Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
FE1 Exam Thread (Read 1st post!) NOTICE: YOU MAY SWAP EXAM GRIDS
Options
Comments
-
michelle2000 wrote: »What are people doing for property? Are ye taking the risk that nothing changes this paper and studying 6 topics? Any predictions? Best if luck to those doing company tomorrow
If something out of the ordinary comes up in property then il 100 percent be crying in the exam hall! trying to go over company at the moment but property is still looming over me...ive succession, AP, co-ownership, easements, family property and a bare idea of licences, what about you?Has anyone got sample answers for Property would be greatly appreciated can swap for contract, constitutional or equity??
I have a few but none for the last 2 or 3 sittings, i can send them on if you want though, just pm your email address0 -
If something out of the ordinary comes up in property then il 100 percent be crying in the exam hall! trying to go over company at the moment but property is still looming over me...ive succession, AP, co-ownership, easements, family property and a bare idea of licences, what about you?
I have a few but none for the last 2 or 3 sittings, i can send them on if you want though, just pm your email address
Same thing - I've prepped rights of res and prop esp in case I have to a q on licences. Have left out bare and contractual as they appeared last year. Have also flicked over finding as its v short might be worth reading for a half hour tomorrow if you have time 0 -
michelle2000 wrote: »What are people doing for property? Are ye taking the risk that nothing changes this paper and studying 6 topics? Any predictions? Best if luck to those doing company tomorrow
After today's paper, I would prefer to leave myself with one or two more options!! But I don't think it will too much of a change! Hopefully!!0 -
-
rickety cricket wrote: »Could anyone tell me if the JD Brian case has seen its appeal? Also is the high court decision saying that the crystallisation was valid but the charge itself could not be recognised as a fixed charge?
I googled it yesterday and couldn't find any mention of a Supreme Court judgment so I think not.
The High Court judgment stated that even though the charge had crystallised (and so was a fixed charge) the holder still couldn't gain priority over preferential creditors (i.e. secured creditors and those listed in s 285).
Correct me if I'm wrong anyone
0 -
Advertisement
-
-
Good luck to everyone in company today! Does anyone know is tort a hard marker? Im so disappointed with how it went after realising a few of us misread question 3!
and does anybody know what they were looking for in question 7? I wrote about the defective products act but now im starting to think it could be a duty to recall if such a thing exists? Any advice would be much appreciated! 0 -
-
Good luck to everyone in company today! Does anyone know is tort a hard marker? Im so disappointed with how it went after realising a few of us misread question 3! and does anybody know what they were looking for in question 7? I wrote about the defective products act but now im starting to think it could be a duty to recall if such a thing exists? Any advice would be much appreciated!
I have heard he is a hard marker but realistically we're all in the same boat, how many people will have made the exact same mistake because of a deliberate attempt to trick us? I cant see that everyone can be harshly penalised otherwise most of us would probably not pass!! Sometimes a harder paper makes for easier markings. I remember sitting Constitutional, I had no clue, no cases, just vomited out as much as I could onto the paper, the girl beside me was literally crying for the first half hr that you have to remain in the hall, uterally gutted. . . and I passed! He cant fail every1! May not be half as bad as u think!0 -
Good luck to everyone in company today! Does anyone know is tort a hard marker? Im so disappointed with how it went after realising a few of us misread question 3! and does anybody know what they were looking for in question 7? I wrote about the defective products act but now im starting to think it could be a duty to recall if such a thing exists? Any advice would be much appreciated!
If Ray Friel is still the examiner, then yes in my experience he is a tough Marker in the FE1's.
On a more optimistic note when I passed Tort I was very concerned I had failed it, but obviously didn't, however I did fail it the first time.
To pass Tort you really really have to get 5 questions finished - although a few bullet points for the last half of the last question may suffice if they are on topic.
I would think completely messing up one question would make it very difficult to pass, but it may be the case that if you pick up a few marks in that question - you might be able to get over the line if the other 3-4 questions are answered well.
People automatically freak out when they think that they largely messed up a question - saying to themselves - I've lost 20 marks there.
In truth - given the papers tend to be marked so hard - you've only potentially missed out on 10-14 marks, and if you got some of the the basics right in the question, and picked up 3-4 marks then you may only have to make up 8-10 marks in the other questions to keep on track.
So what I'm saying is keep the chin-up and concentrate on doing the best you can in those exams that are left - you might be surprised when you get your results to see how your results stack up to your expectations.0 -
Advertisement
-
Yes i hope so! Im trying to study for property at the minute but just keep looking at tort!!! I have to let go and move on! Hopefully the fact that quite a few of us appear to have made the same error he might show some leniency... Even if we picked up 4 or 5 marks like you say and managed to get above 10 on a few other questions we might pass... Although the fact that some students answered correctly maybe not. Only time will tell! Glinda have you any idea what he was looking for in question 7? There was no damage to property so im thinking i may have went off the point on that one too 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Glinda have you any idea what he was looking for in question 7? There was no damage to property so im thinking i may have went off the point on that one too[/quote]
There was no damage so no causal link but duty of care is owed outside of contract and standard of care would be high as it is a medical product but i dono how dangerous exactly it could be other then whole dose being leaked into body rather than in stages. Global Remedy should have recalled product once supplier made them aware of possible defect therefore breached duty etc. . But lot of unknowns in q i thought like whom did she buy the product from, did she have to have it implanted by a medical professional/implications of that. If my thinking above is right claim would be against Global Remedy rather than the original manufacturer? Like the rest of the paper it ws supposed to confuse the hell outa ya!!0 -
-
-
Advertisement
-
Glinda have you any idea what he was looking for in question 7? There was no damage to property so im thinking i may have went off the point on that one too
There was no damage so no causal link but duty of care is owed outside of contract and standard of care would be high as it is a medical product but i dono how dangerous exactly it could be other then whole dose being leaked into body rather than in stages. Global Remedy should have recalled product once supplier made them aware of possible defect therefore breached duty etc. . But lot of unknowns in q i thought like whom did she buy the product from, did she have to have it implanted by a medical professional/implications of that. If my thinking above is right claim would be against Global Remedy rather than the original manufacturer? Like the rest of the paper it ws supposed to confuse the hell outa ya!![/quote]
Haha oh god well it certainly did confuse the hell out of me! In fact it has made me question my chosen career path! Hopefully in real life things wouldnt be so complicated! Was there many cases for recalls? I didnt even mention that! There was nothing about it in my notes! Im hoping it was just a side point rather than supposed to b the main part of the answer!0
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement