Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

My News AH thread closure?

Options
1468910

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 8,584 ✭✭✭TouchingVirus


    So what if OT threads have "never been allowed in AH"...things change. There is a demand for this thread, so why can't the AH mods be flexible? The mods should be more open-minded to change and what the users of the forum want.

    Threads take off in Afterhours for various reasons, it doesn't mean there are needs being missed. There's not exactly a massive shift or upheaval here - there's about 10 users complaining in a thread with 289 posters. I don't think you're representative of anybody except yourselves as posters in that thread.
    I've absolutely zero doubt that this thread will be closed soon by an admin, saying that the decision of the moderators is final. It's very rare that an admin or a moderator does anything wrong on this site after all :rolleyes:

    Since we're all oracles in relation to feedback I'll throw in my prediction - this thread will be closed because it'll become so incredibly polarised it can never come to natural conclusion.

    On one side you'll have a few people, many of them contributors to the My News thread, claiming it was the best thing since sliced bread and the mods are ruining AH. On the other you'll get people like me who think it was an awful thread, not particularly because of the news that gets posted but because of everything that went it with as explained in my earlier posts.

    keith16 wrote: »
    Except for the "I found a safe thread" where the OP was openly antagonising the mods / admins and found to have found dupe / sock-puppet accounts - why was that thread re-opened given such fundamental violations of the terms?

    It wasn't, on both counts. There was a suspected dupe account but the poster was given the benefit of doubt that it was his actual wife posting and not him sockpuppeting.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,061 ✭✭✭keith16



    It wasn't, on both counts. There was a suspected dupe account but the poster was given the benefit of doubt that it was his actual wife posting and not him sockpuppeting.

    Incorrect, there was a third count which the OP admitted was also him.


  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 35,943 Mod ✭✭✭✭dr.bollocko



    I've touched on this recently in AH but I don't understand why the moderation on boards has to be so intrusive and overpowering. Why can't threads/forums evolve organically instead of having to be so controlled?
    I don't think that's a fair opinion... Wherever possible we let things flow before mod intervention.

    Why take it to a general level where one decision you disagree with is responsible for ruining boards?

    It's not helpful. Babies flying out with bathwater.
    It's been repeatedly said that this decision was "for the good of the forum"...well I think that's complete BS. Surely the forum is for the USERS first and foremost. If this thread was a popular thread enjoyed by a large number of users, then it IS good for the forum. It may not be great for the mods because they'll have to moderate it more closely, but if that's an issue then take on more moderators.
    It's been repeatedly said WHY the decision is good for the forum too. If it's BS then tell us why. Don't just dismiss the reasoning behind it because you disagree with it.

    On the point of moderators....
    Moderate it more closely?

    We have no problem with moderators. It's a banal non-story chat thread.

    It doesn't help the forum.

    It helps nurture that off topic flirty crap that ruins threads on AH as it is.

    It doesn't help new users because they'll default to the chat thread to find their friends.
    Or they'll be ignored in the chat thread as regulars get replies.

    The chat thread style of flirty off topic stuff will invade the other threads also.

    It's not needed. It's catered for elsewhere. AH doesn't need to become part of it and I'd argue that it shouldn't.

    This is the same concern I've had when we discussed this when it was first raised in 2010.
    I've absolutely zero doubt that this thread will be closed soon by an admin, saying that the decision of the moderators is final. It's very rare that an admin or a moderator does anything wrong on this site after all :rolleyes:

    Why the need for this? Why the need to insult all the mods and admins on boards forever because you disagree with one decision that is being discussed as we speak?

    I just don't get the point in decrying how boards is ruined because a few people can't post an update on what they did today in AH.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,061 ✭✭✭keith16


    On the other you'll get people like me who think it was an awful thread, not particularly because of the news that gets posted but because of everything that went it with as explained in my earlier posts.


    I agree with you here TV....some of the news content was very funny. A lot of it in fact. The thread DID have a topic, writing your news in a primary school / ironic style.

    Other mods here have also said things along the lines of the thread had potential, good idea etc. etc.

    But it wasn't given a fair chance by mods and users alike. I am completely in favour of locking threads when they get out of hand, no matter how good they are. But the vast majority get a warning first.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,919 ✭✭✭✭Gummy Panda



    Threads take off in Afterhours for various reasons, it doesn't mean there are needs being missed. There's not exactly a massive shift or upheaval here - there's about 10 users complaining in a thread with 289 posters. I don't think you're representative of anybody except yourselves as posters in that thread.
    .

    You seem to be under the impression people know of this feedback thread. Only reason I know of it is due to someone posting in it when I was on the homepage.

    And when I first saw this thread my initial thoughts were "Waste of time".


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 58,456 ✭✭✭✭ibarelycare


    I don't think that's a fair opinion... Wherever possible we let things flow before mod intervention.

    Why take it to a general level where one decision you disagree with is responsible for ruining boards?

    It's not helpful. Babies flying out with bathwater.

    I didn't say this one decision is what's ruining boards for me. I said it's an addition to the list. My comment about the overpowering moderation is something that has been bothering me for a while. I don't know if it's something that's become more prevalent in the past year or so, or whether my eyes have been opened after using other discussion sites where moderators take more of an unseen role, but it is my opinion and I'm sorry you think it's unfair.
    It's been repeatedly said WHY the decision is good for the forum too. If it's BS then tell us why. Don't just dismiss the reasoning behind it because you disagree with it.

    On the point of moderators....
    Moderate it more closely?

    We have no problem with moderators. It's a banal non-story chat thread.

    It doesn't help the forum.

    It helps nurture that off topic flirty crap that ruins threads on AH as it is.

    It doesn't help new users because they'll default to the chat thread to find their friends.
    Or they'll be ignored in the chat thread as regulars get replies.

    The chat thread style of flirty off topic stuff will invade the other threads also.

    It's not needed. It's catered for elsewhere. AH doesn't need to become part of it and I'd argue that it shouldn't.

    This is the same concern I've had when we discussed this when it was first raised in 2010.

    I think it's BS because it's the same tired old reasons being thrown around. I hate "clique-ishness" myself but the truth of the matter is that online friendships form and some people talk to others more often. These camaraderies form all over the place, they can happen in any thread. If there is a thread about a particular subject, and a few pages in 3 or 4 people start having an off-topic discussion amongst themselves, then they will be issued with a warning to keep it on topic. The same can be done with the News thread. I agree that there shouldn't be a general OT thread, there's no need for one, but if this thread had some guidelines and was moderated a bit more closely then it could work. Or is that too much to ask of the mods?

    Why the need for this? Why the need to insult all the mods and admins on boards forever because you disagree with one decision that is being discussed as we speak?

    That wasn't an unfounded insult against anyone. It's my observation on how things often pan out on this site.
    I just don't get the point in decrying how boards is ruined because a few people can't post an update on what they did today in AH.

    You're implying that I'm making some hysterical hyperbole all over this one thread but I'm not. My comments are a build-up of months of frustration and disillusionment with the site as a whole. I know that I'm perfectly entitled to leave if I want, and I'm fully aware that my issues with boards are my problem, but I'm also perfectly entitled to have my say. I stick to private forums for the most part these days anyway.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭Czarcasm


    keith16 wrote: »

    Fair enough, but why then was it left running for so long?

    It became chat but I believe the spirit in which it was intended was not chat and was actually quiet a funny topic.


    Keith you're still getting it wrong, "My News", according to the Mods and even one Admin was a chatty, cliquey, off topic thread that went completely against the spirit of AH and boards in general apparently.

    Posters who dare to post anything positive or funny or even just the shy side of insanity should be directed to Nein 11 for humor, sunshine and lollipops for all that sun shining out of their àrse nonsense, and a private forum or some off topic thread in some other far flung forum where AH doesn't have to be looking at an example of a thread plugging away under it's own steam, posters can put as much or as little into it as they want, any poster can join in and post at any time, nobody was trapped in there like they "had" to post.

    That sort of a thread isn't welcome in AH and you'd be far better off for your own good to get your teeth stuck into the water charges megathread part 3, now there's a thread that'll quite nicely fùck with your grey matter and leave you a whimpering mess, or why not tickle your threaded tastebuds with a "discussion" on the more trivial things in life that annoy you, hell there was a while there when one or two posters treated it like their own personal autobahn the way they railroaded on about road rules. Was that off topic, on topic, discussion or just pure shìte talk back and forth? Hard to tell, but not one Mod was willing to make a call on it.

    Don't forget to fly by the dumb facebook status thread by the way, a prime example of the cliquey AH superiority complex in motion, because you know you're deep in the shìt when you go lower than the mental intellect displayed in that thread. But there for the grace of Godwin go I.


    I don't buy for a second the excuse that Mods don't read all the threads in AH, it's a voluntary job, but a job is a job nonetheless, and if that job involves moderating a forum, no matter how fast moving it is, then you make it your business to read all the threads, not just the ones that interest you. I'd love to be able to cherry pick in my voluntary work too, but I can't.

    If Mods haven't devised a system by now where they have delegated responsibility amongst themselves and organised the workload, then AH is just going to continue along the same lines it always has done. It hasn't changed in the last ten years anyway and Mods can still use the "we didn't see it, nobody reported it" excuse.

    Community? Stop peddling that crap, it's become a tiresome byword nowadays for people looking to be part of something, and then when they form their own neighbourhood within that community, it's immediately shut down as a clique.


    One or the other lads, Ireland's largest online community, or Ireland's largest online clique, which is it?


    I have to go now and see how the woman who's bra came open unexpectedly is getting on. It'll have a huge impact on my life and I won't be able work today for thinking about that poor woman and her breasts bouncing about the place braless.

    Oh the humanity. By the way, my post in there don't ask me how, damn touch site, but I meant to report the thread, not bloody post in it, if a Mod or an Admin would be kind enough to skip over to that thread and fix that up for me that'd be great and thanks ever so much.


    Right, back to work, I can feel the face pain setting in.


  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 35,943 Mod ✭✭✭✭dr.bollocko


    I didn't say this one decision is what's ruining boards for me. I said it's an addition to the list. My comment about the overpowering moderation is something that has been bothering me for a while. I don't know if it's something that's become more prevalent in the past year or so, or whether my eyes have been opened after using other discussion sites where moderators take more of an unseen role, but it is my opinion and I'm sorry you think it's unfair.


    I think it's BS because it's the same tired old reasons being thrown around. I hate "clique-ishness" myself but the truth of the matter is that online friendships form and some people talk to others more often. These camaraderies form all over the place, they can happen in any thread. If there is a thread about a particular subject, and a few pages in 3 or 4 people start having an off-topic discussion amongst themselves, then they will be issued with a warning to keep it on topic. The same can be done with the News thread. I agree that there shouldn't be a general OT thread, there's no need for one, but if this thread had some guidelines and was moderated a bit more closely then it could work. Or is that too much to ask of the mods?

    The My News thread, to my mind, is a chat thread by another name.
    If I said it's the same tired old reasons for a chat thread existing in AH being thrown out, would that be fair? Would it be reasonable for me to call your argument BS because I've heard, discussed and countered your arguments before?


    That wasn't an unfounded insult against anyone. It's my observation on how things often pan out on this site.



    You're implying that I'm making some hysterical hyperbole all over this one thread but I'm not. My comments are a build-up of months of frustration and disillusionment with the site as a whole. I know that I'm perfectly entitled to leave if I want, and I'm fully aware that my issues with boards are my problem, but I'm also perfectly entitled to have my say. I stick to private forums for the most part these days anyway.

    And private forums are more suited to off topic general chat / flirty etc. threads between users.

    What I am saying is a large number of people, mods, c-mods and admins have taken time out to air their reasoning here. I gave a concise list and everything on that list was ignored in favour of hyperbole.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,061 ✭✭✭keith16


    The My News thread, to my mind, is a chat thread by another name.

    Sorry dr.b, but this is fundamentally incorrect. Sure, there was chat in there. But the posts relating to the topic at hand gave me and many more great entertainment value.

    One post from the opening page is about a guy who's neighbours dog had to be put down. The poster then juxtaposes this news with his own news of having a bath.

    That is comic gold, and the thread in general contained some great AH humour. It was so much more than just OT chat.


  • Registered Users Posts: 58,456 ✭✭✭✭ibarelycare


    The My News thread, to my mind, is a chat thread by another name.
    If I said it's the same tired old reasons for a chat thread existing in AH being thrown out, would that be fair? Would it be reasonable for me to call your argument BS because I've heard, discussed and countered your arguments before?

    My point is that it doesn't have to be a chat thread. It can easily be moulded into something that suits both the users AND the mods. Surely there is room for co-operation on both sides.

    And private forums are more suited to off topic general chat / flirty etc. threads between users.

    What I am saying is a large number of people, mods, c-mods and admins have taken time out to air their reasoning here. I gave a concise list and everything on that list was ignored in favour of hyperbole.

    That is completely unfair. I disagree with a lot of the arguments against this particular thread. That doesn't mean I'm ignoring it in favour of hyperbole at all.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,159 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    My comment about the overpowering moderation is something that has been bothering me for a while. I don't know if it's something that's become more prevalent in the past year or so, or whether my eyes have been opened after using other discussion sites where moderators take more of an unseen role
    It's an interesting one. Boards.ie is very mod orientated compared to other sites. Not just in the moderation itself, but the focus on mods is very strong here. Personally speaking I think on balance the moderation is what made the site and is what brought more and more users here. You just don't get the kind of noise here that you get on other general interest sites. There's far more signal and this is a good thing.

    I say general interest sites as specialised sites for like minded people pretty much run themselves. I'm a mod on one that has thousands of users and all we do is hoover up spam and shills. I've never had to ban one of the "locals". Mods in that kinda place are unseen for that reason. Interestingly a few years back an off topic sub forum was suggested and started and that started to require much more attention to the point where we were being seen and in the end the users voted to close it. That off topic forum was kinda like Boards in microcosm.

    Still it can be a hard line to navigate at times. Trying to balance things for the good of the users. Do we approach from bottom up or top down? It can be an easy trap to fall into to just approach from the top down and some have. That said and just speaking for myself here I do think that over the years with a few lurches and changes along the way the balance has been pretty good.
    That wasn't an unfounded insult against anyone. It's my observation on how things often pan out on this site.
    Oh that can happen, but more often than not it doesn't in my experience.
    I stick to private forums for the most part these days anyway.
    I have seen that as a bit of a change alright. More longer term users who I thought were long gone :) now choose to stay within private forums with the odd foray into the public and that's cool too. That choice is there.

    *EDIT*
    Czarcasm wrote: »
    It hasn't changed in the last ten years anyway
    After Hours has changed a lot in the 8 years I've been here. It's changed a lot in the last 2. Take the sexism stuff mentioned earlier. That's gone. There was more heavy handed, more personalised modding at times in the place back in the day too.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 34,809 ✭✭✭✭smash


    Wibbs wrote: »
    It's an interesting one. Boards.ie is very mod orientated compared to other sites. Not just in the moderation itself, but the focus on mods is very strong here.

    As a general point and not targeting anyone in particular because it happens in all forums on boards, I've noticed an increasing level of mods leaving their own witty remark/dig as they close a thread. It's like a 'one up' for them because they know that people can't reply.

    Realistically a thread can be paused, posts removed, users warned and then the thread opened again. Given the level of repeat threads in AH, I would think this would be the way to go rather than the same stuff popping up again and again.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 304 ✭✭The Road Runner


    I thought it was a harmless thread. In fact it brought an animation to users in a seeing how the other live kind of way. I never posted there myself, I never really have much news outside of my day to day, but I always thought if I had an interesting tidbit it was there for me to post it in. I can see the point about it turning into a chat thread but that could be easily rectified. How about a mod post in the first post saying 'This is a thread for your news. It is not a thread for chat. It is in the interest of users to report any chat so that the thread can remain open. Anyone found chatting will be banned from the thread for a month and after their third time banned permanently'

    And in relation to the thing that the thread may swallow up subjects that would otherwise make a good thread of their own. Maybe some kind of internal barometer can be used by posters, as in if they get a huge amount of thanks for a particular post they would consider starting a separate thread for it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭Czarcasm


    Wibbs wrote: »
    I have seen that as a bit of a change alright. More longer term users who I thought were long gone :) now choose to stay within private forums with the odd foray into the public and that's cool too. That choice is there.


