NFC 2012

PacFish

I'll see you in week 2 Ben

Division of death I'd say

BigBadRob83

Played with Cowboys online as though might get them, good receiving corps. Just need to XP Romo into a clutch QB. Really like their offense, and will have to see about the D.

Should be fun division.

How did the Skins fall to Ben?
Thought there's be a lot more interest in them with RG3 and them being in the demo. Well at least he'll find it (more) difficult to improve via the draft.

PADRAIC.M

Wow I can't believe I got the cards at pick 30?! Really looking forward to trying these guys out today! If only I had an Oline lol!

Danger_dave1

Well the NFC East is just as difficult in real life as it is in the BFL. Should be fun match up's tho.. Time for the insulting of each others franchises to began!

Paully D

A couple of nice divisions so far.

NFC East is very, very tough once again this year. I too was surprised that the Redskins fell to day 4, I thought they'd be gone when I was picking on day 3 to be honest. I played with RGIII a few times myself and the read option is lethal, he's also good out of the shotgun and will just get better year after year. Add to that arguably the best player in the franchise is controlling them. The main reason they were probably still there on day 4 was due to question marks over the O-line and little draft picks etc, but at the end of the day I still wouldn't like to be playing against Santry twice a season. Empacher was a tough match up last year even with a poor QB and now has an elite QB to add to a very good run threat in Bradshaw, and probably the best D-line in the game. The Cowboys were a team I thought may fall to me on day 3 so played with them a bit earlier in the week and really liked them. I probably would have taken them if possible. One of the highest rated QB's, good WR's and a decent run threat in Murray. Add to that the joint highest rated defensive player in the game who's a sack machine and you get a very good team. The Eagles will also challenge providing Vick can stay fit for the majority of the season. Notyalc will have two highly rated WR's to aim at and one of the best HB's in the game. Another team and player I wouldn't like to face twice a season with that offence.

I think the East was always going to be a killer division given the quality of the teams in it. Glad I'm not in it to be honest!

Danger_dave1

If you want me to sticky another one up . You better post up a division before 2..

Paully i agree. Cap wise though i think the giants struggle to keep all there stars. It also feels weird that Santry isnt the packers anymore

etloveslsd

I'm disgusted that my arch rival (one of them) is my Giants.

adrian522

Any sign of another div?

ibmax

adrian522 wrote: »

Any sign of another div?

No... And on that bombshell I'd like to propose that any players; trading, communicating or interacting in any way with Raoul and Santry over the next 12 months are to prolong said interaction by as long as possible!!!

Thank you

The_Gatsby

what time is the next division at?

BigBadRob83

Do the Skins and Cowboys have those cap penalties in CCM?

empacher

Whoever took the Patriots is DEAD! I curse you and your QB, Tom Brady will be injured for no less then 4 weeks. Retiring at the end of the Year after another failed Super Bowl attempt

SantryRed

I'm bacckkkkk.

Next up is the NFC North

SantryRed

Paully D

empacher wrote: »

Whoever took the Patriots is DEAD! I curse you and your QB, Tom Brady will be injured for no less then 4 weeks. Retiring at the end of the Year after another failed Super Bowl attempt

I've seen stories of some people reporting that Brady retires after 1 year, others have experienced him playing on but Brees retiring after 1 year. :pac: It seems it varies from each franchise to the other which is good.

helimachoptor

Adrian.. Let's trade!

helimachoptor

helimachoptor wrote: »

Adrian.. Let's trade!

Don't mind him Adrian trade with me

Paully D

SantryRed wrote: »

Good man Santry, cheers.

Jesus, based on who Paddy and Adrian have drafted I may actually get my first choice now. If ET hasn't taken them then it's guaranteed I'll get them. I'd prefer my second choice so hopefully he does, but either way I couldn't complain too much, I'll just have to put in a good bit of practice to get used to them.

Another interesting division. I haven't played HowAreWe but he seems to know what he's talking about based on his posts so I'm sure he'll prove to be a difficult opponent especially with Peterson a huge threat. Adrian finally gets a decent QB this year and will be tough to stop with Megatron to throw to. I considered the Bears myself but they didn't suit my style at all, but the Cutler to Marshall and Forte/Bush at HB will be good along with Urlacher and Peppers, one of the top 5 rated defensive players, marshaling the defense. The Packers are the Packers and with Rodgers plus the second best rated receiving corps on the game Nelbert will fancy his chances against anyone.

matthew8

Forget what I said about my choice being the shock of the draft, Adrian has not picked who I thought he'd pick, and to be honest I'm a bit more comfortable that way though my team will have a worse overall rating. Better madden scheme imo.

BigBadRob83

Paully D wrote: »

I'd prefer my second choice

Case of buyer's remorse after submitting your picks Paully?

madalig12

Clyde Chilly Mouthwash wrote: »

Don't mind him Adrian trade with me

I wanted the Lions! Had the 49ers in as my first and Lions second, I figured the guy picking ahead of me would take San fran so I'm surprised to get them, have been playing away with the lions so I'm gonna need some practice.....so start night shift tomorrow night so I've got all tonight!

Paully D

BigBadRob83 wrote: »

Case of buyer's remorse after submitting your picks Paully?

To be honest I had done a good bit of research into it and really liked my first choice. After I submitted my picks though I started messing around a lot and practicing with my second choice and found I played well with them, had got used to their playbook and would have gladly taken them as first choice.

On saying that mate my first choice also fits my schemes and style perfectly so I would be happy with either, looking at the research I have done again here now it's a toss of a coin between who I would pick #1 if I could submit again, it just means I'd need to put as much practice in as I have over the last week to get 100% comfortable with them but may not get the chance to do that as I'm pretty busy from next week on.

linebacker52

happy to be the bears again but with the real players this time. adrain will be a hard opponent i don't know much about the other two looking forward to playing them over the next three seasons. wont be an easy division to win who ever gets to the super bowl from the nfc will real deserve to be there

Guffy

Yay NFC will be done soon. Should be cable to figure my team out then so can get a bit of practice in today. Really wishing I didn't put my second pick were I did though would rather have my third and fourth to them but sure wat can ya do :-)

madalig12

madalig12 wrote: »

Clyde Chilly Mouthwash wrote: »

Don't mind him Adrian trade with me

I wanted the Lions! Had the 49ers in as my first and Lions second, I figured the guy picking ahead of me would take San fran so I'm surprised to get them, have been playing away with the lions so I'm gonna need some practice.....so start night shift tomorrow night so I've got all tonight!

49ers where my 1st I got my second and lions where my 3rd

adrian522

Looking forward to this division, I've always had good games with paddy. Don't understand why lads didn't put the team they wanted as their first choice. Only issue with the lions was the 4-3 scheme.

Other teams I considered were camolina and San Diego.

madalig12

Clyde Chilly Mouthwash wrote: »

49ers where my 1st I got my second and lions where my 3rd

You are texans then?

madalig12

madalig12 wrote: »

Clyde Chilly Mouthwash wrote: »

49ers where my 1st I got my second and lions where my 3rd

You are texans then?

Cant tell

madalig12

Clyde Chilly Mouthwash wrote: »

Cant tell

I'll take that as yes.