Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Coventry Vacate the Ricoh

  • 23-03-2013 2:22am
    #1
    Posts: 0


    The stadium owners filed a case for administration against Coventry for a rent bill at approximately 1.3m.

    I cant help feeling that perhaps the owners are cutting their nose off in spite of their face. I mean surely even to Coventry, €1.3m isnt alot of money and their revenue stream would be more than enough to cover it over a long period?

    Has there been a bit of jumping the gun here? I realise they havent paid up but surely the powers that be on both sides should realise that they both need each other. I mean surely it would be worth more to this Arena if Coventry remained in the Ricoh.

    Link here http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2013/mar/22/coventry-city-financial-plight

    Coventry staff vacate Ricoh Arena as Football League assess finances

    coventry City staff have been moved from the Ricoh Arena to the training ground and the club shop has been emptied. Photograph: Jan Kruger/Getty Images
    Coventry City's plight reached a new low on Friday night as staff were moved from the Ricoh Arena to work at the training ground in Ryton and the club shop was emptied of its goods. A high court hearing earlier in the day to decide whether the Sky Blues should be placed into administration was adjourned until Tuesday.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,563 ✭✭✭dd972


    Things can change on a sixpence in football, the bigger clubs in the lower divisions always have a bit of a chance, Southampton were in this predicament or something close to it very recently.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,787 ✭✭✭✭padd b1975


    What the hell was wrong with Highfield Road??

    I don't think they have ever sold out The Ricoh.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    padd b1975 wrote: »
    What the hell was wrong with Highfield Road??

    I don't think they have ever sold out The Ricoh.

    The amount of empty seats at Premier league grounds let alone lower leagues is quite incredible week in week out it must be said. The Ricoh might have been too ambitious given where Coventry were at the time of moving there. Its a super facility no doubt but i do think that Coventry being the city's team are needed to play there in order to secure the future of the stadium because otherwise it will become a white elephant (no pun intended).

    It would also be a travesty if the fans of Coventry probably hailing from the city, had to travel to Birmingham or Wolverhampton in order to watch their local football team. The administration move by the Ricoh owners for a measly 1.3 million was very rash. Granted the Coventry owners havent covered themselves in glory either. Trying to pull a right fast one it would seem. When you buy a football club you buy the debts it has like it or not.


  • Registered Users Posts: 651 ✭✭✭Lucan Bohs


    The amount of empty seats at Premier league grounds let alone lower leagues is quite incredible week in week out it must be said.

    Which grounds are these? Wigan are the only team which a swathe of empty seats each week.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Lucan Bohs wrote: »
    Which grounds are these? Wigan are the only team which a swathe of empty seats each week.

    I can remember Middlesborough in the premiership and even Sunderland a couple of years back. Its probably more of a different team reaching a low each week sort of thing this season as opposed to on a regular basis however Fulham, Wigan and Villa only at 75% capacity at the moment to begin with

    Here is a table i found.
    http://www.soccerstats.com/attendance.asp?league=england

    246159.png


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 651 ✭✭✭Lucan Bohs


    The chart doesn't show that there's an incredible amount of empty sheets.

    The Ricoh symbolises everything wrong with modern football. A sterile, plastic ground with doesn't harbour the interest of the fans.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,337 ✭✭✭✭monkey9


    The stadium owners filed a case for administration against Coventry for a rent bill at approximately 1.3m.

    I cant help feeling that perhaps the owners are cutting their nose off in spite of their face. I mean surely even to Coventry, €1.3m isnt alot of money and their revenue stream would be more than enough to cover it over a long period?

    Has there been a bit of jumping the gun here? I realise they havent paid up but surely the powers that be on both sides should realise that they both need each other. I mean surely it would be worth more to this Arena if Coventry remained in the Ricoh.

    Link here http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2013/mar/22/coventry-city-financial-plight

    The owners should just start up their own football club. Liverpool were formed under similar circumstances.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,748 ✭✭✭✭AdamD


    Lucan Bohs wrote: »
    The chart doesn't show that there's an incredible amount of empty sheets.

    The Ricoh symbolises everything wrong with modern football. A sterile, plastic ground with doesn't harbour the interest of the fans.
    It kind of does though, doesn't it?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,341 ✭✭✭✭Chucky the tree


    AdamD wrote: »
    It kind of does though, doesn't it?


    I wouldn't think so. Only 5 teams with less than 90% attendance is pretty good going I think.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,748 ✭✭✭✭AdamD


    I wouldn't think so. Only 5 teams with less than 90% attendance is pretty good going I think.
    Sorry I've written that wrong. Meant to say that the chart pretty accurately portrays the situation. He might think that there are plenty of empty seats but you can't really argue with the stats.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,720 ✭✭✭✭thebaz


    the stadium may be state of the art - but the last time i saw it was more like a battered rugby field


  • Registered Users Posts: 651 ✭✭✭Lucan Bohs


    AdamD wrote: »
    Sorry I've written that wrong. Meant to say that the chart pretty accurately portrays the situation. He might think that there are plenty of empty seats but you can't really argue with the stats.

    But the stats don't show that there are an "incredible" number of empty seats?!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,720 ✭✭✭✭thebaz


    Lucan Bohs wrote: »
    But the stats don't show that there are an "incredible" number of empty seats?!


    the only ones well below capacity are fulham and wigan - both really league one sides , bar rich sugar daddies


  • Registered Users Posts: 651 ✭✭✭Lucan Bohs


    thebaz wrote: »
    the only ones well below capacity are fulham and wigan - both really league one sides , bar rich sugar daddies

    Fulham and Wigan league 1! What are you talking about?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,526 ✭✭✭✭Darkglasses


    Lucan Bohs wrote: »
    Fulham and Wigan league 1! What are you talking about?

    I think he means the clubs are historically quite small, by premier league standards. Look at the leagues that Fulham occupied from 1969 all the way to 1999. They have been in tier 2/3. Wigan even lower than that.


  • Registered Users Posts: 651 ✭✭✭Lucan Bohs


    Yes but not League 1 small


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,720 ✭✭✭✭thebaz


    Lucan Bohs wrote: »
    Fulham and Wigan league 1! What are you talking about?

    most teams even in the Championship would have bigger support bases than Wigan or Fulham - thats all


  • Registered Users Posts: 651 ✭✭✭Lucan Bohs


    thebaz wrote: »
    most teams even in the Championship would have bigger support bases than Wigan or Fulham - thats all

    Probably but the other poster said league 1 not the Championship


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,166 ✭✭✭Beefy78


    Lucan Bohs wrote: »
    Probably but the other poster said league 1 not the Championship

    What makes you think either Wigan or Fulham are anything above League One naturally? I think that's being generous TBH.


  • Registered Users Posts: 651 ✭✭✭Lucan Bohs


    Beefy78 wrote: »
    What makes you think either Wigan or Fulham are anything above League One naturally? I think that's being generous TBH.

    Probably the fact they're in the premiership and have been able to stay there for a good few seasons


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,752 ✭✭✭markesmith


    Lucan Bohs wrote: »
    Probably the fact they're in the premiership and have been able to stay there for a good few seasons

    original?v=mpbl-1&px=-1


  • Registered Users Posts: 651 ✭✭✭Lucan Bohs


    Dunno what you're point is? A club with a "sugar daddy" should be in the PL or thereabouts


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,166 ✭✭✭Beefy78


    Lucan Bohs wrote: »
    Probably the fact they're in the premiership and have been able to stay there for a good few seasons

    They've achieved that because they have been bank-rolled. I remember going to Craven Cottage for a cup game when they were two divisions below Southend. Wigan were non-league within the lifetime of many on here. If you took away the Fayed and Whelan money both clubs would be a couple of divisions below where they are hence their relatively low gates.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Beefy78 wrote: »
    They've achieved that because they have been bank-rolled. I remember going to Craven Cottage for a cup game when they were two divisions below Southend. Wigan were non-league within the lifetime of many on here. If you took away the Fayed and Whelan money both clubs would be a couple of divisions below where they are hence their relatively low gates.


    The fact Wigan has low gates could be down to the fact that they are in a rugby league stronghold. Football has been always swimming against the tide in Wigan even in these premier league times

    Fulham compete with 3 other clubs in West London (one of whom right next door is Chelsea) and about 10 other football league clubs in the area. Tottenham and Arsenal being 2 of them


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,325 ✭✭✭✭Dozen Wicked Words


    Cov have signed a short term deal so they will play the final three home games of the season at the Ricoh, no idea what the future holds for them after that.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,694 Mod ✭✭✭✭dfx-


    Cov have signed a short term deal so they will play the final three home games of the season at the Ricoh, no idea what the future holds for them after that.

    I was wondering where they'd play if they had moved out..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,709 ✭✭✭✭Cantona's Collars


    Deducted 10 points now after going into administration.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,325 ✭✭✭✭Dozen Wicked Words


    They only drop 4 places though, secure in League One anyway, which is bad, but dropping down again would have been a disaster for them. Imagine they were paying Championship type wages right up until it went pear shaped in the hope they wouldn't mess around in that league. Hard league to get out of these days.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,325 ✭✭✭✭Dozen Wicked Words


    Big turn up for the books, Coventry are apparently going to be playing at Northampton Town's ground for next 3 seasons!

    Not good news for Coventry but will earn Northampton a few quid. The Cov fans will sample the "delights" of Sixfields!

    http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/look-coventry-city-agree-groundshare-4866094


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,406 ✭✭✭✭LuckyLloyd


    Jaysus, what a mess!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,579 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    They're not that near, expect Coventrys financial woes to get worse


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,325 ✭✭✭✭Dozen Wicked Words


    CSF wrote: »
    They're not that near, expect Coventrys financial woes to get worse

    30 odd miles, decent road but not good at all for Cov fans. Brighton spent a couple of seasons in Gillingham though and that's double the distance so not all hope is lost for them.

    Not convinced it's going to happen anyway. Fixtures need sorting if they are. Both teams due to start at home.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,630 ✭✭✭mrsoundie


    Heading over to Northampton next week and taking a Cobblers Home game. Was going to get photo taken outside Sixfields and send it back to my very good friend, a Sky Blue fan, thinking now it may be a touch too far.


Advertisement