People who dont read books

marienbad

Jim S wrote: »

Reading is fine, I would think there are very few here who do not read , it is fundamental in the learning process.
Problem is some folks who do read seem not to be able to apply what they read and cannot place it within the context of history ...... denial of genocide being one prety obvious example and the misplaced belief that AH was some form of gift to mankind or a genius are a few other examples.

But that is that just another generalisation that dos'nt mean that much ? Of course people misuse, misunderstand ,misinterpret what they read. But that is more an issue with people than reading .

Jim S

Marienbad

But that is that just another generalisation that dos'nt mean that much ? Of course people misuse, misunderstand ,misinterpret what they read. But that is more an issue with people than reading .

True to some extent , and some people write with similar aims in mind.

To answer the basic question "Why do people not read books" , as other folks have mentioned passive learning via "Sky" is as boring as it is lazy and it is as bland as it is uninformative.
Rather repetitive sometimes low budget poorly made TV has made folks lazy.

puffishoes

Jim S wrote: »

Rather repetitive sometimes low budget poorly made TV has made folks lazy.

Surley there's more badly written ****e books?

50 shades of? etc?

marienbad

Jim S wrote: »

Marienbad


True to some extent , and some people write with similar aims in mind.

To answer the basic question "Why do people not read books" , as other folks have mentioned passive learning via "Sky" is as boring as it is lazy and it is as bland as it is uninformative.
Rather repetitive sometimes low budget poorly made TV has made folks lazy.

I think it is even simpler than that - if you come from a family that reads you more than likely will read and in turn your family will read.

Why it then descends into snobs that read versus thickos that don't debate I really have never experienced .

I am a classical music fan and a sports fanatic and I have seen that dichotomy much, much more in that area with the worst offenders/snobs being the music guys, where as the sports guys just go -really and throw in a comment about wishing to get into music more but alas kids job etc .

johnny_ultimate

I think some of the generalisations in this thread are unfortunate. There's such a wealth of great art being made today - from books to films to music to TV to video games to any other manner of mediums - that I can't imagine dismissing any of them. It feels... strange to have to defend my love of fiction in all its shapes and forms, but nothing at all impresses me more than a great artist's ability to hook me with their creation.

I tend to stick with contemporary literature at the moment, but in recent years have been working my way through the back catalogues of David Mitchell, Jonathan Franzen, Haruki Murakami, Cormac McCarthy, David Foster Wallace, Kurt Vonnegut and others (as well as the odd one off discovery). All of these writers have engrossed me with their literary skills: their abilities to craft convincing worlds and characters out of words and imagination. Murakami's books transport you to surreal, intense alternate realities that have a profound emotional impact that's almost impossible to describe. Mitchell's expertise with historical settings and unusual narratives brings his settings alive in vivid, exhilirating detail (I was pretty much in a constant state of 'swoon' reading the Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet). Franzen's ability to probe into the dynamics of contemporary society resonate deeply while never forgetting to provide a good laugh. I could go on and bore you with further hyperbole, but it's late and I'm feeling generous From the populist to the obtuse, these writers and many others have provided endlessly rewarding experiences for me.

It always saddens me to see people claim 'originality is dead' or 'everything is formulaic and/or crap'. No: talented people are still telling vital, compelling stories. Film is consistently producing a plethora of amazing works - from A Separation to Himizu to Margaret to, heck, Cabin in the Woods. What's so depressing is so many do not get beyond specialist theatres or small DVD releases while the multiplexes are happy to fill screens with nonsense. It's the same with books - a quick glance at a bestsellers list can instill a sense of frustration and dread, but head over to the A-Z section and you're frankly spoiled for choice. The biggest problem with trying to consume the best books or films is trying to keep track of all these wonderful works, and - more distressingly - trying to find the time to experience as much as one possibly can.

Yes, reading isn't for all, and independent and world cinema might turn people off. But just beyond the mainstream (and sometimes smack bang in the middle of it), there's a wealth of accessible, beautifully realised works. It seems such a shame to me personally to cut oneself off from these experiences, or even cut oneself off from all but one or two genres. Humanity continues to create great art, great fiction and great entertainment, as it always has done (haven't even gotten started on classics) - I personally think we should all try our hardest to embrace it.

Jim S

I can only but agree wit JU's last post getting the time to read and view is difficult.
About 2 months ago I started reading Craig Symonds "The Battle of Midway" half way through it - can only give it time as it comes to hand usually before falling asleep !
(A very well written book , first I have read on this subject excellent in that the author takes you from Pearl harbour to Midway via all Japanese naval operations and the behind the scenes intelligence gathering / code breaking.)
Presently doing this and stealing an hour to watch Liam Neeson in "Michael Collins", have had this for bout three years and never watched it until now.

Tigerbaby

Books This is exactly how they work.JPG

m5ex9oqjawdg2i

I love reading, but I would think it very childish for somebody to pass judgement on those who do not read. Is it something you ask people a lot OP?

So what if "educated" people read or not... reading can be damn boring for people.