Cool Vids&Pics&Links Discussion Thread

colinod0806

spank_inferno wrote: »

I miss Conan O'Brien.

He's on 3e every night.

Capt'n Midnight

emo72 wrote: »

i dont get the photo of the car keys on the door with the photographers reflection in the window?

what am i missing?

Epic fail.

You can't open the door and you can't leave the car to go get help

Cookie_Monster

Capt'n Midnight wrote: »

Epic fail.

You can't open the door and you can't leave the car to go get help

er they're just sitting around the plastic but not the seal so not actually stuck in the door.
and even if they were you can just take the one key off the ring and open the door.

Newaglish

Asos yellow skater dress? I don't get it

LizT

Newaglish wrote: »

Asos yellow skater dress? I don't get it

Look to the left.

RandolphEsq

Someone noted that every pic in YLYL is from reddit. Well I don't ever go on that site, or 9GAG so it is handy to get the best photos here.

--Kaiser--

WTF is milimsagon? Mentioned in two posts today

Squ

My limbs are gone.

Darksaga87

RandolphEsq wrote: »

Someone noted that every pic in YLYL is from reddit. Well I don't ever go on that site, or 9GAG so it is handy to get the best photos here.

Stealing images on the internet! What has the world come to.

CardBordWindow

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=82729157&postcount=3891

What am I missing?

Penn

CardBordWindow wrote: »

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=82729157&postcount=3891

What am I missing?

House in such a dilapidated state that even the bed has grass growing on it.

I mean, it's not "Funny Ha Ha", but it's kinda funny

CardBordWindow

Penn wrote: »

House in such a dilapidated state that even the bed has grass growing on it.

I mean, it's not "Funny Ha Ha", but it's kinda funny

Cheers. That's what I saw, but thought I might be missing something else.

staker

From the GIF thread-anyone know who this sassy lady is?


https://i.chzbgr.com/maxW500/6946118144/hD90B22EC/

dulpit

staker wrote: »

From the GIF thread-anyone know who this sassy lady is?


https://i.chzbgr.com/maxW500/6946118144/hD90B22EC/

Yuliya Snigir (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2213155/Bruce-Williss-sexy-star-Yuliya-Snigir-strips-leathers-exposes-bra-A-Good-Day-Die-Hard-trailer.html)

staker

dulpit wrote: »

Yuliya Snigir (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2213155/Bruce-Williss-sexy-star-Yuliya-Snigir-strips-leathers-exposes-bra-A-Good-Day-Die-Hard-trailer.html)

So that's where the film name comes from:pac:

--Kaiser--

Can someone explain me please?
Obama and Biden stuffs

Mousewar

--Kaiser-- wrote: »

Can someone explain me please?
Obama and Biden stuffs

It's funny in its own right but it's also a word for word joke from Mean Girls when the principal is addressing the students.. The character in the film also looks quite like Obama it has to be said. I laughed anyway.

Access

Anyone else happy that "No" cat, Brace Yourself... and Bad Luck Brian have disappeared from YLYL for the past while?

They have to be the most over used ones in YLYL.

Chet T16

Horse burgers is by far the worst thing to happen in a long time.

colinod0806

Access wrote: »

Anyone else happy that "No" cat, Brace Yourself... and Bad Luck Brian have disappeared from YLYL for the past while?

They have to be the most over used ones in YLYL.

I don't mind the bad luck brian ones they can sometimes be funny but that fúcking "no" cat is the worst thing since dolan.

Also, fúck you horse burgers.

Access

Access wrote: »

Anyone else happy that "No" cat, Brace Yourself... and Bad Luck Brian have disappeared from YLYL for the past while?

They have to be the most over used ones in YLYL.

colinod0806 wrote: »

I don't mind the bad luck brian ones they can sometimes be funny but that fúcking "no" cat is the worst thing since dolan.

Also, fúck you horse burgers.

:pac:

colinod0806

Extinction wrote: »

Anyone care to explain?

Darkglasses

colinod0806 wrote: »

Anyone care to explain?

Swedish wood.

flutterflye

colinod0806 wrote: »

Anyone care to explain?

Scandinavia is pleased to see you.

Penn

I'd just like to draw people's attention to this post:

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=82807250&postcount=4097

This was reported 4 times by 4 different people as being a repost. I've looked over the last 15-20 pages and couldn't find it posted before. Unless I've missed something, it's most likely that people saw the image somewhere else and reported it as a repost even though it hadn't been posted here before. There have also been one or two cases lately where an image was reported as a repost, but had actually been posted in the Picture Battle Thread, not in YLYL.

Please take more care when reporting reposts, and if you're not sure if you saw it here or elsewhere, it's probably best not to report it. We're probably going to be taking it a bit easier with regards reposts given some of these issues and feedback we've received lately, so unless it's one of those obvious reposts we get once a month (girl's arm makes it look like her friend is naked, shadow on girl's leg looks like penis etc) or one which was obviously posted in the last week, we might not edit it out. If it was an image posted once last year in YLYL2, we can probably allow it as a lot of people may not have seen it before.

Obviously, we're not expecting you to find where pics were originally posted or anything like that, we're just asking that people take a bit more care with what they do report as being a repost.

Thanks.

Mousewar

I didn't report that one but it's been on the thread at least three times.
I don't look at any other threads like this.
Possibly the previous ones were removed so they're no longer there...

Edit - yeah, one of them was removed on the previous page...

Penn

Mousewar wrote: »

I didn't report that one but it's been on the thread at least three times.
I don't look at any other threads like this.
Possibly the previous ones were removed so they're no longer there...

Edit - yeah, one of them was removed on the previous page...

Just saw that now.

It's possible that it was previously posted and the image link is now broken which means where it was posted the first time, it's no longer showing up. I suppose that's a fair point to make. I'm only using it as an example though.

Mousewar

Yeah, personally I'm not too bothered by reposts - it only takes a second to look past them. And especially so if it's one from a year ago or more.
That said, that particular Lance Armstrong one was annoying because it was three times in about a week iirc.

Cookie_Monster

landsleaving wrote: »

My local shop got a new sign this week. Went well for them.

Deansgrange, Dublin??

landsleaving

Cookie_Monster wrote: »

Deansgrange, Dublin??

Yup, spot on.

splendid101

I'm wondering about one of the gifs in the gif thread, I presume it was taken on the ISS. It's the bags floating in zero gravity and then a blonde woman comes up and gets pass down the corridor....etc., etc. Anyone know the story behind this, or have a link to the corresponding video?

Squeaky the Squirrel

splendid101 wrote: »

I'm wondering about one of the gifs in the gif thread, I presume it was taken on the ISS. It's the bags floating in zero gravity and then a blonde woman comes up and gets pass down the corridor....etc., etc. Anyone know the story behind this, or have a link to the corresponding video?

Proof that theirs little green men in space!

Cookie_Monster

frozenfrozen wrote: »

Oh an incidentally that bike has no suspension.

GastroBoy

Cookie_Monster wrote: »

Oh an incidentally that bike has no suspension.

The saddle is meant to resemble a penis.

p to the e

Cookie_Monster wrote:

Oh an incidentally that bike has no suspension.

Well mister la dee da with his bike suspension.

Cookie_Monster

GastroBoy wrote: »

The saddle is meant to resemble a penis.

Errr...ok...

toodleytoo

Whats the story with the Seth Rogen picture in YLYL?

AEDIC

Blokes out of Mythbusters photo bombing him in the background top right

flutterflye

AEDIC wrote: »

Blokes out of Mythbusters photo bombing him in the background top right

I was trying to figure it out - I thought it was insinuating that some myth was busted - Couldn't come up with anything though.
I don't get the funny

emo72

the harry potter abortion one? "jesus read the book" not really sure what thats about?

Cookie_Monster

emo72 wrote: »

the harry potter abortion one? "jesus read the book" not really sure what thats about?

Harry didn't kill Voldemort, Neville did was the point. so if he'd been aborted it wouldn't of mattered.
(never mind that he killed most of the horcruxes or banished Voldemort in the first place for a couple of years...)

ibarelycare

Cookie_Monster wrote: »

Harry didn't kill Voldemort, Neville did was the point. so if he'd been aborted it wouldn't of mattered.
(never mind that he killed most of the horcruxes or banished Voldemort in the first place for a couple of years...)

Harry did kill Voldemort, Neville killed Nagini. But the prophecy said that either of two infants could defeat Voldemort, it's just that he "chose" Harry. If Harry had been aborted, Neville would have been the one to defeat him


/nerd

CardBordWindow

ARGH!!! :eek:

SPOILER ALERT!!

Cookie_Monster

ibarelycare wrote: »

Harry did kill Voldemort, Neville killed Nagini.

yeah, I didn't even want to go there and add that confusion to the mix...

Guill

In forty minutes it'll be (3+1) o' clock.

seamus

Don't get Bazmo's one:
http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=82940764&postcount=4401

Is he skeptical about the IIII instead of IV? (Which is standard for clocks)

CardBordWindow

seamus wrote: »

Don't get Bazmo's one:
http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=82940764&postcount=4401

Is he skeptical about the IIII instead of IV? (Which is standard for clocks)

I do believe so. The Roman for 4 was IV

seamus

IIII is traditional on clock faces though. I don't know why, the reason for it is probably long gone.

Rovi

BaZmO* wrote: »

A clock my sister bought. Hmmm

<snip>Roman numeral clock</snip>

Is it the "IIII" for the 4 o'clock position you're looking at, or am I missing something else?

Anyhow, "IIII" instead of "IV" is a well established convention for Roman numeral clocks:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_numerals#.22IIII.22_on_clocks

paperclip2

IIII is normal enough on clocks:

Many clocks use IIII because that was the tradition established by the earliest surviving clock, the Wells Cathedral clock built between 1386 and 1392. It used IIII because that was the typical method used to denote 4 in contemporary manuscripts (as iiij or iiii).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_numerals#.22IIII.22_on_clocks