Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

€4 million to Uganda?

135

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,067 ✭✭✭✭fryup


    uch wrote: »
    Ladies and Boy's, my brother lived in Uganda for 10 years and he said the only thing wrong with Uganda is that Ugandans are running the country



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,637 ✭✭✭Show Time


    Nodin wrote: »
    No, no racism there......


    Wow i never knew calling people lazy made me a racist.:rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,073 ✭✭✭gobnaitolunacy


    uch wrote: »
    Ladies and Boy's, my brother lived in Uganda for 10 years and he said the only thing wrong with Uganda is that Ugandans are running the country

    It would be valid by substituting 'Uganda' for 'Ireland' and 'Ugandans' for 'Irish'.:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,116 ✭✭✭archer22


    AHH dont be so hard on the Irish government they were trying to help the Irish economy..it looked good,dept of foreign affairs got an E-mail saying if they sent this guy in Africa 4 million he would forward 100 billion to them.They thought they had Ireland's problems solved...it looked even better than borrowing money for your grandkids to pay back.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 794 ✭✭✭bluecode


    telecaster wrote: »
    I wonder if boards.de has similar threads where irate Germans complain that a basket case island on the arse end of Europe keeps getting funded by them.
    Get your facts right. The Germans are not funding us. Any money sent to Ireland was used to bailout the banks which in turn was sent to bail out the bondholders and most of all to bail out German banks. The Germans are giving us aid.

    As for the Uganda issue. I'm surprised anyone is surprised. Africa in general is an absolute basket case when it comes to running their own affairs. More than 35 years ago as a teenager in school I took part in a Concern 24 hour fast to raise money for Africa. It's clear it was a complete waste of time. Almost nothing has changed. Concern is still going strong feeding people in Africa. Same with all the other charities.

    You really have to ask why nothing has apparently changed in all that time? What is the problem with Africans in general?

    I see ads for various charities. One for water. 'Send us money,' They tell us, 'and we'll dig a well and save children's lives.' My question is what kind of people are they that the cannot dig a well for themselves? What kind of men are they that they are apparently fundamentally incapable of digging a well or building a house for themselves or move on from subsistence farming or change their lives in any meaningful way in half a century?

    I no longer contribute to African charities. I for one do not want to partly responsible for buying tanks, gun tanks not water or Mercedes for dictators.

    It's time Irish government stopped sending aid abroad when there are plenty of charities in this country who will spend it more wisely.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 637 ✭✭✭ruthloss


    4 million went into a secret account in the Prime Minister's office. (radio this morning).


    I blame the Nuns., they just had to go and convert them all those years ago., why?!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,181 ✭✭✭Davidth88


    bluecode wrote: »

    As for the Uganda issue. I'm surprised anyone is surprised. Africa in general is an absolute basket case when it comes to running their own affairs. More than 35 years ago as a teenager in school I took part in a Concern 24 hour fast to raise money for Africa. It's clear it was a complete waste of time. Almost nothing has changed. Concern is still going strong feeding people in Africa. Same with all the other charities.

    You really have to ask why nothing has apparently changed in all that time? What is the problem with Africans in general?

    I see ads for various charities. One for water. 'Send us money,' They tell us, 'and we'll dig a well and save children's lives.' My question is what kind of people are they that the cannot dig a well for themselves? What kind of men are they that they are apparently fundamentally incapable of digging a well or building a house for themselves or move on from subsistence farming or change their lives in any meaningful way in half a century?

    I no longer contribute to African charities. I for one do not want to partly responsible for buying tanks, gun tanks not water or Mercedes for dictators.

    It's time Irish government stopped sending aid abroad when there are plenty of charities in this country who will spend it more wisely.

    +1000 . I have not given any money to any African based charities for years for exactly this reason


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,637 ✭✭✭Show Time


    bluecode wrote: »
    Get your facts right. The Germans are not funding us. Any money sent to Ireland was used to bailout the banks which in turn was sent to bail out the bondholders and most of all to bail out German banks. The Germans are giving us aid.

    As for the Uganda issue. I'm surprised anyone is surprised. Africa in general is an absolute basket case when it comes to running their own affairs. More than 35 years ago as a teenager in school I took part in a Concern 24 hour fast to raise money for Africa. It's clear it was a complete waste of time. Almost nothing has changed. Concern is still going strong feeding people in Africa. Same with all the other charities.

    You really have to ask why nothing has apparently changed in all that time? What is the problem with Africans in general?

    I see ads for various charities. One for water. 'Send us money,' They tell us, 'and we'll dig a well and save children's lives.' My question is what kind of people are they that the cannot dig a well for themselves? What kind of men are they that they are apparently fundamentally incapable of digging a well or building a house for themselves or move on from subsistence farming or change their lives in any meaningful way in half a century?

    I no longer contribute to African charities. I for one do not want to partly responsible for buying tanks, gun tanks not water or Mercedes for dictators.

    It's time Irish government stopped sending aid abroad when there are plenty of charities in this country who will spend it more wisely.
    Smelly Bob got everyone off their ass for Africa and while the rest of the world gave a helping hand the Africans themselves did nothing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,028 ✭✭✭✭SEPT 23 1989


    We hand over 600m in aid even though we have lines of people in the Capital city queuing up for food because they can't afford to eat

    600m would create a lot of jobs so these people could afford food


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,281 ✭✭✭donegal_road


    €166m in aid over 5 years to Uganda from Ireland...

    if you find this thread interesting, here are a couple of links from 2 years ago that make for compelling reading.

    Link 1

    The following link is from an old discussion on Politics.ie on Tullow's investment in Ugandan oil and FF's connection with same

    Link 2


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 528 ✭✭✭telecaster


    Show Time wrote: »
    Smelly Bob got everyone off their ass for Africa and while the rest of the world gave a helping hand the Africans themselves did nothing.

    What is seldom acknowledged in the mainstream media is that the game is hideously rigged against Africa.

    The mantra of free-trade as epoused by the EU and the United States is really "free-trade (but on our terms)".

    It is cheaper to produce many products and resources within Africa than within EU/US, but the subsidies which are paid - particularly to the agriculture sectors - in these more developed nations effectively prohibits the African export business as they can not compete against subsidised markets. This is not freetrade.

    There is also the fact that Africa has been effectively stripped of its resources and then put in the position of necessitating imports of finished goods. For example, raw materials leave Africa at a knockdown rate - often a condition of receiving aid is the privitisation of resources (look up Structural Adjustment Policies), the resources are bought for a song by 'western investors'. Then if an African nation wants to buy an airplane to improve aspects of their infrastructure, they are often (partially) constructed using the natural resources which have initially been exported. Effectively they get shafted both ends of the deal.

    Why can't they build their own airplanes?

    Pretty much because the talented and educated get the hell out of these dysfunctional nations asap.

    Colonialism never ended, it just got better PR.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,568 ✭✭✭Chinasea


    Show Time wrote: »
    Smelly Bob got everyone off their ass for Africa and while the rest of the world gave a helping hand the Africans themselves did nothing.

    How though, is this the fault of the babies starving to death right at this very moment?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,637 ✭✭✭Show Time


    Chinasea wrote: »
    How though, is this the fault of the babies starving to death right at this very moment?
    It is the fault of their own governments for not getting their own infrastructure on track and house in order when the money was rolling in.

    Instead the money went on tanks and plans and guns so the warlords could kill each other.

    So please don't give me that crap about starving babies when here in Ireland we have kids going to school hungry.

    The entire continent of Africa is a money black hole dragging down the rest of the world.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,704 ✭✭✭squod


    Four million euro of Irish Aid funding to Uganda has gone missing in a suspected fraud, the Government has disclosed.


    Fraud on whose side? Our side their side or whats the story? Anyway it's a drop in the ocean compared to the billions the Anglo bail-out fraud has cost us so far.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,568 ✭✭✭Chinasea


    Show Time wrote: »
    It is the fault of their own governments for not getting their own infrastructure on track and house in order when the money was rolling in.

    So, let the starving sinner of a mother and baby die.



    So please don't give me that crap about starving babies when here in Ireland we have kids going to school hungry.

    What kids where? Oh yea, in the shanty towns, no water, no electricity, no food, no welfare no nothing.

    The entire continent of Africa is a money black hole dragging down the rest of the world. NICE
    .


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,441 ✭✭✭planetX


    The thing is that if the government over there prefers to let people starve and spend its money on warplanes, is it the right thing to do to prop up that government by helping out their own poor? Are we just enabling the regime? No country with a military spend should get a penny of aid, it's up to the people there to get rid of their government and replace it with one that has some morals. We could help by imposing sanctions unless they implement basic human rights.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,637 ✭✭✭Show Time


    Chinasea wrote: »
    .
    Cut the holy joe stuff it won't work with me.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Show Time wrote: »
    Cut the holy joe stuff it won't work with me.

    You have to be a "holy joe" to give a **** about humanity in general? Thats news to me.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,109 ✭✭✭MaxSteele


    Those who see the merit in donating to the likes of Oxfam, Trocaire, etc. can do so of their own free will.

    No one is stopping them. It's your own disposable income.

    But taxes in the exchequer are there to serve the people paying them up. Not to squander 600 million's worth on Uganda of all places. Digging wells and planting seeds in third world countries isn't my idea of a public service.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 528 ✭✭✭telecaster


    planetX wrote: »
    No country with a military spend should get a penny of aid, it's up to the people there to get rid of their government and replace it with one that has some morals. We could help by imposing sanctions unless they implement basic human rights.

    At the risk of paraphrasing the Boromir meme....one does not simply oust a totalitarian military government.

    From Human Rights Watch: "The country’s security forces regularly use lethal force, especially during political demonstrations. Opposition politicians, their supporters, and some journalists face harassment, beatings, and arrest. The Ugandan military, despite efforts by key donors countries to ‘professionalize’ them, has yet to address the severe due process violations in military courts – especially the prosecution of civilians, who should be tried in civilian courts. Torture in detention is endemic, with torturers rarely brought to justice. Access to healthcare and education remains a serious problem. Uganda’s notorious Anti-Homosexuality Bill, which proposes the death penalty for some consensual same-sex activities, could still be voted on, threatening the freedom of Uganda’s LGBT community."

    The country is not long out of civil war. To suggest that it scrap military spend is utterly naive. There are many heavily armed non-govt actors in the region. If Uganda did not spend on military its government would be overthrown by another undemocratic military regime.

    Sanctions are moral tokenism and invariably hurt the wrong people.

    The relativism of 'Irish babies are hungry' is bizarre. Conditions in Uganda are from an altogether different paradigm of experience. Children in Ireland are not routinely kidnapped, mutilated, forced in to armed gangs, deprived of education. Yes Ireland has social problems - but turning off an international aid programme is not going to cure any of them. There are social and poverty traps here, and agencies here are funded to deal with them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,637 ✭✭✭Show Time


    Nodin wrote: »
    You have to be a "holy joe" to give a **** about humanity in general? Thats news to me.

    You still have not apologised for calling me a racist.:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,985 ✭✭✭mikeym


    We give a country like Uganda millions of euros of tax payers money and weres our thanks.

    Its a fuping disgrace, not many taxpayers would have known how much we gave over the years to corrupt countries like Uganda if this hadnt came out.

    If Uganda get the rest of the money we might aswell not pay tax to fund corrupt Ugandan government officals :mad:

    I wonder are the Greeks are as stupid as us to be giving away free money.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,272 ✭✭✭lightspeed


    telecaster wrote: »
    At the risk of paraphrasing the Boromir meme....one does not simply oust a totalitarian military government.

    From Human Rights Watch: "The country’s security forces regularly use lethal force, especially during political demonstrations. Opposition politicians, their supporters, and some journalists face harassment, beatings, and arrest. The Ugandan military, despite efforts by key donors countries to ‘professionalize’ them, has yet to address the severe due process violations in military courts – especially the prosecution of civilians, who should be tried in civilian courts. Torture in detention is endemic, with torturers rarely brought to justice. Access to healthcare and education remains a serious problem. Uganda’s notorious Anti-Homosexuality Bill, which proposes the death penalty for some consensual same-sex activities, could still be voted on, threatening the freedom of Uganda’s LGBT community."

    The country is not long out of civil war. To suggest that it scrap military spend is utterly naive. There are many heavily armed non-govt actors in the region. If Uganda did not spend on military its government would be overthrown by another undemocratic military regime.

    Sanctions are moral tokenism and invariably hurt the wrong people.

    The relativism of 'Irish babies are hungry' is bizarre. Conditions in Uganda are from an altogether different paradigm of experience. Children in Ireland are not routinely kidnapped, mutilated, forced in to armed gangs, deprived of education. Yes Ireland has social problems - but turning off an international aid programme is not going to cure any of them. There are social and poverty traps here, and agencies here are funded to deal with them.


    But why is the above any business of the people of Ireland?
    Theres a lot of hungry people in North Korea and they also have corruption and a dictator and spend a lot of money on military equipment.

    There are more Garda stations closing in this country and a lot more hardship to come. By the above logic we should be making sure Kim Jong and likes are looked after despite the hardship of the Irish people.
    If you believe in democracy tell me why its democratic that we have never had a referendum on this issue?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,637 ✭✭✭Show Time


    lightspeed wrote: »
    But why is the above any business of the people of Ireland?
    Theres a lot of hungry people in North Korea and they also have corruption and a dictator and spend a lot of money on military equipment.

    There are more Garda stations closing in this country and a lot more hardship to come. By the above logic we should be making sure Kim Jong and likes are looked after despite the hardship of the Irish people.
    If you believe in democracy tell me why its democratic that we have never had a referendum on this issue?
    One or two posters on here would consider a referendum an act of racism.;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,568 ✭✭✭Chinasea


    Show Time wrote: »
    Cut the holy joe stuff it won't work with me.

    So, am I to assume you think it OK we let the starving mother and baby starve to death?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,637 ✭✭✭Show Time


    Chinasea wrote: »
    So, am I to assume you think it OK we let the starving mother and baby starve to death?
    How much more money will have to be wasted before they are all no longer starving??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 528 ✭✭✭telecaster


    lightspeed wrote: »
    But why is the above any business of the people of Ireland?

    Little happens in isolation. My belief is that as world citizens we are all on the one ship, if it goes down we all go down with it.

    So too, if Ireland ever again found itself again in the most dire need I hope that such humanity would be reciprocated by those more able to help.

    There are many different levels of crises. I'm sure most Ugandans would gladly swap their problems for ours.
    lightspeed wrote: »
    Theres a lot of hungry people in North Korea and they also have corruption and a dictator and spend a lot of money on military equipment.

    There are more Garda stations closing in this country and a lot more hardship to come. By the above logic we should be making sure Kim Jong and likes are looked after despite the hardship of the Irish people.

    I don't know why you're bringing North Korea in to it. It's a desolate and paranoid place as best I understand, and victim of a recent and unnecessary famine. There are some tentative signs that things will improve under the leadership of Kim Jong-Un, but the country remains isolated, and largely closed to the efforts of NGOs to assist.

    What Garda stations closing has to do with it, I simply dont know. I expect overseas aid and policing are managed by separate departments of government and national budget.

    I certainly don't propose funding corrupt regimes. The thrust of what I'm saying is that in the absence of a regime helping its own people then there is an instinct / desire / responsibility for some others to assist until that regime is changed in to one that serves the people rather than itself. Not everyone will feel that responsibility, but some do.

    lightspeed wrote: »
    If you believe in democracy tell me why its democratic that we have never had a referendum on this issue?

    I believe we should have referendums on issues such as this. There should be far more consultation of the citizens about national policy - but thats a meander from the core of the discussion.

    Though as a barometer of national feeling on the broad subject area, a recent MRBI poll has found that 80% of respondents were in favour of Ireland committing to targets of 0.7% of national income to be spent on overseas aid by 2015.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,109 ✭✭✭MaxSteele


    Chinasea wrote: »
    So, am I to assume you think it OK we let the starving mother and baby starve to death?

    How is it our fault or responsibility that generations upon generations of africans have been too feckless and unable to look after themselves ?

    If these mothers were in any way responsible, they wouldn't bring a child into their environment. How were neanderthals and the first men able to survive in just as bad or even worse conditions yet still thrive ?

    How did Ugandans cope before colonialism ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Show Time wrote: »
    You still have not apologised for calling me a racist.:rolleyes:

    Given that the follow up to
    Back in the old days kids use to have to bring a penny into school for the black babies and now they are all over here and still we are sending money out to them.

    was
    Best to let them all either learn how to farm or mine the land and if the natives are to lazy or stupid to even manage that than let them all die off and repopulate the lands with folks who are willing to do some work.

    I'm not seeing any reason to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,962 ✭✭✭✭dark crystal


    Chinasea wrote: »
    So, am I to assume you think it OK we let the starving mother and baby starve to death?

    No one is saying that, so quite why you keep feeling the need to repeat yourself, I don't know.

    We (and other countries) have been sending many millions in aid to Uganda for many years, yet the mothers and babies are still starving - now, what does that tell you?

    Meanwhile, the Ugandan government are spending millions on arms and military aircraft and at least 4 million has found it's way into the Prime Minister's private bank account. Can you see a problem there? At all?

    Do you think we should just continue sending aid, even when that aid is being misappropriated?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,568 ✭✭✭Chinasea


    Show Time wrote: »
    How much more money will have to be wasted before they are all no longer starving??

    Still no answer to my question?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,637 ✭✭✭Show Time


    Nodin wrote: »
    Given that the follow up to



    was



    I'm not seeing any reason to.
    None of the above is considered a racist comment.

    If they were at this point i would be sitting out the next week on Boards.ie

    So be the better man and say sorry it will do you the world of good to admit you were wrong.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    MaxSteele wrote: »
    How is it our fault or responsibility that generations upon generations of africans have been too feckless and unable to look after themselves ?

    ......

    Well done - you've dragged the tone even lower. No mean feat, considering. You're actually so clueless its hard to know where to begin.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,637 ✭✭✭Show Time


    Nodin wrote: »
    I consider them to be so - a deliberate skirting of overt racism.
    Again that is your view which is wrong.


    Now go ahead and be the better man and say sorry for insulting me.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Show Time wrote: »
    Again that is your view which is wrong.


    Now go ahead and be the better man and say sorry for insulting me.


    I call it like I see it. I see no evidence to the contrary.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,963 ✭✭✭Dr Turk Turkelton


    Just read the last few pages of this thread and I see that it is now racist to complain about our government giving a slightly more corrupt goverment money to buy expensive toys!

    Wow there is some seriously high horses itt.
    Also I think some people need to google what racism really is and not just throw the word around willy nilly to score thanks.


  • Registered Users Posts: 555 ✭✭✭cristoir


    52 percent of Ugandans live below the international poverty line. 67 percent of the urban population live in slums. The average student teacher ration in rural schools is 1:72. There are 2.5 million orphans living in Uganda.

    The comparison in this thread between Ireland and Uganda would be laughable if it wasn't so serious.

    People mentioned that we shouldn't give aid to corrupt regimes. Social reform tends to follow economic development. It's a lot easier to get people demanding political reforms once they have a decent standard of living and crucially an education.

    Some aid being mis-appropriated is not an argument for ending aid.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Just read the last few pages of this thread and I see that it is now racist to complain about our government giving a slightly more corrupt goverment money to buy expensive toys!
    .....

    Ye did? Where? A link would be nice.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 528 ✭✭✭telecaster


    We (and other countries) have been sending many millions in aid to Uganda for many years, yet the mothers and babies are still starving - now, what does that tell you?

    It tells you that famine is not a financial issue.

    It is not the chief problem in Uganda either.

    The money mainly goes to developmental projects rather than to air-dropping bags of rice to the starving.

    "Crisis response" and "development" are very different forms of aid.

    Sufficient development will prevent crisies arising.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,962 ✭✭✭✭dark crystal


    telecaster wrote: »
    It tells you that famine is not a financial issue.

    It is not the chief problem in Uganda either.

    The money mainly goes to developmental projects rather than to air-dropping bags of rice to the starving.

    "Crisis response" and "development" are very different forms of aid.

    Sufficient development will prevent crisies arising.

    But has there been sufficient enough development in Uganda though?

    Look, I have no objections to overseas aid. We all have a responsibility towards making the world a better place.

    HOWEVER...

    There should be stringent guidelines as to how the aid is appropriated. If these guidelines are not met, funding should be halted until the government agrees to the targets set out to them by those trying to help the citizens of their country, be it education, healthcare, water supply, agriculture, housing or whatever else. Using this money to buy arms, military aircraft, or to siphon money into personal accounts should never be tolerated.

    We simply cannot afford to continue funding countries who are misspending that money, especially when our own citizens are suffering. This is just commonsense I would have thought.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,637 ✭✭✭Show Time


    Nodin wrote: »
    Ye did? Where? A link would be nice.
    I hope the fall is not to high from that horse you are on.;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,441 ✭✭✭planetX


    telecaster wrote: »

    From Human Rights Watch: "The country’s security forces regularly use lethal force, especially during political demonstrations. Opposition politicians, their supporters, and some journalists face harassment, beatings, and arrest. The Ugandan military, despite efforts by key donors countries to ‘professionalize’ them, has yet to address the severe due process violations in military courts – especially the prosecution of civilians, who should be tried in civilian courts. Torture in detention is endemic, with torturers rarely brought to justice. Access to healthcare and education remains a serious problem. Uganda’s notorious Anti-Homosexuality Bill, which proposes the death penalty for some consensual same-sex activities, could still be voted on, threatening the freedom of Uganda’s LGBT community."

    Aren't the above exactly why we shouldn't be giving that money? It's like giving them the nod of approval.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,272 ✭✭✭lightspeed


    telecaster wrote: »
    Little happens in isolation. My belief is that as world citizens we are all on the one ship, if it goes down we all go down with it.

    So too, if Ireland ever again found itself again in the most dire need I hope that such humanity would be reciprocated by those more able to help.

    There are many different levels of crises. I'm sure most Ugandans would gladly swap their problems for ours.



    I don't know why you're bringing North Korea in to it. It's a desolate and paranoid place as best I understand, and victim of a recent and unnecessary famine. There are some tentative signs that things will improve under the leadership of Kim Jong-Un, but the country remains isolated, and largely closed to the efforts of NGOs to assist.

    What Garda stations closing has to do with it, I simply dont know. I expect overseas aid and policing are managed by separate departments of government and national budget.

    I certainly don't propose funding corrupt regimes. The thrust of what I'm saying is that in the absence of a regime helping its own people then there is an instinct / desire / responsibility for some others to assist until that regime is changed in to one that serves the people rather than itself. Not everyone will feel that responsibility, but some do.




    I believe we should have referendums on issues such as this. There should be far more consultation of the citizens about national policy - but thats a meander from the core of the discussion.

    Though as a barometer of national feeling on the broad subject area, a recent MRBI poll has found that 80% of respondents were in favour of Ireland committing to targets of 0.7% of national income to be spent on overseas aid by 2015.


    1) There is just as much reason to waste money in North Korea than in Africa.
    2) A survey is in no way representative of the democratic will of the people. Sure you could ask people on the street a yes or no answer on the issue. However, did the people conducting this survey point out the severity of both the corruption within these countries and the severity of the cuts we are making here as they were asking if we should continue to donate money abroad to Africa as we borrow money from Germany and the likes to pay off our own debt?

    If not then i reckon the survey is inaccurate. I highly doubt that people would be happy to see our health service and education suffer, crime rising as we cant afford to police the country all at the same time we donate millions abroad to fund warlords in foreign countries.

    I dont understand why you dont understand that I see people in Ireland suffering, whilst we are borrowing money to donate to foreign corrupt countries.
    why cant you figure why myself and many other people in this country have a problem with above?

    Its pure propaganda and lies to suggest that more money helps Africa become a stable country when after all these years of shovelling billions has amounted to nothing more than just more corruption and war. That is not an opinion, it is a fact whether is an inconvenient or not.
    If were not giving these corrupt governments money maybe there would have been an African spring and the African people would put a real democracy in place that actually held corrupt leaders to account. Just like with Saudi Arabia, without the oil money there would have been proper reform there a long time ago. But that cant happen until the people themselves are put in a position whether they have to make it happen. We are not fixing a problem of poverty, we are just fuelling decades of corruption to ensure it can continue.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 528 ✭✭✭telecaster


    But has there been sufficient enough development in Uganda though?

    Evidently not

    There should be stringent guidelines as to how the aid is appropriated. If these guidelines are not met, funding should be halted until the government agrees to the targets set out to them by those trying to help the citizens of their country, be it education, healthcare, water supply, agriculture, housing or whatever else. Using this money to buy arms, military aircraft, or to siphon money into personal accounts should never be tolerated.

    I agree. It's difficult within the scope of a national budget to say "Bundle A" of money, was used to buy "Bundle B" of goods. Countries in receipt of aid will claim that they are incumbent to develop their military as well as their society if only to protect the citizens. I'm no defender of military expenditure incidentally, its an appalling waste of funds globally - not just in terms of aid and development.

    We simply cannot afford to continue funding countries who are misspending that money, especially when our own citizens are suffering. This is just commonsense I would have thought.

    It's important to remember that funding overseas aid has not put Ireland in the economic position that it now finds itself in, and continuing to fund overseas aid will have very little influence in the broad picture of how Ireland's economy will fare in the coming decades.
    planetX wrote: »
    Aren't the above exactly why we shouldn't be giving that money? It's like giving them the nod of approval.
    That's a valid question. But as I posted earlier, aid is not an endorsement of a regime. Aid and funding towards development is increasingly managed on a 'project' basis where the Irish govt grants funds for a specific project to be embarked upon, supplemented or supported. This is frequently done through Irish NGOs or increasingly in tandem with NGOs based in the recepient country - thereby short circuiting the path where the corrupt regime skims or pockets the aid.

    It is imperative to note that this particular incident of the vanishing Eur 4 million was discovered through the office of the Ugandan Auditor General. This position is partly funded by Irish Aid, and is perhaps indicative of how good governance can be instilled through well targetted support. Without the funding of this position the kleptocracy would perhaps go unquestioned and unchallenged.
    lightspeed wrote: »
    1) There is just as much reason to waste money in North Korea than in Africa.
    Agreed, but you'll find NGOs have great difficulty accessing North Korea.
    lightspeed wrote: »
    2) A survey is in no way representative of the democratic will of the people. Sure you could ask people on the street a yes or no answer on the issue. However, did the people conducting this survey point out the severity of both the corruption within these countries and the severity of the cuts we are making here as they were asking if we should continue to donate money abroad to Africa as we borrow money from Germany and the likes to pay off our own debt?
    A survey is imperfect testimony I fully admit, but in the absence of a referrendum (which again I would endorse) its the best I can do in terms of presenting a broader opinion than my own. All surveys / polls are flawed.

    lightspeed wrote: »
    I dont understand why you dont understand that I see people in Ireland suffering, whilst we are borrowing money to donate to foreign corrupt countries.
    why cant you figure why myself and many other people in this country have a problem with above?

    I can figure it. I can, to a point, understand it. I respectfully disagree with it however.

    Ireland would be borrowing money whether an overseas aid programme existed or not. Irish borrowings are not specifically used to donate to developing countries - thats too simplistic, and I'm sure you know that.

    Does every citizen who takes out a loan, then stop buying raffle tickets, girl scout cookies or sponsoring parachutists? Of course not, you can service debt while still contributing within your budget to those who may be in greater need.

    From a more political point of view, I expect it would be viewed in a very bad light internationally if Ireland didn't 'pay it forward' a little having being recepient of much goodwill and rate-friendly investment from stronger nations in recent decades.

    I would hope there's more to Ireland's aid policy than optics and tokenism but I'm not naive enough to think its not a factor.
    lightspeed wrote: »
    Its pure propaganda and lies to suggest that more money helps Africa become a stable country when after all these years of shovelling billions has amounted to nothing more than just more corruption and war. That is not an opinion, it is a fact whether is an inconvenient or not.


    There are a lot of success stories at different levels across Africa (which is a continent, not a country as you have stated). You can read some examples of how projects have been effective in this link.

    Without a test 'normal' you cant logically say what impact aid did or did not have, your conclusion is speculative and not factual as you claim.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,272 ✭✭✭lightspeed


    http://files.transparency.org/content/download/101/407/file/2011_CPI_EN.pdf

    http://cpi.transparency.org/cpi2011/results/

    Judging from the above reports, its seems pretty factual to say that there are a lot of corrupt countries in Africa despite any economic progression across the continent.

    All the money pumped into Africa for so many years and so much liitle progress is ridiculous.

    Why do the government give any foreign aid if there are charities like Goal and Concern already in existence for people who want to give these people money?

    For the people in that survey who agree with giving aid to foreign countries, could we not just set up a scheme similar to VHI except with Concern or Goal where those people are taxed more to fund these other countries?

    So rather than being run by the Irish government, people could volunteer their taxes to fund these other countries. If as many people as are in the survey like their taxes going towards foreign corrupt countries, then surely these countries would still be getting around the same amount of aid from the Irish people?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,281 ✭✭✭donegal_road


    it is about oil


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,311 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    Africa will eventally get Foreign investment like China and the rest of the Far East and Brazil. Economies classed as third world will emerge and become the emerging countries like those did. Once China and Brazil become "too expensive"to manufacture goods corporations will look to more African countries.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • Registered Users Posts: 167 ✭✭passarellaie


    It appears that we are spending 700 million on foreign aid.Imagine with 50,000 a year emigrating,mothers worrying about feeding their kids and these clowns in Dublin are sending 700 MILLION of our money on foreign aid.
    Truly we need a taxpayers strike


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 792 ✭✭✭Japer


    It appears that we are spending 700 million on foreign aid.Imagine with 50,000 a year emigrating,mothers worrying about feeding their kids and these clowns in Dublin are sending 700 MILLION of our money on foreign aid.
    Truly we need a taxpayers strike

    +1. What is sickening as well is the do-gooders working for some of these "charities" getting paid 60,000 and 80,000 a year, plus pension.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 167 ✭✭passarellaie


    Japer wrote: »
    +1. What is sickening as well is the do-gooders working for some of these "charities" getting paid 60,000 and 80,000 a year, plus pension.

    Exactly just another do gooder self justification fraud screwing the real workers who pay for everything


Advertisement