Video of Supermacs bouncers last night

Dan_Solo

happyoutscan wrote: »

I wish the video had a beginning so we could say definitely if the bouncer was a bell-end or was dead right. I'd say a few on here are happy enough there isn't a beginning though, it suits there non-discussion personal agenda.

Is this you you're talking about, where you can assume everybody was asking for it and all drunks are "acting up" and that suits your personal general public hating agenda?

Dan_Solo

Too much of a leap to suggest that everybody who thinks fatman was doing his job well is a doorman themselves of some sort or other?
Form an orderly queue to prove me wrong lads...

moy83

happyoutscan wrote: »

I'd be happy enough to have him intervene on my behalf if I had some drunk moron acting up. That's what he's there for, dealing with morons who can't behave themselves after a night out. If you behave yourself on a night out why would anyone have to worry about any bouncer anyway?

I think bouncers are there to protect everyone. He looked intent on getting a slap on the young fella instead of calming everyone down . It wouldnt have taken much for that crowd to have turned on him and upset the place

Gee_G

Dan_Solo wrote: »

Too much of a leap to suggest that everybody who thinks fatman was doing his job well is a doorman themselves of some sort or other?
Form an orderly queue to prove me wrong lads...

The impression I've got from this thread is that people have said IF the young fella was acting up, the bouncer was in the right! Unless you were actually in Supermacs on the night in question?? Maybe you could clarify what actually happened?!

spud65

happyoutscan wrote: »

I wish the video had a beginning so we could say definitely if the bouncer was a bell-end or was dead right. I'd say a few on here are happy enough there isn't a beginning though, it suits there non-discussion personal agenda.

what ever happened before you still think baldy twat was right to punch the s***e out of the young fella

happyoutscan

Dan_Solo wrote: »

Ah right, so a young lad so paralytic he can't speak and can barely stand is now "acting up"? Being too drunk to stand has now become a great excuse to test out the new move you've been practising down the dojo huh?

Can barely stand up? Were you there? Dojo? You watching Karate Kid again?:rolleyes:

Dan_Solo wrote: »

Is this you you're talking about, where you can assume everybody was asking for it and all drunks are "acting up" and that suits your personal general public hating agenda?

The majority of people who ask for it get it. That isn't rocket science. I'd find it hard to believe all those bouncers were there to back up 'fatso' while he went on a solo mission of no-reason destruction. As for you assuming I have a 'general hatred of the public' is just another of your trolling stunts, seeing as you have nothing else to fall back on.

Dan_Solo wrote: »

I never said I had previous with authority. You made that up. Probably because you live in a fantasy land where you think it's easier just to assume you are right so the poor auld brain never needs to get bothered too much with anything approaching a logical discourse where you might have to, ya know, pay some attention to what people are actually saying.
Bouncer by any chance?

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=69084019&postcount=174
I paid attention and no I'm far from bouncer material, trust me.

Dan_Solo wrote: »

Too much of a leap to suggest that everybody who thinks fatman was doing his job well is a doorman themselves of some sort or other?
Form an orderly queue to prove me wrong lads...

You've proved yourself wrong. Use your head.

moy83

Gee_G wrote: »

The impression I've got from this thread is that people have said IF the young fella was acting up, the bouncer was in the right! Unless you were actually in Supermacs on the night in question?? Maybe you could clarify what actually happened?!

Even if the young fella was acting up there is no way the bouncer should have headed him in the stomach while the others held on to him . He was in no way professional

Dan_Solo

Gee_G wrote: »

The impression I've got from this thread is that people have said IF the young fella was acting up, the bouncer was in the right! Unless you were actually in Supermacs on the night in question?? Maybe you could clarify what actually happened?!

You're already on record as agreeing with someone saying no bouncer anywhere has ever slapped a punter when they didn't need to.
Apparently you already do know then that fatso was within his rights, so tell us yourself the full story.

somefeen

If you go by only what you can see in the video.
Your man in blue punched the baldy ****er in the head while he was trying to get your man in the gray out.

Everyone in that video is out of their ****ing tree anyway. If I went to super macs and they were that busy I'd just say **** that!

Gee_G

Dan_Solo wrote: »

You're already on record as agreeing with someone saying no bouncer anywhere has ever slapped a punter when they didn't need to.
Apparently you already do know then that fatso was within his rights, so tell us yourself the full story.

"On record"?! If you wouldn't mind quoting where exactly I said that,that'd be great!

Dan_Solo

Gee_G wrote: »

"On record"?! If you wouldn't mind quoting where exactly I said that,that'd be great!

Sure thing buddy! Always here to help out those with failing memory.
This is the ludicrous garbage you put your thanks to earlier:

tylercheribini wrote: »

from all my extensive travels both home and abroad i have never ever seen someone gettin done by bouncers/security anywhere when they dont deserve it....(i include mates in that bracket)

Glad to be of service!

biko

Ok can we chill the jets a bit pls

Gee_G

Dan_Solo wrote: »

Sure thing buddy! Always here to help out those with failing memory.
This is the ludicrous garbage you put your thanks to earlier:

Glad to be of service!

Stop trying to talk people in circles and put words in their mouths. I thanked that post as I agree that the young fella had to have done something to have provoked the bouncers. Not once have I said that the bouncer was within his rights. If you'd stop talking **** and go back to my first post in this thread I CLEARLY stated that no bouncer should behave this way.

I'd love to genuinely hear your views on what actually happened. So far I've just seen you trying to make out that every other poster here is a bouncer!

Dan_Solo

happyoutscan wrote: »

Can barely stand up? Were you there? Dojo? You watching Karate Kid again?:rolleyes:

Anybody any idea what that means. Do we have a gibberish translator in the house?
You are aware of a video being posted on this thread where a guy who can barely stand is being grabbed and squashed by a fat bald bouncer? No? Didn't think so.

happyoutscan wrote: »

The majority of people who ask for it get it. That isn't rocket science. I'd find it hard to believe all those bouncers were there to back up 'fatso' while he went on a solo mission of no-reason destruction. As for you assuming I have a 'general hatred of the public' is just another of your trolling stunts, seeing as you have nothing else to fall back on.

Most of the bouncers did absolutely nothing for a few seconds because they looked genuinely astonished that fatso had cause such chaos with his determination to assault somebody. Some of them even look half embarrassed.
We all know "YOU'RE TROLLING!" is the new "I'm getting slaughtered here" BTW. Lame.

happyoutscan wrote: »

http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=69084019&postcount=174

So as evidence that I have "previous" with authority you have a post saying I have little respect for most Gardai. Er, that doesn't say I have previous with them. I have an opinion on Bill Gates and Vladimir Putin, but I've never actually had much dealings with either of them.

happyoutscan wrote: »

You've proved yourself wrong. Use your head.

Oops I must have missed where that happened. Seems you're admitting that you're not able to prove me wrong anyway.

Dan_Solo

Gee_G wrote: »

I'd love to genuinely hear your views on what actually happened. So far I've just seen you trying to make out that every other poster here is a bouncer!

So you couldn't read that correctly either. You're on a real roll. Where did I say every other poster here was a bouncer? Go on. Gonna be a long wait.

happyoutscan

Dan_Solo wrote: »

Anybody any idea what that means. Do we have a gibberish translator in the house?
You are aware of a video being posted on this thread where a guy who can barely stand is being grabbed and squashed by a fat bald bouncer? No? Didn't think so.
Most of the bouncers did absolutely nothing for a few seconds because they looked genuinely astonished that fatso had cause such chaos with his determination to assault somebody. Some of them even look half embarrassed.
We all know "YOU'RE TROLLING!" is the new "I'm getting slaughtered here" BTW. Lame.
So as evidence that I have "previous" with authority you have a post saying I have little respect for most Gardai. Er, that doesn't say I have previous with them. I have an opinion on Bill Gates and Vladimir Putin, but I've never actually had much dealings with either of them.
Oops I must have missed where that happened. Seems you're admitting that you're not able to prove me wrong anyway.

Lame? Coming from you that's funny. You've done a great job in this thread. If anything, I'll know to stay away from you as you are totally incapable of handling any form of discussion. You're quite pathetic, but please by all means keep telling yourself you're right.

Dan_Solo

Gee_G wrote: »

Stop trying to talk people in circles and put words in their mouths. I thanked that post as I agree that the young fella had to have done something to have provoked the bouncers.

You thanked a post saying that no bouncers ever dish it out unless it's necessary. People can scroll back and see that you are now claiming the post said something completely different you know? Here, I'll save them the effort so they can start laughing at you straight away instead:

tylercheribini wrote: »

at the end of the day u dont get punched by bouncers for just buyin a burger and leavin the premises. from all my extensive travels both home and abroad i have never ever seen someone gettin done by bouncers/security anywhere when they dont deserve it....(i include mates in that bracket)

(3) thanks from: elefant, Gee_G, Madcon

Dan_Solo

happyoutscan wrote: »

Lame? Coming from you that's funny. You've done a great job in this thread. If anything, I'll know to stay away from you as you are totally incapable of handling any form of discussion. You're quite pathetic, but please by all means keep telling yourself you're right.

Nice to see you've admitted you are wrong then as you've failed to even mention the argument at all here.
But hey, nobody will notice a few ad hominems will they if I put them in there instead of logic or reasoning which I find too tough to do!

Gee_G

Dan_Solo wrote: »

You thanked a post saying that no bouncers ever dish it out unless it's necessary. People can scroll back and see that you are now claiming the post said something completely different you know? Here, I'll save them the effort so they can start laughing at you straight away instead:


(3) thanks from: elefant, Gee_G, Madcon

I've just explained why I thanked that post,not that I have to in any way justify myself to you. Stop repeating yourself.

I agree with the above poster that you are completely incapable of taking part in a discussion.

Dan_Solo

Gee_G wrote: »

I've just explained why I thanked that post,not that I have to in any way justify myself to you. Stop repeating yourself.

Oh, so you explained why you thanked the post... which didn't appear to have anything to do with what was actually in the post.
I'm sorry if you are having difficult arguing against me. Maybe try being right next time? Always an advantageous place to start in an argument.

Gee_G

Dan_Solo wrote: »

Oh, so you explained why you thanked the post... which didn't appear to have anything to do with what was actually in the post.
I'm sorry if you are having difficult arguing against me. Maybe try being right next time? Always an advantageous place to start in an argument.

This is a discussion board. Not once did I try and make this into an argument. I have asked you for your views on what happened but you choose to keep replying and completely ignoring my question.

Goodnight!

Dan_Solo

Gee_G wrote: »

This is a discussion board. Not once did I try and make this into an argument.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument
Glad to be of service here since you don't appear to know what the word means.
Any time!

biko

I asked nicely but to avail.
Thread closed.