Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

A Receiver's obligations

  • 03-04-2013 2:59pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,869 ✭✭✭


    A question to get the legally minded posters thoughts on the subject I have had dealings with receivers when trying to purchase a repossessed property and they seem to have immunity from most things about the property.

    As a general point of interest, where a receiver is appointed to a business, has the receiver any obligations to the customers?

    I am thinking here of a company which rented owned and apartments has financial difficulties and a receiver is appointed.

    The receiver is quite happy to continue receiving rent, at least until the tenancy agreement expires.

    Obviously, tenants have paid a security deposit, is the receiver liable for the return of the deposit when the tenant leaves (assuming there are no rent arrears nor damage)?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,632 ✭✭✭NoQuarter


    The receivers primary duties are to the creditors. There is a hierarchy of payment to leave the company (if there is any money left) which starts with secured creditors and then onto unsecured creditors. Customers, I'm afraid to say, will be likely last in a long queue.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,869 ✭✭✭odds_on


    NoQuarter wrote: »
    The receivers primary duties are to the creditors. There is a hierarchy of payment to leave the company (if there is any money left) which starts with secured creditors and then onto unsecured creditors. Customers, I'm afraid to say, will be likely last in a long queue.
    Thank you, NoQuarter.

    Another good reason for Residential Tenants' deposits to be held by an independent body rather than with the landlord.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,139 ✭✭✭Jo King


    NoQuarter wrote: »
    The receivers primary duties are to the creditors. There is a hierarchy of payment to leave the company (if there is any money left) which starts with secured creditors and then onto unsecured creditors. Customers, I'm afraid to say, will be likely last in a long queue.

    It is not quite that simple. A receiver who accepts rent from a residential tenant becomes the Landlord under the Residential Tenancies Act.
    "5.—(1) In this Act—

    “landlord” means the person for the time being entitled to receive (otherwise than as agent for another person) the rent paid in respect of a dwelling by the tenant thereof and, where the context so admits, includes a person who has ceased to be so entitled by reason of the termination of the tenancy;"

    He is obliged to return deposits and may be made personally liable. Receivers can repudiate contracts entered into prior to their appointment but can be made personally liable on contracts they make after appointment.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,869 ✭✭✭odds_on


    Jo King wrote: »
    It is not quite that simple. A receiver who accepts rent from a residential tenant becomes the Landlord under the Residential Tenancies Act.
    "5.—(1) In this Act—

    “landlord” means the person for the time being entitled to receive (otherwise than as agent for another person) the rent paid in respect of a dwelling by the tenant thereof and, where the context so admits, includes a person who has ceased to be so entitled by reason of the termination of the tenancy;"

    He is obliged to return deposits and may be made personally liable. Receivers can repudiate contracts entered into prior to their appointment but can be made personally liable on contracts they make after appointment.
    Is that all contracts or contract that could be void because the landlord/owner did not have permission from the lender to rent out the property?

    Would they have to stand by or cover for any lease contract made with permission of the mortgage company.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,139 ✭✭✭Jo King


    odds_on wrote: »
    Is that all contracts or contract that could be void because the landlord/owner did not have permission from the lender to rent out the property?

    Would they have to stand by or cover for any lease contract made with permission of the mortgage company.

    It depends on the type of charge the receiver is appointed under. The original question appeared to be a charge over the assets of a company. Ise the receiver can repudiate all contracts. Some mortgage deeds give a power to appoint a receiver which is a different type of charge. The key issue is whether the receiver accepts rent from the tenant and thus become a landlord.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,713 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    All the above. Plus tenants, in respect of the right to the return of a security deposit, are creditors, and the receiver owes a duty to them as such.


Advertisement