Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Experimenting with burning steel wool.

  • 15-09-2012 11:13pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,637 ✭✭✭✭


    I made a wire rope spinner for spinning burning wire wool and couldn't resist legging it to the beach to try a few spins.

    38293DDF205E4E00A0BD7803D8C180DE-0000339441-0003012923-00640L-64FE7D4B504E4A5ABB9C0C3E92CB7488.jpg

    D7FCC886C2EB4312AF1AB7167D0930F3-0000339441-0003012922-00640L-7C6EAF660C2E4FA89209160684FF0FE9.jpg

    I'm older than Minecraft goats.



Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,655 ✭✭✭✭Tokyo


    Looks awesome - something I've wanted to try for a while now. See if you can find an old tunnel or an underpass, looks great when the sparks thrown off hit the tunnel wall and run down the side like a waterfall.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,259 ✭✭✭alb


    I've no idea what you did, but these are fantastic.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,655 ✭✭✭✭Tokyo


    alb wrote: »
    I've no idea what you did, but these are fantastic.

    I imagine its along the lines of tying a whisk or similar to the end of a piece of string, packing said whisk with steel wool, setting it alight, twirling it while photographing at a long exposure. There have been some beautiful (and award winning) photos using this technique.

    http://www.petapixel.com/2011/07/20/how-to-use-steel-wool-for-beautiful-light-painting-photographs/


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,281 ✭✭✭Ricky91t


    I did the same a few months ago, using a whisk and rope as said above. I'd recommend you buy a decent whisk as using a cheap one means it'll break while spinning and fire large clumps of burning steel wool in the direction of either you, or your friend standing up the cameras.

    Saying that though, it is a lot of fun and can create some cool photos!

    6968865635_f24091329a_c.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,637 ✭✭✭✭OldGoat


    That shows nicely the difference in 'sparkcount' depending on the spinrate. Faster spin at eash end producing more fiewworks while the transition at a slower spinrate gives you a cleaner line. Nice idea, must try that.

    I'm older than Minecraft goats.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,637 ✭✭✭✭OldGoat


    Looking back at the two pics I posted and at a few others I have on the laptop I really, REALLY need a decent tutorial on colour balance.
    All my shots (at 20+ seconds) are picking up the orange/tungston glow and I'm having issues getting a black sky without killing everything else. I'm on a slider frenzy hoping to hit the magical correct balance.

    Am off to hunt through Lydia.com but if anyone has any pointers I'd love to hear them.

    I'm older than Minecraft goats.



  • Registered Users Posts: 545 ✭✭✭amdgilmore


    You could start by lowering your iso.

    There's no need to have it at 800 for a long exposure, and you can see there's a little bit of noise showing up on the sky as a result. Luminance noise is cumulative in long exposures, so 800 spread out over 20 seconds is not a good idea.

    Knock it down to 100 or maybe 200 (or 400! whatever works) and see how that goes. The wool and sparks will be enough to light up the foreground a little and you'll get a darker sky.

    And if that fails... use the adjustment brush in Lightroom to make local adjustments to exposure.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,268 ✭✭✭trooney


    Agree with the above. Def bring your ISO back down, as there really is no need for it to be high if you're shooting a long exposure.

    Here's a couple I did in Charleville, earlier this year. (all done at ISO 200) -

    4CD076728C4B4F7AACAA0ADA884F94BA-0000314448-0002914494-00800L-EEEF82C1E1AB411DA3754F2FE7D4A79A.jpg

    9A3D5233C82844C6B2B71426326787D0-0000314448-0002914492-00800L-0A17D72EA9B849459A04C9D315999449.jpg

    Its great fun, so long as you have a willing subject (plaudits to Jonnykitedude for his patience as a subject). Its also somewhat advisable to supply said subject with some protective equipment where possible. Safety glasses at the very least anyhoo. She be a cruel mistress, Fire.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,637 ✭✭✭✭OldGoat


    amdgilmore wrote: »
    You could start by lowering your iso.

    There's no need to have it at 800 for a long exposure, and you can see there's a little bit of noise showing up on the sky as a result. Luminance noise is cumulative in long exposures, so 800 spread out over 20 seconds is not a good idea.

    Knock it down to 100 or maybe 200 (or 400! whatever works) and see how that goes. The wool and sparks will be enough to light up the foreground a little and you'll get a darker sky.

    And if that fails... use the adjustment brush in Lightroom to make local adjustments to exposure.

    Ahh, yeah. :o The 800 ISO was a mistake, I never checked the settings for the first few shots.

    I'm older than Minecraft goats.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 827 ✭✭✭Jonnykitedude


    Ricky91t wrote: »
    I did the same a few months ago, using a whisk and rope as said above. I'd recommend you buy a decent whisk as using a cheap one means it'll break while spinning and fire large clumps of burning steel wool in the direction of either you, or your friend standing up the cameras.]

    Is that Ballyvourne College In Cork?


  • Advertisement
  • Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 32,387 Mod ✭✭✭✭DeVore


    Its very similar to the settings for fireworks. I took these at ISO 100 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/devoresphotos/sets/72157629917550623/ )

    Definitely going to give steel wool a shot! Looks lovely...

    T.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 494 ✭✭dcukhunter


    These were from my first attempts with steel wool. I have to get out again some night for more.

    P11302261_zpsc9e6c683.jpg

    P11302271_zps0178eae6.jpg

    P11302581_zpse3a841b0.jpg

    P11302591_zpsb2dda258.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 687 ✭✭✭megapixel


    8036852607_ae5da76d57.jpg

    8036853900_22fed51bcd.jpg

    8036852825_1e77749b71.jpg


  • Registered Users Posts: 823 ✭✭✭thatsnotmyname


    A great bit of fun during the long winter nights
    here's one I did in 2011

    5615568241_84f5666402_z.jpg


Advertisement