Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Hall Of Fame Splinter Thread: 1 in, 1 out.

2»

Comments

  • #52
    pitythefool
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 716 ✭✭✭pitythefool


    gnfnrhead wrote: »
    In future? Yes. Now? No.

    Would he be in right now had he not gotten injured? Not a fcuking hope.

    very few wrestlers get in before they retire, he had a long career in comparison to most and achieved a hell of a lot more than some other entrants, he fully deserves it


  • #53
    Hashtag_HEEL
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,520 ✭✭✭Hashtag_HEEL


    1 in. I'm usually dead against celebrity inductees but I'd put Andy Kaufman forward. His work with Lawler in Memphis was truly entertaining!

    1 out. Koko B.Ware nuff said.


  • #54
    A Primal Nut
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,949 ✭✭✭A Primal Nut


    Pete Campbell wrote: »
    If anyone deserves to go in twice its someone like Flair (and a select group including the likes of Hogan and Austin). Don't see the problem myself.

    I don't see how people can put Flair up with Hogan and Austin as far as WWE history is concerned. He was only in the WWF for 18 months at his peak and was mainly an NWA/WCW guy. He came back for 7 years after WCW went under but he was well past his best at that stage, and didn't win the WWE title. In total his combined reigns as WWE champion is four months.


  • #55
    Stereomaniac
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,166 ✭✭✭Stereomaniac


    krudler wrote: »
    Why? he definitely deserves a spot.
    As a lifelong wrestling fan, I found him consistently patronising in his public relation skills. I think that his selling is cartoonish and is one of the most ridiculous things I have ever seen, and I find his locker room conduct to be reprehensible.


  • #56
    gnfnrhead
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,478 ✭✭✭✭gnfnrhead


    A Primal Nut wrote: »
    I don't see how people can put Flair up with Hogan and Austin as far as WWE history is concerned. He was only in the WWF for 18 months at his peak and was mainly an NWA/WCW guy. He came back for 7 years after WCW went under but he was well past his best at that stage, and didn't win the WWE title. In total his combined reigns as WWE champion is four months.

    It's not a WWE only HOF anymore.


  • #57
    krudler
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,788 ✭✭✭✭krudler


    Stereomaniac wrote: »
    As a lifelong wrestling fan, I found him consistently patronising in his public relation skills. I think that his selling is cartoonish and is one of the most ridiculous things I have ever seen, and I find his locker room conduct to be reprehensible.

    sure half the guys in the thing have backstage egos, Hogan, Flair, aren't any different.


Advertisement