Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Negative Equity - What to do when 2 people on the 1 policy but only 1 pays

Options
  • 10-02-2013 11:07pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 3


    Hi,

    I'd be very grateful if anyone could help with the following query or at least put me in the right direction.

    My girlfriend bought her apartment in 2006 (Mary) at the height of the celtic tiger. Because the mortgage was so high, the bank insisted on a 2nd person (Alice) also being on the policy. Now the property is 1/3rd of its value. Mary has always lived there and Alice has never, so Alice has not paid anything into the mortgage at all, she just helped Mary get the mortgage but all letters are addressed FTAO Mary & Alice. Alice is from the Far East (now Irish passport) so is planning to retire in 7 years and move back there with her pension.

    Mary is thinking about declaring bankruptcy by finding a job in the UK as a nurse first and contacting a company to do so.

    Has anyone else had this experience or knows of it when 2 people are on the mortgage policy? What advice can you give as both are in Ireland at present? Can Mary declare bankruptcy in any way without the bank going after Alice? She would if she could. She is also thinking about trying to get a moritorium or reduced payment. Talked to Irish lawyer but grey area as to what can be done in the UK!!

    Any help/leads would be appreciated.

    thanks


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 19,473 ✭✭✭✭Super-Rush


    Moved from After Hours.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,119 ✭✭✭homer911


    physioscot wrote: »
    Hi,

    I'd be very grateful if anyone could help with the following query or at least put me in the right direction.

    My girlfriend bought her apartment in 2006 (Mary) at the height of the celtic tiger. Because the mortgage was so high, the bank insisted on a 2nd person (Alice) also being on the policy. Now the property is 1/3rd of its value. Mary has always lived there and Alice has never, so Alice has not paid anything into the mortgage at all, she just helped Mary get the mortgage but all letters are addressed FTAO Mary & Alice. Alice is from the Far East (now Irish passport) so is planning to retire in 7 years and move back there with her pension.

    Mary is thinking about declaring bankruptcy by finding a job in the UK as a nurse first and contacting a company to do so.

    Has anyone else had this experience or knows of it when 2 people are on the mortgage policy? What advice can you give as both are in Ireland at present? Can Mary declare bankruptcy in any way without the bank going after Alice? She would if she could. She is also thinking about trying to get a moritorium or reduced payment. Talked to Irish lawyer but grey area as to what can be done in the UK!!

    Any help/leads would be appreciated.

    thanks

    There was a case in the irish courts last week where a credit union went after a guarantor and one. If your name is on the policy you are jointly and severably liable.. You should check out this case


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 51,688 Mod ✭✭✭✭Stheno


    THis is the article

    OP if Mary buggers off then the banks can and will pursue Alice for the entire debt, and vice versa


  • Registered Users Posts: 229 ✭✭Skr4wny


    If Mary declares bankruptcy and leaves the country Alice will have to take the hit as the bank will be after her.

    I never get people being somewhat unsure about the implications of being the joint party or guarantor on loan for someone else. It doesn't matter you never made a repayment or never lived there, you're still in the picture.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭StillWaters


    Stheno wrote: »
    THis is the article

    OP if Mary buggers off then the banks can and will pursue Alice for the entire debt, and vice versa
    Thats it in a nutshell. It would not be a nice thing for Mary to do, nasty in fact.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,027 ✭✭✭Lantus


    I would suggest that Alice get legal advice and attempt to have herself removed from the mortgage as quickly as she can. Assuming Mary has made consistent payments then this may not be an issue.

    Once this has happened then Mary can make decisions that she feels represent her best interest.


  • Registered Users Posts: 412 ✭✭roro2


    Lantus wrote: »
    I would suggest that Alice get legal advice and attempt to have herself removed from the mortgage as quickly as she can. Assuming Mary has made consistent payments then this may not be an issue.

    Once this has happened then Mary can make decisions that she feels represent her best interest.

    I reckon this woild be quite a big issue from the bank's perspective, and unlikely to happen. If it insisted on a second borrower in 2006, why would it drop that requirement now, especially with a property that's only worth 1/3rd of the 2006 value?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭StillWaters


    There is not a hope in hell that the bank will take Alice off the mortgage.


Advertisement