FE1 Exam Thread (Read 1st post!) NOTICE: YOU MAY SWAP EXAM GRIDS

LawGuy2016

Does anybody have a Ryanair Holdings case note for EU? I would be super super grateful. I can't seem to find much information on it. I'm really panicking for EU now!!

laurenburne

LawGuy2016 wrote: »

Does anybody have a Ryanair Holdings case note for EU? I would be super super grateful. I can't seem to find much information on it. I'm really panicking for EU now!!

I'm really panicking too. I don't think I'm going to bother with case note question now. So much in it. Can't even get my head around the Microsoft case. I don't have rynair notes sorry

What topics are you covering lawguy?

XxMCRxBabyxX

letmcg wrote: »

are the exams being held in the red cow hotel? saw some people claiming they were sitting it in the law society

People who need disability supports (smaller rooms, extra time, scribes, etc) sit the exams in Blackhall.

bivo87

LawGuy2016 wrote: »

Does anybody have a Ryanair Holdings case note for EU? I would be super super grateful. I can't seem to find much information on it. I'm really panicking for EU now!!

I don't have a case note done but I can send you a link that I found of a case summary if you want to send me your email

bivo87

Does anyone have notes on mergers/. Equality or private international law? I have anything else of people want anything! What are people's thoughts on these topics coming up?

Also does anyone know what q3 on the March 2015 paper was all about? Pringle and the monetary policy- I'm lost!

lawgirl23

lawgal wrote: »

Has anyone ever passed the EU exam and didn't do the casenote? Is it risky not doing it? Or if anyone has some they can send on I would be forever grateful

Yes! Twice!!

lawgal

lawgirl23 wrote: »

Yes! Twice!!

This makes me feel better! Did you pretty much cover everything else so?

tobeginbegin

Was it wrong to discuss perjury in the first part of question 1? Realise it was conspiracy but couldn't remember the law. Would it be completely wrong to argue attempt?

Would I have any chance of passing with three ok questions, one iffy and one completely off? I'd the criminal marker difficult?

lawgirl23

lawgal wrote: »

This makes me feel better! Did you pretty much cover everything else so?

No actually, I didn't do any freedom of movement either. But basically everything else!

I've done case notes this time around just for a backup though...

The Talking Bread

Gunslinger92 wrote: »

God I hope recklessness comes up tomorrow it's so handy! If it does, thanks in advance to the talking bread for mentioning the possibility of it coming up

Hope you did well : )

amomcnico91

The Talking Bread wrote: »

Hope you did well : )

I also did Recklessness because you advised it. Thank you so much!

Overall, a very doable paper.

Leraf

If it wasnt for checking boards last night and seeing the comments about recklessness I would not have covered it in so much detail. Thank god I did as I was really stuck trying to answer 5 questions. I found that exam really tough and I felt prepared going in

Gunslinger92

The Talking Bread wrote: »

Hope you did well : )

You beaut!!!

For anyone who did q.8, what did ye say about the firefighters severing Declan's arm?

odwyer94

Pretty happy with that paper overall And thank you for the suggestions of recklessness and insanity!!!

amomcnico91

Does anyone have any suggestions for Equity and Trusts?

(Secretly hoping The Talking Bread is also sitting it & has tips)

20029422

anybody say how they went about question two?what issues and what they decided.I ignored the age as I didn't know what it meant overall for kevin

ak4321

Did anybody else mess up the last question with the piece on the fella being cut from the wreckage and discuss it as intervention of a third party rather than defence of necessity etc? Got the other 2 parts on causation but just hope the other one doesn't count against me too much

Leraf

I messed it up, Defence of necessity never even crossed my mind until i read your post. Fecked that up so

Snakeydoogey

Completely left out that ladies mental condition and just rattled out all the charges as if she was a person of sound mind.Ah well,always manage to make a mess of a least one question.As for Recklessness,the walking bread you have my love and respect for eternity.

20029422

Snakeydoogey wrote: »

Completely left out that ladies mental condition and just rattled out all the charges as if she was a person of sound mind.Ah well,always manage to make a mess of a least one question.As for Recklessness,the walking bread you have my love and respect for eternity.

did the other woman incite or was it accesorial liability for procuring?

Snakeydoogey

20029422 wrote: »

did the other woman incite or was it accesorial liability for procuring?

I went with incitement

20029422

Snakeydoogey wrote: »

I went with incitement

yeah I didn't I went accesorial liability but I think your right because she was not present during the incident

Gunslinger92

I said incitement too but literally just one or two lines, didn't study the topic

Leraf

Can I ask a slightly off topic and possibly silly question. I am checking out the different colleges for a preparatory course for my next subjects. All seem to mention study notes. Are these the slides they show for each lecture or am I missing something? I did not get anything more than the manual and the past papers/exam reports on my course. I am finding it difficult to choose a college for the course so if anyone was particularly happy with theirs and would recommend it could they pm me the name.

odwyer94

20029422 wrote: »

did the other woman incite or was it accesorial liability for procuring?

I went with counselling, I'm probably wrong though.

Dancing-Ferret

Hey guys, did anyone say for Q1 (i) that the offence committed was conspiracy to perjure? Or anyone say Margaret should plead automatism for Q4? I don't normally do post-mortems, but I'm terrified I messed up those bits!

nuac

Leraf wrote: »

Can I ask a slightly off topic and possibly silly question. I am checking out the different colleges for a preparatory course for my next subjects. All seem to mention study notes. Are these the slides they show for each lecture or am I missing something? I did not get anything more than the manual and the past papers/exam reports on my course. I am finding it difficult to choose a college for the course so if anyone was particularly happy with theirs and would recommend it could they pm me the name.

ModPls don't discuss the merits or otherwise of the various colleges or their staff thru boards.ie

BASHBAG

Hey, for anyone who is doing property tomorrow. How screwed will I be if I don't have the Succession Act going in? Was meant to arrive last Thursday rang them and they said Monday at the latest now no sign of it. I've studied the topic fairly well but just wondering how important citing the act is.

Snakeydoogey

Anyone who fancies posting the 8 topics that are going to come up in equity is free to do so.No rush like.

Rebelgirl87

BASHBAG wrote: »

Hey, for anyone who is doing property tomorrow. How screwed will I be if I don't have the Succession Act going in? Was meant to arrive last Thursday rang them and they said Monday at the latest now no sign of it. I've studied the topic fairly well but just wondering how important citing the act is.

I never had the Succession Act going into that exam. If you have the topic cover really well you should be fine. Don't panic, treat it like every other exam like a close book, you will be fine. Hope this is of some help.