Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Liverpool FC Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours Thread 12/13

1140141143145146203

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,311 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    Haven't seen anything saying that. It seems he's prefer to stay but if Liverpool accept then he'll go.




    Doesn't sound like someone who'll refuse to leave tbh.

    Indeed, sounds like that to me. Obviously no player can be above the club and he seems to recognise that.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,267 ✭✭✭opr


    I think a scenario has to be entertained is that a certain amount of chicken is going on between the club and Agger.

    Agger - Still no contract offer.
    Club - We've offered him a contract.
    Agger - Yeah but a pretty rubbish one.
    Club - Well it's that or we'll sell you.
    Agger - Makes public he doesn't want to leave.
    Club - Well we just set a price at which you will be sold.
    Agger - Ok I may love this club but I will leave if push comes to shove.

    Your move Liverpool.

    Opr


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 5,496 Mod ✭✭✭✭spockety


    K-9 wrote: »
    Indeed, sounds like that to me. Obviously no player can be above the club and he seems to recognise that.

    He can't refuse to leave, but he can refuse a destination.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,910 ✭✭✭✭whatawaster


    There's also the possibility (that won't be popular here) (and I'm not sure I'm convinced by it myself) that Agger wouldn't mind a move to City and is positioning things in PR terms so it looks like he is being forced out.

    I just think it is clear Rodgers doesn't want to sell him and I cant see the club going over his head. I think Agger will stay.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,910 ✭✭✭✭whatawaster


    spockety wrote: »
    K-9 wrote: »
    Indeed, sounds like that to me. Obviously no player can be above the club and he seems to recognise that.

    He can't refuse to leave, but he can refuse a destination.

    He can refuse to leave


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,539 ✭✭✭BenEadir


    spockety wrote: »
    He can't refuse to leave

    That's news to me Spockety, please elaborate?

    The only scenario where he can be forced to leave, as I understand it, is where the club pay up his remaining contract in full and release his registration thus allowing him to sign for another club without a transfer fee. All other scenarios require his agreement.

    Please correct me if I'm wrong.

    Ben


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 5,496 Mod ✭✭✭✭spockety


    BenThere wrote: »
    That's news to me Spockety, please elaborate?

    The only scenario where he can be forced to leave, as I understand it, is where the club pay up his remaining contract in full and release his registration thus allowing him to sign for another club without a transfer fee. All other scenarios require his agreement.

    Please correct me if I'm wrong.

    Ben

    Yes that's what I'm driving at. A club can effectively do what they want with a player.. buy him out or constructive dismissal in the reserves


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,117 ✭✭✭✭Leiva


    Ramirez looks further away than ever .
    @tancredipalmeri: Ramirez's agent Betancourt:"We had meetings with agents close to Liverpool management.But after that Liverpool didn't make any bid".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,539 ✭✭✭BenEadir


    spockety wrote: »
    Yes that's what I'm driving at. A club can effectively do what they want with a player.. buy him out or constructive dismissal in the reserves

    Sorry Spockety, I'm even more confused.com now :confused:

    If the club buys the player out they end up paying him millions and get no transfer fee for him. Is that what you have in mind???

    If they put him in the reserves they just end up letting his contract wind down and at the end of the contract they still get no transfer fee for him.

    What has constructive dismissal got to do with anything? As long as the player trains when and where he's instructed to by the club, is available to play matches for the club (including reserve matches) and doesn't consistently break the rules of the club (taking drugs, breaking curfews etc) there is nothing they can do to force a player to accept a move to another club if he doesn't want to go.

    The days of players being slaves are over ;)

    Ben


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,373 ✭✭✭Dr Galen


    Leiva wrote: »
    Ramirez looks further away than ever .

    Palmeri tweeting earlier that the same agent says that Spurs were the only ones to make a solid bid of 16 million and that the deal didn't go through because the wages on offer were not high enough. Said that Ramirez wouldn't leave Bologna if the wages were to stay pretty much the same.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,655 ✭✭✭El Inho


    He can refuse to leave

    Joe Cole...


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 5,496 Mod ✭✭✭✭spockety


    BenThere wrote: »
    Sorry Spockety, I'm even more confused.com now :confused:

    If the club buys the player out they end up paying him millions and get no transfer fee for him. Is that what you have in mind???

    If they put him in the reserves they just end up letting his contract wind down and at the end of the contract they still get no transfer fee for him.

    What has constructive dismissal got to do with anything? As long as the player trains when and where he's instructed to by the club, is available to play matches for the club (including reserve matches) and doesn't consistently break the rules of the club (taking drugs, breaking curfews etc) there is nothing they can do to force a player to accept a move to another club if he doesn't want to go.

    The days of players being slaves are over ;)

    Ben

    Maybe I'm talking rubbish alright.

    I just mean in the context of agger him saying he won't stay where he's not wanted, but I'm sure he won't be forced to go somewhere he doesn't want to..


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,655 ✭✭✭El Inho


    391294_459094877455860_2085758330_n.jpg
    A headline from EkstraBladet [Danish newspaper] - about Daniel Agger: "He is going to be a legend".

    Apparently it states that Agger has told Liverpool that he will refuse any offers from Man City because of his loyalty to the club.

    via Facebook.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,588 ✭✭✭daithijjj


    There's also the possibility (that won't be popular here) (and I'm not sure I'm convinced by it myself) that Agger wouldn't mind a move to City and is positioning things in PR terms so it looks like he is being forced out.

    I just think it is clear Rodgers doesn't want to sell him and I cant see the club going over his head. I think Agger will stay.

    There's conspiracy theories and then there's things that really don't add up. One day you decide to tattoo your knuckles in YNWA and the next you start making elaborate political advances to engineer a move?.

    I think he will stay.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,206 ✭✭✭✭amiable


    I don't think Ramirez was ever a serious target once Kenny and Clarke left.
    I think his agent just used Liverpool as a club to keep his client in the news.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,662 ✭✭✭Luckycharms_74


    http://www.lfcts.com/understanding-the-4-3-3-centre-backs/


    Understanding the 4-3-3: Centre Backs

    Sami Faizullah August 13, 2012 0

    It seems a bit strange to divide the team into distinct sections. Under the Rodgers system, such a distinction won’t be as evident. But to better interpret the formation being implemented at Anfield, it would be easier to first decipher the various zones involved.

    The basics of this approach are pretty clear to everyone, particularly pertaining to the short passes, quick touches, movement. But to really see how this fits into a team, we’d first have to understand how each player and each zone are specifically set out. Rodger’s 4-3-3 doesn’t have much of a distinction from the general 4-3-3 approach. However as the season progresses one might notice a difference in basic mentality of the players at Liverpool when compared to those at Swansea. That being an attacking emphasis as opposed to a more defensive layout.

    As most football formations incorporate, the 4-3-3 too has a four man final line of defence. But contrary to usual style, this is anything but a flat back four. The movement as mentioned is vital in this approach and lazy defenders hanging at the back and being solid when the opposition attack would pretty much impair the entire system. A basic understanding is that the defenders defend, protecting the man in between the nets behind them and are able to get the ball as far away from their territory as possible. But with the 4-3-3 the defence don’t have such a simple job. Their duties are more complex than that. Rodgers has emphasised on the importance of training and prioritised this as the place to select his starting eleven. It is at Melwood that all the players will really be able to adapt to the new style. It is in training that the defenders will learn how to widen their abilities.

    When you think of the role of the two men at the heart of the defence, its seems pretty clear as to what their presence in the side is. But contrary to popular belief, the defenders will not exist to mark the strikers, win the headers and pump the ball clear. Many have heard the statement “attack is the first line of defence”. Well in the 4-3-3 the defence is the zone that starts the attack and the central defenders being the deepest line of the outfield are presented with this role.

    But lets first analyse how the defenders will set up when put against an opposition attack.

    Playing the pressing game is key to the success of this formation. Sitting deep is not an option. Opposition shouldn’t be given time on the ball. The closer the opposition get into your half, the better chance they have of formulating a decent attack. Putting an end to the attack as soon as possible reduces the chances of a successful opposition attack. This would mean defenders going higher up the pitch. Based on the phase of play they may even need to cover for the midfield while defending. But it would be criminal if both the two center halves leave the safety of their deeper position in a bid to prevent an attack. So when one of the defenders moves forward to put pressure on the advancing attack, his partner would need to cover for him at the back. This second defender would need to now lay deep in defence should the possibility of his partner failing to win possession arise. His failure could have arised due to two reasons. 1) The player in possession managed to get past the pressuring center back and now has a more clear chance at goal. 2) He managed to pass the ball to a teammate in a better position who now has a more clear chance at an attack. For either of these reasons or both, the deeper defender would have to stay back to protect his goalkeeper from a shot at goal.


    96zN1.png


    Obviously now such a situation would most likely arise when the ball is being played through the middle, where the central defenders largely exist. However there does arise the possibility of the center backs having to cover for the wider defenders with the help of the midfielders in certain scenarios. This will be explained more in detail in the next part but there will be many scenarios when the full backs have left their defensive duties in favour of an attacking role and haven’t got back in time. But in such a situation as well, the same policy is followed. A central defender goes ahead to stop an attack from the wing in the absence of the full back, his partner covers for him deeper. And the midfield would have to take a stand in the middle. The role of the midfield too will be dealt with in the latter part of this series.

    The role of these defenders in defence doesn’t end here either. A less highlighted role of theirs would be the movement with the rest of the team as a unit when a wide opposition attack occurs. With the pressuring play, two maybe three players will take the space in and around the opposition player in possession and his passing options. The rest of the players however also play a significant part in the horizon. If an attack occurs from the wide areas, it is largely the duty of the full-backs and midfielders to defend. Their maybe a few exceptional situations though. But the recurring theme would be for the full-backs and midfielders to defend. When this happens, both the central defenders will come closer to the flanks. So if the opposing player does manage to wriggle his way through the full backs and midfielders, or is able to pick out a decent pass, there would still be another two players a bit wide who he would have to get past. This goes with the policy of crowding round the area where the opposition have the ball. Make a sort of enclosure or shield to prevent the attack going any further. Needless to say that work rate and movement are vital for the central defenders in this situation.


    uJWi0.png

    Now when these two defenders regain possession of the ball, whether that be at the edge of the box, far from it or at the flanks, they are not required to hoof it clear. Even in a mode of desperation, playing it out is the scheme. This would involve the center backs to look up and actually pick out a pass rather than getting the burden of the ball off their backs. Now the defenders have a few options, the obvious choice which is widely followed as much as the desperate clearance is playing it out wide to the full backs or a wide midfielder dropping deep. While a desperate clearance is the safe and basic way out in usual style of the defenders, this particular style would involve playing it to the full back as the basic option. It must be stated again, hoofing it clear should not be an option, as much as possible.

    Another option the defenders have is taking a more daring role and having the confidence to move forward with the ball. Being fearless enough to take on a midfielder or two when needed. This would increase the burden on the opposition midfielders even more who would have had to leave their duty of marking their counterparts. The midfielders would further move forward to pressurise the defence allowing the defenders to constantly come forward. This is another shift in play done by the defenders. Opposition would be constantly under pressure and forced backwards.

    5ybSe.png


    Another point to be noted is when the defenders are playing against an attack and gain possession of the ball, despite the dangers of the opposition around the box, the better option would be too again play the ball out with their feet as the opposition is now vulnerable to an attack due to numbers they sent forward and a quick attack could catch them out.

    This attacking style that is required for a defender can be termed as an extra-deep lying playmaker. In an attacking phase his role is no different to a midfield deep lying playmaker. But it is obvious he will playing this role from further down the pitch. It should be mentioned here that while quick touches and short passes are crucial in this style, the defenders would play such passes in a more attacking sense ie if they are closer into the midfield or have a midfielder dropping deep to help them out. When they are higher up the pitch they have the same role of a midfielder and are expected to play as such without any stress. This would mean being comfortable with possession in the midfield to the point that they can even play a quick one two with a midfielder to shake the defence off them and possibly take a shot at goal or a late run into the box after the ball has found its way out wide.

