FiveSive wrote: » OP I seem to be the only one so far who thinks Cavachons are a great breed! i have 2, both bought from a reputable breeder registered with the IKC who is passionate about Bichons & Cavaliers. Cavachons imo take the best from both breeds, they dont seem to be affected as much by the congenital heart defects that effect purebred cavaliers. If you research them a bit more thoroughly you will come across breeders who specialise in them only. I would recommned that you go onto the IKC's website, find the deatails & contact info for either the Bichon or cavaliers clubs, phone them up and ask them about Cavachons.
FiveSive wrote: » OP I seem to be the only one so far who thinks Cavachons are a great breed! i have 2, both bought from a reputable breeder registered with the IKC who is passionate about Bichons & Cavaliers.
FiveSive wrote: » I never said my 2 were IKC registered, i said the breeder who bred them has his Bichons and Cavaliers registered. I know you cant register Cavachons with IKC.
andreac wrote: » THERE ARE NO REPUTABLE BREEDERS OF DESIGNER DOGS, NOT ONE!!!!! :mad::mad: When will people realise this?? No responsible breeder crosses two dogs and gives it a fancy name, not one decent breeder will do this, are you hearing this?? Its about time people woke and see these people for what they really are, PUPPY FARMERS and nothing less!!! They do it for money, not for the good of the breed. If they did they wouldnt cross them in the first place then stick a bloody stupid name like Poochon, Cavachone, Pugalier etc etc on them. Ask a reputable breeder about Cavachons and i can tell you exactly what they would say, nothing, as they would hang up the phone straight away on you, because they dont breed designer dogs, only puppy farmers do that. The only people that specialise in them are puppy farmers. I think you seriously need to wake up and see the wood for the trees as you are absolutely clueless when it comes to designer breeds by the looks of it.... I wish people would take their heads out of the clouds and wake up to what these people are doing!!! Rant over :mad::mad:
FiveSive wrote: » Ok well just to say the breeder i bought from is 100% reputable. i visited his kennels 3 times before i picked up my 2 dogs and he has some of the friendliest, happiest dogs I have ever come across. The dogs living area is better than something you'd see in a Doggy day care. His life seems to revolve around dogs and while he does breed them he doesnt seem to do it for the money, id say he could have charged me twice what he did. I think sometimes when people hear of any of these designer dogs they immediately shout puppy farm and this most certainly wasnt one. And if you were a puppy farmer wouldnt the best thing be to stick with purebreds, they sell for way more. I would be of the opinion that cross breeds can take the the best from both. The Irish Guide dogs use labradoodles quite often, as the hair is less aggravating to people with allergies than a full labrador.
girl in the striped socks wrote: » While I can understand the genuine hate for puppy farmers from other posters, can you at least give FiveSive the benefit of the doubt that he didn't go to a back yard breeder & just happened to get lucky. .
tk123 wrote: » girl in the striped socks wrote: » While I can understand the genuine hate for puppy farmers from other posters, can you at least give FiveSive the benefit of the doubt that he didn't go to a back yard breeder & just happened to get lucky. . What else was it if it wasn't a puppy farmer/BYB? It doesn't need to be a barn with 50 dogs in it, or a shed out the back etc. The OP and anyone else who stumbles across this post need to realize what these people do and how they fool buyers into thinking they're reputable. The 'hostility' in this thread is towards gombeens who are churning out these pups. A lot of people here either have experience of dogs with health issues or indeed experience of reading heart breaking threads on here about poorly bred dogs ending up bad health.
andreac wrote: » Oh God, words fail. They really do, you really haven't a clue.... :rolleyes:
sral1 wrote: » One ? for all the young people in dog breeding today. Where do you think all the IKC breeds came from. Do you think God made them . NO. All breeds are man made by cross breeding. Am I missing something or was there a cut off point in history where no more new breeds were allowed. Andreac what breeds were used to develop the Rottweiler ??? Do you know ,,enlighten us. :rolleyes:
Evac101 wrote: » Actually they were breeding idealised standards of 'historical' dogs or creating breeds which they felt reflected ideals of looks or behaviour which they felt dogs should conform to which, given that the codified dog breeding trend developed out of the Eugenics movement, is hardly the most laudable of motives either. In many cases the dogs were breed to exaggerate features because it caused the owners standing within that community to grow and I find it hard to find cases (out side of Rev Parson & et al) where the breeding was performed with the goal of improving the dogs health or quality of life. Feel free to defend IKC/KC/UKC if you wish, it's entirely your right however it's roots were never in the camp of dog welfare and these organisations still have a long way to go before they'll be considered humane and dog (rather then dog owner) orientated.
ISDW wrote: » Watched pedigree dogs exposed did you?
**Vai** wrote: » Yeah complaining about cavachons and then advising someone to go IKC only seems a bit rich. Do yourself a favour OP and get yourself a little mongrel from a rescue, it'll save you a boatload in both upfront costs and medical costs down the line. Cavachon me hole.