Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Xbox One - General Discussion (NO DISCUSSION REGARDING PS4 - MOD WARNING Post 6903)

Options
1…139140142144145…331

Comments

  • Options
    #4232
    Xenji
    Registered Users Posts: 11,505 ✭✭✭✭Xenji


    2Mad2BeMad wrote: »
    in that case , 9+ free ps games coming for ps4
    i guess none of them are free either ? fifa 14 would work out alot cheaper then :pac:

    Fifa will be a digital download, not a hard copy.


  • Options
    #4233
    FlyingIrishMan
    Registered Users Posts: 2,861 ✭✭✭FlyingIrishMan


    It feels like MS are trying to bribe people into buying the console.


  • Options
    #4234
    Stone Deaf 4evr
    Registered Users Posts: 8,000 ✭✭✭Stone Deaf 4evr


    FlyingIrishMan wrote: »
    It feels like MS are trying to bribe people into buying the console.

    nothing at all wrong with that.


  • Options
    #4235
    CatInABox
    Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,353 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Xenji wrote: »
    Fifa will be a digital download, not a hard copy.

    I think that they're having a discussion about how a free digital game isn't free unless your broadband is unlimited. Of course, you'd still be paying for broadband regardless, so I'm not sure what the original point is.

    As an aside, I wonder how many people will transition over to purchasing digital games in this generation? As a PC gamer as well, I'm used to it through steam already, I wonder will many console only people start now?

    Also, a totally random question, with the fact that both the PS4 and the Xbox One are now built with x86 chips and are using commodity graphics chips, does anyone else think that this generation will be the last that has a problem with backwards compatibility? The next consoles won't swap away from X86 chips, so there'll be a continuation of compatibility from now on.


  • Options
    #4236
    2Mad2BeMad
    Registered Users Posts: 2,791 ✭✭✭2Mad2BeMad


    Xenji wrote: »
    Fifa will be a digital download, not a hard copy.

    whats wrong with that ? :pac: im going all digital for next year, so suits me better,


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #4237
    Victor Slow Rig
    Posts: 13,688 ✭✭✭✭ Victor Slow Rig


    FlyingIrishMan wrote: »
    It feels like MS are trying to bribe people into buying the console.

    Definitely coming across as desperate, to me at least.


  • Options
    #4238
    pleasant Co.
    Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 7,401 Mod ✭✭✭✭pleasant Co.


    meh, it's a free game - a huge release at that, not for everybody mind but for a lot this might sway them (personally I don't think it will, but it'll be a bonus for those already set on buying the X1)

    Being the sceptic that I am, I'm wondering what EA and MS have agreed on to allow this to go free.


  • Options
    #4239
    2Mad2BeMad
    Registered Users Posts: 2,791 ✭✭✭2Mad2BeMad


    pleasant Co. wrote: »
    meh, it's a free game - a huge release at that, not for everybody mind but for a lot this might sway them (personally I don't think it will, but it'll be a bonus for those already set on buying the X1)

    Being the sceptic that I am, I'm wondering what EA and MS have agreed on to allow this to go free.

    apparently fifa ultimate team is exclusive to xboxone
    has ultimate team always been exclusive to the xbox? i thought PS had it as well
    no doubth MS threw a few million in their face for it :D


  • Options
    #4240
    CatInABox
    Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,353 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    2Mad2BeMad wrote: »
    apparently fifa ultimate team is exclusive to xboxone
    has ultimate team always been exclusive to the xbox? i thought PS had it as well
    no doubth MS threw a few million in their face for it :D

    I think it's only the Legends that are exclusive.


  • Options
    #4241
    2Mad2BeMad
    Registered Users Posts: 2,791 ✭✭✭2Mad2BeMad


    CatInABox wrote: »
    I think it's only the Legends that are exclusive.

    your probably right, not a fan of ultimate team myself, much prefer seasons


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #4242
    Xenji
    Registered Users Posts: 11,505 ✭✭✭✭Xenji


    EA have a press briefing starting at 3pm today from Gamescom, sure we will know more about Fifa then and what other deals they have done with the devil.

    http://www.gametrailers.com/ will be streaming it


  • Options
    #4243
    jaffusmax
    Registered Users Posts: 1,602 ✭✭✭jaffusmax


    pleasant Co. wrote: »
    meh, it's a free game - a huge release at that, not for everybody mind but for a lot this might sway them (personally I don't think it will, but it'll be a bonus for those already set on buying the X1)

    Being the sceptic that I am, I'm wondering what EA and MS have agreed on to allow this to go free.

    I wonder if the online portion is available???? EA have always biatched about servers need funding to run! Unless MS has agreed to cover the costs then I can't see EA letting FIFAheads hitching a free ride!


  • Options
    #4244
    2Mad2BeMad
    Registered Users Posts: 2,791 ✭✭✭2Mad2BeMad


    Xenji wrote: »
    EA have a press briefing starting at 3pm today from Gamescom, sure we will know more about Fifa then and what other deals they have done with the devil.

    http://www.gametrailers.com/ will be streaming it

    don't think they have any deals done with Sony yet


  • Options
    #4245
    RasTa
    Closed Accounts Posts: 15,116 ✭✭✭✭RasTa


    Pretty impressive to get Fifa for free, I can see them shifting a lot with that offer. However I'll still never own another MS console after the nightmare of owning my first and last(technically on my 3rd) in the 360.


  • Options
    #4246
    Nolars
    Registered Users Posts: 2,893 ✭✭✭Nolars


    free game cant complain.


  • Options
    #4247
    GTR63
    Closed Accounts Posts: 10,469 ✭✭✭✭GTR63


    pleasant Co. wrote: »
    Being the sceptic that I am, I'm wondering what EA and MS have agreed on to allow this to go free.

    I imagine Peter Moore is still friendly with MS


  • Options
    #4248
    jaffusmax
    Registered Users Posts: 1,602 ✭✭✭jaffusmax


    No Xbox release date!

    http://www.thesixthaxis.com/2013/08/20/no-xbox-one-release-date-announced-by-microsoft/


  • Options
    #4249
    Otacon
    Registered Users Posts: 6,721 ✭✭✭Otacon


    pleasant Co. wrote: »
    Being the sceptic that I am, I'm wondering what EA and MS have agreed on to allow this to go free.

    To be honest, this is a win-win for both parties. Microsoft probably had to pay a wad of cash to get it but they are tackling one of the more important issues they have (price versus value). EA on the other hand receive a nice wad of cash, as well as guaranteeing a large number of consumers, increasing the likelihood of people spending money on DLC or the Ultimate Team stuff.


  • Options
    #4250
    stevenmu
    Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 9,689 Mod ✭✭✭✭stevenmu


    CatInABox wrote: »
    Also, a totally random question, with the fact that both the PS4 and the Xbox One are now built with x86 chips and are using commodity graphics chips, does anyone else think that this generation will be the last that has a problem with backwards compatibility? The next consoles won't swap away from X86 chips, so there'll be a continuation of compatibility from now on.
    I've been wondering about that too, and I've been thinking it might be part of the reason they went with the Xbox One branding. I suspect that we'll see an Xbox Two in a few years that'll be backwards compatible, and an Xbox Three that'll be backwards compatible with both a few years after that.


  • Options
    #4251
    miralize
    Registered Users Posts: 6,207 ✭✭✭miralize


    stevenmu wrote: »
    I've been wondering about that too, and I've been thinking it might be part of the reason they went with the Xbox One branding. I suspect that we'll see an Xbox Two in a few years that'll be backwards compatible, and an Xbox Three that'll be backwards compatible with both a few years after that.
    The Xbox One was called that because it aims to be the singular device in your living room. Not because it will be easier to name in the future...


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #4252
    CatInABox
    Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,353 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    For anyone who was complaining about Microsoft not streaming their conference, the EA conference is a perfect example of a conference that should not be streamed.

    It's like they've managed to find a bunch of news readers with speech difficulties to announce everything.


  • Options
    #4253
    FlyingIrishMan
    Registered Users Posts: 2,861 ✭✭✭FlyingIrishMan


    CatInABox wrote: »
    For anyone who was complaining about Microsoft not streaming their conference, the EA conference is a perfect example of a conference that should not be streamed.

    It's like they've managed to find a bunch of news readers with speech difficulties to announce everything.

    It can't be as bad as the Ubisoft one at E3. That woman was terrible.


  • Options
    #4254
    stevenmu
    Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 9,689 Mod ✭✭✭✭stevenmu


    miralize wrote: »
    The Xbox One was called that because it aims to be the singular device in your living room. Not because it will be easier to name in the future...

    Yeah, but they went through a load of names like Unity and Fusion that equally worked for that before settling on One. I'd be surprised if they didn't have at least half an eye on the future when they settled on One.


  • Options
    #4255
    CatInABox
    Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,353 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    FlyingIrishMan wrote: »
    It can't be as bad as the Ubisoft one at E3. That woman was terrible.

    Yes, in fairness, I've seen worse than this before.


  • Options
    #4256
    Otacon
    Registered Users Posts: 6,721 ✭✭✭Otacon


    FlyingIrishMan wrote: »
    It can't be as bad as the Ubisoft one at E3. That woman was terrible.

    You take that back!?

    Aisha is heavenly...

    Aishatyler.jpg


  • Options
    #4257
    FlyingIrishMan
    Registered Users Posts: 2,861 ✭✭✭FlyingIrishMan


    Otacon wrote: »
    You take that back!?
    [/IMG]

    Is that a question or a statement? :P

    Either way, nope. She was terrible as that conference and tried way too hard to be funny.


  • Options
    #4258
    2Mad2BeMad
    Registered Users Posts: 2,791 ✭✭✭2Mad2BeMad


    b*tch is cray


  • Options
    #4259
    Pushtrak
    Registered Users Posts: 4,640 ✭✭✭Pushtrak


    FlyingIrishMan wrote: »
    It can't be as bad as the Ubisoft one at E3. That woman was terrible.
    I think you are in the minority on that one.


  • Options
    #4260
    Grumpypants
    Registered Users Posts: 7,866 ✭✭✭Grumpypants


    FlyingIrishMan wrote: »
    Is that a question or a statement? :P

    Either way, nope. She was terrible as that conference and tried way too hard to be funny.

    You are just wrong.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #4261
    2Mad2BeMad
    Registered Users Posts: 2,791 ✭✭✭2Mad2BeMad


    Grumpypants wrote: »
    You are just wrong.

    i think hes right :pac: she tryed to hard to be funny, you could actually see it in her face how hard she was trying. Then again I dont understand american comedy:pac:
    she was nice to look at though :cool:


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement