Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Croke Park Agreement 'Savings' revealed to be total crock?

  • 14-10-2012 9:57am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,766 ✭✭✭


    http://www.independent.ie/opinion/analysis/678m-of-croke-parks-savings-are-now-in-doubt-3258429.html
    Eoghan Murphy, FG TD, says an instruction by the Department of Finance to all other government departments to increase all savings figures by 40 per cent when reporting to the Croke Park Implementation Body, cast doubt on the final figures.
    Yesterday, the Implementation Body refuted Mr Murphy's claims "in the strongest terms". A spokeswoman for Mr Howlin and the Implemenation Body said: "Specifically, the Body wishes to clarify for the avoidance of any doubt whatsoever that it was the more conservative savings estimate used by Department of Agriculture management that was used by the Body in its calculation of the overall non-pay savings. Therefore, there can be no question of any overestimation."

    Notice they specifically refer to the Department of Agriculture figures in the response, no mention of whether the figures from other departments were inflated by the 40%.

    Sounds like the mandarins at the Department of finance didn't like the figures so they decided to 'massage' them to make them more palatable.


Advertisement