    There are many reasons why Wibbs in fairness many of the long term posters have requested and joined private forums, many of them are tired of AH trying to shake off the "dregs of boards" mentality and want to have a space where they can enjoy a common interest and let their hair down for a bit and I myself have enjoyed being a member of private forums in the past. I've even seen situations where some of the users of private forums have themselves gotten sick of private forums for one reason or another and set up their own private forum again, separate from the private forum from whence they came.

    That's not exactly what I'd call a community spirit, that sort of fragmented thinking and fence building going on only breeding bitterness and resentment and the "our little private forum is better than your little private forum" mentality going on.

    The My News thread was out in the open in AH, in a place where everyone could see it and anybody could join in. There was no sniping nor bitching, bullying nor backhanded snideness going on. I remember I only reported one single post in the thread, it was one post about somebody's prediliction for butt plugs, totally against the spirit of the thread, and just thrown in there randomly (the post, not the butt plugs!).

    The post was deleted less than an hour later and there was no Mod Note, not another word said about it. That's the way moderation should be done, unseen and in the background, as you yourself would be doing on the other sites you moderate, and Mods should be able to get involved in discussions just as much as the regular posters. There are in my opinion only a handful of Mods I've seen do this, and for the life of me I cannot understand why once a person is charged with the responsibility of becoming a Mod that they wouldn't be able to post in the same fashion and contribute to the community as they did before.

    For all I've heard posters in AH give out about TLL, it is still one of the best moderated forums on boards because the Mods have never set themselves apart from ordinary posters. They see their role as there to HELP posters, not hinder them, and even in saying that they are quick to nip asshat behaviour in the bud. Whether that comes from years of experience or just plain good instincts I don't know, but save for one or two Mods in AH, it's something that's badly lacking from the forum due to extremes of lack of interest on the one hand, and micro-modding on the other.

    The My News thread was an example of one, just one god damn feel good thread in AH where there was nobody trying to be a comedian (though there are some classic comedy exchanges in there!), no thanks whores, and most notably the absence of "look at me being all more intellectual than you and shìt" posters just chomping at the bit to show off their spelling bees knees.

    Sure there was some back and forth chit chat, but if you look back on the thread you'll see that new posters were more than welcomed, and people actually gave a shìt about each other, completely contradictory to the opinion put forward by Zaph, whose judgement might just be colored by how threads generally run in AH where nobody gives a shìt about anyone else but their own opinion.

    *EDIT* After Hours has changed a lot in the 8 years I've been here. It's changed a lot in the last 2. Take the sexism stuff mentioned earlier. That's gone. There was more heavy handed, more personalised modding at times in the place back in the day too.


    I'm lucky the one time I didn't have a coffee in my hand reading this, my phone would be drenched! Wibbs I know you won't take my word for it but in the last month alone (it'd be unfair to include the love match thread), there have been scores of sexist threads started, and sheer volumes of sexist posts that have kept the Mods of AH on their toes. Only the other day Dr. B. closed one, and this morning we have an Erin go braless facebook status type OP which was the start of a woman bemoaning the fact her bra had come undone in public!

    To I think it was Touching Virus who said women were afraid to post in AH because of sexist undertones, etc, there are numerous prolific female posters in AH and many more besides, who have no problem posting in AH, the same as many other minorities that have no issues posting in AH, such as openly gay posters who years ago would never have been seen outside the LGBT forums.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,184 ✭✭✭✭Pighead


    Wibbs wrote: »
    There was more heavy handed, more personalised modding at times in the place back in the day too.
    Maybe Pighead has this arseways in his head but he always thought modding was way less heavy handed back in the day. Trolls are giving way less leeway these days and are generally banned before you can say re-reg.

    At the risk of getting a retrospective banning:eek:, how long would the following thread last today? Would the OP have gotten away with a gentle slap on the wrist?

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=2581280


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,159 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Czarcasm wrote: »
    There are many reasons why Wibbs in fairness many of the long term posters have requested and joined private forums,
    True enough C.
    many of them are tired of AH trying to shake off the "dregs of boards" mentality
    Aside I always hated that somewhat snooty attitude among some regarding After Hours. That it wasn't quite the right sort of forum for Boards.ie kinda thing. IMHO it was and still is one of the best forums on this website.
    That's not exactly what I'd call a community spirit, that sort of fragmented thinking and fence building going on only breeding bitterness and resentment and the "our little private forum is better than your little private forum" mentality going on.
    That goes on? Bloody hell. The ones I've been a part of didn't have that. Then again I've only been invited into a couple so wouldn't have much experience of them. I'm not cool or popular enough *whimpers* :(:D
    The post was deleted less than an hour later and there was no Mod Note, not another word said about it. That's the way moderation should be done, unseen and in the background,
    It does depend on the situation though C. Often enough you have to be seen to be doing something so you stop guff on the spot. Often enough the quiet "crack em over the head and drag em out the back unnoticed" doesn't work to keep things on track. Hell, often enough even if you post a dirty great warning you'll have someone chime in with the same stuff a couple of posts later.
    Mods should be able to get involved in discussions just as much as the regular posters. There are in my opinion only a handful of Mods I've seen do this, and for the life of me I cannot understand why once a person is charged with the responsibility of becoming a Mod that they wouldn't be able to post in the same fashion and contribute to the community as they did before.
    This I agree with in a big way. Mods should be a part of the community, chosen from that community and should be able to post in that community as before. Otherwise there's defo the risk of a "them and us" stylee thing kicking off. On the other hand I reckon a couple of things can stop that. 1, getting the "title" may make some think "oh oh, better up my game" and may make them fearful of chiming in as before. It shouldn't. 2, they might figure that if they do, they wont be seen as a "Mod"(them and us again) and 3, and a biggie in very high traffic forums like AH, they might simply not have the time to post as they once did. Personality and approach may come into it too. If you see yourself as an ordinary member of the community with extra buttons then the modding style is gonna be different to if you see yourself as a title.
    For all I've heard posters in AH give out about TLL, it is still one of the best moderated forums on boards because the Mods have never set themselves apart from ordinary posters. They see their role as there to HELP posters, not hinder them, and even in saying that they are quick to nip asshat behaviour in the bud.
    *blushes. Sends fee by paypal* I dunno CZ we've had our doubts, mistakes as well as good instincts like the folks in AH.
    Whether that comes from years of experience or just plain good instincts I don't know, but save for one or two Mods in AH, it's something that's badly lacking from the forum due to extremes of lack of interest on the one hand, and micro-modding on the other.
    I dunno C I don't really see that and I post in AH a fair bit. Huge tracts of sheeiiite, I'm sure you've had the misfortune of wearing out your scroll button on one of my tracts. :)
    I'm lucky the one time I didn't have a coffee in my hand reading this, my phone would be drenched! Wibbs I know you won't take my word for it but in the last month alone (it'd be unfair to include the love match thread), there have been scores of sexist threads started, and sheer volumes of sexist posts that have kept the Mods of AH on their toes. Only the other day Dr. B. closed one, and this morning we have an Erin go braless facebook status type OP which was the start of a woman bemoaning the fact her bra had come undone in public!
    Oh yea, but they get actioned, whereas before far more would have been left alone.
    To I think it was Touching Virus who said women were afraid to post in AH because of sexist undertones, etc, there are numerous prolific female posters in AH and many more besides, who have no problem posting in AH, the same as many other minorities that have no issues posting in AH, such as openly gay posters who years ago would never have been seen outside the LGBT forums.
    Which is a good thing though that came about through community change and the mods.
    Pighead wrote: »
    Maybe Pighead has this arseways in his head but he always thought modding was way less heavy handed back in the day. Trolls are giving way less leeway these days and are generally banned before you can say re-reg.

    At the risk of getting a retrospective banning:eek:, how long would the following thread last today? Would the OP have gotten away with a gentle slap on the wrist?

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=2581280
    Oh certainly P, I was trying to say(badly) the modding seemed to be more heavy handed (at times) in the sense of personalities involved. There was less consistency with mods and moderation. Sometimes more jokey, but sometimes a bit "eh wtf?".

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭Czarcasm


    ^^

    Quality, level headed post. And one of the great things without being too brown nosed about it is that Wibbs as both a Mod and an ordinary poster you make yourself approachable, something that both Mods, Admins and ordinary posters alike could all learn from.

    At this point I can't see the My News thread being re-opened and tbh I wouldn't care if it was or wasn't re-opened.

    All the good has been taken out of it and it can no longer be the thread it was, and whatever has been said about posters being reluctant to post there before, now they would be even less inclined to do so.

    Hopefully the one thing we can all take from this feedback thread is that lessons were learned, and that can only be of benefit to what always was, still is, and hopefully for the future will be one of the best forums on boards.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,184 ✭✭✭✭Pighead


    Wibbs wrote: »
    Oh certainly P, I was trying to say(badly) the modding seemed to be more heavy handed (at times) in the sense of personalities involved. There was less consistency with mods and moderation. Sometimes more jokey, but sometimes a bit "eh wtf?".
    Ah, get you now. That's fair enough.

    Looks like the creator of the news thread has closed his account. Farewell 'Where to'. You left us too soon. Goodnight Sweet Prince.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,159 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Czarcasm wrote: »
    ^^

    Quality, level headed post.
    Christ my paypal account is really gonna take a hit after that. Hell I want that notorised :D
    Hopefully the one thing we can all take from this feedback thread is that lessons were learned, and that can only be of benefit to what always was, still is, and hopefully for the future will be one of the best forums on boards.
    +1

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 34,809 ✭✭✭✭smash


    Smell of bromance in here :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 14,681 ✭✭✭✭P_1


    I suppose its a natural consequence of Boards getting so big.

    People are always going to 'clash' with those in authority and the people who find themselves in a position of authority can sometimes have difficulty engaging with the 'normal people'. Then you'll always get the people who always ask questions

    Standard human nature stuff.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,061 ✭✭✭keith16


    Pighead wrote: »

    Looks like the creator of the news thread has closed his account. Farewell 'Where to'. You left us too soon. Goodnight Sweet Prince.

    That's very disappointing. Where to was also a long time subscriber and an outstanding contributor. Big loss :mad:
    P_1 wrote: »
    I suppose its a natural consequence of Boards getting so big.

    People are always going to 'clash' with those in authority and the people who find themselves in a position of authority can sometimes have difficulty engaging with the 'normal people'. Then you'll always get the people who always ask questions

    Standard human nature stuff.

    I'm not so sure P_1, some mods have admitted the idea of the thread was good and the fact it developed into chat was missed.

    Others have lazily labelled it as chat and refuse to recognise the validity of the thread as a legitimate, original humorous thread where chat was never the intention. Frankly, it's insulting that distinction isn't recognised.

    Go back and look at how many thanks the OP generated,

    Most disappointing is Dr. B's absolute unwillingness to see the other side of the argument here while accusing others of giving over to hyperbole while ignoring his points. That is simply untrue.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,681 ✭✭✭✭P_1


    Fair point, for whatever reason some people can find it difficult to see both sides to an argument and to articulate their response, hence we have people (from both sides, mod and user alike) repeating the same points over and over with seemingly no reference or acknowledgement of the other side's point.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,293 ✭✭✭1ZRed


    Where to is gone now :( He was a top man.


    I liked the news thread and it kept me in AH. Now I take a look in and see how cyclical the threads are, and it's tiresome and generally mundane.

    This thread did no harm and it should've been allowed to die off, which it would have in due course.

    Lost a good thread and great poster all in one.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    smash wrote: »
    Smell of bromance in here :D


    ...all getting a bit too cliquey....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 595 ✭✭✭Steve O


    Where to was a quality poster. Always cracked up at his posts.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,681 ✭✭✭✭P_1


    Its a shame that we seem to have lost a quality poster (or dare I suggest it, a member of our community) because of a misguided top down decision.


  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 35,943 Mod ✭✭✭✭dr.bollocko


    keith16 wrote: »
    That's very disappointing. Where to was also a long time subscriber and an outstanding contributor. Big loss :mad:



    I'm not so sure P_1, some mods have admitted the idea of the thread was good and the fact it developed into chat was missed.

    Others have lazily labelled it as chat and refuse to recognise the validity of the thread as a legitimate, original humorous thread where chat was never the intention. Frankly, it's insulting that distinction isn't recognised.

    Go back and look at how many thanks the OP generated,

    Most disappointing is Dr. B's absolute unwillingness to see the other side of the argument here while accusing others of giving over to hyperbole while ignoring his points. That is simply untrue.

    Of course I can see other sides to my own opinion.

    I don't want to come across with a snooty "cos I say so" attitude.


    It was, to my mind, a chat thread. Minute updates about your daily life to share with others who were thread regulars with a bit of titillation thrown in.
    This is why I label it as such.

    It's not lazy labeling... It's my distinction of what it is. I don't see it any differently but I have read every bit of feedback. Wherever possible I always do.

    I just don't think hyperbole and sarcasm is helpful here. I can't really respond to posts like that because they're not designed to be responded to.

    You're looking for answers as to the locking and I am trying to provide them as best I can.

    If I'm somewhat blunt in my description I apologise. I can see other sides. I could certainly say that as it was there were definitely smiles to be gotten and clearly it meant a lot to those people who put time into the thread.

    Unfortunately I am weary of being quoted out of context or misunderstood so when it comes down to it, I'd prefer to list my reasons as briefly as I can muster so people, at least, know that it was not our intention to piss on AH for the sake of it or to ruin anyone's fun.

    In general, in more tightly scoped forums and smaller communities, niches on boards, I think that off topic threads help get traffic and good interested people to really grow the forum. That sense of community can be valuable. Certainly they are the lifeblood of many social forums. However on AH I think they're more detrimental than positive for the reasons I have already indicated.

    I am genuinely sorry where to closed his account and hope to see them back some time soon.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,061 ✭✭✭keith16


    Of course I can see other sides to my own opinion.

    I don't want to come across with a snooty "cos I say so" attitude.


    It was, to my mind, a chat thread. Minute updates about your daily life to share with others who were thread regulars with a bit of titillation thrown in.
    This is why I label it as such.


    If I'm somewhat blunt in my description I apologise. I can see other sides. I could certainly say that as it was there were definitely smiles to be gotten and clearly it meant a lot to those people who put time into the thread.

    Unfortunately I am weary of being quoted out of context or misunderstood so when it comes down to it, I'd prefer to list my reasons as briefly as I can muster so people, at least, know that it was not our intention to piss on AH for the sake of it or to ruin anyone's fun.

    In general, in more tightly scoped forums and smaller communities, niches on boards, I think that off topic threads help get traffic and good interested people to really grow the forum. That sense of community can be valuable. Certainly they are the lifeblood of many social forums. However on AH I think they're more detrimental than positive for the reasons I have already indicated.

    I am genuinely sorry where to closed his account and hope to see them back some time soon.

    That's all entirely reasonable dr.B, but I have to say our distinctions as to what the thread was are vastly different. I have popped into the OT threads on other forums and this is not the same but let's agree to differ.


    I'm not going to say any more on the matter other than in the context of the thread being open for so long, it should have at least had the courtesy of a warning before closure.

    That's where the "cos I say so" attitude comes across, not in your posts here dr.B. It went from zero moderation to a decision to lock from nowhere. That's what's most annoying about this situation.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 19,473 ✭✭✭✭Super-Rush


    P_1 wrote: »
    Its a shame that we seem to have lost a quality poster (or dare I suggest it, a member of our community) because of a misguided top down decision.

    Well if you have to close your account because your thread was closed then maybe After Hours and boards is not the place for you.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement