French magazine to publish "fully topless" photos of Kate Middleton today

davet82

http://www.independent.ie/lifestyle/independent-woman/celebrity-news-gossip/french-magazine-to-publish-fully-topless-photos-of-kate-middleton-today-3228935.html

The royals are not happy about this and are trying to get an injunction to stop the pictures. Should the magazine be allowed print the pictures? Surely its in the public interest to publish them?

Steven81

Is there any privacy when you go on holidays

Dravokivich

Depends on the circumstances surrounding getting those pictures. I believe everyone should have a basic right to privacy, but if she was flaunting them out in public, she's asking for it.

leonidas83

Nice, another pair of baps all over the papers, who gives a sh**

Jogathon

I think it's awful. She was in a private house, at a private pool, and someone sneaked in through the bushes to take a long range shot. She's being hounded now and that's not right.

Xavi6

Overrated toff is overrated

Fratton Fred

Why the **** do the French have an obsession with our princesses.

If they kill this one there will be war.

CardBordWindow

Her own fault for having boobs!

Mr.Crinklewood

She was probably playing billiards with Harry.

pickarooney

celebs forum thanks

Fratton Fred

Xavi6 wrote: »

Overrated toff is overrated

You would though..

Crooked Jack

She just doesnt do it for me. big horsey head and weird veiny hands.

GavRedKing

MOAR BEWBS FTW!!!!

danniemcq

Fratton Fred wrote: »

Why the **** do the French have an obsession with our princesses.

If they kill this one there will be war.

our?

speak for youself (not anti English just anti monarchy)

Xavi6

Fratton Fred wrote: »

You would though..

Oh but of course, would be rude not to given her standing in society over on the mainland

Fratton Fred

Xavi6 wrote: »

Fratton Fred wrote: »

You would though..

Oh but of course, would be rude not to given her standing in society over on the mainland

Oh no you didn't.......

later12

Dravokivich wrote: »

Depends on the circumstances surrounding getting those pictures. I believe everyone should have a basic right to privacy, but if she was flaunting them out in public, she's asking for it.

Course she wasn't walking down Main thoroughfare in Kuala Lumpur squeezing her titties together like some mot who just failed the Junior cert.

They were taken at private pool.

Fcuking paps.

Fratton Fred wrote: »

Why the **** do the French have an obsession with our princesses.

If they kill this one there will be war.

....lol

summerskin

fuzzy pics but the wánk bank has been replenished. time to go and spill some man mayo in the jacks at work....

Matt_Trakker

wish it had been Pippa

summerskin

Matt_Trakker wrote: »

wish it had been Pippa

nah, she's a butter face

Duckworth_Luas

summerskin wrote: »

nah, she's a butter face

Who'd be looking at her face?

Lollipops23

I think it's awful, they were at a private residence and by their pool. The paps are bloody vile, I never thought they'd be let away with housing Kate like they did Diana.

Biggins

Fratton Fred wrote: »

Why the **** do the French have an obsession with our princesses.

It was bad enough, they went chopping the heads off their own - now they want other countries princesses to be topless too! :eek:

danniemcq

Duckworth_Luas wrote: »

Who'd be looking at her face?

she has a face?

Happyman42

I'm sure they are loving the attention really, it is the only thing that will keep this archaic entitled institution going and they know it...tatty, tacky, gaudy celebrity! They even pushed Mrs Winsdor out of a plane to keep the hordes entertained.
Expect more of this type of guff.

later12

Lollipops23 wrote: »

The paps are bloody vile

That's a bit harsh on Kate.

Noffles

It's a ****ing disgrace, they were in private and the pap' twats got in with industrial strength lenses to get some lurid pics... sad what some ***** will do to earn a few quid.

And I doubt it'll be long before this turns into another, oh the Brits are so bad and evil and 800 years etc.... and the Royals are this and that... blah ****ing blah.

Real Life

Matt_Trakker wrote: »

wish it had been Pippa

i never got the whole pippa thing, kate is much nicer imo

Zebra3

All the moaning about the paparazzi from people who'll still look at the pics... :rolleyes:

Real Life

Zebra3 wrote: »

All the moaning about the paparazzi from people who'll still look at the pics... :rolleyes:

yea obviously of course im going to check out kate middletons tits if i get the chance but i dont agree with how they were taken.

Lollipops23

Zebra3 wrote: »

All the moaning about the paparazzi from people who'll still look at the pics... :rolleyes:

Nope, I'm not remotely interested in seeing her bits. That, and IMO she's too skinny, so can't imagine it'd be all that nice to look at.

mitosis

If there was no market for pics there'd be no-one taking them. Don't blame the photographers, blame the tabloid buyers.

The naivety of the Brit Royals is astounding. Do they really think they are not being watched and phtographed all the time? Hell, one of them was snapped in his nip at a party a couple of weeks ago.

If they don't want "scandalous" pics taken, it behooves them to keep their kit on.

Oh, and Kate and Pip are only hot in a world populated by horse-faced scrags. In Temple Bar on a Friday night they'd just be average.

Zebra3

Real Life wrote: »

yea obviously of course im going to check out kate middletons tits if i get the chance but i dont agree with how they were taken.

Hypocrite.

RikkFlair

Not safe for anywhere really

She has a bit of a gut on her...

danniemcq

RikkFlair wrote: »

Not safe for anywhere really

She has a bit of a gut on her...

still wou.......

well after a few pints i woul....

feck it any hole is a goal

PizzamanIRL

Soooo...where can i see them?

sbsquarepants

Meh, kate shmate. She's an at best average looking bird with no tits as far as i can see. Give me rossana davison over kate any day of the week!

later12

Lollipops23 wrote: »

Nope, I'm not remotely interested in seeing her bits. That, and IMO she's too skinny, so can't imagine it'd be all that nice to look at.

So basically what you're looking for is a... fat man?

mitosis wrote: »

The naivety of the Brit Royals is astounding. Do they really think they are not being watched and phtographed all the time? Hell, one of them was snapped in his nip at a party a couple of weeks ago.

If they don't want "scandalous" pics taken, it behooves them to keep their kit on.

It "behooves" them?
Behooves.

Come on.

A woman should expect to enjoy privacy when she is in any state of undress in a private setting. Being a semi-public figure does is not a free pass for the paparazzi to photograph you in such a way. I hope she sues the arse of them.

sbsquarepants wrote: »

Meh, kate shmate. She's an at best average looking bird with no tits as far as i can see. Give me rossana davison over kate any day of the week!

Kate has class, Roseanna has crass. :cool:

Colmustard

I do think Kate is a classy and beautiful woman. But would you be bothered to find a half topless Kate.

I mean Ehh my friends told me about lots of sites you can see a host of topless and bottomless women getting up to all sorts of stuff.

summerskin

summerskin wrote: »

fuzzy pics but the wánk bank has been replenished. time to go and spill some man mayo in the jacks at work....

mission accomplished.

davet82

Colmustard wrote: »

I mean Ehh my friends told me about lots of sites you can see a host of topless and bottomless women getting up to all sorts of stuff.

PM me :cool:

Jenroche

And this matters why?

With all that's going on in the world, does it matter a damn if some one got their t*ts out? I'll never understand peoples obesssion with celebs or royalty.

sbsquarepants

later12 wrote: »

A woman should expect to enjoy privacy when she is in any state of undress in a private setting. Being a semi-public figure does is not a free pass for the paparazzi to photograph you in such a way. I hope she sues the arse of them.

Ah come on will you, if you're a world famous figure and you wander about in the great outdoors with your knockers on show, you may expect a papparazzi to catch you, end of story. It's not like she was in the shower or something, she was sunbathing topless - could she really be so stupid as to expect no one to notice? Them there's princess tits, good, bad, perky, saggy, who cares - they're still belonging to a princess and as such worth their weight in gold to a papparazzi (probably more in this case €39 doesn't sound like much for a shot like that:D)

later12 wrote: »

Kate has class, Roseanna has crass. :cool:

Well at least we know if we ever meet the two of them on a hen do in temple bar, we won't fall out over who gets who!

rubadub

later12 wrote: »

A woman should expect to enjoy privacy when she is in any state of undress in a private setting. Being a semi-public figure does is not a free pass for the paparazzi to photograph you in such a way. I hope she sues the arse of them.

If she can sue them I wonder would the prince have the same "suing rights", he was also 'topless'.

i.e. I wonder if any laws on stuff like this specify a difference on exposed nipples depending on sex.

swimming in a sea

mitosis wrote: »

Oh, and Kate and Pip are only hot in a world populated by horse-faced scrags. In Temple Bar on a Friday night they'd just be average.

There is a fair amount of average on a Friday night in Temple Bar, that's for sure:eek:

later12

sbsquarepants wrote: »

Ah come on will you, if you're a world famous figure and you wander about in the great outdoors with your knockers on show, you may expect a papparazzi to catch you, end of story.

Yeah, if you're doing it on a public beach; not at "a private swimming pool area of a private hotel". This wasn't the great outdoors.

I'm not going to say that I didn't look at the magazine cover, or that the media reaction isn't a little amusing. The pictures are out either way.

But as a basic principle, yes; it is wrong to take pictures of an individual when they are undressed in a private setting where they believe themselves to be out of sight. That's not a very controversial point, I would have thought.

mike65

The best approach would be to invite the snappers to an open session and the pix bidded for, the money raised would go to a child abuse charity. I suspect this would cause an outbreak of awkward shoe gazing.

Oh yesh!!!!
Show me them royal puppies!!!

Mr Benevolent

Four pages of whining and no boobs. What has become of AH?

Colmustard

mike65 wrote: »

The best approach would be to invite the snappers to an open session and the pix bidded for, the money raised would go to a child abuse charity. I suspect this would cause an outbreak of awkward shoe gazing.

It really is but would you let your misses do that.

dr.bollocko

There are other sites on the internet to fulfill the lust for boobs.