Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

BF4 ideas?

Options
12357…10

Comments

  • Options
    #122
    MajesticDonkey
    Registered Users Posts: 2,213 ✭✭✭MajesticDonkey


    Spear wrote: »
    For the sake of being a killjoy, various APC/IFVs have propellors at the back for amphibious landings.
    Yeah, even the Vodnik can go in water! :D
    Not sure about the propellors though...


  • Options
    #123
    ktulu123
    Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 3,092 Mod ✭✭✭✭ktulu123


    This is true, but they would hardly make a big deal about something like that would they?





    ...oops sorry its DICE :p


  • Options
    #124
    PhlegmyMoses
    Registered Users Posts: 11,906 ✭✭✭✭PhlegmyMoses


    mozattack wrote: »
    BF4 autumn 2013, PS4 spring 2014 I would say (in Europe)

    What are these release dates based on? Particularly the European PS4 launch date. Has there been some more info?


  • Options
    #125
    Soby
    Registered Users Posts: 5,977 ✭✭✭Soby


    Spear wrote: »
    For the sake of being a killjoy, various APC/IFVs have propellors at the back for amphibious landings.

    Will be a purchase dlc for 10 euro to use on all vehicles. Standard will be

    rowing-oar_500_copyright.gif


  • Options
    #126
    ktulu123
    Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 3,092 Mod ✭✭✭✭ktulu123


    Another image popped up on the BF4 landing page: http://battlefieldo.com/threads/aircraft-carrier-revealed-in-battlefield-4.9530/

    This has got me a bit excited. I said last year that a titan mode type game play involving attacking an air craft carrier would be unreal. Would be so awesome if this was what was happening :)


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #127
    cherryghost
    Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 17,133 Mod ✭✭✭✭cherryghost


    Naval Warfare, sehr gut


  • Options
    #128
    cherryghost
    Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 17,133 Mod ✭✭✭✭cherryghost


    Maybe we'll get some of this going on :P

    5gzlYDB.jpg


  • Options
    #129
    danniemcq
    Registered Users Posts: 14,163 ✭✭✭✭danniemcq


    All this talk of submarines... And wasn't that just a glitch in one of the dlcs the mountain one


  • Options
    #130
    Nuri Sahin
    Site Banned Posts: 26,456 ✭✭✭✭Nuri Sahin


    New pic of Battlefield 4 is up.


















    Image.jpg?p=081209_11:13


  • Options
    #131
    Soby
    Registered Users Posts: 5,977 ✭✭✭Soby


    Nuri Sahin wrote: »
    New pic of Battlefield 4 is up.




    pic

    ENEMY SPLASH INCOMING


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #132
    GottaGetGatt
    Registered Users Posts: 2,133 ✭✭✭GottaGetGatt


    Soby wrote: »
    ENEMY SPLASH INCOMING

    If there is a Sub, it'll probably be in the singleplayer. Or more than likely with EA included with a DLC IN 2015:(


  • Options
    #133
    Spear
    Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Help & Feedback Category Moderators Posts: 25,261 CMod ✭✭✭✭Spear


    I'm looking out the window at constant rain, safe in the knowledge that there's a lot more rain to come. And then realizing that many of use are going to pay €50 for software the simulates that rain. EA may be utter bastards but they're not stupid.


  • Options
    #134
    mozattack
    Registered Users Posts: 1,908 ✭✭✭mozattack


    From a console player's point of view at least we now can look forward to 64 player games so even if BF4 = BF3, we will have that to look forward to.

    I hope it is as good as people say. Is it really though?


  • Options
    #135
    MajesticDonkey
    Registered Users Posts: 2,213 ✭✭✭MajesticDonkey


    mozattack wrote: »
    From a console player's point of view at least we now can look forward to 64 player games so even if BF4 = BF3, we will have that to look forward to.

    I hope it is as good as people say. Is it really though?
    64 player is a load of ****e really on most of the maps. I very rarely play anything bigger than 32 player...sometimes 48 player depending on the map but definitely no bigger than that.

    Try playing 64 man Close Quarters if you want the lolz.


  • Options
    #136
    Kylo Ren
    Registered Users Posts: 10,364 ✭✭✭✭Kylo Ren


    Some sort of way of having team mates flashlights and lasers not be seen by you.


  • Options
    #137
    mozattack
    Registered Users Posts: 1,908 ✭✭✭mozattack


    MajesticDonkey wrote: »
    64 player is a load of ****e really on most of the maps. I very rarely play anything bigger than 32 player...sometimes 48 player depending on the map but definitely no bigger than that.

    Try playing 64 man Close Quarters if you want the lolz.

    What about 64 player Operation Firestorm, Kharg, Caspian, Bandar Desert and Armored Shield - must be good?


  • Options
    #138
    MajesticDonkey
    Registered Users Posts: 2,213 ✭✭✭MajesticDonkey


    mozattack wrote: »
    What about 64 player Operation Firestorm, Kharg, Caspian, Bandar Desert and Armored Shield - must be good?
    I personally never play Armored Kill. I play Firestorm and Kharg quite a bit, but still feel 64 players is too much. It's just complete mayhem on even the big maps - as soon as you cap a flag and are just after leaving, someone else is capping it back again. No real flow to the game when there's too many players.


  • Options
    #139
    GottaGetGatt
    Registered Users Posts: 2,133 ✭✭✭GottaGetGatt


    I couldnt imagine trying to fly a chopper in a 64 man server.The amount of pricks with stingers, it would be pointless.


  • Options
    #140
    Nuri Sahin
    Site Banned Posts: 26,456 ✭✭✭✭Nuri Sahin


    GottaGetGatt wrote: »
    I couldnt imagine trying to fly a chopper in a 64 man server.The amount of pricks with stingers, it would be pointless.

    Likewise. On console (PS3 anyway), 12 v 12, a lot of games are against 2-4 people running a Stinger/IGLA set ups these days, so I can only imagine the BS of 64 man players. Novelty would wear off very quickly for me unless the average map size was that of an Armoured Kill map.

    I think 32-48 players is plenty enough. 40 I'd be quite content with as I've always thought that a few of the maps and gametypes (Conquest and Conquest Assault namely) could really benefit from from a couple of extra squads in a team.


  • Options
    #141
    Nuri Sahin
    Site Banned Posts: 26,456 ✭✭✭✭Nuri Sahin


    mozattack wrote: »
    What about 64 player Operation Firestorm, Kharg, Caspian, Bandar Desert and Armored Shield - must be good?

    Caspian Border and Kharg Island, 20 vs 20 would be fine playing CQ IMHO. Probably Operation Firestorm as well.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #142
    GottaGetGatt
    Registered Users Posts: 2,133 ✭✭✭GottaGetGatt


    I've heard 64 man on metro is 20 lads standing over an ammo box, spamming grenades down the stairs, great craic and they call themselves the master race. lol.What do i want for BF4?.. to get their Sh*t together and put out an alpha so most of the stupid exploits can be sorted out before the game even releases.


  • Options
    #143
    Spear
    Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Help & Feedback Category Moderators Posts: 25,261 CMod ✭✭✭✭Spear


    GottaGetGatt wrote: »
    I've heard 64 man on metro is 20 lads standing over an ammo box, spamming grenades down the stairs, great craic and they call themselves the master race. lol

    From what I've seen of an instance of that, it that it's just a shade short of being stat padding.


  • Options
    #144
    ktulu123
    Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 3,092 Mod ✭✭✭✭ktulu123


    GUYS!!! They have confirmed that both Tanks AND Helicopters will be in the game! I'm so excited by this

    https://twitter.com/BATTLEFIELDO/status/315873258006278144/photo/1

    https://twitter.com/BATTLEFIELDO/status/315873344635404289/photo/1

    :(


  • Options
    #145
    cherryghost
    Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 17,133 Mod ✭✭✭✭cherryghost


    Looks like a Chinese Type 99 MBT and 2 Mi-28's. So Russia vs China it is :P


  • Options
    #146
    ktulu123
    Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 3,092 Mod ✭✭✭✭ktulu123


    Yeah thats the tank anyway, the guys over at Battlefieldo seem to think they are two Apache ah64's. Would be awesome to have 3 factions again


  • Options
    #147
    cherryghost
    Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 17,133 Mod ✭✭✭✭cherryghost


    ktulu123 wrote: »
    Yeah thats the tank anyway, the guys over at Battlefieldo seem to think they are two Apache ah64's. Would be awesome to have 3 factions again

    They don't look like Apache's to me, but then again I'm not an expert on helis


  • Options
    #148
    Spear
    Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Help & Feedback Category Moderators Posts: 25,261 CMod ✭✭✭✭Spear


    cherryghost wrote: »
    They don't look like Apache's to me, but then again I'm not an expert on helis

    They're Mi-28 Havocs, but the tanks are the slightly older type 96's I think.


  • Options
    #149
    ktulu123
    Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 3,092 Mod ✭✭✭✭ktulu123


    hmmm coul this mean 3 factions? Would be awesome!


  • Options
    #150
    5uspect
    Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 10,518 Mod ✭✭✭✭5uspect


    Yeah, definitely a Havoc:
    mi28.jpg
    looks nothing like an Apache:
    AIR_AH-64A_and_AH-64D_lg.jpg

    At least now we really know it's contemporary, I would have liked something different.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #151
    Chorcai
    Registered Users Posts: 2,283 ✭✭✭Chorcai


    I thought it was the WZ-10 from Bf2....

    http://battlefield.wikia.com/wiki/WZ-10


Advertisement