Renting, pushy neighbor on the "board"

amtc

on spellings - it's storey as well not story!

I'd hazard a guess that this is Waterville. If it is, all units have access to a shared storage shed. Which is where bicycles should be. No dishes, and no visible washing. (Although apparently also no animals, however I am awake because of neighbours dog yapping!)

ted1

gctest50 wrote: »

You can if you need to receive satellite from you home country afaik

EU law > law of miserable,wet,broke country ?


http://m.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055124066&page=3

Nonsense it is against planning permission to mount on the front of the property.

ResearchWill

ted1 wrote: »

Nonsense it is against planning permission to mount on the front of the property.

To try and clarify this issue. A private landlord can refuse you permission to erect a dish, there may be an issue with Convention right to receive information but only if a State Authority gets involved. In the Area of planning if there is no other way to receive the signal there there may be a issue.

If you want to read the case. http://www.manskligarattigheter.se/Media/Get/174/Europadomstolens%20dom%20i%20målet%20(2008-12-16)%20Khurshid%20Mustafa%20m.fl.%20mot%20Sverige

fasttalkerchat

ted1 wrote: »

Nonsense it is against planning permission to mount on the front of the property.

Really? There is no need to seek planning permission for the first dish, only if you have one for sky and another for Polsat as far as I know

ted1

No, if it is on the front of the house theres a requirement:


Please find attached herewith a copy of the Class 4 exempt development conditions and limitations for satellite dishes.

If the dish is not placed, as per the exempt class requirement, it is not exempt development, and would require the benefit of a planning permission

CLASS 4
(a) The erection of a wireless or
television antenna, other than a satellite
television signal receiving antenna, on the roof of a house.

(b) The erection on or within the
curtilage of a house, of a dish type
antenna used for the receiving and
transmitting of signals from satellites.

The height of the antenna above the roof
of the house shall not exceed 6 metres.

1. Not more than one such antenna shall
be erected on, or within the curtilage of a
house.

2. The diameter of any such antenna shall not exceed 1 metre.

3. No such antenna shall be erected on, or forward of, the front wall of the house.

4. No such antenna shall be erected on
the front roof slope of the house or higher than the highest part of the roof of the house.

athtrasna

peter_dublin wrote: »

Your right, you know what, F**K it, I always wanted a pink PVC door, i'm getting one.

fasttalkerchat wrote: »

As long as you replace it with a neutral one when you sell the house or return it to the LL to be let again I don't see the problem.
In Ireland we have a serious problem of creating boring housing estates that all look the same and people don't give a **** about where they live because every house is the same.

In a managed development you will find a clause that prohibits you from altering the external appearance of the development so changing doors would not be tolerated either! People signed up to these rules at purchase, and they are legally enforceable.

skimpydoo

Marcusm wrote: »

Because the flatholder signed leases precluding themselves from putting up satellite dishes and if building control departments actually did their joib, they would be issuing enforcement notices. If UPC is already piped int hen the satellite signal can be sent down those cables (provided any exclusivity period has expired). It's not that hard or expensive and I've seen it implemented in Dublin (Gasworks) some years after the development was completed.

My apartment has the same management agents as The Gasworks, and a couple of years ago like them we allowed a Sky Dish to be put on our complex. With the one dish many Sky customers can access it.

ResearchWill

ted1 wrote: »

No, if it is on the front of the house theres a requirement:


Please find attached herewith a copy of the Class 4 exempt development conditions and limitations for satellite dishes.

If the dish is not placed, as per the exempt class requirement, it is not exempt development, and would require the benefit of a planning permission

CLASS 4
(a) The erection of a wireless or
television antenna, other than a satellite
television signal receiving antenna, on the roof of a house.

(b) The erection on or within the
curtilage of a house, of a dish type
antenna used for the receiving and
transmitting of signals from satellites.

The height of the antenna above the roof
of the house shall not exceed 6 metres.

1. Not more than one such antenna shall
be erected on, or within the curtilage of a
house.

2. The diameter of any such antenna shall not exceed 1 metre.

3. No such antenna shall be erected on, or forward of, the front wall of the house.

4. No such antenna shall be erected on
the front roof slope of the house or higher than the highest part of the roof of the house.

Just to clarify, you are saying that to position a dish at the front of a house requires planning permission. So therefore is not impossible.

athtrasna

Ronan Leonard wrote: »

My apartment has the same management agents as The Gasworks, and a couple of years ago like them we allowed a Sky Dish to be put on our complex. With the one dish many Sky customers can access it.

The problem with that is that a large number of the people who want dishes want them to get eastern European channels rather than Sky. Could be open to a discrimination case