Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Best wireless router for office setup?

Options
  • 18-01-2013 12:05am
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 8,249 ✭✭✭


    Looking to get a reliable wireless router that can handle around 20 simultaneous wireless connections without any hiccups for an office environment.

    Must also have QOS so data traffic can be prioritised over other traffic. The router will be used in a setup with heavy data upload at certain times of the day.

    Any suggestions welcome..


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,874 ✭✭✭✭PogMoThoin


    You may need more than one if it's a big area. Check out the Mikrotik RB751, see this thread
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2056805249

    They have a newer one just out, not sure if they are available yet tho
    http://routerboard.com/RB951G-2HnD


  • Registered Users Posts: 646 ✭✭✭vigos


    PogMoThoin, you must have shares in this company! :)

    Was on the lookout for a new router myself and was going to go the openwrt/dd-wrt route but saw your recommendations on here for the mikrotik.

    Anyway its looks the part alright and have ordered one of the new ones the http://routerboard.com/RB951G-2HnD .


  • Registered Users Posts: 754 ✭✭✭whowantstwoknow


    If I'm reading this right the Mikrotik RB751 (or its upgraded version) would do the sort of stuff I alluded to in my thread

    Its for a home LAN, so is there any need for the newer model? I assume it can function as a AP as I dont really need the router function.

    vigos, any pointer to where you purchased the unit?

    Thanks
    W.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,874 ✭✭✭✭PogMoThoin


    Yes, that would suit your needs perfectly, you'd need to stop it routing though and disable DHCP. You can get them on Ebay

    http://www.ebay.ie/itm/MIKROTIK-Routerboard-RB951G-2HnD-WIRELESS-5xPORT-GIGABIT-ROUTER-RB-951G-2HnD-/170976792941?pt=COMP_EN_Routers&hash=item27cf02d16d#ht_4307wt_1037


  • Registered Users Posts: 646 ✭✭✭vigos


    I ordered it from the eBay seller mentioned above, only ordered yesterday and its already been shipped so all bodes well


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 357 ✭✭Ctrl Alt Del


    Hi,

    I could be wrong but 1000mW is way above the EU regulations !??

    Please correct me if i'm wrong !


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,874 ✭✭✭✭PogMoThoin


    Hi,

    I could be wrong but 1000mW is way above the EU regulations !??

    Please correct me if i'm wrong !

    It's CE certified


  • Registered Users Posts: 754 ✭✭✭whowantstwoknow


    Hi Pog,

    Got the unit last nite. Jesus there's more settings on this yoke than lights on an xmas tree!!! :-)

    Didnt get it working but heres what I did:

    1) Added it to the network. The HTPC is connected via the units LAN connection
    2) Logged in via browser.
    3) Switched it from router to bridge mode. The unit receives its ip address from the original router running DHCP (via the WLAN connection)
    4) Gave it the same ssid & pwd as old unit. Set the admin pwd

    The wifi devices seem to connect, but dont have any internet access. This is backed up by the HTPC, it has no internet access either. Is the above correct? Is the option "use ACL" the feature which provides the MAC filtering?

    Thanks
    W.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,874 ✭✭✭✭PogMoThoin


    Hi Pog,

    Got the unit last nite. Jesus there's more settings on this yoke than lights on an xmas tree!!! :-)

    Didnt get it working but heres what I did:

    1) Added it to the network. The HTPC is connected via the units LAN connection
    2) Logged in via browser.
    3) Switched it from router to bridge mode. The unit receives its ip address from the original router running DHCP (via the WLAN connection)
    4) Gave it the same ssid & pwd as old unit. Set the admin pwd

    The wifi devices seem to connect, but dont have any internet access. This is backed up by the HTPC, it has no internet access either. Is the above correct? Is the option "use ACL" the feature which provides the MAC filtering?

    Thanks
    W.

    My understanding is that you were connecting to the original router by cat5 cable, is this right?

    If so, use any port, 2-5 to connect it to the original, not port 1 which could still be set as Wan and trying to route. You need to disable the DHCP server so the original router handles all DHCP (and routing to the internet).

    I'm not sure what setting it to AP disables or whether it stops it trying to route. To make it a full AP with 5 port switch you will need to stop it routing, to do this disable Nat by disabling the masquerade rule in ip-->firewall-->Nat (may already be disabled) and you need to assign the interface to the switch in interfaces by setting ether1-gateway to have a master port of ether2-master-local (may already be done).

    You're biting off more than you can chew with ACL's, move along, nothing to see here yet :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 754 ✭✭✭whowantstwoknow


    PogMoThoin wrote: »
    My understanding is that you were connecting to the original router by cat5 cable, is this right?

    If so, use any port, 2-5 to connect it to the original, not port 1 which could still be set as Wan and trying to route. You need to disable the DHCP server so the original router handles all DHCP (and routing to the internet).

    I'm not sure what setting it to AP disables or whether it stops it trying to route. To make it a full AP with 5 port switch you will need to stop it routing, to do this disable Nat by disabling the masquerade rule in ip-->firewall-->Nat (may already be disabled) and you need to assign the interface to the switch in interfaces by setting ether1-gateway to have a master port of ether2-master-local (may already be done).

    You're biting off more than you can chew with ACL's, move along, nothing to see here yet :D

    Hi,

    Thanks for that. I ended up resetting the configuration and starting over again. I dont know if by switching to bridge mode does the things above, but that NAT stuff was disabled and the interfaces seem to suggest the above (but what do I know!!).

    FYI: I have my router connected on port1 (WLAN) and it seems to be working fine.

    PS: How does the PoE work? At the moment I have it up and running with the mains adapter...

    Thanks
    W.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,874 ✭✭✭✭PogMoThoin


    PS: How does the PoE work? At the moment I have it up and running with the mains adapter...

    That's fine, Power over Ethernet is an alternative to using the power supply, some switches can do PoE.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,456 ✭✭✭FSL


    Hi,

    I could be wrong but 1000mW is way above the EU regulations !??

    Please correct me if i'm wrong !

    You are not wrong.

    Equivalent isotropically radiated power (EIRP) in the EU is limited to 20 dBm (100 mW).

    The reason for limiting the power in the unlicensed spectrum is to enable wireless devices to work in a relatively small area without interfering with adjacent areas.

    If I lived in a high density residential area and my wireless connection was being drowned out by a 1000mW router I'd be onto Comreg like a shot.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,874 ✭✭✭✭PogMoThoin


    FSL wrote: »
    If I lived in a high density residential area and my wireless connection was being drowned out by a 1000mW router I'd be onto Comreg like a shot.

    Good luck with that. Comreg are only interested in collecting money and then clapping themselves on the back


  • Registered Users Posts: 646 ✭✭✭vigos


    The 1000mW can be reduced if necessary they seem to describe it on the forum haven't tried it yet myself

    http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=59608

    Hoping to get mine setup over the weekend, hopefuly won't take too long!


  • Registered Users Posts: 754 ✭✭✭whowantstwoknow


    Hi all (/Pog)

    Dont know if you can help, but my unit has started to play up. Devices cant connect wirelessly, though on my smart phone the wifi analysier shows a signal. The phone says is authenticating or obtaining an ip address. When I try to connect to the browser admin interface I cant. I'm left with rebooting the device. I've upgrade the firmware but no luck...

    Thanks
    W.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,874 ✭✭✭✭PogMoThoin


    Hi all (/Pog)

    Dont know if you can help, but my unit has started to play up. Devices cant connect wirelessly, though on my smart phone the wifi analysier shows a signal. The phone says is authenticating or obtaining an ip address. When I try to connect to the browser admin interface I cant. I'm left with rebooting the device. I've upgrade the firmware but no luck...

    Thanks
    W.

    Might be best to do a full factory reset and start again. Be sure take a backup when you have it all setup and running right again

    Have you tried the new release candidate software releases (v6.0rc11 )? I'm getting much better wireless performance from them


  • Registered Users Posts: 754 ✭✭✭whowantstwoknow


    Havent upgraded to v6.0rc11 yet,

    but I'm looking to promote the RB951G-2HnD as my main router. See here for the background of the change.

    As you can see I havent got much of a response!!!. To date I've played about with the configuration (from a factory reset) and have set these tasks:

    1) Provides typical security for the home network (I think!!)
    4) Create port forwarding rules (excluding to broadcast addresses)


    as for these:

    2) Allows the TA612V to function as VoIP/ATA with QoS - I thought it might be wise to move this device to a DMZ. I've followed the wiki examples and given the device a static IP address behind the DMZ interface, but I cant seem to connect to the device's admin page. Again setup firewall filters as per number examples I've seen...

    3) Enable UPnP on the RB951G (used by the WHS setup) - Again, followed the wiki examples, but when I use the WHS 2011 remote access configuration wizard it keeps saying your router isnt UPnP enabled. Though it worked on the old TA612V router.


    Appreciate any helpful advise...

    W.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 552 ✭✭✭smee again


    There's a huge amount of info in the other thread
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2056718566

    For your ATA router, DMZ wouldn't be the best way to go about it. You shouldn't need to do anything it should work fine on DHCP, mine does. Add a rule for remote management of the device. For this example we'll use 192.168.88.99 for the ATA router. Lets say the management port is 8080 (make it that if it's not).
    /ip firewall nat
    add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat comment="Ata router mgmt" dst-port=8080 protocol=tcp to-addresses=192.168.88.99 to-ports=8080

    You may need to enable the SIP service-port, it's a helper for NAT of SIP connections /ip firewall service-port
    http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:IP/Services#Service_Ports

    To enable UPnP you set it to the bridge, then it will be applied to both wlan and ether2-local-master as they are assigned to this bridge (and thereby ether3-5 as they are slave to the master port).
    /ip upnp
    set allow-disable-external-interface=no enabled=yes show-dummy-rule=no
    /ip upnp interfaces
    add interface=bridge-local type=internal
    add interface=ether1-gateway type=external


Advertisement