Swansea (2) V Chelsea (0), Capital 1 Cup, K/O 7:45pm Sky Sports

lmao

Kid made a meal of it, but Hazard is a clown for kicking him.

kingshankly

Not a Chelsea fan but that's the worst decision I have ever seen

Xavi6

I'd have kicked him again, little fecker diving on the ball like that.

passremarkable

what a joke of a red card..the kid deserved more than what he got..

kfallon

Can see a few handbags here after the final whistle.

As Taggart once said, "Football.....bloody hell!"

Gbear

You can't go kicking ball boys.

Still, the little weasel deserved a bit of a kicking.

KingdomYid

GavRedKing wrote: »

That will surely be rescinded.

Thats going to take away from a possible swansea victory.

It wont and shouldnt be rescinded, you cant go kicking the ball boy no matter how badly he acted.

SlickRic

pathetic.

ballboys even getting trained in gamesmanship and feigning injury.

the ref should be ashamed by that decision.

Fuhrer

GavRedKing wrote: »

That will surely be rescinded.

Thats going to take away from a possible swansea victory.

hahaha, you serious?


How could it possibly be rescinded?

Its clear as day, the ballboy should have given the ball back but he still kicked him. Thats violent conduct, a 3 game ban.

I am pie

He is a kid...you cant kick kids if you are a millionaire footballer.

Sh1tstorm!

super_furry

Anyone wrote: »

How long was Cantona banned for attacking that fan?

Get the boat. Hazard kicked the ball from under a kid who was trying to prevent him getting it back.

Pompey Magnus

GavRedKing wrote: »

That will surely be rescinded.

Would it be rescinded if it had kicked a player lying on the ball to waste time?

super_furry

I am pie wrote: »

He is a kid...you cant kick kids if you are a millionaire footballer.

Sh1tstorm!

He didn't kick the kid. He kicked the ball.

willmunny1990

Should of kicked the lad in the head.

Liam O

bahahahaha, funniest thing ever.

Gbear

Hopefully the ball boy is banned from any further participation in football matches.

super_furry

Pompey Magnus wrote: »

Would it be rescinded if it had kicked a player lying on the ball to waste time?

The player trying to waste time would be booked.

Corholio

super_furry wrote: »

Definitely acting. He grabbed the ball, then threw himself on top of it to prevent Hazard getting it and when Hazard kicked it out from under him, he pretended he was hurt.

..........hahaha red card?!? Mental.

From under him? Why didnt the ball fly out then? Kid seems bit of a prick hamming it up, but Hazard is braindead to do that. Definitely caught the kid with the kick.

niallo27

Should he have even been on the field, I thought they were supposed to stay behind the advertising boards.

noodler

Oh dear.

You are in deep doo-doo Mr Hazard.

The_Kew_Tour

I honestly think that is one worst decisions I have seen.

#hazardwasright

Necronomicon

GavRedKing wrote: »

That will surely be rescinded.

Thats going to take away from a possible swansea victory.

You're probably right, but it shouldn't. They're well worth their win, if it does indeed stay that way. Chelsea have been spineless.

It was a joke of a situation, but Hazard was utterly stupid for kicking the ball boy all the same.

GavRedKing

KingdomYid wrote: »

It wont and shouldnt be rescinded, you cant go kicking the ball boy no matter how badly he acted.

He clesrly kicked the ball, the ref was acting on what the linesman think he seen.

kingshankly

It's the only kick hazard got all night was useless

Francie Barrett

super_furry wrote: »

Get the boat. Hazard kicked the ball from under a kid who was trying to prevent him getting it back.

Hazard is a grown man launching a kick at a lad on the ground, it's pretty disgraceful!

Lord TSC

You don't kick anyone, let alone a young ballboy. If the kid is wasting time, you tell the ref, get extra time played, you launch a complaint afer that match...

You don't assault him.

Kid will probably get a nice pay day now...

KingdomYid

willmunny1990 wrote: »

Should of kicked the lad in the head.

Yeah great suggestion :rolleyes:

homer simpson

Anyone wrote: »

How long was Cantona banned for attacking that fan?

Are you really comparing Cantona karate kicking a fan sitting in the stands to Hazard just kicking the ball from under a ball boy refusing to give the ball back, lol. Pull the other one.

SlickRic

also lads...no ballboy was kicked.

the ball was clearly all Hazard kicked.

he SHOULD'VE wellied the child into row Z for good measure.

willmunny1990

Francie Barrett wrote: »

Hazard is a grown man launching a kick at a lad on the ground, it's pretty disgraceful!

LOL

passremarkable

super_furry wrote: »

The player trying to waste time would be booked.

the kids job is the give the ball back

Chucky the tree

For stupidity alone Hazard deserves a red.

Phoenix Park

Well done Hazard, you've gone up in my estimation.

MyBrokenKnees

willmunny1990 wrote: »

Should of kicked the lad in the head.

No bloody call for that! He is a kid.

Bowlardo

Anyone wrote: »

How long was Cantona banned for attacking that fan?

Think you are being too extreme there. He only tipped the ball from underneath him. all things considered i thought it was fairly considerate out of the hazard they way he did it.

i don't like hazard and i hate chelsea but it that young lad claims he was injured or hurt then it is an absolute sham

fullstop

MyBrokenKnees wrote: »

Fair play red card deserved. Now for the big claim from the kid!

He can **** off with a claim, he shouldn't have been acting the bollox in the first place.

wnolan1992

Plenty of people in football "deserve" kicks.

Doesn't mean a player shouldn't be red carded when he does kick someone IMO.

0ph0rce0

SlickRic wrote: »

also lads...no ballboy was kicked.

the ball was clearly all Hazard kicked.

he SHOULD'VE wellied the child into row Z for good measure.

He boot him in the ribs, nice close up there

Francie Barrett

Between Inter and Chelsea, I think Benitez is saying goodbye to any career managing at a high level.

Mr.Nice Guy

The lad shouldn't have fallen on the ball but it looks like Hazard did kick the kid in the chest so it was a dumb move on his part. Ref had little option.

kfallon

When young lads look up to footballers they are gonna copy them, that's why the ballboy made a meal of it.

15 minutes of fame for him right there (and prob 2 tickets to the final :pac:)

A_Sober_Paddy

Kid did make a meal of it, he also tried to slow the game down...But Hazard kicked him while getting the boy back, absolutely idiotic thing to do and he should be at the business end of a fairly lengthy ban IMHO

Tayla

That was outrageous, Hazard just wanted to get the game restarted and tried to kick the ball out from under him.

niallo27

Corholio wrote: »

From under him? Why didnt the ball fly out then? Kid seems bit of a prick hamming it up, but Hazard is braindead to do that. Definitely caught the kid with the kick.

It didn't fly out because he was lying on it, if he kicked him in the ribs the ball would not have moved.

passremarkable

thats def one of the worst decisions i have ever seen..the ref should get a match ban for that decision

IvySlayer

Ballboy shoula been booked for time wasting :P

Nalz

Can't wait to see this!! Sounds hilarious

Corholio

GavRedKing wrote: »

He clesrly kicked the ball, the ref was acting on what the linesman think he seen.

Did you see that magnified replay Sky just showed? Clear as day he kicked the kid.

pistolpetes11

Fuhrer wrote: »

hahaha, you serious?


How could it possibly be rescinded?

Its clear as day, the ballboy should have given the ball back but he still kicked him. Thats violent conduct, a 3 game ban.

Kicked the ball under the lad , hows the view up there on your high horse ?

super_furry

Actually that Sky replay makes it look like Hazard just booted the ballboy.