    With regards to Liverpool it can largely be seen that Skrtel and Agger would be the obvious choices for the two center back positions. Agger breeds on playing like an extra deep lying playmaker and he would flourish with having to move forward with the ball at his feet. He would also be successful with moving forward and putting pressure. Skrtel would be a more than apt solid cover. Having said that the task of going forward and putting pressure lies with the defender on whose side the attack is emerging. Coates is still young and learning but it can be seen that his possesses the traits of both Martin and Daniel. He has shown he can be good on the ball while still being a strong defender. Carragher has been guilty of hoofing the ball clear often. And with that not being the main reason, he will find lesser playing time. But he can prove to be a good cover when needed. Martin Kelly has mostly been played wide by former Liverpool managers but he too can be comfortable in the center. A role he has occupied for the reserves and the U-21 England team. Andre Wisdom, Stephen Sama, Conor Coady are others who can play in defence but they’ll find opportunities hard to come by this season.

    Liverpool fans have been hoping that Man City fail in their attempt to sign our Great Dane. The concerns are understandable. Agger is someone who would be absolutely vital for the success of the 4-3-3. His play helps linking the defence with midfield and ultimately attack. In his absence we would need our deep lying playmaker to fall further deep in order to collect the ball and move it forward. With Agger in the team, it relieves the midfielder from this duty and instead Agger would assume this role. When in complete control and in attack, Agger would even occupy the spot next to the defensive minded midfielder/deep lying playmaker.

    Skrtel as mentioned would be an ideal cover but he too would need to add pressure when called upon. But largely he would function as the solid centre back who would be more defensive that his partner. This season could prove to be vital for Seb Coates. It could be his breakthrough season. Irrespective of Agger’s future, Coates will be given opportunities to break into the first team. Its rare to find defenders who can be solid defensively and still possess quality attacking ability. This skill has to be taught well, and it will be pivotal for the career of the Uruguayan that he is being coached by Rodgers. It will be hard to make Carragher change his style but his experience and knowledge to read the game cannot be ignored. Also he would be vital for the development of the younger players.

    Strikers attack, defenders defend is the general accepted theme. But as the 4-3-3 has proved and as we will learn from watching Liverpool play this season, that is the opinion of a narrow


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,397 ✭✭✭✭Turtyturd


    spockety wrote: »
    Maybe I'm talking rubbish alright.

    I just mean in the context of agger him saying he won't stay where he's not wanted, but I'm sure he won't be forced to go somewhere he doesn't want to..

    They can't force him but if he has two years left on his contract they can force him to play in the reserves for the duration, which in turn will cost him his place with the international team and reduce the amount he would make when he is free to leave.

    Essentially for the sake of his career he would have no choice but to go.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,910 ✭✭✭✭whatawaster


    daithijjj wrote: »
    There's also the possibility (that won't be popular here) (and I'm not sure I'm convinced by it myself) that Agger wouldn't mind a move to City and is positioning things in PR terms so it looks like he is being forced out.

    I just think it is clear Rodgers doesn't want to sell him and I cant see the club going over his head. I think Agger will stay.

    There's conspiracy theories and then there's things that really don't add up. One day you decide to tattoo your knuckles in YNWA and the next you start making elaborate political advances to engineer a move?.

    I think he will stay.

    I think he will too


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,373 ✭✭✭Dr Galen


    Kess73 wrote: »
    Then again the early promise he showed was as a 21 year old player. Then as a 22 year old he had the massive falling out with Magath and was bombed out on loan to Roma last season where he did not seem to settle on or off the pitch.


    As said earlier, I think there could be a good to very good player in him, but he would need to cut the brain farts out of his game in order to attain his potential as he can be very like the Skrtel of the season before last in terms of errors.

    Then again he would not be an expensive player to buy as I doubt he would cost more than £6m at this stage and he does speak english.

    I do think he suffers a bit from the same "Agger" effect as Skrtel though, as in when he is in a team that does not contain Agger he is more prone to error.
    -Ade- wrote: »
    I thought so too at the time. But then as you said, his early form petered out and Magath as you probably are aware of is a right character to put it kindly, one of whom many player has fallen out of favour with.

    Kjaer's time in Roma was a disaster too. Roma weren't great last season, fair enough, but my word, some of his defending was baffling to say the least.

    I think the "Agger" effect affects everyone tbh. Carra looks a hell of a lot better even beside him. Fcuk, even I'd look decent beside him. :D

    As far as Kjaer goes, I just think he has had an awful 2 years or so. None of what has been going on can have been positive for him and his on field performances. I think with the right manager and coaching we could see him back to that earlier potential. I'd be uneasy though with him as an Agger replacement though, I would say that.

    All for nothing though, as reports are suggesting that Skrtel is on the verge of a new deal. I'm not unhappy with that before anyone starts. He is a good player and I'll be delighted if he kicks on after last season. I just remain to be convinced that he can deliver that level of performance consistently and so, if a big money offer had of come in for him this summer I'd have been relatively ok with him moving on.


  • Registered Users Posts: 630 ✭✭✭gaelicred


    HerFrom @LFCGlobe

    This is the Daniel Agger situation, as it stands:

    Brendan Rodgers wants to keep Agger and Agger is equally committed to remaining at Liverpool.

    However, the owners believe selling Agger for an 'exceptional fee' can help the club make up for last year's excessive losses. This resulted in Agger not being offered a new contract, as was planned at the start of the summer.

    Manchester City and Barcelona both enquired about Agger last month and Liverpool quickly set their price tag on the player which resulted in Barcelona backing out as they were unwilling to match the asking price.

    Man City started negotiations with Liverpool, which are still on-going, and are using Liverpool's interest in Adam Johnson to bring the fee down. They have, so far, had three bids rejected, one which involved Johnson moving on a season-long loan with Liverpool paying all of the player's wages.

    We can confirm that the club today started discussions with Per Steffensen - Agger's agent - about a new contract to put pressure on Man City to pay their asking price before an official contract is offered.

    As it stands, neither club are budging from their stance and with contract discussions now opening, Agger will remain at Liverpool next season.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,243 ✭✭✭✭Jesus Wept


    Throwing good money after bad. Wp.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,206 ✭✭✭✭amiable


    Now Ben Smith confirms Liverpool are trying get Tello and Sahin on loan.
    He goes on to say that a deal for Tello is closer.


  • Registered Users Posts: 630 ✭✭✭gaelicred


    amiable wrote: »
    Now Ben Smith confirms Liverpool are trying get Tello and Sahin on loan.
    He goes on to say that a deal for Tello is closer.

    I thought Barca said Tello was going nowhere


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,066 ✭✭✭Washington Irving


    gaelicred wrote: »
    I thought Barca said Tello was going nowhere

    Nah, Twitter said Tello was going nowhere


  • Registered Users Posts: 630 ✭✭✭gaelicred


    SaulGoode9 wrote: »
    Nah, Twitter said Tello was going nowhere

    Good point:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,105 ✭✭✭mada999


    Turtyturd wrote: »
    They can't force him but if he has two years left on his contract they can force him to play in the reserves for the duration, which in turn will cost him his place with the international team and reduce the amount he would make when he is free to leave.

    Essentially for the sake of his career he would have no choice but to go.

    I can't see Liverpool keeping D'Agger in the reserves.... Their would be huge fan pressure and outcry to get him playing again in the first team...

    Stick to your guns Daniel son Liverpool will reap the rewards this season... he's perfeck for our "system".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,473 ✭✭✭✭Super-Rush


    So Agger wants to stay.

    The manager wants to keep him.

    Yanks out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,473 ✭✭✭✭Super-Rush


    Oh yeah.

    Subscribes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,163 ✭✭✭✭danniemcq


    96zN1.png
    uJWi0.png
    5ybSe.png

    who's this player fella?

    seems to be all over the park


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,662 ✭✭✭Luckycharms_74


    danniemcq wrote: »
    who's this player fella?

    seems to be all over the park

    Don't tell anyone but according to Twitter we are set to buy him for €99 millions :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,182 ✭✭✭Sappy404


    The player wants to stay and the manager wants to keep him. There's no possibility he'll play in the reserves if he's not sold.

    However he has as good as said in that interview that he'll go if the club decides to sell him. To me it looks like it will purely come down to Liverpool and Man City sorting out a deal unless Agger signs that new contract. City have the money and the makeweight players, unfortunately, and now is the time for Liverpool to sell him if he only has 2 years left on his current deal and isn't agreeing to the extension.

    I'm not optimistic of him staying.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,163 ✭✭✭✭danniemcq


    Don't tell anyone but according to Twitter we are set to buy him for €99 millions :D

    so young and English then?


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,952 ✭✭✭Morzadec


    amiable wrote: »
    Now Ben Smith confirms Liverpool are trying get Tello and Sahin on loan.
    He goes on to say that a deal for Tello is closer.

    Would be happy with either one of these. Both would be fantastic.

    Agger staying looking like a more likely prospect.

    Transfer window is starting to look a little better since the doom-and-glooming going on a week or two back


  • Registered Users Posts: 279 ✭✭Captain Morgan Freeman


    danniemcq wrote: »
    who's this player fella?

    seems to be all over the park

    Dirk Kuyt.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,662 ✭✭✭Luckycharms_74


    From Richard Buxton

    There seems to be a lack of collusion at #LFC with regards to Daniel Agger's future. Brendan Rodgers wants the defender to stay at Anfield, as does the player himself, but the club's owners, Fenway Sports Group, appear to think otherwise which has led to #MCFC's recent pursuit.

    The Americans, it appears, consider Agger's injury record, though vastly improved last season, as the designated departure to deliver Rodgers further funds to rebuild. Last summer's ill-fated home grown transfer policy has left FSG highly reluctant to bankroll another spending spree.

    New deals for both Agger and Martin Skrtel have remained on the table since the end of last season, when both harboured misgivings about the progress undertaken at Anfield, and it would prove a ruthless and risky move if the Denmark international was sold against both his and his manager's wishes.

    Rodgers himself may have a vision of the long-term project at Liverpool but if that vision was compromised by being overridden by his employers, it would bring what has thus far been a very smooth honeymoon period to an abrupt end.


  • Registered Users Posts: 630 ✭✭✭gaelicred


    How reliable is Richard Buxton


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,397 ✭✭✭✭Turtyturd


    Don't tell anyone but according to Twitter we are set to buy him for €99 millions :D

    Willy says we won't get him, he thinks he won't go to a club without CL football.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,662 ✭✭✭Luckycharms_74


    gaelicred wrote: »
    How reliable is Richard Buxton

    Very. One of the few that is


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭willmunny1990


    Turtyturd wrote: »
    Willy says we won't get him, he thinks he won't go to a club without CL football.

    He won't.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,662 ✭✭✭Luckycharms_74


    He won't.

    Is is not past your bedtime :rolleyes:


  • Subscribers Posts: 32,855 ✭✭✭✭5starpool


    He won't.

    Bet you he won't go to a club with CL football. Forum access bet for that specific Player?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,504 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde




  • Registered Users Posts: 630 ✭✭✭gaelicred


    That would be a great addition if we can do it


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭willmunny1990


    5starpool wrote: »
    Bet you he won't go to a club with CL football. Forum access bet for that specific Player?

    I didn't even read what player turty was referring to, just assumed it was Sahin because afair that's the only player I said won't go to a club without CL football.

    So yeah, that bet is on with regards Sahin. No problem.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,910 ✭✭✭✭whatawaster


    Would be disappointed if there isn't an agreement to buy in any deal for Tello.

    If he does work out we won't want to lose him in 12 months.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,267 ✭✭✭opr


    gaelicred wrote: »
    That would be a great addition if we can do it

    How many times have you seen Tello? Why do you think he would be a great signing?

    Opr


  • Subscribers Posts: 32,855 ✭✭✭✭5starpool


    I know that Sterling is too young to play a significant role this season, but I wouldn't want him blocked by a loanee we would likely not be able to sign who has a touch of the headless chicken, albeit a fast one, at times.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,119 ✭✭✭Colemania


    gaelicred wrote: »
    That would be a great addition if we can do it

    He's fairly average in fairness. He'd be an ok squad player but we need someone who'll be in the starting 11 week in week out.


  • Registered Users Posts: 630 ✭✭✭gaelicred


    Saw him quite a bit both in Barcas a and b team
    he has pace skillful on the ball and he scores goals


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,504 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/liverpool-transfers-fulhams-clint-dempsey-1259543

    Poor Demsey, He's like a teenage boy who thinks a girl likes him, but she does not


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement