy78

Mr.Crinklewood wrote: »

The FA have charged Terry.

You must be mistaken, mate. About a dozen people in here told me as fact that that wouldn't happen.

Beefy78

Beefy78 wrote: »

Mr.Crinklewood wrote: »

The FA have charged Terry.

You must be mistaken, mate. About a dozen people in here told me as fact that that wouldn't happen.

Internet is serious business.

_blank_

willmunny1990 wrote: »

Although Anton clearly brought this on himself

hahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Leiva

Rio looks to be getting a 4 game ban aswell .

The FA has today charged Manchester United's Rio Ferdinand with improper conduct in relation to comments posted on Twitter.

The allegation is that the player acted in a way which was improper and/or bought the game into disrepute by making comments which included a reference to ethnic origin and/or colour and/or race.

Ferdinand has until 4pm on 2 August 2012 to respond to the charge.

Giggsy11

I thought Manutd control FA and all the politics in England.

citytillidie

Leiva wrote: »

Rio looks to be getting a 4 game ban aswell .

Nah just a fine