50 shades of grey. No shame!

otto_26

I have nothing against pornographic novels or anything but I went swimming today in my local pool, they have seats where people can relax and read a book or newspaper. This place is also a hotel.

Went over to read a newspaper today and saw a women that must have been in her late 40's with what must of been her daughter of about 15 sitting in the area, the women was reading 50 shades of grey.

I mean I'm all for we live in the 21st century and stuff but surely their is a more appropriate place to read a pornographic novel than in public and in front of a 15 year old girl.

Am I missing something here but some people could just have a small bit of tact or is it because it's so popular it's ok to read in public?. How would that women feel if I was reading a pornographic magazine with just a women in her bikini on the front cover. Would she not think that would be inappropriate of me, as in younger people around and in a public area?

Fair enough the book doesn't have any pictures but the front cover (which is all anyone would be able to see) of my mag would have a women in a bikini no more different that any ladies mag?

MagicMarker

What's the big deal, me and me da watch barely legal creampies together all the time.

TheBody

Was she a yummy mummy?

antodeco

Did you have a **** in the pool? Waved it goodbye as it floated away

Celly Smunt

if that is all you have to worry about i'll worry for you.

af_thefragile

Hah, when I was flying back to dublin this summer, there was a girl on the plane who was no older than 16yrs reading the 3rd book in the plane...

Its popular fiction man. Get on with the times!

BBDBB

maybe she was borrowing the daughters copy

Corvo

Would have been a good time to ask her for a ride. She would have been well up for it after reading that utter filth.

1ZRed

Read a sample of this off iBooks.

It's heartbreakingly shite

Celly Smunt

1ZRed wrote: »

Read a sample of this off iBooks.

It's heart breakingly shite

you're just not embracing your inner goddess.

Madam_X

The daughter is 15, not eight - and even then, the parent only has to ensure the kid doesn't look at the book. Its cover doesn't scream "porn" either.
When I was 12 I was checking out Jackie Collins books - as filthy I reckon, if not filthier, than 50 S.O.G. (lol - "sog" :pac:).

some random drunk

otto_26 wrote: »

Went over to read a newspaper today and saw a women that must have been in her late 40's with what must of been her daughter of about 15 sitting in the area, the women was reading 50 shades of grey.

Thought you were going to complain that she handed it to the 15 yr old to read. I don't really see the big deal, it's just words.

mackg

otto_26 wrote: »

I mean I'm all for we live in the 21st century and stuff but surely their is a more appropriate place to read a pornographic novel than in public and in front of a 15 year old girl.

Am I missing something here but some people could just have a small bit of tact or is it because it's so popular it's ok to read in public?. How would that women feel if I was reading a pornographic magazine with just a women in her bikini on the front cover. Would she not think that would be inappropriate of me, as in younger people around and in a public area?

There could have been someone sitting there reading something way dirtier than 50 Shades of Grey and you wouldn't have deemed it inappropriate because you would have never heard of it. Its popularity is the only reason you have an issue.

1ZRed

In fairness why should you be ashamed? Not as if you could spring a horn

admiralofthefleet

MagicMarker wrote: »

What's the big deal, me and me da watch barely legal creampies together all the time.

yeah i used to watch anal cum swappers 3 with my granda

michellie

Really ?? Some people are so bloody nosy! It really was nothing to do with you what that woman was doing!!

Celly Smunt

admiralofthefleet wrote: »

yeah i used to watch anal cum swappers 3 with my granda

lucky you,we acted it

1ZRed

pmcmahon wrote: »

you're just not embracing your inner goddess.

Meh. I could think up far better and durtier porn than any goddess ever could

otto_26

mackg wrote: »

There could have been someone sitting there reading something way dirtier than 50 Shades of Grey and you wouldn't have deemed it inappropriate because you would have never heard of it. It's popularity is the only reason you have an issue.

No the issue is I'm aware its a pornographic novel and how she was reading it in a public place in front of a 15 year old girl... Is that the reason people would feel its inappropriate for people to read porn mags in public because they are popular not the content?

Hey I don't mind its her daughter would just have a bit more tact myself but everyone to there own I guess.

gaziah

Sure the 15 year old was probably reading it on the sly. You know what pubescent 15 year olds are like :P

admiralofthefleet

pmcmahon wrote: »

lucky you,we acted it

you from mullingar?

hatrickpatrick

Meh, I started reading (and writing ) dirty stuff at around age 13
Why is it a problem really? At 15 most teens have seen and heard far more disturbing stuff than 50 shades I'd say

Celly Smunt

admiralofthefleet wrote: »

you from mullingar?

are you coming onto me?

otto_26

michellie wrote: »

Really ?? Some people are so bloody nosy! It really was nothing to do with you what that woman was doing!!

