Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Manager Transfer Window

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,527 ✭✭✭Paz-CCFC


    There is a protection for managers - it's called compensation.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 354 ✭✭The Guardian


    and idiot managers dont deserve any real 'protection' imo


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53,262 ✭✭✭✭GavRedKing


    and idiot managers dont deserve any real 'protection' imo

    What defines an " idiot " manager though?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 354 ✭✭The Guardian


    apologies, i should consider my wording more carefully

    if you hire a gaffer that within 3/4 games shows a lack of understanding of basic tactical principles, and/or lacks a credible strategic medium term vision for the club, then in my opinion you should be turfing him out back on the dole queue


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,828 ✭✭✭bullvine


    Football clubs are businesses and if you feel like you've made a mistake hiring the most important employee, you need to get rid of him quick.

    Maybe a probation period, like in a regular job. Or, you can be sacked at any stage in the first window but if you make it to the second one, you cant be until the window has re-opened.

    In fairness though, a lot of these managers don't help themselves by taking ridiculous position's a certain clubs.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    GavRedKing wrote: »
    What defines an " idiot " manager though?

    paul%20ince%20blackburn%20football.gif


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53,262 ✭✭✭✭GavRedKing


    That's worse then the transfer window idea. :P

    It's impossible to bed down your ideas and philisophy within a handful of games, the players will only just be about grasping your ideas before you're kicked out the door.

    The dangerous part is who is going to decide that a manager lacks tactical knowledge? The chairman/owner who hasnt seen a coaching course in his life.

    Its lunacy, a club that hires a manager shouldnt go sacking him when it goes tits up after a few weeks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,406 ✭✭✭✭LuckyLloyd


    Blackburn have been a circus in recent times, and it's ultimately down to them making a string of terrible hires this season - but anyone could see that Appleton was utterly hapless and wasn't deserving of any more time.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,325 ✭✭✭RoryMac



    if you hire a gaffer that within 3/4 games shows a lack of understanding of basic tactical principles, and/or lacks a credible strategic medium term vision for the club, then in my opinion you should be turfing him out back on the dole queue

    The person who hired the manager in your example should be the one getting sacked!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,783 ✭✭✭Pj!


    and idiot managers dont deserve any real 'protection' imo
    if you hire a gaffer that within 3/4 games shows a lack of understanding of basic tactical principles, and/or lacks a credible strategic medium term vision for the club, then in my opinion you should be turfing him out back on the dole queue

    You're not going to solve anything.

    How are these idiot managers getting appointed? What on earth is wrong with the recruitment process?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,382 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Amusing that he uses Appleton as an example of a manager getting no time.

    Yeah, Blackpool were horrid for sacking him so quickly, weren't they.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,819 ✭✭✭EuropeanSon


    GavRedKing wrote: »

    The dangerous part is who is going to decide that a manager lacks tactical knowledge? The chairman/owner who hasnt seen a coaching course in his life.

    I'm not able to play a Mozart concerto, but if some eejit who says he can is slapping the keyboard randomly I think I'm still qualified to say that he's not able to play one either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,580 ✭✭✭✭CSF



    I'm not able to play a Mozart concerto, but if some eejit who says he can is slapping the keyboard randomly I think I'm still qualified to say that he's not able to play one either.
    Terrible comparison. Chalk and cheese.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭Essien


    If a club has a player who's clearly not up to it, they can drop him or use him sparingly before moving him on during the window. There are plenty of players on the bench willing and able to take his spot.

    You can't exactly take a manager off the bench, so what's the point in keeping one around who's clearly not up to the job?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53,262 ✭✭✭✭GavRedKing


    I'm not able to play a Mozart concerto, but if some eejit who says he can is slapping the keyboard randomly I think I'm still qualified to say that he's not able to play one either.

    The problem is that eejit would be left nowhere near a stage/venue of any great importance (club) and if he is its the organiser (chairman/owner) who should take a look at themsleves for allowing it to happen in the first place.

    I've no problem with managers coming and going, my gripe is with the OP who said give a guy 3 or 4 games, what is that going to acheive at all?

    That's worse then anything even Abromivich could dream up.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 354 ✭✭The Guardian


    my point is that all clubs should have the right to sack a manager within 2 hours of arrival if they quickly realise that the guy is not fit-for-purpose / equipped to undertake the role

    i'm not suggesting this is good practice, but business is business and if its not working out you cut your losses as quickly as possible (and dont wait for some ridiculous transfer window to open)

    simple as..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 354 ✭✭The Guardian


    thats that sorted so...

    lets move onto the next discussion topic.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53,262 ✭✭✭✭GavRedKing


    my point is that all clubs should have the right to sack a manager within 2 hours of arrival if they quickly realise that the guy is not fit-for-purpose / equipped to undertake the role

    i'm not suggesting this is good practice, but business is business and if its not working out you cut your losses as quickly as possible (and dont wait for some ridiculous transfer window to open)

    simple as..

    So its gone from 3/4 games to 2 hours.

    " Hi, welcome to club, you have 2 hours to improve, our position financially and globally and also to win trophies and build a team, good luck. "

    Excellent idea.

    The transfer window for managers is a stupid idea and your suggestions to combat it are worse, every manager would be sacked with a month if clubs took your line of approach.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,627 ✭✭✭Sgt Pepper 64


    GavRedKing wrote: »
    So its gone from 3/4 games to 2 hours.

    " Hi, welcome to club, you have 2 hours to improve, our position financially and globally and also to win trophies and build a team, good luck. "

    Excellent idea.

    The transfer window for managers is a stupid idea and your suggestions to combat it are worse, every manager would be sacked with a month if clubs took your line of approach.

    "Right then, I'm off to put some cones out" :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    If Paul Ince isn't a success as a manager the only reason will be because he's black and wasn't given a chance :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 354 ✭✭The Guardian


    GavRedKing wrote: »
    So its gone from 3/4 games to 2 hours.

    " Hi, welcome to club, you have 2 hours to improve, our position financially and globally and also to win trophies and build a team, good luck. "

    Excellent idea.

    The transfer window for managers is a stupid idea and your suggestions to combat it are worse, every manager would be sacked with a month if clubs took your line of approach.

    dude, you're missing the point again

    football is a business
    generally individuals are hired to manage components of a business, that is to oversee the achievement of agreed goals and objectives
    when it becomes clear that a hire is not capable of making this happen, a good business will promptly make this individual disappear.
    this disappearance might be activated within a day of arrival, within a year of arrival, maybe even after 20 years
    however, the important thing here to remember is that disappearance is possible at any chosen time

    introducing some window so that all the losers can be turfed out after they've been given a fair chance is quite frankly, loserdom of the highest order.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,580 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    Paully D wrote: »
    If Paul Ince isn't a success as a manager the only reason will be because he's black and wasn't given a chance :rolleyes:

    Ah here


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    CSF wrote: »
    Ah here

    The world according to Paul Ince. John Barnes is another who throws in the racism card to cover up for his own failings as a manager.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Paully D wrote: »
    The world according to Paul Ince. John Barnes is another who throws in the racism card to cover up for his own failings as a manager.

    Stick a link up for Barnes playing the racism card.

    Always found him brilliant when talking about racism tbh. Speaks a lot of sense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,710 ✭✭✭✭Paully D


    rarnes1 wrote: »
    Stick a link up for Barnes playing the racism card.

    Always found him brilliant when talking about racism tbh. Speaks a lot of sense.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/jun/16/john-barnes-tranmere-manager
    "From the perspective of what happened with Celtic people might argue that I didn't have the experience for another big job but I don't think my experience with Celtic explains why I couldn't get a job in the fourth division. Look at how Paul Ince wasn't given enough time at Blackburn. Young English managers don't get enough time, young black managers aren't given enough time, there are a lot of reasons why. I went for a fair few jobs before this and lower down than Tranmere, at least half a dozen in the last five years."

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/7463038.stm
    "I believe the situation for black managers is like it was for black players back in the 1970s," he stated.

    "Black players used to be put out on the wing because it was deemed they could run fast but not think too well.

    "They weren't trusted to be a playmaker in central midfield or to wear the captain's armband.

    "Now I think there is an analogous situation in management. Chairmen don't believe we can do the top managerial jobs.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-426036/Barnes-Black-managers-dont-chances.html
    Former England international John Barnes believes there is sub-conscious racism in British football which sees black managers treated unfairly.

    ........

    The Liverpool legend said: "From an athletic point of view there will be black people because athletically we are equal, from a managerial perspective it's more to do with the intellectual aspect of it and I don't think we are regarded as intellectually equal."


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    How is that covering up his own failings as a manager?

    Seems like he is making some good points there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,580 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    Paully D wrote: »
    The world according to Paul Ince. John Barnes is another who throws in the racism card to cover up for his own failings as a manager.

    Please provide some quotes of either man saying racism had anything to do with their failings.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    CSF wrote: »
    Please provide some quotes of either man saying racism had anything to do with their failings.

    I would say they don't exist.

    Been down this road before with Paully


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,940 ✭✭✭BhoscaCapall


    Paul Ince, one of the worst managers ever in the game, who tried to play the race card when he got found out as useless. Shouldn't even be given the time of day.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,580 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    You're so far off the mark with those quotes Paully. No excuses for their failings at all, just raising awareness of a much wider issues.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,580 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    Paul Ince, one of the worst managers ever in the game, who tried to play the race card when he got found out as useless. Shouldn't even be given the time of day.

    Gwan so, gimme a quote of Ince saying he was hard done by in a job because of his colour.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,084 ✭✭✭✭Kirby


    Nobody will come out with it so openly like that because they know better. You won't get a quote like that. But that doesn't mean they don't make the same excuses in a less obvious fashion. You don't think it's oddly self serving to write an article about black managers not getting enough time......if you are a black manager yourself?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,580 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    Kirby wrote: »
    Nobody will come out with it so openly like that because they know better. You won't get a quote like that. But that doesn't mean they don't make the same excuses in a less obvious fashion. You don't think it's oddly self serving to write an article about black managers not getting enough time......if you are a black manager yourself?
    No I don't think so. It is an obvious issue that needs to be addressed, and who else other than black footballers and coaches are going to address it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,463 ✭✭✭Kiwi_knock


    The fact Paul Ince is not a good manager (only got the Blackpool job because his son play for them) should not take away from the fact that a lot of qualified black coaches are not getting the chance to actually coach at a decent level.

    Very good article here on Michael Johnson (ex Derby and Birmingham player) attempts to get into management.
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/20123376


Advertisement