List of 60 most valuable players realeased!!

BrianJD

Well, do you agree? Rooney at 4 is a bit daft imo.


http://www.newstalk.ie/60-most-valuable-players

Mr Blobby

Stopped reading after Nani was ahead of Xavi.

BhoscaCapall

I'm afraid none of these players have been released.

RoryMac

It must be April Fools day looking at that list

bullvine

Yeah but its transfer value, correct? Nani is a lot younger than Xavi maybe that's why.

Pro. F

This is just some randomers calling themselves a consulting firm and trying to monetize talking shìte.

Francie Barrett

35) Oscar – Chelsea - €33.1 million

:pac:

Lawrence1895

Borussia Dortmund's Robert Lewandowski second last? That makes me even more proud, that Borussia cruised into the quarter finals of the Champions League. leaving Real and City well behind :P

SureYWouldntYa

Torres 30.6m ? :eek:

Remind me to never read anything from Newstalk again

eh i dunno

Wheres

Neil3030

Pro. F wrote: »

1. This is just some randomers calling themselves a consulting firm

2. and trying to monetize talking shìte.

Tautology, surely?

LiamoSail

SureYWouldntYa wrote: »

Torres 30.6m ? :eek:

Remind me to never read anything from Newstalk again

To be fair, they didn't compile the list, they're only reporting it

hefferboi

LiamoSail wrote: »

To be fair, they didn't compile the list, they're only reporting it

But why report ****e, just for the sake of it?

Mr Blobby

hefferboi wrote: »

But why report ****e, just for the sake of it?

You do know how the news works?

Jimmy Iovine

blobby360 wrote: »

Stopped reading after Nani was ahead of Xavi.

I stopped reading when I saw that Neymar was ahead of Bebe :mad:.

Ridiculous that he never gets the credit that his talent deserves.

hefferboi

blobby360 wrote: »

You do know how the news works?

:pac:

keith16

I stopped reading when I couldn't even click on the link.

cadete

No gutierrez and mike williamson aint there either #Joke

Doyler92

I don't know what all you guys are complaining about. I see only one problem with this list - no Emile Heskey!

The_Kew_Tour

blobby360 wrote: »

Stopped reading after Nani was ahead of Xavi.

Oh Dear

Seems like you don't know why he is valued higher.

The_Kew_Tour

Doyler92 wrote: »

I don't know what all you guys are complaining about. I see only one problem with this list - no Emile Heskey!

or Liam Miller.

Mr Blobby

The_Kew_Tour wrote: »

Oh Dear

Seems like you don't know why he is valued higher.

Well please explain to us, Oh enlightened one.

The_Kew_Tour

blobby360 wrote: »

Well please explain to us, Oh enlightened one.

Common sense really. How much would you pay to have Xavi in your team?

MUSEIST

The_Kew_Tour wrote: »

Common sense really. How much would you pay to have Xavi in your team?

A lot more than I would for nani anyway

Mr Blobby

Around 27Million for Xavi, and 17Million for Nani

The_Kew_Tour

MUSEIST wrote: »

A lot more than I would for nani anyway

Really? How much?

darced

This post has been deleted.

The_Kew_Tour

blobby360 wrote: »

Around 27Million for Xavi, and 17Million for Nani

Paying 27 Million for player who is 33 next month would be considered madness to most Club Chairmans.

Nani has 7 years over Xavi and would get some money if they were to sell in future. Also the wages would mean Xavi is out of reach anyway.

Xavi is one of greatest players I have ever seen, but to pay 27 million for him now. Cazy. Its not even realistic.

You want be sugar daddy of the sugar daddys.

Kirby

The_Kew_Tour wrote: »

Paying 27 Million for player who is 33 next month would be considered madness to most Club Chairmans.

Nani has 7 years over Xavi and would get some money if they were to sell in future. Also the wages would mean Xavi is out of reach anyway.

Xavi is one of greatest players I have ever seen, but to pay 27 million for him now. Cazy. Its not even realistic.

You want be sugar daddy of the sugar daddys.

Xavi is the type of player who could play till he is 40. And "chairmen" shouldn't be deciding recruitment policy. Thats the managers job or the director of footballs job. All they do is sign the cheque's. And whether its 27 million for 4 youngsters or 27 million for 1 oldie is irrelevant. That's what the manager says he needs.

If ANY team in europe thought they could get him for that little or that he would leave Barca.........he would have 20 club reps at his front gate tomorrow waiting in line.

hefferboi

Yeah but Nani is shít.

Lawrence1895

darced wrote: »

This post has been deleted.

Maybe, he had been valued in Zloty?

The_Kew_Tour

Kirby wrote: »

Xavi is the type of player who could play till he is 40. And "chairmen" shouldn't be deciding recruitment policy. Thats the managers job or the director of footballs job. All they do is sign the cheque's. And whether its 27 million for 4 youngsters or 27 million for 1 oldie is irrelevant. That's what the manager says he needs.

If ANY team in europe thought they could get him for that little or that he would leave Barca.........he would have 20 club reps at his front gate tomorrow waiting in line.

No manager would buy a 33 year old for 27 million. End of.

Kirby

The_Kew_Tour wrote: »

No manager would buy a 33 year old for 27 million. End of.

Shanghai Shenhua spent about that on Drogba....and he's 34. Over thirty million dollars. Beckam signed for Galaxy at 33 for alot more.

It would appear, you are wrong. End of.

Shane732

Nani is an absolutely horrible player and I'm a United supporter.

The_Kew_Tour

Kirby wrote: »

Shanghai Shenhua spent about that on Drogba....and he's 34. Over thirty million dollars. Beckam signed for Galaxy at 33 for alot more.

It would appear, you are wrong. End of.

Did they not get him on a free transfer?

Jimmy Iovine

Shane732 wrote: »

Nani is an absolutely horrible player and I'm a United supporter.

Well if you say he's horrible AND you're a United supporter then it must be true.

Kirby

The_Kew_Tour wrote: »

Did they not get him on a free transfer?

Nothing is free. 27 million up front and 0 on wages is the same amount of money as 0 up front and 520k a week.

Money spent is money spent. And that's what a "Chairman" cares about.

The_Kew_Tour

Kirby wrote: »

Shanghai Shenhua spent about that on Drogba....and he's 34. Over thirty million dollars. Beckam signed for Galaxy at 33 for alot more.

It would appear, you are wrong. End of.

lol

Beckham was bought for more then 27 million????

Thats news to me.:pac::pac:

Lawrence1895

Jimmy Iovine wrote: »

Well if you say he's horrible AND you're a United supporter then it must be true.

I know a United supporter, who actually likes Nani. As always, everything in life is relative

The_Kew_Tour

Kirby wrote: »

Nothing is free. 27 million up front and 0 on wages is the same amount of money as 0 up front and 520k a week.

Money spent is money spent. And that's what a "Chairman" cares about.

Hence why Xavi is worth Less value wise then Nani.

Thanks for proving my point.

Kirby

The_Kew_Tour wrote: »

lol

Beckham was bought for more then 27 million????

Thats news to me.:pac::pac:

He was on a base salary of about 8 million a year including bonus'. He took a pay cut last year, but even at 7 million a year.......7x5 is 35.

Money is Money whether its paid up front or over 5 years. I mean, you are not naive enough to think that when teams buy players they always pay it up front? They often pay it in installments over several years. Almost like a wage! :eek:

Kerrigooney

That is the most ridiculous piece of shit list I've ever set eyes on.

MaroonAndGreen

Oscar surely should be higher than Balotelli, Muller, Schweinsteiger, Ramos, Kompany, Sanchez and Nani.

List isnt great IMO....

The_Kew_Tour

Kirby wrote: »

He was on a base salary of about 8 million a year including bonus'. He took a pay cut last year, but even at 7 million a year.......7x5 is 35.

Money is Money whether its paid up front or over 5 years. I mean, you are not niave enough to think that when teams buy players they always pay it up front? They often pay it in installments over several years. Almost like a wage! :eek:

Yes of course but you seem to not understand the difference between Wages alone and wages plus transfer fee.

Thats why I state again why Nani is higher value then Xavi. Its not cause he is better(although different position of course) its that value wise its 100 times more likely that Xavi would be sold for shorter contract reducing his wages and his age means not such a high fee. On other hand Nani is in his prime and would be seen to be in his prime for at least 2/3 seasons the way things stand.

People seem think this article is based on best player rather then what the player between wages and transfer fee would cost.

Total different ball game.

Coillte_Bhoy

SureYWouldntYa wrote: »

Torres 30.6m ? :eek:

Remind me to never read anything from Newstalk again

Newstalk didnt draw up the list ffs:rolleyes:

Moist Bread

It's just a list, man.

Liam O

Typical it's Nani that people go after at being worth more than Xavi. Not Lucas or Ramires.

The_Kew_Tour

and willing to pay 65 million between wages and transfer fees for 33 year old.

Crazy! or just cheap shot maybe

areyawell

Wheres Andy Carroll?

oldyouth

Surely Robbie Keane has picked up €5m from joining each of his boyhood hero clubs

Wolves
Coventry
Inter
Leeds
Celtic
Liverpool
West Ham
Villa
Spurs
Galaxy

hefferboi

Liam O wrote: »

Typical it's Nani that people go after at being worth more than Xavi. Not Lucas or Ramires.

Lucas isn't even on the list?