Nosy! she is sitting in a public place I had to walk past her to get a paper!! I wasn't looking in her sitting room window! :rolleyes:

I didn't say it had anything to do with me I noticed something I didn't find appropriate didn't interfere with her in anyway, just having a chat about it now bloody hell!

say_who_now?

If the OP had said the 15 year old was reading fifty shades of grey beside her mother who was turning fifty shades of red, I might have raised an eyebrow, but come on OP, it's the modern day mills and boon, I was 11 when I was robbing my elder sister's copies of "forbidden and unbridled lust" for a quick crack one off when I'd get home from school and in between settling down to do my homework.

Years later I still managed an A+ in honours english in my Leaving Cert.

My own version of "Less stress, more success", if you will!

admiralofthefleet

pmcmahon wrote: »

are you coming onto me?

nah, i dont want to become custard cousins with your granda

Eggy Baby!

I was 11 when I was robbing my elder sister's copies of "forbidden and unbridled lust" for a quick crack one off

You were cracking one off at 11? What came out of it, dust?

admiralofthefleet

Eggy Baby! wrote: »

You were cracking one off at 11? What came out of it, dust?

i had my first tug at 11. i thought i broke it

Teyla Emmagan

I read the Story of O when I was about 8. And look how well I turned out.

The 15 yo is probably up to worse herself. At the same time though, reading 50 Shades of Grey in public is insufferably naff. That's the real crime here.

kowloon

Why buy the book when yo can get it for free?

say_who_now?

Eggy Baby! wrote: »

You were cracking one off at 11? What came out of it, dust?

50ml of fapping juice

flutterflye

I would be extremely embarrassed to be seen reading that in public.
Not because of the pornographic content, but because I've seen excerpts from it, and it seems like the worst, cringiest piece of 'English literature' I've ever cum (:)) across!

Madam_X

My friend in London was saying there were rows of women on the Tube reading it over the summer. "Oh look everyone, I'm so sexually liberated! I'm reading a book nearly everyone's reading and not shocked by!"
Now if they were reading a book called Tales Of Cum-Guzzling with a picture of a woman sporting a pearl necklace on the front, THAT would be sexually liberated.

pickarooney

otto_26 wrote: »

I have nothing against pornographic novels or anything but I went swimming today in my local pool, they have seats where people can relax and read a book or newspaper. This place is also a hotel.

Went over to read a newspaper today and saw a women that must have been in her late 40's with what must of been her daughter of about 15 sitting in the area, the women was reading 50 shades of grey.

I mean I'm all for we live in the 21st century and stuff but surely their is a more appropriate place to read a pornographic novel than in public and in front of a 15 year old girl.

Am I missing something here but some people could just have a small bit of tact or is it because it's so popular it's ok to read in public?. How would that women feel if I was reading a pornographic magazine with just a women in her bikini on the front cover. Would she not think that would be inappropriate of me, as in younger people around and in a public area?

Fair enough the book doesn't have any pictures but the front cover (which is all anyone would be able to see) of my mag would have a women in a bikini no more different that any ladies mag?

A picture of a woman in just a bikini? At a swimming pool? It's like the last days of Sodom all over again.

BBDBB

Madam_X wrote: »

My friend in London was saying there were rows of women on the Tube reading it over the summer. "Oh look everyone, I'm so sexually liberated! I'm reading a book nearly everyone's reading and not shocked by!"
Now if they were reading a book called Tales Of Cum-Guzzling with a picture of a woman sporting a pearl necklace on the front, THAT would be sexually liberated.

is that a "How to" guide?

its just she cant be a very good guzzler if she's sporting a pearl necklace

Madam_X

BBDBB wrote: »

is that a "How to" guide?

its just she cant be a very good guzzler if she's sporting a pearl necklace

Like, duh... some people can do other stuff you know. :rolleyes:

Internet Hero

MagicMarker wrote: »

What's the big deal, me and me da watch barely legal creampies together all the time.

ah gross

one of my friends once sent me a vid that was newly legal creampies. it was criminal in everything but the eyes of the law. they said it was the night before the girls birthday and they timed it down to 12 o clock with there boners ready and when it hit 12 they put it in the girls ass. was scarey

BBDBB

Madam_X wrote: »

Like, duh... some people can do other stuff you know. :rolleyes:

ahh, yer a dribbler so

FanadMan

otto_26 wrote: »

No the issue is I'm aware its a pornographic novel and how she was reading it in a public place in front of a 15 year old girl... Is that the reason people would feel its inappropriate for people to read porn mags in public because they are popular not the content?

Hey I don't mind its her daughter would just have a bit more tact myself but everyone to there own I guess.

There is a massive difference between a book that has nothing graphic on the cover and a pornographic magazine. As someone else here said, you only know what the book's about because of all the hype

Pompey Magnus

otto_26 wrote: »

I mean I'm all for we live in the 21st century and stuff but surely their is a more appropriate place to read a pornographic novel than in public and in front of a 15 year old girl.

You really need an update on the modern world. Let me help:

Man leaving a standard sex shop: Pervert.
Woman leaving an Ann Summers store: Liberated woman.

Man pinching a girl's bum in nightclub: Pervert.
Woman pinching a man's bum in nightclub: Just having a laugh.

Man looking at erotic material in public: Pervert and most probably mentally ill.
Woman looking at erotic material in public: Not afraid of showing she is sexually liberated.

TV advert using busty ladies in low cut tops: Pervy ad made by perverts for fellow perverts.
TV advert using a good looking guy with no shirt on: A bit of harmless fun.

weisses

Did you ask if she was 15 ?? ... More swimming less assuming me think

Eggy Baby!

say_who_now? wrote: »

50ml of fapping juice

I thought jizzly was only produced at 12+ ?

(You measured it?)

say_who_now?

Eggy Baby! wrote: »

I thought jizzly was only produced at 12+ ?

(You measured it?)

All joking aside and all- nope, once you hit puberty, etc, the very same way as a girl can be an early developer.

And no, lol, I didn't measure, it just fitted in with the theme of the thread. Your average man will produce about a teaspoon, or 5ml in an ejaculation.

Unless you're Peter North, but he's definitely not your average man!


I probably shouldn't be answering these questions when I have a few drinks down, damn touch site is far too handy, kudos for the pm notifications btw, about time!

ArtSmart

otto_26 wrote: »

I have nothing against pornographic novels or anything but I went swimming today in my local pool, they have seats where people can relax and read a book or newspaper. This place is also a hotel.

Went over to read a newspaper today and saw a women that must have been in her late 40's with what must of been her daughter of about 15 sitting in the area, the women was reading 50 shades of grey.

I mean I'm all for we live in the 21st century and stuff but surely their is a more appropriate place to read a pornographic novel than in public and in front of a 15 year old girl.

Am I missing something here but some people could just have a small bit of tact or is it because it's so popular it's ok to read in public?. How would that women feel if I was reading a pornographic magazine with just a women in her bikini on the front cover. Would she not think that would be inappropriate of me, as in younger people around and in a public area?

Fair enough the book doesn't have any pictures but the front cover (which is all anyone would be able to see) of my mag would have a women in a bikini no more different that any ladies mag?

has thinly veiled 'should i buy a copy' been done yet?

if not, i call it

ArtSmart

pickarooney wrote: »

A picture of a woman in just a bikini? At a swimming pool? It's like the last days of Sodom all over again.

nonsense.

bikinis were a Greek invention - they never reached that part of the world, until the 1950s.

1ZRed

Internet Hero wrote: »

ah gross

one of my friends once sent me a vid that was newly legal creampies. it was criminal in everything but the eyes of the law. they said it was the night before the girls birthday and they timed it down to 12 o clock with there boners ready and when it hit 12 they put it in the girls ass. was scarey

Easy there tayto, and throw me the link!

billybudd

The most important issue with this lame story is: who the fcuk goes to a swimming pool to read? lazy ****.

hatrickpatrick

ArtSmart wrote: »

nonsense.

bikinis were a Greek invention - they never reached that part of the world, until the 1950s.

Feckin' Greeks! THEY INVENTED GAYNESS!!!!!

ArtSmart

hatrickpatrick wrote: »

Feckin' Greeks! THEY INVENTED GAYNESS!!!!!

Yes. Yes they did.



The Bikinis were used 2776 years ago by the athletes in the games to allow ease of movement. Or at least, that was the excuse they gave.

Boskowski

What's the story with this shame thing anyway? What should people be ashamed of exactly?

The only thing one should be ashamed of - if anything - would be that one apparently got hooked on the latest fad which has been widely acknowledged as harmless frustrated housewife drivel.

AnonoBoy

She should have been ashamed for reading any book in public!

Does't she have a mobile phone that she can go on Facebook on instead of reading a book? :mad: