Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Fulham v Sunderland

  • 18-11-2012 5:23pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,832 ✭✭✭✭


    Anyone else just hear O'Shea say ''book him, yeah book him for fecking diving'' :pac:

    Not a whole lot going on in the game otherwise, Sunderland don't look up to much going forward, Fulham looking threatening but not overly so.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    Easily the worst game I've watched so far this season. Absolutely atrocious.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,832 ✭✭✭✭Blatter


    Paully D wrote: »
    Easily the worst game I've watched so far this season. Absolutely atrocious.

    Surely not as bad as the Stoke v Sunderland game?

    Ye desperately need one or two of Johnson, McClean, Sessegnon or Larsson to hit some form. There's a huge lack of creativity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,190 ✭✭✭✭IvySlayer


    Straight red for Hangeland


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,832 ✭✭✭✭Blatter


    Silly boy, can't go in like that these days.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,852 ✭✭✭homer simpson


    Never a red, football really has gotten soft!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    Blatter wrote: »
    Surely not as bad as the Stoke v Sunderland game?

    Ye desperately need one or two of Johnson, McClean, Sessegnon or Larsson to hit some form. There's a huge lack of creativity.

    It's worse, honestly. At least there were a few shots on target in that game and a penalty shout.

    Hangeland sent off, harsh IMO but I can understand why the ref gave it. Hopefully it will open things up a bit anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,558 ✭✭✭✭dreamers75


    Never a red, football really has gotten soft!

    Love when this gets thrown about.

    How is allowing that tackle good for football?

    Stupid tackle, straight red.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    Alan Parry hates Sunderland :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,852 ✭✭✭homer simpson


    dreamers75 wrote: »
    Love when this gets thrown about.

    How is allowing that tackle good for football?

    Stupid tackle, straight red.

    Heh? He clearly got the ball, wasn't even close to causing an injury to a player if that's what your trying to say.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,224 ✭✭✭✭SantryRed


    Never a red.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,704 ✭✭✭G.K.


    Goal sunderland.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,296 ✭✭✭EdenHazard


    And I thought Fletcher was a dud signing!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    Cracking ball by Johnson there too.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,972 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    Pity the MOTD2 editor


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,704 ✭✭✭G.K.


    Petric 1-1


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,704 ✭✭✭G.K.


    Petric 1-1


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,704 ✭✭✭G.K.


    cuellar 2-1


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,704 ✭✭✭G.K.


    cuellar 2-1


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,972 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    Lol! plenty for the editor now 2-1 Sunderland.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,972 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    Or not! 2-1 Sunderland


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,972 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    Or not! 2-1 Sunderland


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,972 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    Lol! plenty for the editor now 2-1 Sunderland.

    edit Boards went a bit mad there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,116 ✭✭✭Professional Griefer


    3-1 to Sunderland, almost 4-1 Fletch was offside.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    Can someone explain what the 3 beside Sunderland means in the top corner? I've never seen that before. :eek:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,979 ✭✭✭Vurnon San Benito


    Some strike by Sessegnon. The win to restart the Party with Marty? :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    Doocey wrote: »
    Some strike by Sessegnon. The win to restart the Party with Marty? :pac:

    In true Sunderland style we'll probably lose 1-0 at home to West Brom next weekend.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,905 ✭✭✭✭Handsome Bob


    Great 2nd half and I have to say, Berbatov put a shift in in midfield when Fulham went down to 10 men. If he had better players around him, he could have gotten Fulham something out this game.

    Also, both teams look awfully dodgy at the back. Wouldn't be confident of Senderos playing adequately in the next few games with Hangeland suspended.


Advertisement